Management of menopause when estrogen cannot be used

Osteoprotective effect of Phaseolus vulgaris L in ovariectomy-induced osteopenia in rats

OBJECTIVE

Phytoestrogens and phytoestrogen-containing plants are currently being explored as potential candidates for the treatment of estrogen-related disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-osteoporotic effect of the phytoestrogen-rich plant Phaseolus vulgaris L, commonly known as French beans.

METHODS

Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were either bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) or sham operated. OVX and sham control groups were administered vehicle, whereas the other two OVX groups were given 0.15 mg/kg estradiol and 1 g/kg methanolic extract of P vulgaris L seeds (MPV) orally for 10 weeks (10 rats per group). At autopsy, blood, urine, bones, and uteri of the animals were collected. Serum was evaluated for estradiol, calcium (Ca), phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, tartarate resistant acid phosphatase, and urine for Ca. The bone density, ash density, mineral content, and mechanical strength of bones was evaluated. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of bones (tibia) was performed. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test.

RESULTS

Compared with the OVX control, MPV (1 g/kg PO) significantly decreased serum alkaline phosphatase and reduced serum tartarate resistant acid phosphatase and urinary Ca levels. It caused an increase in bone density, ash density, and bone mechanical strength and significantly increased bone Ca. Improvement in bone microarchitecture was indicated by image analysis of scanning electron microscopic photomicrographs. No increase in weight of atrophic uterus in OVX animals was observed with MPV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with MPV prevented estrogen deficiency-induced osteopenia without affecting the uterine mass. The promising results of the study warrant further investigation of French beans as a potential candidate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methanolic Extract of Cuminum cyminum Inhibits Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss in Rats

Several animal and clinical studies have shown that phytoestrogens, plant-derived estrogenic compounds, can be useful in treating postmenopausal osteoporosis. Phytoestrogens and phytoestrogen-containing plants are currently under active investigation for their role in estrogen-related disorders. The present study deals with anti-osteoporotic evaluation of phytoestrogen-rich plant Cuminum cyminum, commonly known as cumin. Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) and randomly assigned to 3 groups (10 rats/group). Additional 10 animals were sham operated. OVX and sham control groups were orally administered with vehicle while the other two OVX groups were administered 0.15 mg/kg estradiol and 1 g/kg of methanolic extract of Cuminum cyminum fruits (MCC) in two divided doses for 10 weeks. At the end of the study blood, bones and uteri of the animals were collected. Serum was evaluated for calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and tartarate resistant acid phosphatase. Bone density, ash density, mineral content and mechanical strength of bones were evaluated. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) analysis of bones (tibia) was performed. Results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparison test. MCC (1 g/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced urinary calcium excretion and significantly increased calcium content and mechanical strength of bones in comparison to OVX control. It showed greater bone and ash densities and improved microarchitecture of bones in SEM analysis. Unlike estradiol it did not affect body weight gain and weight of atrophic uterus in OVX animals. MCC prevented ovariectomy-induced bone loss in rats with no anabolic effect on atrophic uterus. The osteoprotective effect was comparable with estradiol.

Dietary factors and vasomotor symptoms in breast cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS)(hot flashes, night sweats) are associated with natural or surgically or chemotherapy-induced menopause, the latter occurring frequently in women treated for breast cancer. To manage VMS, some women seek alternatives to menopausal hormone therapy, such as supplements or modified food choices. The objective of the present analyses was to assess associations of VMS occurrence and change in severity of VMS over 12 months with dietary intakes of fiber, fat, and selected soy-containing foods, and use of phytoestrogen or vitamin E supplements in women with recent early stage breast cancer, adjusting for covariates.

DESIGN

Using multivariate logistic regression, data were analyzed from 2,198 women with early-stage breast cancer who enrolled 2 to 48 months after diagnosis in the Women's Healthy Eating and Living randomized, controlled trial of a high-vegetable, high-fiber, reduced-fat diet.

RESULTS

Being peri- or postmenopausal, using tamoxifen, having low social support or depressive symptoms, and using vitamin E or phytoestrogen supplements were significantly associated cross-sectionally with reporting moderate/severe VMS at enrollment. Increased symptom severity after 12 months was significantly associated with higher body mass index, tamoxifen use, and smoking. Decreased symptom severity at 12 months was significantly associated with high dietary fiber intake; no decrease was observed in women who were peri- or postmenopausal, using tamoxifen, or had low fat intake or low social support.

CONCLUSIONS

High dietary fiber intakes, premenopausal, and high social support were related to decreased severity of VMS 1 year after study enrollment in women recently treated for breast cancer.

