Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among older veterans with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a deadly respiratory disease of older patients. IPF therapies (antifibrotics) are efficacious in slowing disease progression, but they are critically underutilized. Potential barriers to antifibrotic use are polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM). We examined the frequency of these factors for older patients with IPF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed records of Veterans ≥ 65 years old in the Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System who received a diagnosis of IPF and received care between 11 April 2023 and 9 September 2024. We analyzed medication profiles from the Corporate Data Warehouse including total medication counts, polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications), severe polypharmacy (> 15 medications), and prescription of a PIM in the anticholinergic, antidepressant, sedative, and antipsychotic classes using published geriatric guidelines (2023 Beers criteria, Screening Tool of Older People's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions [STOPP] version 3). Identified PIMs underwent protocolized review to categorize them further as likely appropriate or inappropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 367 Veterans ≥ 65 years old with a diagnosis of IPF diagnostic during our study period. Total medication count was high for older Veterans (mean 14.2, SD 7.0). Veterans commonly had polypharmacy (350/367, 95.4%), severe polypharmacy (161/367, 43.9%), and ≥ 1 PIM (97/367, 26.4%). After protocolized review, 5.7% (21/367) of older Veterans with IPF had a likely inappropriate medication without documentation of a failed preferred alternative.

CONCLUSION

For older Veterans with IPF, polypharmacy and PIM use were common and represent likely barriers to effective IPF pharmacotherapy initiation. Interventions that target these factors like deprescribing could improve antifibrotic use.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Association of potentially inappropriate medications with prognosis among older patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are common among older adults with cancer, but their association with overall survival (OS) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of PIMs and OS in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we included patients ≥ 65 years with newly diagnosed NSCLC from January 2014 to December 2020. Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is defined by the Beers criteria of 2019 at baseline and within six months following the initiation of systemic therapy. Multivariable Cox regression model was built to assess the association between PIMs and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We finally included 338 patients with a median follow-up for OS of 1777 days. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one PIM was 39.9% (135/338) and 61.2% (71/116) at baseline and after systemic therapy, respectively. The most important factor associated with PIM use was the number of prescribed medications (P < 0.001). Baseline PIM use and PIM after systemic therapy were significantly associated with inferior OS (476 days vs. 844 days, P = 0.044; and 633 days vs. 1600 days, P = 0.007; respectively). In multivariable analysis, both baseline PIM use and PIM after systemic therapy were independent predictors of poor prognosis (adjusted HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.75; P = 0.041; and adjusted HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.11-3.14; P = 0.020; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PIMs are prevalent among older patients with NSCLC and are independent predictors of NSCLC prognosis. There is an urgent need for clinicians to conduct medication reconciliation and appropriate deprescribing for this population, especially for patients with multiple PIMs.

Lung cancer, comorbidities, and medication: the infernal trio

Most patients with lung cancer are smokers and are of advanced age. They are therefore at high risk of having age- and lifestyle-related comorbidities. These comorbidities are subject to treatment or even polypharmacy. There is growing evidence of a link between lung cancer, comorbidities and medications. The relationships between these entities are complex. The presence of comorbidities and their treatments influence the time of cancer diagnosis, as well as the diagnostic and treatment strategy. On the other hand, cancer treatment may have an impact on the patient's comorbidities such as renal failure, pneumonitis or endocrinopathies. This review highlights how some comorbidities may have an impact on lung cancer presentation and may require treatment adjustments. Reciprocal influences between the treatment of comorbidities and anticancer therapy will also be discussed.

The prevalence of relevant drug-drug interactions and associated clinical outcomes in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis on concurrent anticoagulation and anticancer or supportive care therapies

BACKGROUND

A main concern in the management of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between anticoagulants and anticancer therapies. Their clinical implications remain unclear.

METHODS

To quantify the prevalence of DDIs and risks of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding events in patients with CAT on anticoagulation, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with CAT on concurrent anticoagulants and anticancer and/or supportive care therapies. All patients were followed for 6 months from CAT diagnosis or until death (whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with anticoagulant DDIs classified as risk C, D, or X in Lexicomp® at any time during the 6 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE and clinically relevant bleeding events. We calculated the 6-month cumulative incidence of outcomes with 95 % confidence interval (CI) and compared those with and without DDIs, considering death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Among 267 patients included, 111 (41.6 %) had DDIs with anticoagulants at any time during the study. Those on DOACs at any time had more DDIs compared to LMWH (50.9 % vs 19.3 %, p < 0.0001). The 6-month incidence was 8.2 % (95 % CI 5.3-11.9) for recurrent VTE and 6.7 % (95 % CI 4.2-10.2) for clinically relevant bleeding, with no significant differences between groups with or without DDIs.

CONCLUSIONS

There are high incidences of DDIs in patients with CAT on anticoagulants, more with DOACs. DDIs classified as risk C, D, or X by Lexicomp® were not associated with recurrent VTE or bleeding events in our cohort.

Management pattern and medication-related harms and its predictors in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional-based retrospective study

Introduction

Data on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients' thorough management practices and medication-related harms (MRH) are scarce. This study's aim was to investigate the MRHs in patients receiving CRC chemotherapy at the comprehensive specialized hospital of the University of Gondar (UoGCSH).

Methods

A registry-based retrospective cohort study was conducted on CRC patients at the UoGCSH during 2017-2021. From February to May 2022, medical records were reviewed using a pretested data collection tool to collect socio-demographic and disease-related characteristics, MRHs, and medication regimens. MRHs occurrence and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) severity were assessed using standard guidelines and protocols. Version 16/MP of STATA for Windows was used for the analysis. Independent predictors of MRHs were investigated using logistic regression analysis. A p-value ≤0.05 was used to determine an independent variable's statistical significance.

Results

One hundred forty three CRC patients were included, with a mean age of 49.9 ± 14.5 years. About 32.9% and 33.6% had stage II and III cancer, respectively. Significant patients had co-morbidities (15.4%) and complications (13.3%). Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens were given to more than half (56%) of the patients. MRHs were found in 53.1% of the patients, with a mean of 2.45 ± 1.37 MRHs. The most common MRHs were the need for additional drug therapy, sub-therapeutic dose, DDIs, and ADRs. Being on stage IV (AOR = 27.7, 95% CI = 3.85-199.38, p = 0.001), having co-morbidity (AOR = 7.42, 95% CI = 1.80-30.59, p = 0.018) and having complication (AOR = 11.04, 95% CI = 1.72-70.95, p = 0.011) and treated with five or more drugs (AOR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.07-6.07, p = 0.035) were independent predictors of MRHs.

