Argatroban Anticoagulation for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Elderly Patients

Superior outcomes with Argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background Argatroban, lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin, and danaparoid are commonly used to manage heparin-induced thrombocytopenia related complications. However, the most suitable drug for this condition still remains controversial. Aim of the review This Bayesian network meta-analysis study compared the most common anticoagulant drugs used in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Method All clinical trials comparing two or more anticoagulant therapies for suspected or confirmed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were considered for inclusion. Studies concerning the use of heparins or oral anticoagulants were not considered. Data concerning hospitalisation length, thromboembolic, major, and minor haemorrhagic events, and mortality rate were collected. The network analyses were made through the STATA routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis with standardised mean difference (SMD) and log odd ratio (LOR) effect measures. Results Data from a total of 4338 patients were analysed. The overall mean age was 62.31 ± 6.6 years old. Hospitalization length was considerably shorter in favour of the argatroban group (SMD: - 1.70). Argatroban evidenced the lowest rate of major (LOR: - 1.51) and minor (LOR: - 0.57) haemorrhagic events. Argatroban demonstrated the lowest rate of thromboembolic events (LOR: 0.62), and mortality rate (LOR: - 1.16). Conclusion Argatroban performed better overall for selected patients with HIT. Argatroban demonstrated the shortest hospitalization, and lowest rate of haemorrhages, thromboembolisms, and mortality compared to bivalirudin, lepirudin, desirudin, and danaparoid.

Prognostic factors for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review

Background  Little is known with regards to the prognostic factors for patients with suspected or diagnosed Heparin-Induced Thromobocytopenia (HIT). The role of patient and therapy characteristics may play a role in predicting the outcome. Aim of the review To investigate the role of patient and therapy characteristics as potential prognostic factors for HIT-related complications (haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events), and mortality. Method The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. In September 2020, the main online databases were accessed: Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar. All the clinical trials concerning the management of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT were eligible. Studies evaluating the use of oral anticoagulants (e.g. vitamin K antagonists, Apixaban) were not considered, along with those comparing the use of heparin. For pairwise correlation, the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used. The final effect was evaluated according to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.Results Data from 33 clinical studies (4338 patients) were retrieved. The overall mean age was 62.3 ± 6.6 years old. Patients with HIT-related thromboembolism at the moment of diagnosis were associated with greater rate of haemorrhages (P > 0.0001), thromboembolism (P > 0.0001) and mortality (P = 0.001). Patients with more comorbidities at diagnosis were associated with a greater risk of haemorrhages (P = 0.07), thromboembolism (P = 0.002) and mortality (P = 0.002). Patients with longer duration of the therapy were associated with lower rate of mortality (P = 0.04). ConclusionsPatient comorbidities, presence of HIT-related thromboembolism on admission and shorter anticoagulant therapy were found to be negative prognostic factors. Thrombocythemia on admission, patients age and gender did not influence the overall outcome.

Update on argatroban for the prophylaxis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but potentially severe complication of heparin therapy that is strongly associated with venous and arterial thrombosis (HIT and thrombosis syndrome, HITTS), which requires urgent detection and treatment with a nonheparin anticoagulant. Argatroban, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with HIT, including those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Argatroban has a relatively short elimination half-life of approximately 45 minutes, which is predominantly performed via hepatic metabolism. It is derived from L-arginine that selectively and reversibly inhibits thrombin, both clot-bound and free, at the catalytic site. Argatroban anticoagulation has been systematically studied in patients with HIT and HITTS and proved to be a safe and effective agent for this indication. The current review presents the pharmacology of argatroban, data regarding monitoring of the agent, and an overview of the results of the major clinical trials assessing argatroban anticoagulation in HIT patients. Additionally, data from recent clinical trials with argatroban use in more special indications such as in percutaneous coronary intervention, liver dysfunction, renal replacement therapy, and intensive care medicine, are reviewed. The approved initial dosage of argatroban for adults with HIT or HITTS is 2 μg/kg/minute for patients with normal hepatic function and 0.5 μg/kg/minute for patients with hepatic dysfunction. There is evidence that a reduced initial dose may also be advisable for patients with heart failure, multiple organ dysfunction, severe anasarca, or after cardiac surgery. Given this information, argatroban can be effectively used in treating HIT with monitoring of activated partial thromboplastin time.

Argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for anticoagulation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT; in several countries) and in patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; in the USA). HIT is a relatively common extreme prothrombotic condition. When HIT is reasonably suspected, an alternative anticoagulant should be promptly initiated. In historical controlled studies, argatroban reduced new thrombosis, mortality from thrombosis and the composite of death, amputation or thrombosis, without increasing bleeding. With intravenous infusion, advantages include short half-life, easy monitoring and elimination primarily by hepatobiliary (rather than renal) means. In patients undergoing PCI, argatroban with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition leads to high rates of procedural success with low bleeding risk. Herein we review argatroban therapy for HIT and for PCI.

Use of argatroban: experiences in continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a common complication after cardiac surgery, complicated by suspected or proven heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (type II). The present study evaluated the use of argatroban as an anticoagulant during continuous RRT in the early period after cardiac surgery. Argatroban was compared with unfractionated heparin (UH) with respect to bleeding complications and the effectiveness of anticoagulation.

METHODS

Patients requiring RRT after cardiac surgery from March 2007 to June 2009 were identified. The effectiveness of anticoagulation was measured indirectly by the duration of dialysis filter use. Bleeding was defined as clinical signs of blood loss or the need for transfusion.

RESULTS

Of 94 patients, 41 received argatroban, 27 UH, and 26 required conversion from UH to argatroban. In all 3 subgroups, RRT was begun within a median postoperative period of 2.0 days. Similar levels of anticoagulation were achieved with the duration of the circuit and filter changed an average of 1.1 times daily during RRT. Liver function was comparable in all patients. Neither clinically relevant signs of bleeding nor significant differences in the hemoglobin levels or a requirement for transfusion were noted. However, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II values during dialysis and mortality were significantly greater in the patients initially receiving argatroban compared with those who received UH alone (54 ± 2 vs 43 ± 3, P < .001; 71% vs 44%, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Argatroban can provide effective anticoagulation in postoperative cardiac patients receiving continuous RRT. Close monitoring and dose titration resulted in a comparable risk of bleeding for anticoagulation with both argatroban and heparin, regardless of the disease severity or impaired hepatic function.

Diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder caused by antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes. It presents with declining platelet counts 5 to 14 days after heparin administration and results in a predisposition to arterial and venous thrombosis. Establishing the diagnosis of HIT can be extremely challenging. It is essential to conduct a thorough clinical evaluation in addition to laboratory testing to confirm the presence of PF4/H antibodies. Multiple clinical algorithms have been developed to aid the clinician in predicting the likelihood of HIT. Once HIT is recognized, an alternative anticoagulant should be initiated to prevent further complications.

Successful management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using argatroban in a very old woman: a case report

Thrombosis due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is rare but has a severe prognosis. Its management is not always easy, particularly in old patients with renal insufficiency. A 95-year-old woman was hospitalized for dyspnea. Curative treatment with unfractionated heparin was started because pulmonary embolism was suspected. Disseminated intravascular coagulation was then suspected because of thrombocytopenia, hypoprothrombinemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and a positive ethanol gelation test. The first immunoassay for HIT was negative. On the 12th day of hospitalization, bilateral cyanosis of the toes occurred associated with recent deep bilateral venous and arterial thrombosis at duplex ultrasound. New biological tests confirmed HIT and led us to stop heparin and to start argatroban with a positive clinical and biological evolution. Venous and arterial thrombosis associated with thrombocytopenia during heparin treatment must be considered HIT whatever the biological test results are. Argatroban is a good alternative treatment in the elderly.

Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but severe prothrombotic adverse effect of heparin treatment. The underlying cause is the formation of highly immunogenic complexes between negatively charged heparin and positively charged platelet factor 4 (PF4). Resulting antibodies against these PF4/heparin complexes can activate platelets via the platelet FcγIIa receptor, leading to thrombin generation and thus to the paradox of a prothrombotic state despite thrombocytopenia and application of heparin. Prompt diagnosis of HIT is important in order to change treatment to prevent severe thromboembolic complications. However, this is often difficult as thrombocytopenia is frequent in hospitalized patients and the commercially available laboratory tests for HIT antibodies have a high negative predictive value but only a poor positive predictive value. This leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of HIT, which also bear the risk for adverse outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims at resuming recent data on HIT, thereby focusing on the role of new anticoagulants and providing a framework for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, it provides some insights into the pathogenesis of this peculiar adverse drug reaction and ventures a guess at its future relevance in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

New drugs which are strongly negatively charged should be assessed for their capacity to form complexes with PF4. If they do so, they bear the risk of inducing a HIT-like immune response. The immunology of HIT is still largely unresolved. Understanding HIT might provide insights into other immune and autoimmune response mechanisms.