Therapy for Menopausal Symptoms During and After Treatment for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common newly diagnosed cancer in women. Life-time risk in the US is 1 in 8 (13.2%), in the UK it is 1 in 9 and in Australia it affects 1 in 11 women, of whom approximately 27% will be premenopausal at the time of their diagnosis. Many of these women will experience a sudden menopause as a result of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or surgical interventions. For these women, the onset of menopausal symptoms is often sudden and severe. The management of such symptoms remains controversial. Women experiencing menopausal symptoms after breast cancer should be encouraged to avoid identifiable triggers for their symptoms and to consider lifestyle modification as a means of controlling those symptoms. When such measures fail, non-hormonal treatments may also be considered. These include clonidine, gabapentin and some antidepressants. Randomised trials have shown a significant difference in the symptom relief associated with various selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin and noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors compared with placebo. Many women elect to use non-prescription complementary therapies to alleviate their menopausal symptoms. Systematic reviews of phytoestrogens have, however, failed to demonstrate significant relief of menopausal symptoms. More than 20 clinical trials have been conducted examining the relationship between postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer recurrence. The majority of these have been observational and have shown no increased risk of recurrence. However, the largest randomised trial that has thus far been conducted was recently halted because of a reported increase in the risk of recurrence amongst users of hormone replacement therapy. Tibolone, a selective tissue estrogen activity regulator, is a compound that exerts clinical effects both by receptor-mediated actions and tissue selective enzyme inhibition, and has been shown in preclinical studies to have different effects to estrogen on the breast. Although tibolone may prove safer than estrogen for long-term use in breast cancer survivors, the results of a large randomised trial are awaited to confirm this.The decision on how best to manage menopausal symptoms must thus be made on an individual basis and after thorough discussion and evaluation of the risks and benefits of each potential intervention.

Hot flashes in breast cancer survivors

Hot flashes can be a major problem for patients with a history of breast cancer. The precipitation of menopause in premenopausal women who undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer can lead to the rapid onset of hot flash symptoms that are more frequent and more severe than those associated with natural menopause. In addition, tamoxifen, historically the most commonly prescribed pharmacologic agent for the treatment of breast cancer, is associated with hot flashes in more than 50% of its users. Although estrogen relieves hot flashes in 80-90% of women who initiate treatment, its use in women with a history of breast cancer is controversial, and most physicians in the community will not use this treatment modality. In addition, the results of the long-awaited Women's Health Initiative study and other recent studies suggest that long-term estrogen therapy should not be recommended for most women for a variety of reasons. However, hot flashes in breast cancer survivors should no longer be considered untreatable, as there are many pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments that can help alleviate this problem. This article reviews the current strategies for the management of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors and the evidence supporting their use.

Hot flushes

Almost every woman and some men will encounter hot flushes during their lifetime. Despite the prevalence of the symptoms, the pathophysiology of hot flushes remains unknown. A decline in hormone concentrations might lead to alterations in brain neurotransmitters and to instability in the hypothalamic thermoregulatory setpoint. The most effective treatments for hot flushes include oestrogens and progestagens. However, many women and their physicians are reluctant to accept hormonal treatments. Women want non-pharmacological treatments but unfortunately such treatments are not very effective, and non-hormonal drugs are often associated with adverse effects. Results from recent studies showed that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other similar compounds can safely reduce hot flushes. Moreover, the efficacy of these drugs provides new insight into the pathophysiology of hot flushes. In this critical review, we assess knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of hot flushes.

Fever and sweats in the patient with advanced cancer

Fever and sweats are common complications of cancer and its treatment. This article reviews potential causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms of fever and sweat. Management recommendations, consisting of primary interventions directed at contributing causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms, and non-specific palliative measures are discussed. Optimal management is contingent on the physician's integration of medical expertise with patient-derived goals of care.

The role of serotonin in hot flushes

Hot flushes are experienced in those periods of the female life when estrogen levels are low. Hormone replacement therapy is thus the first choice for treatment of hot flushes. However this treatment is not always accepted or contraindicated for a variety of reasons. Estrogen (and progestogen) strongly interact with a number of neurotransmitters and this has led to a range of non-hormonal treatments including compounds that act via the noradrenergic or dopaminergic systems as well as herbal remedies. These treatments (which are shortly reviewed) are not always successful. Surprisingly, apart from treatment with some selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRI's), up till now, little attention is given to the strong interaction of estrogens with the serotonergic system. These interactions are shortly reviewed. Based on these interactions, a hypothesis on the genesis of hot flushes is postulated. Especially the 5-HT(2A) receptor subtype may play a key role in the occurrence of hot flushes. A number of arguments that support this hypothesis are discussed.