Conclusion

A fluorouracil-based treatment regimen was most frequently used. MRHs were found in nearly half of CRC patients. Furthermore, MRHs were significantly associated with cancer stage, comorbidity and complication status, and the number of medications used. Because MRHs are common, improving clinical pharmacy services is critical for optimizing drug therapy in CRC patients.

The burden of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions in older cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Polypharmacy is a common problem in older cancer patients, although the data about polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescription practices is limited in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the polypharmacy frequency and drug-drug interactions in older cancer patients (≥65 years) treated with ICIs.

METHODS

A total of 70 geriatric patients with advanced cancer were included. The polypharmacy was defined as regular use of 5 or more drugs. The START/STOPP Criteria Version 2 was used for the potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and potential prescription omissions (PPO). The Medscape Drug Interaction Checker was used for potential drug-drug interactions.

RESULTS

The patients had a median of 6 regular drugs, and polypharmacy was present in 77.1%. The polypharmacy risk was significantly increased in patients over 75 years of age (p = 0.028) and with opioid use (p = 0.048). The 50% of patients had category D or X interactions. Patients with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index had significantly increased risk for drug interactions (CCI ≤10 vs. >10, p = 0.017). The PIMs were present in 44.3% and the PPOs in 68.6% of the patients. While the overall survival and immune related adverse events were similar according to polypharmacy, in patients using seven or more drugs, the acute kidney injury risk was increased (HR: 4.667, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed a high rate of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescription practices in ICI-treated patients. These issues pointed out the need for improved general medical care and attention for better comedication management in ICI-treated patients.

A randomised controlled trial of clinical pharmacy intervention versus standard care to improve medication adherence in outpatients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Patient understanding of medicines information and adherence to medication instructions are important variables for ensuring optimal cancer care. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the impact of an outpatient clinical pharmacy service on medication adherence and symptom burden in cancer patients.

METHODS

In this single-centre RCT, 115 patients were randomised 1:1 to a pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care program (intervention, n = 59) versus standard of care (control, n = 56) within an outpatient multidisciplinary radiotherapy clinic. The primary endpoint was medication adherence as assessed by Medication Understanding and Use Self-Efficacy (MUSE) scale and Teach-Back assessment. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Patients were assessed at baseline (weeks 1-2) and at discharge from radiotherapy (weeks 5-7).

RESULTS

Polypharmacy (use of five or more medications) was observed in 26% of patients at baseline compared to 97% at discharge. Patient self-efficacy and medication adherence was higher in the intervention arm compared to the control arm, with a mean MUSE score difference of 2.70 (95% CI 1.24, 4.17) after adjustment for baseline, and a higher proportion of patients with average Teach-Back score of four or more (86% vs 14%; odds ratio (OR) 46.09, 95% CI 14.49, 146.56). The mean (SD) scores for aggregate ESAS (0-100) at discharge were 26.2 (14.0) in the intervention arm and 32.0 (15.8) in the control arm demonstrating lower overall symptom burden associated with the intervention (mean score difference adjusted for baseline - 0.52; 95% CI - 1.03, - 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A structured outpatient clinic pharmacy service significantly improved medication adherence and reduced overall symptom burden in patients receiving radiotherapy.

Healthcare Utilization and Comorbidity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

PURPOSE

Age-related comorbidity is highly prevalent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The purpose of this study was to provide information on current patterns of healthcare utilization in CLL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used data from Danish nation-wide registers to study healthcare utilization the year before and the year after CLL diagnosis and in relation to first-line treatment. Patients diagnosed with CLL between 1997 and 2018 were included and stratified on number of comorbidities, presence of specific comorbidities, and fitness status, respectively. Healthcare utilization was studied in terms of hospital admissions, in-hospital bed days, out-patient visits, emergency room visits, and prescription drugs. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for age, sex, and calendar year.

RESULTS

The study comprised 9170 patients with CLL with a median age of 71 years, of whom 35% had ≥1 comorbidity. Healthcare utilization increased markedly upon CLL diagnosis both in patients with and without comorbidities. During the year after CLL diagnosis, 39% were hospitalized, 16% visited an emergency room, 88% visited an out-patient clinic, and 93% received prescription drugs. Both individual comorbidities and the total number of comorbidities were associated with increased healthcare utilization of all types, except for contacts to hematological departments.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that CLL diagnosis may unveil incipient diseases and aggravate comorbidities and thereby have considerably wider health implications than those directly related to CLL. These findings may be used by clinicians and decisions makers to guide planning of multidisciplinary care for cancer patients.

Dose intensity for induction in acute myeloid leukemia: what, when, and for whom?

Intensive chemotherapy has been the backbone of the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for decades. However, an increase in novel targeted agents, which has been brought about in part by a deeper understanding of the genetic makeup of AML, has led to remission-inducing regimens that do not require traditional cytotoxic agents. Combinations of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax have doubled the chance of remission for patients considered unfit for induction chemotherapy who would have traditionally been offered singleagent HMA. In fact, this regimen may rival the complete remission rate achieved with induction chemotherapy for certain populations such as the very elderly and those with secondary AML, but equivalency has yet to be established. Further advances include the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin and FLT3 inhibitors to induction chemotherapy, which improves survival for patients with core-binding factor and FLT3-mutated AML, respectively. Still, much work is needed to improve the outcomes of the highest-risk subgroups: frail patients and those with high-risk cytogenetics and/or TP53 mutations. Promisingly, the landscape of AML therapy is shifting dramatically and no longer is intensity, when feasible, always the best answer for AML.

