Drug therapy in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations

Cancer therapy in patients with reduced kidney function

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cancer constitute two major public health burdens, and both are on the rise. Moreover, the number of patients affected simultaneously by both conditions is growing. The potential nephrotoxic effect of cancer therapies is particularly important for patients with CKD, as they are also affected by several comorbidities. Therefore, administering the right therapy at the right dose for patients with decreased kidney function can represent a daunting challenge. We review in detail the renal toxicities of anticancer therapies, i.e. conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors and radioligand therapies, issue recommendations for patient monitoring along with guidance on when to withdraw treatment and suggest dosage guidelines for select agents in advanced stage CKD. Various electrolytes disturbances can occur as the result of the administration of anticancer agents in the patient with decreased kidney function. These patients are prone to developing hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and other metabolic abnormalities because of a decreased glomerular filtration rate. Therefore, all electrolytes, minerals and acid base status should be checked at baseline and before each administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Moreover, studies on patients on kidney replacement therapy are very limited and only single cases or small case series have been published. Therefore, clinical therapeutical decisions in cancer patients with decreased function should be made by multidisciplinary teams constituted of medical oncologists, nephrologists and other specialists. Onconephrology is an evolving and expanding subspecialty. It is crucial to consider anticancer drug treatment in these patients and offer them a chance to be treated effectively.

Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Children with Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly encountered comorbidity in critically ill children. The coexistence of AKI disturbs drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, leading to clinically significant consequences. This can complicate an already critical clinical scenario by causing potential underdosing or overdosing giving way to possible therapeutic failures and adverse reactions. Current available studies offer little guidance to help maneuver such complex dosing regimens and decision-making in pediatric patients as most of them are done on heterogeneous groups of adult populations. Though there are some studies on drug dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), their utility is in question because of the recent advances in CRRT technology. Our review aims to discuss the principles of pharmacokinetics pertinent for honing the existing practices of drug dosing in critically ill children with AKI, and the various complexities and intricate challenges involved. This in turn will provide a framework to help enable caretakers to tailor dosing regimens in complex clinical setups with further ease and precision.

Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Infection With Remdesivir in Peritoneal Dialysis

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has been shown to be correlated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infection and mortality. Remdesivir is an effective non-EUA U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antiviral agent for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients, though a lack of data has prevented its use in patients with severe kidney disease including dialysis patients. Some observational studies report the use of remdesivir in hemodialysis patients, but there are no reports of patients treated with remdesivir on peritoneal dialysis. Dialysis modalities may affect drug pharmacokinetics, and safety and efficiency of remdesivir in peritoneal dialysis is unknown. We report the first case, to our knowledge, of using remdesivir in a patient treated with peritoneal dialysis with no significant adverse events. This case illustrates the potential for remdesivir to be considered in peritoneal dialysis patients with severe COVID infection. Proper risk analysis and careful monitoring should be done, given the unpredictable clearance of the drug.

Cancer Drug Dosing in Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis

Patients with malignancies have a high prevalence of kidney disease and are often treated with antineoplastic agents that undergo kidney metabolism or excretion or clearance via renal replacement therapies. Thus, the dosing of these agents, including classic chemotherapeutic drugs, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, must take into account patients' kidney function. In this review, we will discuss the pitfalls of accurate measurement of kidney function and how kidney disease affects both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of drugs. Lastly, we will discuss specific agents and summarize current dosing strategies for use in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease.

Vancomycin in peritoneal dialysis: Clinical pharmacology considerations in therapy

Intraperitoneal vancomycin is the first-line therapy in the management of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis. However, due to the paucity of data, vancomycin dosing for peritonitis in patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is empiric and based on clinical experience rather than evidence. Studies in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients have been used to provide guidelines for dosing and are often extrapolated for APD use, but it is unclear whether this is appropriate. This review summarizes the available pharmacokinetic data used to inform optimal dosing in patients on CAPD or APD. The determinants of vancomycin disposition and pharmacodynamic effects are critically summarized, knowledge gaps explored, and a vancomycin dosing algorithm in PD patients is proposed.

Multiple-Dose-Kinetics of Ofloxacin after Intraperitoneal Application in CAPD Patients

Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin in plasma and peritoneal fluid were studied in 11 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Seven patients without peritonitis received 20 mg ofloxacin added to 2L dialysate i.p. every 6 h for one day only, while 4 patients with acute peritonitis were treated with this same dosage every 4 h for 3 days, then every 6 h for the next 7 days. Ofloxacin concentrations in plasma and dialysate were determined by HPLC.