A pilot trial assessing the efficacy of paroxetine hydrochloride (Paxil) in controlling hot flashes in breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Many breast cancer survivors suffer debilitating hot flashes. Estrogen, the drug of choice in perimenopausal women, is generally not recommenced to breast cancer survivors. Nonhormonal treatments are mostly disappointing. Anecdotal reports in our institution suggested that the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine hydrochloride, might be efficacious in alleviating hot flashes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty women with prior breast cancer who were suffering at least two hot flashes a day entered a single institution pilot trial to evaluate paroxetine's efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of hot flashes. After completing daily diaries for one week on no therapy, the women received open-label paroxetine, 10 mg daily for one week, followed by four weeks of paroxetine, 20 mg daily. The women completed hot-flash daily diaries throughout the study period, and a health-related symptom-assessment questionnaire and a quality-of-life rating scale in the first and sixth week of the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven women completed the six-week study period. The mean reduction of hot flash frequency was 67% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 56%-79%). The mean reduction in hot flash severity score was 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%). There was a statistically significant improvement in depression, sleep, anxiety, and quality of life scores. Furthermore, 25 (83%) of the study participants chose to continue paroxetine therapy at the end of study. The most common adverse effect was somnolence, resulting in drug discontinuation in two women, and dose reduction in two women. One woman discontinued drug due to anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Paroxetine hydrochloride is a promising new treatment for hot flashes in breast cancer survivors, and warrants further evaluation in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Persistence with estrogen therapy in a postmenopausal Medicaid population

We evaluated rates of persistence with estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal Georgia Medicaid recipients adjusted for age and race. Data files for 1992-1994 were examined to estimate 3-year conditional survival probabilities using the Kaplan-Meier model, and 3800 subjects were identified. Over 54% of women remained compliant over 29 months, and 17% continued therapy for the entire 35 months of observation. Kaplan-Meier predictors indicated that white women have a 70% chance of being compliant for 3 years, whereas black women have a 60% chance. Monthly discontinuation rates ranged from 1-1.5% after the second month of therapy. Younger, white women were the most likely to maintain and comply with therapy.

Definitions of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors

Menopause is an expected event in a woman's life. Treatment for breast cancer can impact the onset of menopause and precipitate symptoms such as hot flashes. Yet this sequelae of events is not well measured, defined or assimilated into quality of life assessments for cancer survivors. Though not life threatening, hot flashes can greatly impact a woman's quality of life or functional ability. It is important for health care professionals to more fully understand the nature of the experience of hot flashes so as not to underestimate their disruptive potential. As part of a larger clinical trial to look at the effectiveness of vitamin E for hot flashes, breast cancer survivors kept a log of both the frequency and intensity of their hot flashes. These women then wrote descriptions to define the severity of those hot flashes. The purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the experience of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors and to describe the severity of hot flashes with narratives given by the women experiencing them.

Nonestrogen management of menopausal symptoms

Women who cannot or choose not to take estrogens do have alternatives; however, the options are few and unproven in longterm clinical trials with respect to safety and efficacy. Many available alternative treatments may alleviate the symptoms of the menopause, but do not convey long-term protection against osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. This article reviews treatment alternatives to estrogen replacement therapy for symptomatic relief.

Salmon calcitonin nasal spray : An effective alternative to estrogen therapy in select postmenopausal women

The efficacy and safety of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and salmon calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis are reviewed with special consideration given to patients for whom ERT, the primary antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis, is not indicated, tolerable, or is refused. The various formulations of estrogen and salmon calcitonin, for which the nasal spray formulation was recently approved for use in the United States, are reviewed in depth with reference to dose ranges, side effects, and convenience. Data regarding increases in bone mineral density (BMD) produced by each agent are presented. Specifically, the range of increases in BMD induced by ERT and salmon calcitonin are comparable. Given the substantial public health consequences of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures, the primary care physician is increasingly faced with the need to educated and recruit postmenopausal patients to appropriate therapy with the optimal agent for that particular patient. In the many patients who are unable or unwilling to accept, initiate, and comply with prescribed ERT, alternative therapeutic options are necessary Based on the established safety profile of salmon calcitonin, ease of administration, an uncomplicated dosing regimen, no reported drug interactions, and the lack of uterine bleeding associated with ERT or gastrointestinal adverse effects of other agents used to treat osteoporosis, salmon calcitonin nasal spray is an appropriate alternative approach for the treatment of postmenopausal bone loss.

