Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet functions: a literature review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many epidemiological studies have evidenced an increased bleeding risk associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This review summarizes data on SSRIs' effects on platelet functions assessed with assays used in clinical practice and highlights the areas that deserve further investigation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conflicting results of SSRI effects on platelet aggregation were observed irrespectively of the agonist used, the antidepressant drug or the study type. Alike, discrepant results were reported with flow-cytometry-based assays assessing either platelet surface glycoprotein levels, integrin activation, agonist-induced secretion of intraplatelet granule content or membrane anionic phospholipid exposure. Other tests may have detected a platelet function defect in SSRIs samples, however, results were largely inconsistent.

SUMMARY

Critical literature examination unveils very low certainty of evidence on potential SSRI effect on platelet functions. Findings are often inconsistent even when similar methods are used, most likely because of differences in study design, included patients (age, comorbid conditions), SSRIs' type and dose, uncontrolled confounding factors, and statistical analysis power. Further studies are needed to disentangle any intrinsic antiplatelet effect of SSRIs and the multiple confounding factors, mainly the depression control itself and the degree of platelet SERT inhibition.

Association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors use and blood transfusion risk in older adults after hip fracture: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hip fracture is common and associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) influence platelet hemostasis and might result in abnormal bleeding. This study aims to determine whether the use of SSRIs in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery is associated with the risk of perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study using prospectively collected data of patients aged 70 years and older admitted to a French geriatric perioperative ward for hip fracture between January 2012 and June 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of RBC transfusion during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression was performed, with a sensitivity analysis according to co-prescriptions.

RESULTS

Out of 1085 patients, 253 (23%) were male, mean age was 86 (± 6.2) years, and median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 7 (interquartile range [5-8]). 486 (45%) patients received perioperative RBC transfusion, with a median of 2 units (interquartile range [1-3]) transfused per patient postoperatively. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, functional status, institutionalization, polypharmacy, antiplatelet therapy, fracture type, hemoglobin and albumin levels, the use of SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of RBC transfusion (aOR 0.91, 95%CI 0.64-1.29, p = 0.59). We did not observe any association between concomitant use of SSRIs and anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and the risk of RBC transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older comorbid adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, the use of SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of perioperative RBC transfusion.

Diosgenin normalization of disrupted behavioral and central neurochemical activity after single prolonged stress

Introduction: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic mental illness triggered by traumatic experiences such as wars, natural disasters, or catastrophes, and it is characterized by anxiety, depression and cognitive impairment. Diosgenin is a steroidal sapogenin with known neuroprotective and antioxidant properties. This study aimed to assess the pharmacological potential of diosgenin in a single prolonged stress (SPS) model of PTSD, plus other behavioral models along with any consequent alterations in brain neurochemistry in male mice. Methodology: SPS was induced by restraining animals for 2 h, followed by 20 min of forced swim, recuperation for 15 min, and finally, exposure to ether to induce anesthesia. The SPS-exposed animals were treated with diosgenin (20, 40, and 60 mg/kg) and compared with the positive controls, fluoxetine or donepezil, then they were observed for any changes in anxiety/depression-like behaviors, and cognitive impairment. After behavioral screening, postmortem serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine, vitamin C, adenosine and its metabolites inosine and hypoxanthine were quantified in the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum by high-performance liquid chromatography. Additionally, animal serum was screened for changes in corticosterone levels. Results: The results showed that diosgenin reversed anxiety- and depression-like behaviors, and ameliorated cognitive impairment in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, diosgenin restored monoamine and vitamin C levels dose-dependently and modulated adenosine and its metabolites in the brain regions. Diosgenin also reinstated otherwise increased serum corticosterone levels in SPS mice. Conclusion: The findings suggest that diosgenin may be a potential candidate for improving symptoms of PTSD.

Clinical profile of trazodone users in a multisetting older population: data from the Italian GeroCovid Observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Depression is highly prevalent in older adults, especially in those with dementia. Trazodone, an antidepressant, has shown to be effective in older patients with moderate anxiolytic and hypnotic activity; and a common off-label use is rising for managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). The aim of the study is to comparatively assess the clinical profiles of older patients treated with trazodone or other antidepressants.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved adults aged ≥ 60 years at risk of or affected with COVID-19 enrolled in the GeroCovid Observational study from acute wards, geriatric and dementia-specific outpatient clinics, as well as long-term care facilities (LTCF). Participants were grouped according to the use of trazodone, other antidepressants, or no antidepressant use.

RESULTS

Of the 3396 study participants (mean age 80.6 ± 9.1 years; 57.1% females), 10.8% used trazodone and 8.5% others antidepressants. Individuals treated with trazodone were older, more functionally dependent, and had a higher prevalence of dementia and BPSD than those using other antidepressants or no antidepressant use. Logistic regression analyses found that the presence of BPSD was associated with trazodone use (odds ratio (OR) 28.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18-44.7 for the outcome trazodone vs no antidepressants use, among participants without depression; OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.05-4.49 for the outcome trazodone vs no antidepressants use, among participants with depression). A cluster analysis of trazodone use identified three clusters: cluster 1 included mainly women, living at home with assistance, multimorbidity, dementia, BPSD, and depression; cluster 2 included mainly institutionalized women, with disabilities, depression, and dementia; cluster 3 included mostly men, often living at home unassisted, with better mobility performance, fewer chronic diseases, dementia, BPSD, and depression.

DISCUSSION

The use of trazodone was highly prevalent in functionally dependent and comorbid older adults admitted to LTCF or living at home. Clinical conditions associated with its prescription included depression as well as BPSD.

Ameliorating effect offluoxetine on tamoxifen-induced memory loss: The role of corticolimbic NMDA receptors and CREB/BDNF/cFos signaling pathways in rats

Tamoxifen-induced cognitive dysfunction may lead to fluoxetine consumption in patients with breast cancer. Since the brain mechanisms are unclear in tamoxifen/fluoxetine therapy, the blockade effect of hippocampal/amygdala/prefrontal cortical NMDA receptors was examined in fluoxetine/tamoxifen-induced memory retrieval. We also assessed the corticolimbic signaling pathways in memory retrieval under the drug treatment in adult male Wistar rats. Using the Western blot technique, the expression levels of the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and cFos were evaluated in the corticolimbic regions. The results showed that pre-test administration of fluoxetine (3 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) improved tamoxifen-induced memory impairment in the passive avoidance learning task. Pre-test bilateral microinjection of D-AP5, a selective NMDA receptor antagonist, into the dorsal hippocampal CA1 regions and the central amygdala (CeA), but not the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), inhibited the improving effect of fluoxetine on tamoxifen response. It is important to note that the microinjection of D-AP5 into the different sites by itself did not affect memory retrieval. Memory retrieval increased the signaling pathway of pCREB/CREB/BDNF/cFos in the corticolimbic regions. Tamoxifen-induced memory impairment decreased the hippocampal/PFC BDNF level and the amygdala level of pCREB/CREB/cFos. The improving effect of fluoxetine on tamoxifen significantly increased the hippocampal/PFC expression levels of BDNF, the PFC/amygdala expression levels of cFos, and the ratio of pCREB/CREB in all targeted areas. Thus, NMDA receptors' activity in the different corticolimbic regions mediates fluoxetine/tamoxifen memory retrieval. The corticolimbic synaptic plasticity changes likely accompany the improving effect of fluoxetine on tamoxifen response.