After i.p. drug application there was a rapid elimination of ofloxacin from dialysate, this being significantly faster in patients with peritonitis as compared to those without. Likewise, the total amount lost from the first bag after a 3 h dwell was higher in the peritonitis group (84.7±1.5%; mean±SEM) than in the non-peritonitis group (75.6±2.1 %). Twenty-four h after start of ofloxacin treatment, the mean peritoneal fluid concentrations at the end of each exchange studied were all above 3 mg/L. In patients with peritonitis, plasma concentrations of ofloxacin rose to 0.94±0.05 mg/L after 24 h reaching a Cmax of 1.8±0.2 mg/L after a tmax of 84±23 h.lntraperitoneal administration of ofloxacin was well tolerated, and no local or systemic adverse events were observed. Peritonitis episodes that were caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis (3) and by E. coli (1) were cured in all patients.

Influence of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis on Elimination of Drugs

Renal failure delays elimination of many drugs thus prolonging their half lives. By knowing the half life and distribution volume, one can estimate total plasma clearance. When measured values have not been reported, endogenous total plasma clearance can be estimated and compared with peritoneal clearance to determine the effect of CAPD on half life. When peritoneal clearance has not been reported, it can be estimated knowing molecular mass and unbound plasma fraction. Such estimates suggest that elimination kinetics of most drugs are not appreciably affected by CAPD. Compared to those of untreated anuric patients, plasma levels of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, some cephalosporins, all aminoglycosides, vancomycin, sfluorocytosine, amantadine, atenolol, sotalol, timolol, chlorpropamide, theophylline and lithium may be reduced somewhat by CAPD. Thus one should monitor plasma levels of these agents to insure therapeutic concentrations rather than simply following the dosage guidelines for anuric patient.

Computer Simulation of Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics in Patients on CAPD

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has become an accepted alternative to chronic hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease. The method utilizes the diffusion of drugs from the blood through the peritoneal membrane to the peritoneal cavity if administered intravenously (IV) and perorally (PO) and in the opposite direction if applied intraperitoneally (IP). The present work uses an open, two-compartment pharmacokinetic model reversibly linked with the compartment representing the peritoneal cavity and an analog-hybrid computer to simulate drug levels in sampled and unsampled compartments under conditions of various routes of administration (IV, IP and sequential IV, IP and PO) and different clinical status (presence and absence of peritonitis). The drug chosen for simulation was ciprofloxacin (CIP), a new synthetic antibacterial agent of the 4-quinolone group. Eight patients were included in the study, and CIP concentrations in plasma and dialysate were obtained by HPLC analysis to assess the reliability of the model and the efficiency of the sequential dosing scheme. CIP plasma and dialysate levels were adequate for the majority of microbes causing CAPD peritonitis. The proposed regimen was efficient in 85% of cases.

An Open, Randomized, Single-Center, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study of Meropenem after Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Administration in Patients Receiving Automated Peritoneal Dialysis

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem in automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) patients. In 6 patients without peritonitis, a single dose of 0.5 g of meropenem was applied intraperitoneally (i.p.) or intravenously (i.v.) and concentrations in serum and dialysate were measured at specified intervals over 24 h with high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The mean maximum concentrations of meropenem in serum (Cmax) were 27.2 mg/liter (standard deviation [SD], ±6.9) and 10.1 mg/liter (SD, ±2.5) and in dialysate were 3.6 mg/liter (SD, ±2.3) and 185.8 mg/liter (SD, ±18.7) after i.v. and i.p. administrations, respectively. The mean areas under the curve from 0 to 24 (AUC0-24) of meropenem in serum were 173.5 mg · h/liter (SD, ±29.7) and 141.4 mg · h/liter (SD, ±37.5) (P = 0.046) and in dialysate were 42.6 mg · h/liter (SD, ±20.0) and 623.4 mg · h/liter (SD, ±84.1) (P = 0.028) after i.v. and i.p. administrations, respectively. The ratios for dialysate exposure over plasma exposure after i.v. and i.p. treatments were 0.2 (SD, ±0.1) and 4.6 (SD, ±0.9), respectively (P = 0.031). A mean target value of 40% T>MIC (time for which the free meropenem concentration exceeds the MIC) for clinically relevant pathogens with EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints of 2 mg/liter was reached in serum after i.p. and i.v. administrations and in dialysate after i.p. but not after i.v. administration. The present data indicate that low i.p. exposure limits the i.v. use of meropenem for PD-associated peritonitis. In contrast, i.p. administration not only results in superior concentrations in dialysate but also might be used to treat systemic infections.