Impacts of Pharmacists-Managed Oncology Outpatient Clinic on Resolving Drug-Related Problems in Ambulatory Neoplasm Patients: A Prospective Study in China

Pharmacists are health care professionals who are actively involved in identifying and solving drug-related problems (DRPs) in neoplasm patients. However, the effectiveness of pharmaceutical services at outpatient clinic for neoplasm patients have not been reported in China. This study aims to describe and investigate the impacts of pharmacists-managed oncology outpatient clinic on ambulatory neoplasm patients. We performed a descriptive, prospective study from June 6, 2018 to June 6, 2020. Firstly, we established a pharmacists-managed oncology outpatient clinic and a Pharmacists Work System of Medication Therapy Management (MTM) software with the cooperation of oncologists, pharmacists and software engineers in 2018. Subjects were neoplasm patients who visited the pharmacists-managed outpatient clinic. The pharmacists performed a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s medication and made planned interventions based on the DRPs identified. A total of 215 eligible patients with 707 visits were enrolled and recorded in the MTM software. A total of 316 DRPs (1.47 per patient) were identified. Adverse reactions, non-adherence, untreated indication, and drug interactions were the leading DRPs. 261 (82.6%) of the identified DRPs had been confirmed as resolved and 104 (78.2%) of adverse reactions were improved following pharmacist interventions and 2 to 3 course follow-up. Of the 382 planned interventions, 345 (90.3%) were accepted by patients or physicians. This is the first pharmacists-managed oncology outpatient clinic to describe the type of DRPs in neoplasm patients and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions in China. Pharmacist interventions were efficacious in resolving DRPs and improving adverse reactions. We confirmed that pharmacists have an important role in ambulatory neoplasm patients care.

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and severe drug interactions (SDIs) in older adults with cancer

BACKGROUND

Older adults with cancer frequently have other co-morbidities requiring prescription pharmacotherapy. The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), severe drug interactions (SDIs) and associated risk factors in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This twelve-month prospective observation study was conducted at an Irish Hospital. PIMs were identified in older adults (≥65 years) using STOPP and OncPal criteria; potential SDIs using Stockley's interaction checker.

RESULTS

We enrolled 186 patients; mean age 72.5(SD5.7) years, 46.2% female, mean co-morbidities 7.5(SD3.4), median medications 7(IQR4-9). Polypharmacy (≥6 medications) and major polypharmacy (≥11 medications) were identified in 60.8% and 17.7% respectively. STOPP PIMs were observed in 73.1%; median 2(IQR1-3). The most common PIM identified was any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration (46.5%). For each additional prescription, the odds of receiving a STOPP PIM increased by 79.2% (OR 1.792, 95% CI 1.459-2.02). Potential SDIs were identified in 50.5% participants. The most common were beta-blocker/alpha-blocker (6.5%), selective-serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI)/proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (5.9%) and SSRI/Aspirin (4.8%). For each additional prescription, the odds of an SDI increased by 50.8% (OR 1.508, 95% CI 1.288-1.764). Seventy-seven (41.4%) participants died within six months of enrolment. OncPal PIMs were observed in 81.8% of this cohort, median 2(IQR1-3). The most common OncPal PIM was statin therapy (38%). For each additional prescription, the odds of receiving an OncPal PIM increased by 38.2%, (OR 1.382, 95% CI 1.080-1.767).

CONCLUSIONS

PIMs and SDIs are common in this population. Comprehensive specialist evaluation of medications by a geriatrician may identify PIMs thereby reducing related adverse outcomes such as SDIs.

Age-Related Considerations in Cardio-Oncology

Cardio-Oncology has blossomed as a new field in cardiovascular medicine, in large part due to new therapies, which may have cardiovascular sequelae. Despite this, anthracyclines still serve as cornerstone therapy for most pediatric cancers, several solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Cardiotoxicity is the main limiting concern with anthracyclines, and this is particularly an issue in patients in extremes of age (both young and old patients). Pediatric hearts are susceptible for cardiotoxicity, while in older patients, concomitant risk factors may contribute to lower threshold for cardiotoxic effects. With increasing patient survival, a significant increase in elderly cancer patients and long-term cardiotoxicity effects of anthracyclines, a better mechanistic understanding of age-dependent processes-that define cardiotoxicity-is needed. This review sheds light on how age affects underlying molecular pathways of anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity and aims to provide preventive strategies that can be used in clinical practice.

Drug-related problems in head and neck cancer patients identified by repeated medication reviews on consecutive therapy cycles

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are particularly vulnerable to drug-related problems (DRPs) given the toxicity of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the number and type of potential DRPs (pDRPs) in HNC outpatients undergoing five consecutive cycles of CCRT.

METHODS

A single-centre, non-randomized, non-interventional, observational study was conducted at the Oncological Outpatient Clinic of the Center for Integrated Oncology at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Clinical pharmacists took a comprehensive medication history, documented laboratory data, assessed patients' symptom burden, and retrospectively performed medication reviews at study entry and on the first day of each therapy cycle without any clinical intervention.

RESULTS

In 26 patients, the mean number of pDRPs continuously increased during therapy course, from 4.8 (SD 2.7, range 2-12) at cycle 1 to 6.9 (SD 2.6, range 2-12) at cycle 5, with drug-drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate durations of use, and inappropriate dosage intervals being the most common. Considering only new and recurrent pDRPs, the mean number was 4.3 (SD 2.3, range 2-9) at cycle 1 and lower in the further therapy course with an average of 1.3 (SD 1.7, range 0-7) at cycle 2 and 1.9 (SD 1.5, range 0-5) at cycle 5. The number of pDRPs was found to be associated with medication regimen complexity and health-related quality of life assessed in the first therapy cycle.

CONCLUSION

pDRPs frequently occurred in HNC outpatients demonstrating the need for pharmaceutical care. A methodological framework for repeated medication reviews was established, facilitating implementation into routine healthcare practice.

Impact of a pharmacist and geriatrician medication review on drug-related problems in older outpatients with cancer

OBJECTIVES

Older patients with cancer have increased risk for comorbidity, polypharmacy (PP) and drug related problems (DRP). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a clinical pharmacist and geriatrician medication review (MR) among older outpatients with cancer to optimize management of comorbidities during comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center prospective study among older outpatients with cancer (≥75 years). A pharmacist consultation was added into CGA process. The clinical pharmacist detected and assessed PP and DRP such as potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) according to the Laroche French list and STOPP criteria, START criteria and adverse drug events (ADE) risk. After a multidisciplinary MR, the proposals for prescription modification were sent to general practitioners (GPs).