Association of recent hospitalisation with antidepressant initiation among community dwellers with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES

Antidepressant are commonly prescribed to persons with cognitive disorders to treat depressive and other neuropsychiatric symptoms despite the inconclusive evidence on their effectiveness on this indication. We studied whether recent hospitalisation was associated with antidepressant initiation in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

The register-based Finnish nationwide Medication use and Alzheimer's disease cohort includes community-dwelling persons diagnosed with AD during 2005-2011 in Finland (n = 70,718). This study was restricted to people who initiated antidepressant use after AD diagnosis and had no active cancer treatment and schizophrenia or bipolar disorder diagnoses. We performed a nested case-control study with antidepressant initiators as cases. A matched noninitiator (sex, age and AD duration), was identified for each initiator (15,360 matched pairs). Recent hospitalisation was defined as hospital discharge within the past 14 days of initiation.

RESULTS

Antidepressant initiators were four times more likely (adjusted odds ratio: 4.41, 95% confidence interval: 4.06-4.80) to have been hospitalised within the past 2 weeks before initiation (21.2%, n = 3250) than matched noninitiators (5.4%, n = 831) and the duration of hospital stay was significantly longer among initiators. Dementia was the most common main discharge diagnosis among both initiators (43.8%, n = 1423) and noninitiators (24.8%, n = 206).

CONCLUSION

Recent hospitalisation was strongly associated with antidepressant initiation in persons with AD. Further studies are needed to investigate whether this is due to neuropsychiatric symptoms leading to hospital admission, inpatient care triggering or worsening neuropsychiatric symptoms or other indications. Nonpharmacological treatments for neuropsychiatric symptoms should be prioritised and the threshold for prescribing antidepressants should be high.

[The handling of psychotropics in diseases of central nervous system]

Psychiatric signs and symptoms occur frequently in individuals with central nervous system diseases. Inadequately treated, these comorbid conditions affect patient rehabilitation, compliance with treatment and quality of life. Their management poses a major challenge given the variable efficacy and safety profiles of available psychotropic drugs and increased risk of drug interaction. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on the prescription of psychotropic drugs for management of psychiatric disorders among persons with central nervous system's diseases.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake-Inhibitors for Symptom-Based Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorders in Older Adults: An International Delphi Study

OBJECTIVE

International guidelines on symptom-based treatment of borderline personality disorders (BPD) in older adults are lacking. The number of older adults (≥ 65 years) with borderline personality disorder is rising. Effectiveness of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) on symptoms of BPD has only been investigated in younger adults and results are ambiguous. During life, serotonergic function changes, which can influence the indication and effectiveness of SSRIs in older adults with BPD. Aim of this study is to reach consensus on the suitability of SSRIs for the treatment of older adults with BPD.

METHODS

A Delphi study was conducted among eighteen international experts. In three successive rounds, a total of 16 statements addressing the treatment with SSRI's in older adults with BPD were assessed. Consensus on specific statements was reached if at least two-third of these experts agreed.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 11 statements related to the indication and effectiveness of SSRIs in the treatment of older adults with BPD.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest a valuable role for SSRIs in the treatment of affective instability, and to a lesser extent impulsive behavior, in older adults with BPD. Sertraline or citalopram are suggested to be the first-choice medication but should be prescribed with some caution. Treatment recommendations have been suggested (presented in a flowchart), but still have to be investigated in clinical practice.

Psychotropic Medication and Cognitive, Functional, and Neuropsychiatric Outcomes in Alzheimer's Disease (AD)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

There are growing concerns about the safety and efficacy of psychotropic medications in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We sought to examine associations between psychotropic medication exposure and longitudinal change in cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric outcomes in a large clinical AD cohort.

DESIGN

Longitudinal observational study.

SETTING

National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center combining data from 39 Alzheimer's disease centers.

PARTICIPANTS

8,034 participants with AD dementia.

MEASUREMENTS

Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) Total. Probability of exposure to medication (the propensity score, PS) calculated via logistic regression. Medication classes included all antipsychotics (atypical vs conventional), antidepressants (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor [SSRI] vs non-SSRI), and benzodiazepines. Participants treated with a medication class were matched with participants not treated with that class with the closest-matched PS. The effect of medication treatment was assessed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.5 (9.8) years, and mean (SD) scores of MMSE 21.3 (5.7), CDR-SB 5.5 (3.4), and NPI-Q Total 4.5 (4.4). Mean duration of follow-up was 2.9-3.3 years depending on medication class. Non-SSRI antidepressant use was associated with better CDR-SB (2-year difference in change-DIC: -0.38 [-0.61, -0.15], P = .001). Atypical antipsychotic use was associated with greater decline on MMSE (DIC: -0.91 [-1.54, -0.28] P = .005) and CDR-SB scores (DIC: 0.50 [0.14, 0.86], P = .006). Notably, no drug class was associated with better NPI-Q scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of atypical antipsychotics was associated with poorer cognition and function, and no drug class was associated with improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Association Between Side Effects and Blood microRNA Expression Levels and Their Targeted Pathways in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Treated by a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor, Escitalopram: A CAN-BIND-1 Report

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressant drugs are effective therapies for major depressive disorder; however, they are frequently associated with side effects. Although there is some evidence for a relationship between genetic variation and side effects, little is known regarding the role of dynamic molecular factors as moderators of side effects. The aim of this study was to assess microRNA (miRNA) changes associated with side effects during escitalopram treatment and their downstream effects on target gene expression.