Pharmacology of argatroban

Argatroban is a synthetic, small-molecule direct thrombin inhibitor that is approved in the USA, the EU and Japan for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and for anticoagulation of HIT patients undergoing PCI. Argatroban binds reversibly to, and inhibits both soluble and clot-bound thrombin. Argatroban does not generate antibodies, is not susceptible to degradation by proteases and is cleared hepatically. It has a predictable anticoagulant effect and there is a good correlation between dose, plasma concentration and pharmacodynamic effect. Initial clinical studies suggest that further investigations to establish the use of argatroban in ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, hemodialysis, blood oxygenation, off-pump cardiac surgery and other clinical indications are warranted.

Argatroban in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunoglobulin-mediated serious complication of heparin therapy characterized by thrombocytopenia and high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis: HIT and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated as the anticoagulant for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with HIT and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who have HIT. The aim of this review is to examine the pharmacological characteristics and the clinical efficacy and safety of this drug in adults with HIT, including those undergoing PCI. Briefly, 2 prospective multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of argatroban as an anticoagulant in patients with HIT or HITTS. Both studies showed that the incidence of the primary efficacy end point, a composite of all-cause death, all-cause amputation, or new thrombosis, was reduced in argatroban-treated patients vs control subjects with HIT or HITTS. In both studies, bleeding rates were similar between the groups. Argatroban was evaluated as the anticoagulant therapy in 3 prospective, multicenter, open-label studies in HIT patients who underwent PCI. The studies were similar in design with respect to patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, the argatroban dosing regimen, and primary efficacy outcomes. The investigators performed a pooled analysis of these studies, which showed that most (≥95%) patients achieved a satisfactory outcome from the procedure and adequate anticoagulation (coprimary end points).

Argatroban: a review of its use in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban, a highly selective direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated for use as an anticoagulant for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who have, or are at risk for, HIT. Intravenous argatroban improved clinical outcomes and was generally well tolerated in adults with HIT or HIT with thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). In two pivotal, open-label, historically controlled studies in adults with HIT, the incidence of the primary composite endpoint (all-cause death, all-cause amputation, or new thrombosis) was significantly lower in argatroban recipients than in historical controls, and more argatroban recipients than historical controls stayed event-free during the study according to a Kaplan-Meier analysis. In adults with HITTS in these trials, although the incidence of the primary composite endpoint did not differ significantly between argatroban recipients and historical controls, a Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that more patients receiving argatroban than historical controls remained event-free during the study. Major and minor bleeding rates in argatroban recipients were generally similar to those in historical controls in these studies. Argatroban was also an effective anticoagulant in patients with HIT undergoing PCI in three small, uncontrolled trials, pooled data from which showed that most (>or=95%) patients achieved a satisfactory outcome of the PCI procedure and adequate anticoagulation (coprimary endpoints). It was generally well tolerated in these patients, with the incidence of major bleeding being <or=1.1%. The efficacy and safety of argatroban in pediatric patients has not been established. However, a small uncontrolled, preliminary study suggests that it may be useful in seriously ill pediatric patients requiring nonheparin anticoagulation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. A contemporary clinical approach to diagnosis and management

Thrombocytopenia following heparin administration can be associated with an immune reaction, now referred to as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT is essentially a prothrombotic disorder mediated by an IgG antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody, which induces platelet, endothelial cell, monocyte, and other cellular activation, leading to thrombin generation and thrombotic complications. Indeed, HIT can also be regarded as a serious adverse drug effect. Importantly, HIT can be a life-threatening and limb-threatening condition frequently associated with characteristically severe and extensive thromboembolism (both venous and arterial) rather than with bleeding. This article provides an overview of HIT, with an emphasis on the clinical diagnosis and management.

Clinical experience with argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a large teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for the prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The product monograph does not guide clinicians beyond specifying the initial dose of 2 μg/kg per minute (or 0.5 μg/kg per minute for patients with hepatic impairment). Some authors have suggested that in the intensive care unit (ICU) and for patients with acute cardiac disease and those with renal or hepatic dysfunction, this dose may result in a supratherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of argatroban in adult patients with suspected HIT in a large teaching hospital, and to review dosing for patients in the ICU, patients with acute cardiac disease, and patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction.

METHODS

Charts of patients with suspected HIT who had received argatroban for at least 24 h between October 1, 2005, and October 1, 2007, at the Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria, with charts available for review. Of these, 21 (70%) patients had an initial argatroban dose of 2 μg/kg per minute and 4 (13%) had an initial dose of 0.5 μg/kg per minute. The median duration of therapy was 6 days, and the mean dose was 2.14 μg/kg per minute. There were 122 dosage adjustments, the most common change being 0.5 μg/kg per minute, followed by adjustments of 1 and 0.1 μg/kg per minute. Six patients had supratherapeutic aPTT values (above 100 s), and none experienced major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that an initial argatroban dose of 2 μg/kg per minute is appropriate for patients with no hepatic dysfunction. Patients with acute cardiac disease and critically ill patients may require lower doses of argatroban; however no dosage adjustments are required for patients with renal dysfunction.