RESULTS

Fifty-one consenting patients were recruited between May 2016 and March 2017, with a median age of 83 years. Prevalence of PP was 80.4%. 165 DRP were detected among 86% patients (median number of DRP = 3.0): 19.4% were misuse, 43.6% underuse, and 37.0% overuse. A significant decrease was observed in prevalence of PIM use (Laroche: 31.4% versus 5.9%, p = 0.002), START criteria (66.7% to 5.9%; P < 0.001) and ADE score (4.0 before MR versus 2.0 after, p = 0.023). A trend was observed for a lower number of medications (10.0 versus 8.0, p = 0.092) and on STOPP criteria prevalence (56.9% versus 31.4%, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

A clinical pharmacist and a geriatrician MR is effective to detect and reduce DRP in older outpatients with cancer.

Association between clinically relevant toxicities of pazopanib and sunitinib and the use of weak CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors

PURPOSE

Sunitinib and pazopanib, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), may be targets of potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (P-PK-DDIs). While strong cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A4) inhibitors or inducers should cause a clinically relevant modification in plasma TKI concentrations, the effect of weak inhibitors is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between weak P-PK-DDI and clinically relevant toxicity in real life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study including patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib for any malignancies, for whom a PK-DDI analysis was performed before starting TKI. The primary endpoint was the correlation between P-PK-DDIs and a dose decrease after 1 month of treatment. The secondary endpoint was the correlation between PK-DDIs and drug withdrawal due to toxicity.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were assessed. A P-PK-DDI with weak CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibition was found in 14 patients. In patients with P-PK-DDI or without, the dose was reduced during the first month in 57.1% and 17.7% (p = 0.003) and the drug withdrawn in 42.8% and 11.3% (p = 0.011), respectively. In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation was found between P-PK-DDI (CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors) and dose reduction, and between drug withdrawal and PK-DDI (CYP3A4 inhibitors).

CONCLUSION

P-PK-DDI was correlated with dose reduction and drug withdrawal due to toxicity. The causality of this relationship warrants to be assessed; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary in patients treated with TKI.

Design of the functional requirements of a smartphone app for patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents: The e-OncoSalud® app

Objective

To design a mobile app based on the needs of the onco-hematological patient receiving oral antineoplastic agents.

Methods

A multidisciplinary working group (pharmacy–oncology–hematology) was created to design the app. The study was developed in three phases: first, we analyzed the features of patients receiving oral antineoplastic agents. We then analyzed available apps for cancer patients. Finally, we designed the app's functionalities.

Results

We included 51 patients with middle-advanced age (68.7 years (SD=10.7)). They were polymedicated (mean: 5.3 (SD = 2.7), with numerous drug–drug interactions and adverse effects (all patients presented adverse effects). We then analyzed 166 apps. Most apps had more than one use, the most frequent being information (39.8%) and diagnosis (38.6%). Ten apps (6%) were for registering and monitoring treatment and adverse effects. Almost half of the apps (48.8%) were developed by healthcare organizations. Finally, we designed an app (e-OncoSalud®) with the following functionalities: (a) agenda; (b) treatment and drug interactions checker; (c) continuous recording of self-controls (weight, blood pressure, general condition) and adverse effects. The management of the adverse effects are based on an algorithm which provides different recommendations according to the adverse effects severity; (d) patient–pharmacist messaging in real-time; (e) education.

Conclusions

After analysis of the main problems affecting these patients and the needs not covered by the existing apps, we designed e-OncoSalud®. It integrates relevant information about their treatment, focused on drug interactions identification and the prevention, and management of adverse effects.

Adverse Drug Reactions in an Oncological Population: Prevalence, Predictability, and Preventability

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to determine (a) the prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in patients with cancer and (b) the prevalence, predictability, and preventability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) causing/contributing to hospitalization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a 12-month prospective observational study of patients aged ≥16 years admitted to an oncology center. Older adults were aged ≥70 years.

RESULTS

We enrolled 350 patients: 52.3% (n = 183) female, mean age 63.6 years (SD 12.1), 36.6% (n = 121) aged ≥70 years. Multimorbidity (≥2 conditions) was identified in 96.9%; 68% had ≥5 conditions. The median number of medications was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-8); 47% were prescribed ≥6 medications and 11.4% ≥11 medications. Older adults had higher numbers of comorbid conditions (7 [IQR 5-10] vs. 5 [IQR 3-7]) and were prescribed more medications (median 7 [IQR 4-9] vs. 4 [IQR 2-7]). ADRs caused/contributed to hospitalization in 21.5% (n = 75): 35.8% (n = 72) of emergency admissions and 4.7% (n = 3) of elective admissions. The most common ADRs were neutropenia with infection (25.3%), dyspepsia/nausea/vomiting (20%), and constipation (20%). Causative medications included systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs; 53.3%), opioids (17.3%), corticosteroids (6.7%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (5.3%). ADR prevalence was similar in older and younger adults secondary to SACTs (8.3% vs. 13.1%), non-cancer medications (10.7% vs. 8.3%), and both (0% vs. 1.3%). ADRs were predictable in 89.3% (n = 67), definitely avoidable in 29.3% (n = 22), and possibly avoidable in 33.3% (n = 25). No association was identified between ADRs and age, gender, daily medication number, length of stay, or death. No ADR predictor variables were identified by logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

More than 21% of admissions to an oncology service are ADR-related. ADRs are caused by both SACTs and non-cancer-specific medications. The majority are predictable; ≥60% may be preventable. Patients with cancer have high levels of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which require vigilance for related adverse outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A diagnosis of cancer often occurs in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Cancer can cause an altered physiological environment, placing patients at risk of drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study identified that ADRs caused or contributed to one in five hospital admissions of patients with cancer. ADRs were caused by systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) in 53.3% of cases and non-cancer medications in 45.4% of cases, and a combination of both in 1.3%. ADRs occurred in similar frequencies in older and younger patients secondary to SACTs (8.3% vs. 13.1%, p = .295), non-SACTs (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p = .107), and a combination of both (0% vs. 1.3%, p = .240). The majority of ADRs were predictable (89.3%) and potentially preventable (62.6%). These findings support the need for increased awareness of medication-related adversity in patients with cancer and interventions to minimize their occurrence, thus supporting the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines that recommend adults ≥65 years of age receiving chemotherapy have geriatric assessment to identify medical and medication issues.