METHODS

A total 160 patients with major depressive disorder from the CAN-BIND-1 cohort were included. Side effects were assessed with the Toronto Side Effect Scale after 2 weeks of treatment with escitalopram. We assessed the relationship between side effects and changes in peripheral expression of miRNAs between baseline and week 2. For miRNA whose expression changed, we used target prediction algorithms to identify putative messenger RNA (mRNA) targets and assessed their expression.

RESULTS

Nausea was experienced by 42.5% of patients. We identified 45 miRNAs whose expression changed on initiation of escitalopram treatment, of which 10 displayed a negative association with intensity of nausea (miR15b-5p, miR17-5p, miR20a-5p, miR20b-5p, miR103a-3p, miR103b, miR106a-5p, miR182-5p, miR185-5p, and miR660-5p). Additionally, we found negative associations between 4 microRNAs (miR20a-5p, miR106a-5p, miR185-5p, miR660-5p) and mRNA targets. The expression of the miR185-5p target, CAMK2δ was significantly decreased [log 2 mean = -0.048 (0.233)] between weeks 0 and 2 (P = .01)].

CONCLUSIONS

We identified an overexpression of miR185-5p during escitalopram treatment of major depressive disorder, which was negatively associated with intensity of nausea, and identified a potential mRNA target that may mediate this effect.

Non-pharmacological treatment for depressed older patients in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Late-life depression is most often treated in primary care, and it usually coincides with chronic somatic diseases. Given that antidepressants contribute to polypharmacy in these patients, and potentially to interactions with other drugs, non-pharmacological treatments are essential. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to present an overview of the non-pharmacological treatments available in primary care for late-life depression.

Method

The databases of PubMed, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched in January 2017 with combinations of MeSH-terms and free text words for “general practice,” “older adults,” “depression,” and “non-pharmacological treatment”. All studies with empirical data concerning adults aged 60 years or older were included, and the results were stratified by primary care, and community setting. We narratively reviewed the results and performed a meta-analysis on cognitive behavioral therapy in the primary care setting.

Results

We included 11 studies conducted in primary care, which covered the following five treatment modalities: cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, problem-solving therapy, behavioral activation, and bright-light therapy. Overall, the meta-analysis showed a small effect for cognitive behavioral therapy, with one study also showing that bright-light therapy was effective. Another 18 studies, which evaluated potential non-pharmacological interventions in the community suitable for implementation, indicated that bibliotherapy, life-review, problem-solving therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy were effective at short-term follow-up.

Discussion

We conclude that the effects of several treatments are promising, but need to be replicated before they can be implemented more widely in primary care. Although more treatment modalities were effective in a community setting, more research is needed to investigate whether these treatments are also applicable in primary care.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42016038442.

Persistent benefits of slow titration of paroxetine in a six-month follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Paroxetine titration may be difficult in older individuals as they are more sensitive to side effects. The current study extends to 6 months our previously published report in which paroxetine was started at 2.5 mg/day and slowly increased by 2.5 mg on alternate days (slow titration) or rapidly titrated to target dose from 10 mg/day (standard titration) in a naturalistic setting.

METHODS

Here, the follow-up period was extended to 26 weeks. We performed an intent-to-treat analysis of 47 subjects from the original sample (major depressive disorder and/or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD); >60 years of age). Missing evaluations were replaced by last observations carried forward. GAD was included as a stratification factor.

RESULTS

Patients in whom paroxetine was slowly up-titrated were more likely to remit (84.0% vs 54.5%; p = 0.028) and had lower core depression (p = 0.0015) and psychic anxiety levels (p = 0.006) after 26 weeks. Dropout rate was 20% in the slow titration group compared with 77.3% in the standard titration arm (p < 0.001). Patients with GAD accounted for all significant associations. No substantial differences were reported between slow and standard titration groups in the subsample without GAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some limitations, these findings suggest that paroxetine treatment should be started at lower doses in older depressed patients and slowly up-titrated. This strategy would allow to increase antidepressant response and the likelihood of completing treatment cycle in patients with high anxiety levels and GAD comorbidity.

Extrapyramidal Reactions Associated with Serotonergic Antidepressants

OBJECTIVE

Extrapyramidal reactions (EPRs) associated with serotonergic antidepressant treatments have been reported since 1958. These reactions can be distressing for patients and complicate treatment. Our objective was to complete a follow-up review of published EPR cases reported for serotonergic antidepressants.

DATA SOURCES

Published cases between January 1998 and May 2015 were collected through a medical literature search. Citation reference lists were also searched manually.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Identified cases were reviewed for patient age, gender, psychiatric diagnosis, dosage, time to reaction onset, concurrent medications, and EPR description. Cases were excluded when there was not a clear description, if descriptions were not consistent with accepted definitions, or if the written English was poor. We included cases of akathisia, dystonia, dyskinesia, parkinsonism, or mixed EPRs. Authors scored each case using the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 86 published reports involving 91 patients; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were implicated in 80.2% of cases. All EPR types were reported: 17 akathisia cases, 18 dyskinesia cases, 27 dystonia cases, 19 parkinsonism cases, and 10 mixed EPR cases. EPRs typically occurred within 30 days of either treatment initiation or dose increase. Age, gender, antidepressant dosing, or concurrent antipsychotic treatment did not appear to broadly contribute to EPR risk. Naranjo scores ranged from 2 to 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Case reports associating serotonergic antidepressants with EPRs continue to be published. Practitioners are advised that monitoring for such is important. Rigorous research efforts are needed to better understand the clinical risk factors for these adverse drug reactions.

Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia

Symptoms of disturbed perception, thought content, mood, or behavior that frequently occur in patients with dementia are defined as the term "Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)." The behavioral symptoms of dementia include physical/verbal aggression, agitation, disinhibition, restlessness, wandering, culturally inappropriate behaviors, sexual disinhibition, and hoarding, and the psychological symptoms of dementia are anxiety, depressive mood, hallucinations and delusions, apathy, and misidentification syndrome. With the cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Dementia (AD), the frequency of neuropsychiatric symptoms increases. Apathy, depression, irritability, agitation, and anxiety are the most frequently detected neuropsychiatric symptoms of AD. In the mild stage of AD, affective symptoms are more likely to occur; agitated and psychotic behaviors are frequent in patients with moderately impaired cognitive function. When neuropsychiatric symptoms are first detected, medical conditions, such as delirium, infection, dehydration, diarrhea, and drug interactions, must be ruled out. The treatment of mild BPSD must be started with psychosocial approaches, such as behavioral management, caregiver education, and physical activity. Medications are indicated for BPSD symptoms that are refractory to non-pharmacological interventions or severe or jeopardizing the safety of a patient or others, often in conjunction with non-pharmacological interventions.

