Interaction of roxatidine acetate with antacids, food and other drugs

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Studies of Roxatidine Acetate Hydrochloride Sustained-Release Capsule in Healthy Chinese Subjects

This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between a generic roxatidine acetate hydrochloride (RAH) sustained-release capsule and brand-named formulation (ALTAT) under fasting and fed conditions. An open-label, single-center, randomized 2-period crossover study with a 5-day washout period was conducted. A single oral dose of 75-mg generic RAH sustained-release capsule (test drug) or a commercial capsule (reference drug) was given to healthy volunteers under fasting (n = 36) and fed conditions (n = 36). Blood samples were collected at baseline and during the 24 hours after dosing. The concentrations of roxatidine acetate (ROX) and bioactive metabolite roxatidine in plasma were detected using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed with noncompartmental methods. As prodrug, RAH was dehydrochloric acid to ROX in body and further rapidly converted to roxatidine. Such a rapid metabolism resulted in ROX that was hardly detected in plasma. Active metabolism roxatidine was therefore used to evaluate the pharmacokinetic process. The major pharmacokinetic parameters of roxatidine including peak plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to time t, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity were similar between the 2 preparations under fasting and fed conditions. The generic RAH sustained-release capsule is bioequivalent to the reference drug under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese subjects.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs

The safety profile of any pharmacological agent is defined on the basis of its toxicity, tolerability and potential for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions with other compounds, which may belong to the same or to a different pharmacological class. Drug-drug interactions are important in clinical practice because short and long term therapeutic regimens frequently require coadministration of different drugs. The pharmacological treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers (and of related syndromes) includes older and newer compounds, which have different mechanisms of action and exert different therapeutic effects. These compounds are widely prescribed in combination with other drugs being given for the treatment of concomitant diseases. This article reviews pharmacokinetic interactions with anti-ulcer drugs, paying particular attention to those which have clinically relevant adverse effects. Drugs mentioned in the literature as causing any pharmacokinetic interaction with anti-ulcer compounds are considered in this article.

Double-blind, randomized trial of roxatidine 150 mg in the early evening versus bedtime administration in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of early evening (19.00-21.00 hours) vs. bedtime (22.00-00.00 hours) oral administration of roxatidine 150 mg in the short-term treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

METHODS

The trial was randomized, double-blind and double-dummy, with parallel groups. A total of 276 patients were recruited and randomly assigned either to roxatidine in the early evening (n = 139) or roxatidine at bedtime (n = 137).

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, 78% of patients receiving roxatidine in the early evening and 74% of those treated at bedtime had achieved complete healing, as determined by per-protocol analysis. With intention-to-treat analysis the healing rates were 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively. After 8 weeks the healing rates in the early evening and bedtime treatment groups were 92% and 95% (per-protocol analysis) and 78% and 84% (intention-to-treat analysis). Both treatments proved effective in reducing the frequency and severity of daytime and nocturnal epigastric pain, as well as other ulcer-related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the healing and analgesic properties of roxatidine in duodenal ulcer disease. Early evening or bedtime dosing with roxatidine 150 mg resulted in similar 4- to 8-week rates of duodenal ulcer healing.

Roxatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blind controlled multicentre study in Singapore

Roxatidine acetate, a new H2 receptor antagonist, was compared with ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers in a double-blind multicentre study. Eighty-four patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 150 mg roxatidine acetate or 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime. Repeat endoscopy was performed after 4 weeks (25-33 days) and if the ulcer had not healed, another endoscopy was performed after a further 4 weeks of treatment. Using per protocol analysis 73.6% of ulcers treated with roxatidine healed at 4 weeks compared to 72.2% of ulcers treated with ranitidine (P = NS). The healing rates at 8 weeks were 92% with roxatidine and 83.3% with ranitidine (P = NS). Using equivalence tests, the healing rate of roxatidine was found to be equivalent to that of ranitidine within a 20% region. Roxatidine users took significantly less antacids than ranitidine users (P < 0.05). There were no significant adverse effects due to roxatidine or ranitidine. Roxatidine is a safe effective drug in the treatment of duodenal ulcers with a healing rate comparable to that of ranitidine.