Medication dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease

Appropriate dosage adjustments for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are critical for patient safety. This article reviews adjustments for common antidiabetic, antibiotic, analgesic, and antithrombotic medications, as well as important patient teaching information for over-the-counter (OTC) medications.

Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal and intravenous fosfomycin in automated peritoneal dialysis patients without peritonitis

Blood and dialysate concentrations of fosfomycin were determined after intravenous and intraperitoneal application of 4 mg/liter in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis. Maximum serum concentrations after intravenous (287.75 ± 86.34 mg/liter) and intraperitoneal (205.78 ± 66.78 mg/liter) administration were comparable. Ratios of intraperitoneal to systemic exposure were 1.12 (intraperitoneal administration) and 0.22 (intravenous administration), indicating good systemic exposure after intraperitoneal application but limited penetration of fosfomycin into the peritoneal fluid after the intravenous dose.

Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease-a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)

Drug dosage adjustment for patients with acute or chronic kidney disease is an accepted standard of practice. The challenge is how to accurately estimate a patient's kidney function in both acute and chronic kidney disease and determine the influence of renal replacement therapies on drug disposition. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a conference to investigate these issues and propose recommendations for practitioners, researchers, and those involved in the drug development and regulatory arenas. The conference attendees discussed the major challenges facing drug dosage adjustment for patients with kidney disease. In particular, although glomerular filtration rate is the metric used to guide dose adjustment, kidney disease does affect nonrenal clearances, and this is not adequately considered in most pharmacokinetic studies. There are also inadequate studies in patients receiving all forms of renal replacement therapy and in the pediatric population. The conference generated 37 recommendations for clinical practice, 32 recommendations for future research directions, and 24 recommendations for regulatory agencies (US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) to enhance the quality of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information available to clinicians. The KDIGO Conference highlighted the gaps and focused on crafting paths to the future that will stimulate research and improve the global outcomes of patients with acute and chronic kidney disease.

Medication dosing and renal insufficiency in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: impact of pharmacist consultation

Pediatric patients who have undergone cardiac surgery are at risk for renal insufficiency. The impact of pharmacist consultation in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) has yet to be defined. Patients admitted to the pediatric cardiac ICU at our institution from January through March of 2006 were included. Patient information, collected retrospectively, included: demographics, cardiac lesion/surgery, height, weight, need for peritoneal or hemodialysis, need for mechanical support, highest and lowest serum creatinine, ICU length of stay (LOS), renally eliminated medications, pharmacist recommendations (accepted or not), and appropriateness of dosing changes.There were 140 total admissions (131 patients; age: 3.0 +/- 6.3 years) during the study period. In total, 14 classes of renally eliminated medications were administered, with 32.6 +/- 56.4 doses administered per patient admission. Thirty-seven patient admissions had one or more medications adjusted for renal insufficiency; the most commonly adjusted medication was ranitidine. Patients who required medication adjustment for renal dysfunction were significantly younger compared to those patients not requiring medication adjustment. Pharmacist recommendations were responsible for 96% of medication adjustments for renal dysfunction, and the recommendations were accepted and appropriate all of the time. The monetary impact of pharmacist interventions, in doses saved, was approximately $12,000. Pharmacist consultation can result in improved dosing of medications and cost savings. The youngest patients are most at risk for inappropriate dosing.

Peritoneal fluid titer test for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis

Standard microbiological tests (i.e., MIC) do not account for the unique factors of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis which can significantly influence treatment response. Our goals were to develop a peritoneal fluid titer (PFT) test and to conduct a pilot study of its association with clinical outcome. The methodology was developed by using spent dialysate collected from patients with bacterial PD-related peritonitis prior to the initiation of antibiotics. Dialysate was processed and spiked with antibiotic to simulate two standard intraperitoneal regimens: cefazolin plus tobramycin and cefazolin alone. Thirty-six clinical isolates, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were tested. In the pilot study, dialysate was collected from 14 patients with bacterial PD-related peritonitis. Titers were determined by using each patient's dialysate and infecting pathogen. Titers were highly reproducible, with discrepancies in only 1% of cases. Overall, PFTs were notably higher against gram-positive bacteria (P < 0.0001). The addition of tobramycin increased titers significantly from zero to values of 1/16 to 1/64 against E. cloacae and P. aeruginosa (P < 0.0001). In the pilot study, peritoneal fluid inhibitory titers were significantly associated with clinical outcome, with a median value of 1/96 for patients who were cured compared to 1/32 for those who failed treatment (P = 0.036). In conclusion, this study provides preliminary support for the PFT as a pharmacodynamic index specific to the treatment of PD-related peritonitis. With further characterization and validation in patients, the PFT test may advance the study of antibiotic therapies for PD-related peritonitis.

The clinical course of culture-negative peritonitis complicating peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Culture-negative peritonitis is a serious complication in peritoneal dialysis patients.

METHODS

We studied all consecutive episodes of culture-negative peritonitis in our unit from 1995 to 2001. We identified 1,182 episodes of peritonitis recorded; 212 episodes in 149 patients had negative culture results.

RESULTS

The overall primary response rate was 67.5%, and the complete cure rate was 37.7%. In 95 episodes (44.8%), technical problems during the collection of dialysis effluent were suspected. There was a history of antibiotic therapy within 30 days before the onset in 56 episodes (26.4%). Recent antibiotic therapy was associated with a lower primary response rate (31 of 56 versus 113 of 156 episodes; P = 0.019) and lower complete cure rate (12 of 56 versus 68 of 156 episodes; P = 0.003). Furthermore, a history of peritonitis from 31 to 120 days before the onset also was associated with a lower complete cure rate (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that recent peritonitis was the only independent predictor of treatment failure (odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 5.29).

CONCLUSION

Most of the culture-negative peritonitis could be explained by recent antibiotic therapy or technical problems during dialysate culture. Recent peritonitis and antibiotic therapy are associated with a poor treatment response. Early Tenckhoff catheter removal is recommended in this group of patients.

Automated peritoneal dialysis: new implications for pharmacists

OBJECTIVE

To review the new automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) modalities that are available to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and to examine their potential pharmacokinetic and drug dosing consequences.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (from January 1966 to June 1996) of English-language literature pertaining to peritoneal dialysis was performed. Additional references were obtained by reviewing the references of pertinent articles identified through the search. Tertiary sources were also used.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data regarding peritoneal dialysis techniques and pharmacokinetics were extracted from the literature. Data were evaluated according to the study design, population, results, and conclusions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ESRD is the result of progressive chronic renal insufficiency and requires renal replacement therapy. APD is the fastest growing renal replacement therapy by percentage in the US and provides dialysis exchanges via a machine while the patient sleeps, thereby improving patient convenience, peritoneal dialysis compliance rates, and decreasing peritonitis rates. Well-designed pharmacokinetic studies involving APD have not been conducted. Consequently, no formal drug dosing recommendations are available for APD, and pharmacists must rely on established dosing guidelines for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) when recommending dosing regimens. This article describes the new APD treatment modalities available and the potential pharmacokinetic differences between CAPD and APD.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-designed studies are needed to fully characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs in APD. Until then, pharmacists should recommend that intraperitoneally administered drugs be given during the longest peritoneal dialysate dwell of the day and that serum concentrations of drugs with narrow therapeutic indices be monitored closely.

Pefloxacin clinical pharmacokinetics

Pefloxacin has a broad spectrum of activity against a great number of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. It is also capable of penetration into cells, yielding high tissue:serum ratios, with implications for the treatment of infections caused by intracellular pathogens. Pefloxacin is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. Its elimination half-life ranges from 6.2 to 12.4 hours. After repeated administration, a major change in pharmacokinetic parameters is observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters are minimally altered or not altered in patients with impaired renal function. Altered plasma pharmacokinetics in patients with liver insufficiency and in elderly patients are observed, so dosage adjustments are necessary. In addition, pefloxacin interacts with a number of other compounds at hepatic (e.g. theophylline and cimetidine) and gastrointestinal (e.g. antacids) sites. With the exception of saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, aqueous humor, vitreous fluid and amniotic fluid, body fluid concentrations reach plasma concentrations. Studies on tissue penetration show that concentrations exceeding plasma concentrations are obtained in most tissues. The highest tissue:plasma concentration ratios are achieved in lung and kidney, whereas concentrations in fat are considerably lower than those in plasma.