Benefit of slow titration of paroxetine to treat depression in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

Paroxetine is commonly used to treat depression in the elderly; however, titration issues have been raised. Rapid titration may lead to increased anxiety and early dropout. The aim of this cost-utility analysis was to compare the potential benefit of standard (10 mg the first day) versus slow titration (2.5 mg gradually increased).

METHODS

Clinical analysis was based on a naturalistic trial integrated with a decision-analytic model representing second treatments for those who initially did not respond and for dropout cases. Treatment setting was a public outpatient center for mental disorders in Italy. Service use data were estimated from best practice guidelines, whereas costs (Euros; 2012) were retrieved from Italian official sources.

RESULTS

Slow titration approach produced 0.031 more quality-adjusted life years (remission rate: 57% vs 44% in standard titration group) at an incremental cost of €5.53 (generic paroxetine) and €54.54 (brand paroxetine syrup). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values were €159 and €1768, respectively, in favor of slow titration approach. Cost-effectiveness threshold, defined as ICER < 1 GDP per capita according to World Health Organization criteria, is about €25 000 in Italy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with a superiority of slow titration of paroxetine in older depressed patients. However, these findings, in part based on simulated data, need to be replicated in clinical trials.

Effect of Jobelyn® on intruder- and isolation-induced aggressive behavior in mice

BACKGROUND

Aggression is a violent behavior emitted against another organism that may lead to its harm or death and thus is of public health significance, which necessitates the search for agents with anti-aggressive property. This study investigated the effect of Jobelyn® (JB), a unique African polyherbal formulation, on intruder- and isolation-induced aggressive behaviors in mice.

METHODS

Male mice that showed aggression after being housed individually with female counterparts for 3 weeks or kept in isolation for 4 weeks were treated orally (p.o.) with JB (5, 10 or 50 mg/kg), haloperidol (HP) (1 mg/kg), fluoxetine (FL) (10 mg/kg), p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA) (20 mg/kg), mianserin (MS) (50 mg/kg) or distilled water (10 mL/kg) 60 min before being tested for aggression. Interaction studies involving oral administration of PCPA (20 mg/kg), FL (10 mg/kg) or MS (50 mg/kg) to aggressive mice that had received JB (5 or 10 mg/kg, p.o.) 30 min earlier were assessed. The effect of JB (5, 10 or 50 mg/kg, p.o.) on defensive behaviors was also evaluated.

RESULTS

JB (5, 10 or 50 mg/kg) decreased aggressive behaviors without impairing the defensive mechanisms of mice. PCPA (20 mg/kg), an inhibitor of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) biosynthesis, increased aggressive responses and reduced the anti-aggressive effect of JB. FL (10 mg/kg), a 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, significantly suppressed aggression but did not alter the effect of JB on aggression. MS (50 mg/kg), a 5-HT receptor antagonist, reduced aggression and enhanced the effect of JB on aggression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that JB has anti-aggressive activity, which may be related to the enhancement of serotonergic system.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants on cerebrovascular events: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Depression is a common disorder worldwide and is strongly associated with stroke. Use of antidepressants could potentially decrease the risk of stroke in patients with depression. However, the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most frequently prescribed antidepressant in this era, in the risk of stroke showed inconsistent results. We aimed to assess the association between the use of different types of antidepressants, SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and the risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with depression or anxiety. A nationwide population-based cohort study was retrospectively conducted in patients with depression or anxiety who started to take SSRIs and TCAs identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database (2001-2009). We examined the association between the 2 types of antidepressants and incidence of stroke using a proportional hazard model adjusted for stroke risk factors. Among the 24,662 SSRI and 14,736 TCA initiators, the crude incidence rate for stroke was 10.03 and 13.77 per 100 person-years, respectively. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use was not associated with risk of stroke as compared with TCAs in the time-fixed analysis. After adjusting for baseline propensity scores in the time-varying analysis, SSRI use significantly reduced risk of stroke as compared with TCAs with the adjusted hazard ratio of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.96). The effect persisted even after considering the antidepressant dosage (hazard ratio, 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]). In summary, use of SSRIs was associated with a reduced risk for stroke, as compared with TCAs, in this specific disease population.

Side effects of antidepressants during long-term use in a naturalistic setting

Side effects of antidepressants are usually underreported in clinical trials and large scale naturalistic studies are restricted to six months of use. We examined the prevalence and nature of patient-perceived side effects and their determinants during long-term antidepressant use in a naturalistic setting. Subjects, aged 19 to 67 years, in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety were recruited from primary care and specialized mental health care covered 927 cases of single antidepressant use. In 64% of cases, on average, 2.9 side effects were reported. The number of side effects was higher when subjects had higher depression severity (OR=1.28; p=0.002), three or more psychiatric diagnoses (OR=1.97; p=0.02), higher dose (OR=1.44; p=0.006) and was lower when subjects were older (OR=0.83; p=0.02) and had longer duration of use (OR=0.94; p=0.04). Tricyclic antidepressants were associated with more side effects (OR=2.52; p=0.003) and, particularly, more anticholinergic effects, like dry mouth and constipation, as compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Venlafaxine showed more profuse sweating (OR=1.79; p=0.007), whereas mirtazapine showed more weight gain and less sexual dysfunction (OR=0.36; p=0.03), as compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Weight gain was associated with female gender (OR=1.76; p=0.004) and duration of use (OR=1.06; p=0.03). We show that antidepressant side effect, known from short-term studies, persist during long-term use and are associated with depression severity and antidepressant dose. A novel finding was that venlafaxine is associated with more profuse sweating and that weight gain appeared more specific in female users. Clinicians should be aware that, during long-term antidepressant use, side effects are common and persistent.

Orofacial dyskinesia associated with the use of levofloxacin

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of orofacial dyskinesia in a patient treated with levofloxacin for acute diverticulitis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old woman with mild renal insufficiency was admitted with acute diverticulitis. She was initiated on levofloxacin 500 mg IV daily and metronidazole 500 mg IV every 8 hours. On day 4 of treatment, she experienced involuntary, rhythmic facial grimacing accompanied by periodic cervical muscular contractures. Her speech became dysarthric, interrupted by uncontrolled facial and tongue movements, all findings consistent with orofacial dyskinesia. Antibiotics were discontinued, and symptoms resolved after administration of diphenhydramine and lorazepam IV.