Polypharmacy in elderly cancer patients: Challenges and the way clinical pharmacists can contribute in resource-limited settings

The aim of this study was to address the problems associated with polypharmacy in elderly cancer patients and to highlight the role of pharmacists in such cases in resource-limited settings. A narrative review of existing literature was performed to summarize the evidence regarding the impact of polypharmacy in elderly cancer patients and the pharmaceutical strategies to manage it. This review emphasizes the significance of polypharmacy, which is often ignored in real clinical practice. Polypharmacy in the elderly cancer population is mainly due to: chemotherapy with one or more neoplastic agents for cancer treatment, treatment for adverse drug reactions due to neoplastic agents, the patient's comorbid conditions, or drug interactions. The role of the clinical pharmacist in specialized oncology hospitals or oncology departments of tertiary care hospitals is well established; however, this is not the case in many developing countries. A clinical pharmacist can contribute to solving the problems associated with polypharmacy by identifying the risks associated with polypharmacy and its management in resource-limited settings. As in many developed countries, the involvement of a clinical pharmacist in cancer care for elderly patients may play a vital role in the recognition and management of polypharmacy-related problems. Further research can be conducted to support this role.

Evaluation of potentially inappropriate medication utilization in elderly patients with cancer at outpatient oncology unit

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients with cancer.

Method

This study was conducted at outpatient oncology clinic from December 2014 to March 2015 among elderly cancer patients. Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria were used to identify potentially inappropriate medication in elderly patients.

Results

Among 114 cancer patients 55.26% of them were male and the mean age of them was 71.78 ± 5.50 (years). The most common concurrent diseases were hypertension in 45 (39.47%) and diabetes in 26 (22.81%) patients. Polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was seen in 94.73% of them. Eighteen patients (15.79%) utilized medications inappropriately according to Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria. Medication omissions were identified in 112 patients (98.25%) with Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria.

Conclusions

Clinical pharmacists could improve the current prescribing practices in elderly patients with cancer by assessing potentially inappropriate medications.

A systematic review of the impact of outpatient clinical pharmacy services on medication-related outcomes in patients receiving anticancer therapies

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving anticancer therapies are frequently prescribed complex and high-risk medication regimens, which at times can result in medication misadventures. The objective of this review was to assess the effect of outpatient clinical pharmacy services on medication-related outcomes in patients receiving anticancer therapies, including patients undergoing radiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of original publications indexed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library from June 2007 to June 2017. Eligible studies evaluated outpatient pharmacy clinic services for cancer patients and reported at least one medication-related quantitative outcome measure. Two authors independently reviewed full-text articles for inclusion, then extracted data and performed quality and risk of bias assessments.

RESULTS

Of 908 identified publications, 13 met predefined eligibility criteria; 1 randomised control trial, 2 controlled cohort studies and 10 uncontrolled before-after studies. Many excluded studies described outpatient pharmacy services but lacked medication-related outcomes. All included studies had informative practice model designs, with interventions for drug-related problems including drug dose optimisation ( n = 8), reduced drug interaction ( n = 6) and adverse drug reaction reporting ( n = 3). Most studies ( n = 11) reported on symptom improvement, commonly nausea ( n = 7) and pain ( n = 5). Of four studies in radiotherapy cohorts, pharmacist involvement was associated with improved symptoms, satisfaction and wellbeing scores.

CONCLUSION

Few studies have objectively assessed outpatient pharmacy cancer services, even fewer in the radiotherapy settings. Although the results support these services, significant heterogeneity and bias in the study designs prohibit robust conclusions and further controlled trials are required.

Use of prescription drugs among women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer patients often suffer from chronic diseases requiring drug treatment. We assessed temporal patterns of drug use among women with ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified all postmenopausal women with epithelial ovarian cancer in Denmark 2005-2012 and a comparison cohort of age-matched women without cancer. We calculated rates of new drug treatment and total drug use and examined use of new and prevalent drugs before and after diagnosis. Analyses were stratified by histological type and stage of epithelial ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

We identified 2742 patients. The rate of new drug treatment increased from 3 to 5 months before diagnosis and peaked in the first month after diagnosis at 99 new types of drug therapy per 100 individuals (mainly antiemetics, proton-pump inhibitors, hypnotics, and opioids). Although declining, the rate of new drug use remained substantially higher among epithelial ovarian cancer patients than among controls throughout the 3-year postdiagnosis follow-up period. The number of prevalent drugs increased slightly from a median of 4 drugs (interquartile range 2-7) before diagnosis to 5 drugs (interquartile range 2-8) shortly after the diagnosis. The use of preventive drugs decreased only slightly after diagnosis. In stratified analyses, we found limited variation according to histological type, whereas patterns were slightly more pronounced among women with nonlocalized disease compared with localized disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug use among postmenopausal women with epithelial ovarian cancer was substantial and varied considerably in relation to the time of cancer diagnosis, although only limited changes were seen in the use of preventive medicines.

The prevalence of major drug-drug interactions in older adults with cancer and the role of clinical decision support software

OBJECTIVES

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) represent an escalating concern for older adults attributed to polypharmacy, multi-morbidity and organ dysfunction. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of major DDIs and the variability between DDI detection software which confuses management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prevalence of major DDIs was examined as a secondary analysis of outpatients aged ≥65 years. Demographic and clinical information was collected from electronic health records including age, sex, race, cancer type, comorbidities, and medications. All DDIs were screened by a clinical pharmacist using Lexi-Interact® and Micromedex®. Major DDIs were defined as Lexi-Interact® category D or X and/or Micromedex® category major or contraindication. Summary statistics of patient characteristics and DDIs were computed.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 142 patients (mean age, 77.7 years; 56% women, 73% Caucasian). The mean medications was 9.8 including 6.7 prescriptions, 2.6 non-prescriptions, and 0.5 herbals. Lexi-Interact® identified 310 major DDIs in 69% of patients (n = 98) with an average of 2.2 DDIs per patient. Micromedex® identified 315 major DDIs in 61% of patients (n = 87) with an average of 2.2 DDIs per patient. DDIs mostly involved opioids, antiplatelets, electrolyte supplements, antiemetics, and antidepressants. Variability existed with the severity rating reporting of the clinical decision support software.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high prevalence of major DDIs in older adults with cancer. Utilizing clinical decision support software was beneficial for detecting DDIs however, variability existed with severity reporting. Future studies need to identify the relevant DDIs with clinical implications in order to optimize medication safety in this population.