Drug dosage in patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations

The advantages of continuous haemofiltration and haemodialysis over intermittent haemodialysis for the treatment of acute renal failure are well recognised. In intensive care patients, 4 different continuous procedures, arteriovenous and venovenous haemofiltration (CAVH and CVVH) or haemodialysis (CAVHD and CVVHD), are employed. These effective detoxification treatments require knowledge of their influence on drug disposition. Data on kinetics of drugs during continuous treatment are scarce and limited almost exclusively to the oldest and least effective procedure (CAVH). Selected dialysis membranes may adsorb drugs, as in the case of aminoglycosides. In addition, elimination of substances with large molecular weights may vary depending on the pore size of the membrane, as in the case of vancomycin. Thus, even if drug dosages can be based on pharmacokinetic studies, selection of a dialysis membrane not studied may cause unpredictable drug concentrations. With these limitations in mind and considering the available literature on pharmacokinetics in patients with renal failure, general guidelines for drug dosage during continuous renal replacement therapy can be given. In haemofiltration, drug protein binding is the major factor determining sieving, i.e. the appearance of the drug in the ultrafiltrate. In haemodialysis, diffusion is added to ultrafiltration, and therefore the saturation of the combined dialysate and ultrafiltrate will decrease further with increasing dialysate flow rate. In continuous haemofiltration or haemodialysis the extracorporeal clearance can be calculated by multiplying the saturation value (estimated or, better, measured) with the ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rate. Dividing the extracorporeal clearance by the total clearance (including the nonrenal clearance) gives the fraction of the dose removed due to extracorporeal elimination. Whether dosage recommendations available for anuric patients have to be modified or not can be decided on the basis of this value. In case of high nonrenal clearance, the degree of saturation is without clinical significance. Based on these considerations guidelines have been constructed for the effect of extracorporeal elimination on more than 120 different drugs commonly used in intensive care patients.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a review of its mechanics, advantages, complications, and areas of controversy

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this article is to review the mechanics, advantages, complications, pharmacokinetics, and future trends of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) as they pertain to pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Pertinent articles were obtained from an English-language literature search using MEDLINE (1980-1991), Index Medicus (1987-1990), and bibliographic reviews of review articles. Indexing terms included peritoneal dialysis, pharmacokinetics, peritonitis, vancomycin, and fluoroquinolones.

DATA SYNTHESIS

All clinical studies comparing organism recovery methods and treatment of peritonitis have methodologic limitations (e.g., comparison of disparate patient groups, different definitions of peritonitis, lack of follow-up, lack of control for sterile cultures) that may affect the reported results.

CONCLUSIONS

CAPD is an alternative to hemodialysis for the treatment of endstage renal disease and has many complications, leading to significant morbidity. This indicates that CAPD is not appropriate for all patients. Using blood-culturing techniques to culture for dialysate is most productive, but also the most costly. There are few data to indicate exactly the drugs, doses, and durations of choice for peritonitis. Both intraperitoneal and oral administration appear to be appropriate.

Considerations in dosage selection for third generation cephalosporins

Pharmacokinetic parameters of third generation cephalosporins vary widely, requiring different dosage regimens and adjustment methods for each agent. Although their antibacterial spectrum favours their usage in infections caused by aerobic Gram-negative organisms, due to their limited post-antibiotic effect against these organisms, dosage regimens should ensure that free drug concentrations at the site of infection remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration for as much of the dosage interval as possible in patients with normal host defence mechanisms and for the entire dosage interval in immunocompromised patients. Altered protein binding encountered in various disease states can affect both microbiological and pharmacokinetic properties especially for drugs with high protein binding. Since the concentrations at the site of action are often different from those in serum, a higher or lower range of dosages needs to be selected depending on the target site. Decreased renal function affects the elimination of most third generation cephalosporins, whereas the presence of hepatic disease does not generally necessitate dosage adjustment. Because of the complex age-related physiological changes in paediatric and elderly patients, dosage should be adjusted on the basis of the reported pharmacokinetic data in these populations. The usual recommended dose may or may not be optimal in a given condition depending on the complex interactions between pharmacokinetic, microbiological and other host factors.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and kinetic-dynamic relationships of dilevalol and labetalol