Reducing harm associated with anticoagulation: practical considerations of argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a hepatically metabolized, direct thrombin inhibitor used for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and for patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this review is to summarize practical considerations of argatroban therapy in HIT. The US FDA-recommended argatroban dose in HIT is 2 microg/kg/min (reduced in patients with hepatic impairment and in paediatric patients), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline (not >100 seconds). Contemporary experiences indicate that reduced doses are also needed in patients with conditions associated with hepatic hypoperfusion, e.g. heart failure, yet are unnecessary for renal dysfunction, adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity. Argatroban 0.5-1.2 microg/kg/min typically supports therapeutic aPTTs. The FDA-recommended dose during PCI is 25 microg/kg/min (350 microg/kg initial bolus), adjusted to achieve activated clotting times (ACTs) of 300-450 sec. For PCI, argatroban has not been investigated in hepatically impaired patients; dose adjustment is unnecessary for adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity, and lesser doses may be adequate with concurrent glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Argatroban prolongs the International Normalized Ratio, and published approaches for monitoring the argatroban-to-warfarin transition should be followed. Major bleeding with argatroban is 0-10% in the non-interventional setting and 0-5.8% periprocedurally. Argatroban has no specific antidote, and if excessive anticoagulation occurs, argatroban infusion should be stopped or reduced. Improved familiarity of healthcare professionals with argatroban therapy in HIT, including in special populations and during PCI, may facilitate reduction of harm associated with HIT (e.g. fewer thromboses) or its treatment (e.g. fewer argatroban medication errors).

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: some working hypotheses on pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present contribution will illustrate some evolving concepts on the pathogenesis and clinical management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and describe how we approach patients with suspected HIT at our institution.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIT is caused by an autoimmune reaction leading to the formation of antibodies directed against platelet factor 4. Conditions favoring the development of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies differ from those required for the formation of macromolecular ternary complexes (HIT antibody/platelet factor 4/heparin), which are able to activate platelets and induce clinical HIT. HIT can be diagnosed by combining its pretest probability with the quantitative result of rapid HIT-antibody assays. Treatment of acute HIT requires inhibition of in-vivo thrombin generation by means of alternative nonheparin anticoagulant drugs, whose effective dosage appears to be significantly lower than the official recommendations. As HIT antibodies are transient, HIT patients can be re-exposed to heparin, provided that previous heparin treatment is remote and that anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies are undetectable.

SUMMARY

In recent years, there has been a continuing elucidation of pathogenic and clinically relevant issues, which are intellectually rewarding to follow and should enable us to offer a steadily improving treatment to the HIT patients we are in charge of.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This chapter about the recognition, treatment, and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices. Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom the clinician considers the risk of HIT to be > 1.0%, we recommend platelet count monitoring over no platelet count monitoring (Grade 1C). For patients who are receiving heparin or have received heparin within the previous 2 weeks, we recommend investigating for a diagnosis of HIT if the platelet count falls by >/= 50%, and/or a thrombotic event occurs, between days 5 and 14 (inclusive) following initiation of heparin, even if the patient is no longer receiving heparin therapy when thrombosis or thrombocytopenia has occurred (Grade 1C). For patients with strongly suspected (or confirmed) HIT, whether or not complicated by thrombosis, we recommend use of an alternative, nonheparin anticoagulant (danaparoid [Grade 1B], lepirudin [Grade 1C], argatroban [Grade 1C], fondaparinux [Grade 2C], or bivalirudin [Grade 2C]) over the further use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy or initiation/continuation of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) [Grade 1B]. The guidelines include specific recommendations for nonheparin anticoagulant dosing that differ from the package inserts. For patients with strongly suspected or confirmed HIT, we recommend against the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [coumarin] therapy until after the platelet count has substantially recovered (usually, to at least 150 x 10(9)/L) over starting VKA therapy at a lower platelet count (Grade 1B); that VKA therapy be started only with low maintenance doses (maximum, 5 mg of warfarin or 6 mg of phenprocoumon) over higher initial doses (Grade 1B); and that the nonheparin anticoagulant (eg, lepirudin, argatroban, danaparoid) be continued until the platelet count has reached a stable plateau, the international normalized ratio (INR) has reached the intended target range, and after a minimum overlap of at least 5 days between nonheparin anticoagulation and VKA therapy rather than a shorter overlap (Grade 1B). For patients receiving VKAs at the time of diagnosis of HIT, we recommend use of vitamin K (10 mg po or 5 to 10 mg IV) [Grade 1C].