Potential Medication-Related Problems in Older Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer Patients in the United States

Background: Older adults are often exposed to multiple medications, some of which could be inappropriate or have the potential to interact with each other. Older cancer patients may be at increased risk for medication-related problems due to exposure to cancer-directed treatment.Methods: We described patterns of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and potential drug-chemotherapy interactions among adults age 66+ years diagnosed with stage I-III breast, stage II-III colon, and stage I to II lung cancer. Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database, patients had to have Medicare Part D coverage with 1+ prescription in the diagnosis month and Medicare Parts A/B coverage in the prior 12 months. We estimated monthly prevalence of any and cancer-related PIM from 6 months pre- to 23 months postcancer diagnosis and 12-month period prevalence of potential drug-chemotherapy interactions.Results: Overall, 19,318 breast, 7,283 colon, and 7,237 lung cancer patients were evaluated. Monthly PIM prevalence was stable prediagnosis (37%-40%), but increased in the year following a colon or lung cancer diagnosis, and decreased following a breast cancer diagnosis. Changes in PIM prevalence were driven primarily by cancer-related PIM in patients on chemotherapy. Potential drug-chemotherapy interactions were observed in all cohorts, with prevalent interactions involving hydrochlorothiazide, warfarin, and proton-pump inhibitors.Conclusions: There was a high burden of potential medication-related problems among older cancer patients; future research to evaluate outcomes of these exposures is warranted.Impact: Older adults diagnosed with cancer have unique medication management needs. Thus, pharmacy specialists should be integrated into multidisciplinary teams caring for these patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(1); 41-49. ©2017 AACR.

Definition of Unfit for Standard Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

Determining who is fit or unfit for standard treatments among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a challenge. However, available evidence can provide guidance on strategies to assess and categorize fitness. Evidence is strongest to guide identification of "frail" older adults at the time of diagnosis based on performance status, physical function, and comorbidity. Many older adults, with adequate performance status and comorbidity burden, however, may be better characterized as "vulnerable". These patients have subclinical impairments that limit resilience when stressed with intensive therapies. More sensitive assessment strategies are needed to differentiate fit and vulnerable older adults regardless of chronologic age. Research is ongoing to identify tools and approaches, such as geriatric assessment, that can enhance characterization of fitness for AML therapies. This review will highlight available evidence for assessment of fitness among older adults with AML and discuss implications for practice and research.

Integrated safety analysis of rolapitant with coadministered drugs from phase II/III trials: an assessment of CYP2D6 or BCRP inhibition by rolapitant

BACKGROUND

Rolapitant, a long-acting neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonist (RA), has demonstrated efficacy in prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients administered moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Unlike other NK1 RAs, rolapitant does not inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, but it does inhibit CYP2D6 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). To analyze potential drug-drug interactions between rolapitant and concomitant medications, this integrated safety analysis of four double-blind, randomized phase II or III studies of rolapitant examined adverse events (AEs) by use versus non-use of drug substrates of CYP2D6 or BCRP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either 180 mg oral rolapitant or placebo ∼1-2 h before chemotherapy in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 RA and dexamethasone. Data for treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious AEs (TESAEs) during cycle 1 were pooled across the four studies and summarized in the overall population and by concomitant use/non-use of CYP2D6 or BCRP substrate drugs.

RESULTS

In the integrated safety population, 828 of 1294 patients (64%) in the rolapitant group and 840 of 1301 patients (65%) in the control group experienced at least one TEAE. Frequencies of common TEAEs were similar in the rolapitant and control populations. Overall, 53% of patients received CYP2D6 substrate drugs, none of which had a narrow therapeutic index (like thioridazine or pimozide), and 63% received BCRP substrate drugs. When grouped by concomitant use versus non-use of CYP2D6 or BCRP substrate drugs, TEAEs and TESAEs occurred with similar frequency in the rolapitant and control populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the safety of rolapitant as part of an antiemetic triple-drug regimen in patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy, including those administered concomitant medications that are substrates of CYP2D6 or BCRP, such as ondansetron, docetaxel, or irinotecan.

Drug Prescription Including Interactions with Anticancer Treatments in the Elderly: A Global Approach

BACKGROUND

Consequences of inappropriate prescriptions and polymedication in patients suffering from cancer are beginning to be well documented. However, the methods used to evaluate these consequences are often discussed. Few studies evaluate the risk of interaction with anticancer drugs in elderly patients suffering from cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence (i) of polypharmacy, (ii) of potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions and (iii) of drug interactions involving anticancer treatments, using a multiple reference tools.

DESIGN

A retrospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study performed from January to December 2012.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 65 years or older suffering from cancer presented at the oncogeriatric multidisciplinary meeting.

MEASUREMENTS

Polymedication (>6 drugs), potentially inappropriate prescriptions and drug interactions involving anticancer treatment were analyzed in combination with explicit and implicit criteria within a global approach.

RESULTS

Among the 106 patients included in this study, polypharmacy was present in 60.4% of cases, potentially inappropriate drug prescription in 63.1% and drug interactions in 16% of case, of which 47% involved anti-cancer treatments. Twenty-seven major drug interactions were identified and eight interactions involved chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Polymedication, inappropriate prescribing and drug interactions involving anti-cancer drugs are common and largely underestimated in elderly cancer patients.

A Comprehensive Look at Polypharmacy and Medication Screening Tools for the Older Cancer Patient

: Inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy are extremely common among older adults. Numerous studies have discussed the importance of a comprehensive medication assessment in the general geriatric population. However, only a handful of studies have evaluated inappropriate medication use in the geriatric oncology patient. Almost a dozen medication screening tools exist for the older adult. Each available tool has the potential to improve aspects of the care of older cancer patients, but no single tool has been developed for this population. We extensively reviewed the literature (MEDLINE, PubMed) to evaluate and summarize the most relevant medication screening tools for older patients with cancer. Findings of this review support the use of several screening tools concurrently for the elderly patient with cancer. A deprescribing tool should be developed and included in a comprehensive geriatric oncology assessment. Finally, prospective studies are needed to evaluate such a tool to determine its feasibility and impact in older patients with cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The prevalence of polypharmacy increases with advancing age. Older adults are more susceptible to adverse effects of medications. "Prescribing cascades" are common, whereas "deprescribing" remains uncommon; thus, older patients tend to accumulate medications over time. Older patients with cancer are at high risk for adverse drug events, in part because of the complexity and intensity of cancer treatment. Additionally, a cancer diagnosis often alters assessments of life expectancy, clinical status, and competing risk. Screening for polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications could reduce the risk for adverse drug events, enhance quality of life, and reduce health care spending for older cancer patients.