Dilevalol and labetalol are examples of a growing number of new beta-blockers which combine nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonism with vasodilator activity. Dilevalol is one of the 4 stereoisomers of labetalol, and is estimated to form approximately 25% of the racemic drug. Labetalol itself is an alpha 1-antagonist but dilevalol, which has negligible affinity for alpha-receptors, exerts its vasodilator effect via beta 2-agonism. Both drugs are rapidly and completely absorbed in 60 to 90 min and subject to extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism; the average bioavailability after oral administration is around 20 to 35%, and there is wide interindividual variability in plasma drug concentrations and dosage requirements. The volume of distribution of dilevalol (17 to 25 L/kg) is higher than that reported for labetalol (3 to 16 L/kg), although both drugs are concentrated in the extravascular compartment. Correspondingly, the elimination half-life of dilevalol at steady-state is around 15h compared with 8h for labetalol. There is evidence that the pharmacokinetics of dilevalol change (a reduction in clearance) in translation from single-dose to long term therapy. There is no clinically significant effect of age on the steady-state disposition of either drug and the pharmacokinetics of labetalol appear to be unchanged during pregnancy. Although there is a linear relationship between dose and area under the concentration-time curve, early studies found no evidence of a simple relationship between dose or plasma drug concentration and the fall in blood pressure. However, an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model has been used to correlate concentrations of both drugs with reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in individuals. This approach derives a mathematical description of antihypertensive response which integrates pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information and also takes account of placebo effects and changes in drug concentration and blood pressure during the dosage interval. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of labetalol are characterised by a linear model. For example, in a group of healthy volunteers, the 'responsiveness' to labetalol was -0.19mm Hg/micrograms/L. In contrast, the relationships of dilevalol are best described by a Langmuir maximum effect model, and so individual responses to short and long term treatment have been quantified by the concentration-effect parameters of maximum effect and drug concentration required to produce 50% of this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of single-dose intravenous, oral, and intraperitoneal pefloxacin in patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Comparison of plasma and dialysate concentrations of pefloxacin after intravenous, oral, or intraperitoneal administration shows excellent bidirectional diffusion of the quinolone through the peritoneal membrane, demonstrating that therapeutical concentrations can be achieved in the dialysate after intravenous or oral administration. In this study, the half-life of the drug was 18.8 +/- 1.4 h, i.e., apparently longer than that reported for normal controls or uremic patients on hemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The pharmacokinetics of fluconazole given orally (100 mg) or intraperitoneally (50 and 150 mg) were determined in 15 patients with chronic renal failure who were undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. The half-life (72 to 85 hours) was intermediate between values obtained in healthy volunteers and in patients with renal insufficiency studied during an interhaemodialysis period. The peritoneal clearance, 0.26 to 0.33 L/h, led to an 18% recovery of administered drug in the dialysates after 48 hours. The peritoneal absorption was slow (time to peak plasma concentration 7 hours) but the peritoneal bioavailability was excellent at 87 +/- 5%. The mean concentrations of fluconazole up to 24 hours were 770 and 1900 micrograms/L after single intraperitoneal doses of 50 and 150 mg, respectively. The volume of distribution (40 to 60 L) did not differ from that determined in patients with normal renal function. In the case of fungal peritonitis essentially attributed to Candida spp., a 6-hour intraperitoneal infusion of fluconazole 150 mg every 2 days appears to be a good regimen to rapidly exceed minimum inhibitory concentrations and treat infection without risk of systemic dissemination of fungi or toxicity.

Teicoplanin pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after intravenous and intraperitoneal dosing

The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin after single 6-mg/kg intravenous and intraperitoneal doses were studied in five noninfected patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Biological samples were assayed for teicoplanin content by a microbiological assay technique. Terminal disposition half-life (266.4 +/- 51.9 h [mean +/- standard error of the mean]) was prolonged and total body clearance (0.040 +/- 0.004 ml/min per kg) was reduced compared with values previously reported in subjects with normal renal function. The volume of distribution at steady state (1.15 +/- 0.19 liters/kg) was higher than values previously reported in subjects with normal renal function (0.56 to 0.72 liter/kg). Peritoneal dialysis clearance (0.007 +/- 0.001 ml/min per kg) accounted for only 16.1% of total body clearance. The absolute systemic bioavailability of teicoplanin after intraperitoneal administration was 81.5 +/- 10.7%.