DISCUSSION

Fluoroquinolone-associated central nervous system (CNS) toxicities are infrequently observed. They are most commonly associated with ciprofloxacin and are thought to be related to inhibition of γ-aminobutyric acid receptors and activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors. Orofacial dyskinesia has previously been reported primarily with second-generation fluoroquinolones, with only a single case report implicating a third-generation fluoroquinolone. To our knowledge, we report the second case of orofacial dyskinesia with a third-generation fluoroquinolone, the first such case associated with levofloxacin. The orofacial dyskinesia experienced in this case was categorized as probably related to levofloxacin, as assessed by the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability assessment tool. Contributing factors likely included age and renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, CNS toxicities such as orofacial dyskinesia have been reported with levofloxacin. Patients on fluoroquinolones of advanced age and with renal insufficiency should be monitored closely for such toxicities.

The use of antidepressants in Belgian nursing homes: focus on indications and dosages in the PHEBE study

BACKGROUND

Since antidepressants are prescribed for multiple indications, the use of an antidepressant cannot be equated with a diagnosis of depression.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the quality of antidepressant prescribing in Belgian nursing homes, with a critical evaluation of indications and dosages, to see whether depression was appropriately treated in terms of drug choice, the indications for which antidepressants were being prescribed and whether there was underdosing.

METHODS

This analysis was based on data obtained in the Prescribing in Homes for the Elderly in Belgium (PHEBE) study, a cross-sectional, descriptive study of a representative, stratified, random sample of 1,730 residents from 76 Belgian nursing homes. The PHEBE study investigated overall drug utilization in Belgian nursing homes in 2006. Clinical and medication data for the present study were obtained from this study. A 28-item checklist of clinical conditions was designed ad hoc for the PHEBE study and sent to the residents' general practitioners (GPs) to collect clinical information. We copied the residents' medication charts, classified the drugs using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system codes and transferred the drug names and dosages into a database. Information on indications was retrospectively obtained from the GPs, so that we could link the indication to each medication. Minimum effective doses (MEDs) of antidepressants to treat major depression were obtained from the literature to assess underdosing.

RESULTS

The overall use of antidepressants in nursing homes was 39.5 % (95 % CI 37.2, 41.8). The physicians classified 34.2 % (95 % CI 32.0, 36.4) of the residents as having depression, and 80.9 % of these patients were treated with an antidepressant. Indications among the single antidepressant users (n = 551) were depression (66.2 %), insomnia (13.4 %), anxiety (6.2 %) and neuropathic pain (1.6 %). In the indication of depression, 74.8 % used a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), predominantly citalopram, sertraline and escitalopram. Venlafaxine was used by 10.7 % of the residents. Dosages for these antidepressants were equal to or higher than the MED. But when trazodone, amitriptyline or mirtazapine were used to treat depression, respectively, 92.3, 55.5 and 44.5 % of prescribed dosages were below the MED. In the indication of insomnia, most of the time, trazodone (90.5 %) or mirtazapine (5.4 %) were used, and in lower dosages than those required for depression treatment (<MED). Tricyclic antidepressants were predominantly used for the treatment of neuropathic pain and were also used at lower dosages. Of all the residents receiving a medication for anxiety, only 13.9 % received an antidepressant (mostly an SSRI), and the remaining received a benzodiazepine.

CONCLUSIONS

The number one indication for the use of an antidepressant was depression. Within this indication, mostly the recommended SSRIs were used, in dosages equal to or higher than the MED. Furthermore, we noticed that there was substantial use of sedative antidepressants for insomnia and that the physicians preferred to prescribe benzodiazepines over the recommended SSRIs to treat anxiety chronically.

Adverse drug events as a cause of hospitalization in older adults

Older adults are about four to seven times more likely than younger persons to experience adverse drug events (ADEs) that cause hospitalization, especially if they are women and take multiple medications. The prevalence of drug-related hospitalizations has been reported to be as high as 31%, with large heterogeneity between different studies, depending on study setting (all hospital admissions or only acute hospital admissions), study population (entire hospital, specific wards, selected population and/or age groups), type of drug-related problem measured (adverse drug reaction or ADE), method of data collection (chart review, spontaneous reporting or database research) and method and definition used to detect ADEs. The higher risk of drug-related hospitalizations in older adults is mainly caused by age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes, a higher number of chronic conditions and polypharmacy, which is often associated with the use of potentially inappropriate drugs. Other factors that have been involved are errors related to prescription or administration of drugs, medication non-adherence and inadequate monitoring of pharmacological therapies. A few commonly used drugs are responsible for the majority of emergency hospitalizations in older subjects, i.e. warfarin, oral antiplatelet agents, insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents, central nervous system agents. The aims of the present review are to summarize recent evidence concerning drug-related hospitalization in older adults, to assess the contribution of specific medications, and to identify potential interventions able to reduce the occurrence of these drug-related events, as they are, at least partly, potentially preventable.

Inappropriate use of psychotropic drugs in older individuals: implications for practice

Frailty at old age and institutionalization in nursing homes are often associated with multiple chronic diseases (multimorbidity) requiring multiple medications (polypharmacy). Among these chronic conditions, mental health problems (e.g., dementia, depression and insomnia) are common. Psychotropic drugs are frequently used as a treatment approach for these conditions, and the prevalence of their use is high among community-dwelling older adults, but even higher in nursing homes. Furthermore, within the problem of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing, psychotropic drugs (defined in this article as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants) constitute a significant proportion. The use of psychotropics in older adults remains controversial given the risk of adverse effects, in contrast to the limited effectiveness. Guidelines advise a thorough risk–benefit analysis before the initiation of psychotropics, in addition to time-limited use and discontinuation. In the future, serious efforts should be undertaken to tackle the burden of inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in older adults by incorporating a multidisciplinary approach and by offering credible alternatives.

Epidemiology and treatment of mood disorders in a day hospital setting from 1996 to 2007: an Italian study

BACKGROUND

THE PRESENT STUDY AIMED: to assess prescribing patterns in the treatment of major depression, bipolar disorder type I, cyclothymia, and dysthymia from 1996 to 2007 in a day hospital setting; to evaluate the prevalence of the above-mentioned mood disorders and gender distribution; and to relate familiality, comorbidity, and marital status to each diagnosis.

METHODS

Medical records for 777 day hospital patients with a diagnosis of major depression, bipolar disorder type I, cyclothymia, or dysthymia were grouped into two 6-year periods so as to compare the prescribing patterns of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, first-generation antipsychotics, second-generation antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers. Gender, prevalence, familiality, comorbidity, and marital status were related to each diagnosis.