Osteoporosis: the need for comprehensive treatment guidelines

Osteoporosis is a debilitating disease that results in nearly 1.3 million fractures per year in the United States. The cost of treating these fractures has been estimated to be as high as $10 billion per year. These costs are expected to more than double during the next 50 years unless comprehensive programs of prevention and treatment are initiated. Both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions (eg, diet and exercise) have been shown to have a significant impact on the incidence of osteoporosis, depending on the time of their application. Unfortunately, osteoporosis is often not diagnosed until after fractures have occurred, when it may be too late for treatment to have a major impact. To be most effective, therapy should be started early, before serious bone loss has occurred. Because of its efficacy and relatively low acquisition cost, long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is considered first-line pharmacologic therapy for the prevention of osteoporosis. However, for various reasons, less than 25% of US women who might benefit from HRT are receiving it. Aside from HRT, the only other products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of osteoporosis are salmon calcitonin and alendronate. Several other agents are under development, including sustained-release fluoride and other products in the bisphosphonate class. The development and adoption of early detection programs and treatment guidelines are crucial to help ease the economic burden of osteoporosis. These guidelines should incorporate preventive measures such as diet and exercise, risk assessment through proper screening programs, and the appropriate use of pharmaceutical products. The purpose of this paper is to discuss relevant economic issues associated with osteoporosis and discuss the need for a management algorithm that could be used to more efficiently prevent and treat this disease. We conclude that further modeling is needed to determine which programs and treatments are most cost-effective within each at-risk subgroup. As clinicians better understand the need for preventive care and the advantages of the various pharmacologic therapies, patients with osteoporosis will receive higher-quality and more efficient medical care.

Megestrol acetate for the prevention of hot flashes

BACKGROUND

Vasomotor hot flashes are a common symptom in women during menopause and in men who have undergone androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Although treatment with estrogens in women and androgens in men can attenuate these symptoms, these hormones may be contraindicated in women with breast cancer and in men with prostate cancer. Pilot trials have suggested that the progestational agent megestrol acetate can ameliorate hot flashes in both groups of patients.

METHODS

The patients included 97 women with a history of breast cancer and 66 men with prostate cancer who had undergone androgen-deprivation therapy. All patients had experienced bothersome hot flashes (median number per day at base line, 6.1 for the women and 8.4 for the men). After a one-week pretreatment observation period, the patients received megestrol acetate (20 mg twice daily) for four weeks, followed by placebo for four weeks, or vice versa in a double-blind manner as determined by pretreatment randomization. The patients documented the frequency and severity of hot flashes in daily symptom diaries.

RESULTS

After four weeks, hot flashes were reduced by 21 percent in the group receiving placebo first and by 85 percent in the group receiving megestrol acetate first (P < 0.001). An intention-to-treat analysis of data for all eligible treated patients showed that 74 percent of the megestrol acetate group, as compared with 20 percent of the placebo group, had a decrease of 50 percent or more in the frequency of hot flashes during the first four weeks (P < 0.001). The degree of efficacy was similar in men and women. The only side effect was withdrawal menstrual bleeding in women, generally occurring one to two weeks after the megestrol acetate had been discontinued.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose megestrol acetate is well tolerated and can substantially decrease the frequency of hot flashes in women and men.

Intranasal salmon calcitonin. A review of its pharmacological properties and potential utility in metabolic bone disorders associated with aging

Salmon calcitonin, a polypeptide hormone secreted by the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid gland, lowers serum calcium levels by decreasing bone resorption and renal tubular calcium reabsorption. An analgesic action, possibly mediated via beta-endorphins, is also evident. In the past, parenteral formulations of salmon calcitonin have been used in the management of metabolic bone disorders, but their routine use has been limited by the inconvenience of this route of administration and by poor tolerability. The development of an intranasal preparation of salmon calcitonin will provide a more convenient means of administering the drug. In clinical trials published to date intranasal salmon calcitonin has been effective and well tolerated in small numbers of recently postmenopausal women at risk of developing osteoporosis, and in patients with established osteoporosis, Paget's disease, or osteoporosis secondary to corticosteroid usage, multiple myeloma or ovariectomy. For periods of up to 2 years the drug reduces bone resorption and improves bone architecture, relieves pain and increases functional status. Further research is needed to confirm longer term efficacy (in particular, effects on fracture rate), optimal dosage schedules and the role of intermittent and combination treatment regimens.