Labetalol. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease

Since labetalol was first reviewed in the Journal (1978), its scope of therapeutic use has expanded and become better defined. Labetalol is an adrenoceptor blocking drug with combined alpha- and beta-blocking properties. These result in a more favourable haemodynamic profile for labetalol compared with 'pure' beta-blockers or pure alpha-blockers, but also contribute to a wider range, but not an overall increased incidence, of adverse effects. The drug is effective and well-tolerated in patients with all grades of hypertension, but is of particular value in special subgroups such as Black patients, the elderly and patients with renal hypertension. While comparative studies are not extensive, available data show that the drug reduces blood pressure to a similar extent, and in a similar proportion of patients, as 'pure' beta-blockers such as propranolol, pure alpha-blockers such as prazosin, calcium antagonists (nifedipine, verapamil), and centrally acting drugs (clonidine and methyldopa). Labetalol is very effective in hypertensive pregnant women and in hypertensive crises, where it provides good control of blood pressure without serious adverse effects, and where few therapeutic options exist. Few controlled studies have investigated the use of labetalol in deliberate induction of hypotension or prevention of hypertension during anaesthesia, and also in patients with ischaemic heart disease. However, available evidence suggests a role for labetalol in these indications and further studies should aid in clarification of its efficacy in these areas. Thus, with its broad scope of therapeutic use in hypertension labetalol remains an important therapeutic option, and the drug may well find an additional place in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia if further evidence confirms encouraging preliminary findings.

Pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The disposition of a single oral dose of diltiazem hydrochloride was studied in six male patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Peak concentrations were obtained 2 to 4 hours postdose. The mean absorption rate constant was 0.94 +/- 0.21 (sd) hr-1, and the mean elimination half-life was 3.09 +/- 1.16 hr. Serum levels of deacetyldiltiazem, a metabolite of diltiazem, were always below 10 ng/mL. The amounts of diltiazem and deacetyldiltiazem eliminated in dialysate over 24 hours represent less than 0.1% of the administered dose. The pharmacokinetic parameters of diltiazem determined in these patients did not differ from those determined in healthy volunteers and in patients suffering from end-stage renal disease.

Pharmacokinetics of imipenem-cilastatin in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

In six patients with end-stage renal disease, a single bolus of imipenem-cilastatin (500 mg each) was given either intravenously or intraperitoneally in a randomized crossover protocol such that each patient received the drug by both routes at a 2- to 3-week interval. Drug levels in plasma and the peritoneal dialysis fluid were analyzed at frequent intervals, and various pharmacokinetic variables were calculated for a one-compartment open model. Data obtained in the present study suggest that while no significant difference in peak plasma levels or volume of distribution were noted, the following variables were significantly different for imipenem as compared with cilastatin: elimination half-life, total plasma clearance, area under the concentration-time curve, and percent drug excretion in the peritoneal dialysis fluid. The elimination half-life of imipenem (3.28 h) or cilastatin (8.84 h) in our patients was in the same range as observed in patients with minimal renal function undergoing hemodialysis. The dose of imipenem-cilastatin should be reduced appropriately in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Pentamidine therapy in renal failure: case report and literature review

The literature lacks adequate dosing guidelines for modifying pentamidine therapy in renal failure. This report describes a patient in renal failure undergoing intermittent peritoneal dialysis who is treated with pentamidine for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Data on pentamidine's disposition are reviewed.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and intraperitoneal moxalactam in chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

The kinetics of moxalactam has been investigated in 10 subjects undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). A single 1 g dose was injected i.v. and a 1 g dose was given intraperitoneally in the CAPD fluid during a 4 h dwell-time. Moxalactam was assayed by HPLC. After i.v. injection, the serum kinetics of moxalactam were: plasma t 1/2 = 17.9 h; volume of distribution at steady-state, 0.27 l/kg; total plasma clearance, 12.8 ml/min; peritoneal clearance, 2.1 ml/min. Dialysate moxalactam concentrations rose rapidly but only 20% of the dose was eliminated by the peritoneal route. After intraperitoneal instillation, moxalactam appeared in the serum rapidly and the peak serum concentration ranged from 21 to 49 micrograms/ml after between 4 and 5 h. The absorption of moxalactam from the peritoneal space was 57 +/- 16%. The data suggest that moxalactam has bidirectional exchange characteristics through the peritoneal membrane. Instillation of moxalactam in CAPD fluid may permit rapid absorption and the appearance of a therapeutic serum concentration.