RESULTS

The most common mood disorder, with a female preponderance, was major depression, regardless of marital status. High percentages of familiality and comorbidity were found for major depression, while a reduction was found in the utilization of tricyclic antidepressants. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, but some irregularities were found upon evaluating each diagnosis (eg, increased utilization of these agents in dysthymia and major depression, respectively). There was an increase in prescriptions for serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, but no marked differences in utilization of noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, which remained basically low. There was no significant difference in prescribing of first-generation antipsychotic agents, although a reduction was found. There was a significant increase in utilization of second-generation antipsychotics and mood stabilizers.

CONCLUSION

Our epidemiological findings are consistent with data reported in the literature regarding the high prevalence of major depression among the mood disorders, as well as the impact of familiality and comorbidity. Analysis of prescribing patterns for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers in the treatment of mood disorders shows a shift from older to newer drugs, and wider use of mood stabilizers.

Psychotropic drug-induced falls in older people: a review of interventions aimed at reducing the problem

Falls are a common health problem for older people, and psychotropic medications have been identified as an important independent fall risk factor. The objective of this paper was to review the literature relating to the effect of psychotropic medications on falls in older people, with a particular focus on evidence supporting minimization of their use to reduce risk of falls. A literature search identified 18 randomized trials meeting the inclusion criteria for the review of effectiveness of psychotropic medication withdrawal studies, including four with falls outcomes. One of these, which targeted reduced psychotropic medication use in the community, reported a 66% reduction in falls, while the other studies demonstrated some success in reducing psychotropic medication use but with mixed effects on falls. Other randomized trials evaluated various approaches to reducing psychotropic medications generally or specific classes of psychotropic medications (e.g. benzodiazepines), but did not report fall-related outcomes. Overall, these studies reported moderate success in reducing psychotropic medication use, and a number reported no or limited worsening of key outcomes such as sleep quality or behavioural difficulties associated with withdrawal of psychotropic medication use. Reduced prescription of psychotropic medications (e.g. seeking non-pharmacological alternatives to their use in place of prescription in the first place or, for those patients for whom these medications are deemed necessary, regular monitoring and efforts to cease use or wean off use over time) needs to be a strong focus in clinical practice for three reasons. Firstly, psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for older people, both in the community and especially in the residential care setting, and their effectiveness in a number of clinical groups has been questioned. Secondly, there is strong evidence of an association between substantially increased risk of falls and use of a number of psychotropic medications, including benzodiazepines (particularly, the long-acting agents), antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs. Finally, the largest effect of any randomized trial of falls prevention to date was achieved with a single intervention consisting of weaning psychotropic drug users off their medications.

Contemporary concepts in the pharmacotherapy of depression in older people

Late-life depression is common in older people. Its incidence increases significantly after age 70 to 85, as well as among those living in long-term care facilities. Depression contributes to excess morbidity and complicates management of comorbid conditions in older people. Diagnosis and management of depression often present clinicians with a challenge. Indeed, symptoms of depression in older people may not always be the same as those associated with depression in younger people. Additionally, age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics also impact selection, dosing, and monitoring of psychopharmacologic regimens. Optimizing management of depression and providing sound advice to older patients with depression requires knowledge and understanding of many clinical factors. The purpose of this review is to highlight salient issues in late-life depression, with a focus on the pharmacotherapy of depression.

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on platelet function: mechanisms, clinical outcomes and implications for use in elderly patients

Among the antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often preferred to other classes of antidepressants in the treatment of depression in the elderly because of their better safety profile. Most of the known effects of SSRIs, either beneficial or adverse, are linked to their inhibitory action on the serotonin reuptake transporter (5-HTT). This reuptake mechanism is present not only in neurons but also in other cells such as platelets. Serotoninergic mechanisms seem to play an important role in haemostasis, and their importance in this regard has long been underestimated. Abnormal activation may lead to a pro-thrombotic state, as may occur in patients with major depressive disorder, whilst downregulation, as occurs in patients treated with SSRIs, may have two clinical consequences, both of particular interest in the elderly. On the one hand, there may be an increased risk of bleeding; on the other hand, a reduction in thrombotic risk may be possible. Polymorphism in the promoter region of the gene that transcribes the 5-HTT has been shown to have a relevant impact on its function and, in turn, on the beneficial and adverse effects of SSRIs. Bleeding has been a concern since the introduction of SSRIs, with multiple case reports published and communicated to the pharmacovigilance systems. The first epidemiological study was published in 1999 and since then, 34 epidemiological studies from different areas, most of them including elderly patients in their study populations, have been published with a variety of results. Broadly, the epidemiological evidence supports a moderately increased risk of bleeding associated with the use of SSRIs, which may be critically dependent on patient susceptibility and the presence of risk factors. The impairment of primary haemostasis induced by SSRIs may result, as a beneficial counterpart, in a reduction in the thrombotic risk. A small number of clinical trials and an increasing number of epidemiological studies that include elderly patients have been conducted to clarify whether SSRIs reduce the risk of primary and secondary ischaemic disorders. However, the results have been inconclusive with some studies suggesting a preventive effect and others no effect or even an increased risk. Behind such contradictory results may be the role of depression itself as a cardiovascular risk factor and, therefore, a major confounding factor. How to disentangle its effect from that of the antidepressants is the methodological challenge to be overcome in future studies. In this complex scenario, the elderly seem to be at a crossroads, because they are the group in which both the risks and the benefits can be the greatest. Studies performed to date have provided us with some clues that can help orient clinicians in taking the most appropriate course of action. For instance, as the gastrointestinal bleeding risk appears to increase with age, prudent advice in patients with a previous history of upper-gastrointestinal bleeding or peptic ulcer, and in those who take NSAIDs, oral anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs or corticosteroids, would be to suggest addition of an acid-suppressing agent to the drug regimen in those elderly patients in whom SSRIs are indicated.

Change in psychotropic drug use among community-dwelling people aged 75 years and older in Finland: repeated cross-sectional population studies

BACKGROUND

Older people are at high risk of experiencing psychotropic-related adverse drug events. The objective of this study was to compare and contrast the use of psychotropic drugs among community-dwelling people aged ≥ 75 years in 1998 and 2004.

METHODS

Comparable random samples of people aged ≥ 75 years were extracted from the population register in Kuopio, Finland, in 1998 (n = 700) and 2003 (n = 1000). In 1998 and 2004, 523 and 700 community-dwelling people respectively participated in nurse interviews, during which demographic, diagnostic and drug use data were elicited. Logistic regression was used to compute unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the prevalence of psychotropic drug use in 2004 compared to 1998.