Practical pharmacology and cost-effective management of peptic ulcer disease

The clinical approach to the therapy of peptic ulcer disease has changed over the years as our understanding of its pathogenesis has grown. No longer is excess acid production seen as the single cause of ulcer disease; rather, its pathogenesis is viewed as the disturbance of a complex balance of ulcerogenic and protective factors. Today, the clinician's aim is to restore the balance between protective and aggressive factors. Simultaneously, the development of new classes of medications has provided the clinician with the tools to decrease intragastric acidity, neutralize or suppress acid production, and enhance the protective and restorative properties of the mucosa.

Roxatidine acetate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and its therapeutic potential in peptic ulcer disease and related disorders

Roxatidine acetate is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist which, after almost complete oral absorption (greater than 95%), is rapidly converted to its active metabolite, roxatidine, by esterases in the small intestine, plasma and liver. Roxatidine is a potent inhibitor of basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion in animals and humans and, like most other H2-receptor antagonists, has no anti-androgenic effects and does not interfere with the hepatic metabolism of other drugs. Large-scale trials have shown that roxatidine acetate 150mg per day is as effective as standard doses of cimetidine and ranitidine in the treatment of patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, and that roxatidine acetate 75mg in the evening is likely to become a 'standard' regimen for the prevention of peptic ulcer recurrence. Preliminary data also suggest that roxatidine acetate may be useful in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and in the prevention of pulmonary acid aspiration. Roxatidine acetate is an H2-receptor antagonist which has been well tolerated in clinical trials. However, broader experience is required before definitive statements about tolerability relative to other H2-receptor antagonists can be made, and before the role of roxatidine acetate in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and stomal ulcer, and the prophylaxis of acid aspiration pneumonitis, can be clearly defined.

The effect of roxatidine acetate and cimetidine on hepatic drug clearance assessed by simultaneous administration of three model substrates

The effect of pretreatment for 7 days with either roxatidine acetate 75 mg twice daily or cimetidine 200 mg four times daily on the kinetics of antipyrine (AP), trimethadione (TMO) and indocyanine green (ICG) was studied in seven healthy, male, nonsmoking subjects. After pretreatment with cimetidine, the plasma clearances (CL) of AP and TMO were significantly lower and the elimination half-life (t1/2) of AP was significantly increased. The volumes of distribution (V) of AP and TMO were not affected. After roxatidine acetate, the pharmacokinetics of AP and TMO were unchanged. The cumulative renal excretion (% dose) and formation clearance of 3-hydroxymethyl-3-nor-antipyrine (NORA) were lowered by cimetidine treatment, but not following the administration of roxatidine acetate. ICG clearance was not changed significantly by either pretreatment. The results of this study show that roxatidine acetate does not impair the metabolism of three model substrates used to assess hepatic drug clearance.

Effects of roxatidine acetate on 24-hour gastric acidity. Early evening versus bedtime administration in healthy subjects

The gastric antisecretory activity of roxatidine acetate was studied on 24-hour intragastric pH in 12 healthy male volunteers. The study was randomised, double-blind and double-dummy where either roxatidine acetate 150 mg as a slow release granulated formulation or placebo were administered at 7.30 pm or 10 pm. Roxatidine acetate 150 mg produced a significant decrease in the number of hours during which gastric acidity ranged between pH 1.5 and 4.0 which was consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug. There was no significant difference between the median intragastric pH values for early evening and bedtime administration of roxatidine acetate. The present data confirm that roxatidine acetate 150 mg inhibits gastric acid secretion but while a single evening dose is effective in controlling intragastric pH the results suggest there is no clear advantage in an early evening dose compared with a bedtime dose.