Elderly acute myeloid leukemia: assessing risk

Treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is challenging in part due to the difficulty of accurately predicting risks and benefits of available therapies. While older patients represent the majority of those with newly diagnosed disease, there remains no consensus regarding optimal therapy. Older age is associated with increased risk of treatment-related toxicity and worse survival compared to younger adults. Age-related outcome disparity in the setting of AML therapy is clearly attributed in part to differences in tumor biology conferring resistance to therapy. However, physiologic changes of aging that decrease treatment tolerance also influence outcomes and vary among patients of the same chronologic age. Measurable patient characteristics such as comorbidity and physical function can reflect the heterogeneity of physiologic aging among older patients and help predict resilience during and after the stress of diagnosis and treatment. To improve outcomes for older adults with AML, it will be critical to investigate the predictive utility of patient characteristics in parallel with tumor biology to improve decision-making, inform trial design, and identify actionable targets for supportive care interventions. This review will focus on available data addressing risk assessment for older adults treated for AML with a focus on patient characteristics that may reflect vulnerability to poor treatment tolerance.

Treating older adults with cancer: geriatric perspectives

The proportion of older adults (age 65 and older) in oncology practices continues to increase. Older adults present with unique issues that complicate management decisions and evidence from randomized clinical trials to inform management of these patients is lacking. Despite this, principles of geriatric medicine need to be incorporated into oncology practice to provide optimal individualized care to patients. There is increasing evidence from observational studies that geriatric assessment (GA) strategies can be applied in oncology, can help predict treatment outcomes, and can inform supportive care management for older adults. In this review, we discuss the principles of GA and their use in older adults with cancer. In addition, considerations on when to refer to a geriatrician and issues related to management of vulnerable older adults will be addressed.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Assessment Used to Identify Prevalence of and Associations With Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use Among Ambulatory Senior Adults With Cancer

Purpose

The use of multiple and/or inappropriate medications in seniors is a significant public health problem, and cancer treatment escalates its prevalence and complexity. Existing studies are limited by patient self-report and medical record extraction compared with a pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively examined medication use in ambulatory senior adults with cancer to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy (PP) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and associated factors. PP was defined as concurrent use of five or more and less than 10 medications, and excessive polypharmacy (EPP) was defined as 10 or more medications. PIMs were categorized by 2012 Beers Criteria, Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP), and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).

Results

A total of 248 patients received a geriatric oncology assessment between January 2011 and June 2013 (mean age was 79.9 years, 64% were women, 74% were white, and 87% had solid tumors). Only 234 patients (evaluated by pharmacists) were included in the final analysis. Mean number of medications used was 9.23. The prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use was 41% (n = 96), 43% (n = 101), and 51% (n = 119), respectively. 2012 Beers, STOPP, and HEDIS criteria classified 173 occurrences of PIMs, which were present in 40%, 38%, and 21% of patients, respectively. Associations with PIM use were PP (P < .001) and increased comorbidities (P = .005).

Conclusion

A pharmacist-led comprehensive medication assessment demonstrated a high prevalence of PP, EPP, and PIM use. Medication assessments that integrate both 2012 Beers and STOPP criteria and consider cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and cancer-related therapy are needed to optimize medication use in this population.

Potentially inappropriate medication use in older people with cancer: prevalence and correlates

OBJECTIVES

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use has been associated with an increase in adverse drug events, hospitalization and mortality. This study investigated the prevalence and factors associated with PIM use in patients presenting to a medical oncology outpatient clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n=385) aged ≥ 70 years referred to a medical oncology outpatient clinic between January 2009 and July 2010 completed a structured data collection instrument. The instrument assessed medication use, diagnoses, self-reported falls in the previous six months, pain (10-point visual analog scale [VAS]) and distress (10-point VAS). Frailty was defined using exhaustion, weight loss, Karnofsky Performance Scale, instrumental activities of daily living and physical function. PIM use was defined by the Beers Criteria. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with PIM use.

RESULTS

In total, 26.5% (n=102) of the sample used ≥1 PIM. The five most prevalent classes of PIMs were benzodiazepines (n=34, 8.8%), tricyclic antidepressants (n=16, 4.2%), alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists (prazosin) (n=15, 3.9%), propulsives (metoclopramide) (n=15, 3.9%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=14, 3.6%). In multivariate analyses, PIM use was associated with age 75-79 years (OR 1.83; 95%CI 1.02-3.26) compared to age 70-74 years, using ≥ 5 medications (OR 4.10; 95%CI 2.26-7.44) compared to <5 medications and being frail (OR 3.05; 95%CI 1.18-7.87) compared to being robust.

CONCLUSION

More than one quarter of older people with cancer used one or more PIMs, and this was associated with being frail compared to being robust.

The prognostic importance of polypharmacy in older adults treated for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)

We retrospectively evaluated the prognostic significance of polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use among 150 patients >60 years of age receiving induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). After adjustment for age and comorbidity, increased number of medications at diagnosis (≥ 4 versus ≤ 1) was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR=9.98, 95% CI=1.18-84.13), lower odds of complete remission status (OR=0.20, 95% CI=0.06-0.65), and higher overall mortality (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.15-3.92). Inappropriate medication use (classified according to Beers criteria) was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes. Polypharmacy warrants further study as a modifiable marker of vulnerability among older adults with AML.