RESULTS

The unadjusted prevalence of total psychotropic (37.3% and 38.4%, OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.83-1.33), anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative (29.6% and 31.3%, OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.85-1.38), and antidepressant (10.7% and 11.9%, OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.78-1.61) use were similar in 1998 and 2004. There was a decrease in the unadjusted prevalence of antipsychotic use (9.2% and 5.7%, OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39-0.93). After adjusting for socioeconomic and health status differences, there was an increase in the prevalence of total psychotropic (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.70) and antidepressant (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06-2.40) use.

CONCLUSION

The unadjusted prevalence of psychotropic drug use remained stable between 1998 and 2004. However, in adjusted analyses there was a small increase in the prevalence of any psychotropic drug use and antidepressant use specifically.

Prevalence and predictors of antidepressant prescribing in nursing home residents in the United States

BACKGROUND

Late-life depression is a common psychiatric disorder associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Depression is often under-detected and undertreated in elderly nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of antidepressant drug use and to identify the factors associated with its use among elderly nursing home residents.

METHODS

The study involved the analysis of a nationally representative sample of prescription and resident files from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey (NNHS). The study sample included all elderly nursing home residents ≥65 years of age. The analysis focused on prescribing from any antidepressant class, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), serotonin modulators, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), and others. Descriptive weighted analysis was performed to examine antidepressant use prevalence patterns in elderly nursing home residents. Multiple logistic regression analysis within the conceptual framework of Anderson's behavioral model was used to examine the predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics associated with antidepressant use.

RESULTS

According to the 2004 NNHS, overall prevalence of antidepressant use among elderly nursing home residents was 46.22% (95% CI, 45.16-47.27). Most antidepressant users were ≥85 years of age (49.7%), female (75.7%), non-Hispanic (96.4%), and white (91.1%). The most prescribed class of antidepressants was SSRIs (31.09%; 95% CI, 30.12-32.07), followed by serotonin modulators (4.65%; 95% CI, 4.22-5.09), SNRIs (2.78%; 95% CI, 2.45-3.12), TCAs (2.34%; 95% CI, 2.03-2.65), and MAOIs (0.01%; 95% CI, 0.00-0.03). Citalopram (12.92%; 95% CI, 12.21-13.63) was the most prescribed individual antidepressant, followed by mirtazapine (10.19%; 95% CI, 9.55-10.84). Among the predisposing characteristics, age, race, and marital status were significantly associated with antidepressant use. The odds of receiving an antidepressant were lower for those aged ≥85 years and those who were unmarried elderly residents, when compared with their counterparts; whites were more likely to receive an antidepressant than nonwhites. Enabling factors such as Medicaid and bed capacity significantly predicted antidepressant use. Having Medicaid was positively associated with antidepressant prescription, whereas an increase in the total number of beds decreased the probability of an antidepressant prescription. Among need characteristics, the likelihood of antidepressant prescription use decreased with increased dependence in decision-making ability and out-of-bed mobility. The presence of depressed mood indicators and a history of falls/fractures increased the likelihood of antidepressant prescription use. The odds of receiving an antidepressant increased with diagnosis of depression but decreased with diagnosis of anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of elderly nursing home residents received antidepressants. In addition to need factors, predisposing and enabling factors played an important role in influencing the use of antidepressants in elderly nursing home residents.

Concomitant use of SSRIs, NSAIDs/aspirin and gastroprotective drugs among residents of long-term care facilities: a medical record review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [including aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)] may potentiate the likelihood of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (UGIH). The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence and factors associated with concomitant SSRI/NSAID use among residents of long-term care facilities, and to investigate the use of gastroprotective drugs among concomitant SSRI/NSAID users.

METHODS

The study sample comprised 1087 out of 1444 residents of all 53 long-term care wards in Helsinki, Finland, in September 2003. Data were extracted from residents' medication charts and medical records by trained nurses. Medication, diagnostic and mortality data were available for 1004 residents.

RESULTS

Among the 1004 residents (mean ± SD age 81.3 ± 10.9 years), 28% used an SSRI, 38% used an NSAID and 24% used a gastroprotective drug. Thirteen percent of residents were concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs. Concomitant use was associated with diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), previous stroke (p < 0.001) and a higher degree of co-morbidity (p < 0.001). Gastroprotective drugs were used by 27% of concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs compared with 37%, 20% and 22% of SSRI users, NSAID users and non-users of SSRIs/NSAIDs, respectively. One-year all-cause mortality was similar among all groups.

CONCLUSION

The long-term facility residents in this study sample were frequently exposed to drug-drug interactions that potentiate the risk of UGIH. Only about one-quarter of concomitant users of SSRIs/NSAIDs were prescribed a gastroprotective drug. Further initiatives are needed to optimize the use of SSRIs, NSAIDs and gastroprotective drugs.

Getting the balance right: Established and emerging therapies for major depressive disorders

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common and serious illness of our times, associated with monoamine deficiency in the brain. Moreover, increased levels of cortisol, possibly caused by stress, may be related to depression. In the treatment of MDD, the use of older antidepressants such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants is decreasing rapidly, mainly due to their adverse effect profiles. In contrast, the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and newer antidepressants, which have dual modes of action such as inhibition of the serotonin and noradrenaline or dopamine reuptake, is increasing. Novel antidepressants have additive modes of action such as agomelatine, a potent agonist of melatonin receptors. Drugs in development for treatment of MDD include triple reuptake inhibitors, dual-acting serotonin reuptake inhibitors and histamine antagonists, and many more. Newer antidepressants have similar efficacy and in general good tolerability profiles. Nevertheless, compliance with treatment for MDD is poor and may contribute to treatment failure. Despite the broad spectrum of available antidepressants, there are still at least 30% of depressive patients who do not benefit from treatment. Therefore, new approaches in drug development are necessary and, according to current research developments, the future of antidepressant treatment may be promising.

Fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics in healthy elderly subjects and elderly patients with chronic heart failure

AIMS

To investigate the effects of age and chronic heart failure (CHF) on the oral disposition kinetics of fluvoxamine.

METHODS

A single fluvoxamine dose (50 mg) was administered orally to 10 healthy young adults, 10 healthy elderly subjects and 10 elderly patients with CHF. Fluvoxamine concentration in plasma was measured for up to 96 h.