Reduced Argatroban Doses After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Background:

The Food and Drug Administration–approved argatroban dose for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is 2 μg/kg/min (0.5 μg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 1.5–3 times baseline. Recent data suggest that reduced doses are required after cardiovascular surgery.

Objective:

To characterize dosing requirements, aPTTs, factors affecting dosage, and clinical outcomes in patients administered argatroban after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Methods:

Charts of 39 patients who underwent CABG surgery and were administered argatroban postoperatively for laboratory-confirmed HIT (n = 25), antibody-negative suspected HIT (n = 10), or previous HIT requiring anticoagulation (n = 4) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, argatroban dosing information, aPTTs (target range 45–90 sec), and outcomes were summarized. Regression analyses explored potential effectors of dosage.

Results:

Patient features, argatroban dosing patterns, and aPTTs were similar among groups. Many patients had laboratory evidence of some hepatic and/or renal dysfunction (median [range] bilirubin 1.0 [0.3–8.0] mg/dL, creatinine clearance 47 [18–287] mL/min). Overall, median argatroban doses were 0.5 μg/kg/min initially and 0.6 μg/kg/min during therapy (median duration 5.3 days). After argatroban initiation, aPTTs were greater than 90 seconds at first assessment in 4 patients (3 with abnormal hepatic function test results) initially administered 0.5, 1, 2, and 2 μg/kg/min, respectively. Within approximately 16 hours of therapy, 33 (85%) patients achieved consecutive therapeutic aPTTs. No association was detected between mean dose during therapy and preoperative ejection fraction, routine hepatic or renal function test results (other than blood urea nitrogen [BUN]), or surgery type. A clinically insignificant association existed between dose and BUN: there was an approximately 0.15 μg/kg/min dose decrease for each 10 mg/dL BUN increase. One patient developed thrombosis, 1 underwent finger amputation, 7 died (5 after argatroban cessation), and 4 had significant bleeding.

Conclusions:

These findings suggest that reduced initial argatroban doses (eg, 0.5 μg/kg/min), adjusted to achieve therapeutic aPTTs, provide rapid, adequate anticoagulation in postoperative CABG patients with presumed or previous HIT. Prospective study of reduced initial dosing in this setting is warranted.

Argatroban Therapy in Women with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVES

Women have increased risk of developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a serious, immune-mediated prothrombotic condition, and have a worse prognosis when affected. We compared gender differences for treatment and outcomes in HIT patients administered argatroban therapy.

METHODS

From a multicenter retrospective registry of argatroban-treated patients, we identified females (n = 42) and males (n = 50) with clinically diagnosed HIT who were administered argatroban <or=10 microg/kg/min. Upon diagnosis of HIT, heparin was discontinued. Continuous intravenous argatroban was instituted, adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline. Between-gender comparisons were made of argatroban dosing, aPTT responses, and clinical outcomes (death, amputation, new thrombosis, major bleeding).

RESULTS

At baseline, females and males were generally well matched, excepting platelet count (medians, 101 x 10(9)/L vs. 170 x 10(9)/L, p = 0.01), with 9 (21%) females and 19 (38%) males having HIT-related thrombosis. Typically, argatroban was initiated and maintained at 1.0-1.1 mug/kg/min for approximately 6 days, irrespective of gender. No differences were detected between females and males in aPTTs during therapy (respective medians, 57.3 vs. 59.5 seconds) or time to therapeutic aPTTs (7.3 vs. 10.3 hours), or platelet count recovery (2.5 vs. 7.4 days). Of patients with available data, 20 of 35 (57%) females and 19 of 35 (54%) males were converted to warfarin. The composite end point of death, amputation, or new thrombosis within 37 days of argatroban initiation occurred in 10 (24%) females and 8 (16%) males (p = 0.43). Within 37 days, 7 (17%) females and 7 (14%) males died (2 while on argatroban), 1 (2%) female required amputation (off argatroban), and 3 (7%) females and 2 (4%) males developed new thrombosis (3 while on argatroban). Major bleeding occurred in 1 (2%) female and 1 (2%) male.

CONCLUSIONS

Argatroban can be used effectively and safely to manage HIT in females, with dosing requirements, aPTT responses, and clinical outcomes comparable to those in men. Future, larger studies are warranted in establishing the unique characteristics of HIT in females.