Potential drug interactions and chemotoxicity in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Increased risk of drug interactions due to polypharmacy and aging-related changes in physiology among older patients with cancer is further augmented during chemotherapy. No previous studies examined potential drug interactions (PDIs) from polypharmacy and their association with chemotherapy tolerance in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective medical chart review of 244 patients aged 70+ years who received chemotherapy for solid or hematological malignancies. PDI among all drugs, supplements, and herbals taken with the first chemotherapy cycle were screened for using the Drug Interaction Facts software, which classifies PDIs into five levels of clinical significance with level 1 being the highest. Descriptive and correlative statistics were used to describe rates of PDI. The association between PDI and severe chemotoxicity was tested with logistic regressions adjusted for baseline covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 769 PDIs were identified in 75.4% patients. Of the 82 level 1 PDIs identified among these, 32 PDIs involved chemotherapeutics. A large proportion of the identified PDIs were of minor clinical significance. The risk of severe non-hematological toxicity almost doubled with each level 1 PDI (OR=1.94, 95% CI: 1.22-3.09), and tripled with each level 1 PDI involving chemotherapeutics (OR=3.08, 95% CI: 1.33-7.12). No association between PDI and hematological toxicity was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this convenience sample of older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy we found notable rates of PDI and a substantial adjusted impact of PDI on risk of non-hematological toxicity. These findings warrant further research to optimize chemotherapy outcomes.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer

PURPOSE

Polypharmacy has been associated with drug-drug interactions, adverse drug events, hospitalisation and increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in older people with cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged≥70 years (n=385) presenting to the medical oncology outpatient clinic at Royal Adelaide Hospital between January 2009 and July 2010 completed a structured data collection instrument. The instrument included domains related to medications, diagnoses, instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), physical function (SF-36), pain (ten-point visual analogue scale, VAS), weight loss (patient self-reported over previous 6 months), exhaustion (CES-D) and distress (ten-point VAS). Frailty was computed using Fried's frailty phenotype. Logistic regression was used to compute unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between polypharmacy (defined as five or more self-reported daily medications) and clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy was present in 57% (n=221) of patients. When adjusting for age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy was associated with being pre-frail (OR=2.35, 95%CI=1.43-3.86) and frail (OR=4.48, 95%CI=1.90-10.54) compared to being robust. When adjusting for age, gender, exhaustion, KPS, IADLs, pain and distress, polypharmacy was associated with higher CCI scores (OR=1.58, 95%CI=1.29-1.94) and poorer physical function (OR=1.13, 95%CI=1.06-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is highly prevalent in older people with cancer and associated with impaired physical function and being pre-frail and frail compared to being robust. Research is needed to identify strategies to minimize patients' medication regimens.

Polypharmacy and the management of the older cancer patient

Aging is associated with polymorbidity and polypharmacy. In the absence of a consensual definition, polypharmacy has been defined according to the number of drugs that an individual takes or to the presence of the risk of at least one severe drug interaction. In older cancer patients, polypharmacy is at least as common as it is in individuals of the same age without cancer. The management of cancer itself may result in the addition of more medications to counteract the adverse effects of antineoplastic treatment. Polypharmacy may be necessary to control the multiple health conditions of the older person, but it may represent a risk factor for more complications from antineoplastic therapy, and it may affect the outcome of cancer treatment. Polypharmacy is also associated with increased cost. The criteria proposed for the management of polypharmacy include the assessment that all medical conditions are properly treated, the avoidance of drug interactions, and of drugs that may compromise the outcome of antineoplastic treatment and the choice of drugs with the lowest risk of complications in older individuals.

Health literacy and urbanicity among cancer patients

PURPOSE

Low health literacy is associated with inadequate health care utilization and poor health outcomes, particularly among elderly persons. There is a dearth of research exploring the relationship between health literacy and place of residence (urbanicity). This study examined the association between urbanicity and health literacy, as well as factors related to low health literacy, among cancer patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted with a population-based sample of 1,841 cancer patients in Wisconsin. Data on sociodemographics, urbanicity, clinical characteristics, insurance status, and health literacy were obtained from the state's cancer registry and participants' answers to a mailed questionnaire. Partially and fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to examine: (1) the association between urbanicity and health literacy and (2) the role of socioeconomic status as a possible mediator of this relationship.

FINDINGS

Rural cancer patients had a 33% (95% CI: 1.06-1.67) higher odds of having lower levels of health literacy than their counterparts in more urban areas of Wisconsin. The association between urbanicity and health literacy attenuated after controlling for socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Level of urbanicity was significantly related to health literacy. Socioeconomic status fully mediated the relationship between urbanicity and health literacy. These results call for policies and interventions to assess and address health literacy barriers among cancer patients in rural areas.

Twelve-month frequency of drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter-based drug-drug interaction potential in patients receiving oral enzyme-targeted kinase inhibitor antineoplastic agents

OBJECTIVE

To describe 12-month rates and patterns of coprescription of drugs that potentially create drug-drug interactions (DDIs) through shared metabolic or transport pathways for 9 enzyme-targeted kinase inhibitor oral antineoplastic drugs (OADs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a deidentified pharmacy claims database identifying patients prescribed dasatinib, erlotinib, everolimus, imatinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, or sunitinib between January 1, 2008, and May 31, 2010. Coprescribing was 1 or more overlapping days of supply between the OAD and potential DDI drugs during the 12-month period beginning on the OAD index date. Product labels identified the cytochrome P450 metabolic enzymes used and whether P-glycoprotein was used by the OADs. Drugs that induce and/or inhibit these pathways were identified from the label and online resources.

RESULTS

Sample sizes ranged from 96 (pazopanib group) to 4617 (imatinib group). Coprescribing rates with drugs that may decrease OAD effectiveness were 359/1546 (23%) (sunitinib group) to 1851/3263 (57%) (erlotinib group). Coprescribing rates with drugs that may increase OAD toxicity were 364/1546 (24%) (sunitinib group) to 71/96 (74%) (pazopanib group). Patients coprescribed DDI drugs had a median of 1 to 4 more medications present on the OAD index date than those not coprescribed a DDI drug. Most groups coprescribed DDI drugs had a median of 180 or more OAD days of supply during follow-up. The proportion of OAD days of supply with overlapping days of DDI drugs ranged from 7% to 85%. Generally, oncologists prescribed the OAD and nononcologists the DDI drug.

CONCLUSION

Coprescription of drugs that induce or inhibit metabolic pathways used by enzyme-targeted kinase inhibitor OADs is high. The clinical consequences need further study.