RESULTS

With the exception of apparent distribution volume, ageing modified all main pharmacokinetic parameters of fluvoxamine. Thus, peak concentration was about doubled {31 +/- 19 vs. 15 +/- 9 ng ml(-1); difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] 16 (3, 29), P < 0.05}, and area under the concentration-time curve was almost three times higher [885 +/- 560 vs. 304 +/- 84 ng h ml(-1); difference (95% CI) 581 (205, 957), P < 0.05]; half-life was prolonged by 63% [21.1 +/- 6.2 vs. 12.9 +/- 6.4 h; difference (95% CI) 8.2 (2.3, 14.1), P < 0.01], and oral clearance was halved (1.12 +/- 0.77 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.66 l h(-1) kg(-1); difference (95% CI) -1.13 (-1.80, -0.46), P < 0.001]. A significant inverse correlation was consistently observed between age and oral clearance (r=-0.67; P < 0.001). The coexistence of CHF had no significant effect on any pharmacokinetic parameters in elderly subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Ageing results in considerable impairment of fluvoxamine disposition, whereas CHF causes no significant modifications. Therefore, adjustment of initial dose and subsequent dose titrations may be required in elderly subjects, whereas no further dose reduction is necessary in elderly patients with CHF.

Risk of ischemic stroke associated with antidepressant drug use in elderly persons

Competing hypotheses have been formulated about a possible association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and ischemic stroke. However, the relationship between antidepressant drug use and ischemic stroke is still unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the association between the use of different types of antidepressants and the risk of ischemic stroke in elderly outpatients. A population-based, nested, case-control study was conducted in persons 65 years and older in the Integrated Primary Care Information database (1996-2005). Cases were all patients with a validated first ischemic stroke. Controls were matched on year of birth, sex, and index date. Exposure to antidepressants was divided in current, past, and nonuse and further categorized by type (SSRI, tricyclic, and other antidepressants), dose, and duration. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare the risk of ischemic stroke between users of antidepressants and nonusers. Overall, 996 incident ischemic strokes were identified. Current use of SSRIs was associated with a significantly increased risk as compared with nonuse (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.25) in elderly patients, particularly when used for less than six months. No associations were observed for current use of tricyclic and other antidepressant drugs. To summarize, compared with nonuse, only SSRI use seems to be associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in elderly patients, particularly as a short-term effect.

Sedative load among long-term care facility residents with and without dementia: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

People with cognitive impairment are particularly susceptible to adverse drug events linked to sedative and psychotropic drugs. A model to calculate sedative load has been developed to quantify the cumulative effect of taking multiple drugs with sedative properties. The objective of this study was to describe the sedative load and use of sedative and psychotropic drugs among long-term care facility residents with and without dementia.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were collected from all 53 long-term care wards in Helsinki, Finland, in September 2003. Of the 1444 eligible residents, consent to participate was obtained for 1087 (75%) residents. Medication and diagnostic data were available for 1052 residents. All drugs were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Sedative load was calculated for each resident using a previously published four-group model.

RESULTS

Of the 1052 residents, 781 (74.2%) were determined to have dementia. Residents with and without dementia had a similar sedative load (mean 3.0 vs 2.7, p = 0.267), but residents with dementia were taking fewer drugs than residents without dementia (mean 6.7 vs 7.4, p = 0.011). Residents with dementia were more frequent users of antipsychotics (42.8% vs 32.8%, p = 0.004), but less frequent users of antidepressants (35.6% vs 46.1%, p = 0.002) and sedative-hypnotics (22.8% vs 27.7%, p = 0.003) than residents without dementia. The most frequently used primary sedatives among people with dementia were temazepam (n = 122, 15.6%), oxazepam (n = 98, 12.5%) and lorazepam (n = 95, 12.2%). The most frequently used drugs with sedation as a prominent adverse effect or preparations with a sedating component among people with dementia were citalopram (n = 183, 23.4%), risperidone (n = 155, 19.8%) and olanzapine (n = 73, 9.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents with dementia were less frequent users of sedative-hypnotic drugs than residents without dementia. However, residents with and without dementia had a similar sedative load. Clinicians should be aware of the extent to which all individual drugs, not only those prescribed for intentional sedation, contribute to a resident's sedative load. The very high rates of sedative and psychotropic use observed in long-term care facility residents highlight the need for new strategies to optimize drug use.

Contemporary Therapies for Depression in Older People

Major depressive disorder is common in the elderly and is associated with significant morbidity and disability, as well as increased risk of mortality. Extensive literature is extant examining the efficacy and tolerability of the earlier antidepressants but there are comparatively fewer trials examining the newer antidepressants, the so‐called ‘third generation’ antidepressants with a variable mode of action. This article reviews the literature published in the past 10 years on the efficacy and tolerability of the new antidepressants – escitalopram, venlafaxine, duloxetine and mirtazapine – used in treating depression of old age. There are no published data for the newly released desvenlafaxine in the elderly population. Due to the limited number of published trials and their highly heterogeneous nature, specific treatment recommendations for depression in older people are not supported by solid empirical evidence. Clearly, further studies on the management of depression in older people are needed in order to develop reliable and practical guidelines.

Preadmission use of SSRIs alone or in combination with NSAIDs and 30-day mortality after peptic ulcer bleeding

OBJECTIVE. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and this risk is amplified by concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The aim of the study was to examine the impact of SSRI use alone or in combination with NSAIDs on 30-day mortality after peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB). MATERIAL AND METHODS. A population-based cohort study of patients with a first hospitalization with PUB in three Danish counties was carried out between 1991 and 2005 using medical databases. We calculated 30-day mortality rate ratios (MRRs) associated with the use of SSRIs, alone or in combination with NSAIDs, adjusted for important covariates. RESULTS. Of 7415 patients admitted with PUB, 5.9% used SSRIs only, and 3.8% used SSRIs in combination with NSAIDs, with a 30-day mortality of 11.8% and 11.3%, respectively. Compared with patients who used neither SSRIs nor NSAIDs, the adjusted 30-day MRR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.76-1.36) for current users of SSRIs and 0.89 (0.62-1.28) for the combined use of SSRIs with NSAIDs. There was a 2.11-fold (95% CI 1.35-3.30) increased risk of death associated with SSRI use starting within 60 days of admission; for those younger than 80 years, the adjusted MRR was 1.54 (0.72-3.29), and 2.57 (1.47-4.49) for those older than 80 years. CONCLUSIONS. Use of SSRIs, alone or in combination with NSAIDs, was not associated with increased 30-day mortality following PUB. However, increased mortality was found in patients who started SSRI therapy, particularly among those older than 80 years. We can only speculate on whether this finding is due to pharmacological action or confounding factors.