Pharmacotherapy of childhood asthma. An inflammatory disease

Long-term effects of specific immunotherapy, administered during childhood, in asthmatic patients allergic to either house-dust mite or to both house-dust mite and grass pollen

In a retrospective study, asthmatic patients allergic to either house-dust mite (HDM) (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) (n = 34) or to both HDM and grass pollen (GP) (n = 14), and who were treated with specific immunotherapy (SIT) during childhood (mean duration of SIT: 61 +/- 9.70 months), were re-evaluated in early adulthood after mean cessation of SIT for 9.3 +/- 2.76 years. The results were compared to those of a control group of asthmatic patients (n = 42) with comparable asthma features, who were treated with appropriate antiasthmatic drugs during childhood, but who never received SIT. Re-evaluation was carried out with a standardized questionnaire, skin prick tests (SPT), and lung-function assessments. At the time of re-evaluation, the mean age in the SIT-treated group was 23.1 +/- 3.50 years; in the control group, it was 22.7 +/- 3.40 years. At re-evaluation, the risk of frequent asthmatic symptoms was three times higher in the control group than in the SIT-treated group (prevalence ratio: 3.43; P = 0.0006). The frequent use of antiasthmatic medication was also more pronounced in the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.38). Lung-function parameters and results of SPT with HDM were comparable in both groups. It is concluded that SIT has long-term effects on asthmatic symptoms in young adults.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation of asthma treatment

Asthma is generally managed with bronchodilator therapy and/or anti-inflammatory drugs. Guidelines now advocate selection of drugs and pharmaceutical formulations (long-acting vs short-acting, inhaled vs systemic) on the basis of disease severity. Theophylline has a narrow therapeutic margin. Clearance is highly variable and plasma concentrations should be monitored to avoid the occurrence of plasma concentration-related adverse effects. The rate of absorption of theophylline differs depending on the sustained release formulation administered. Some products do not provide sufficient plasma drug concentrations for therapeutic efficacy over a 12-hour period, particularly in patients with high clearance rates (e.g. children and patients who smoke). Administration of drugs via inhalation offers several advantages over systemic routes of administration (e.g. adverse effects are decreased). Inhalation is now advocated as first-line therapy. Aerosol medications available for the treatment of asthma are beta 2-agonist (including the newer long-acting agents such as salmeterol), corticosteroids, anticholinergic drugs, sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) and nedocromil. To reach the airways, aerosolised particles should be 1 to 5 microns in diameter. Particles of this size can be produced by nebuliser for continuous administration or by metered-dose inhaler and drug powder inhaler for unit dose medication. For efficient use of the metered-dose inhaler, slow inhalation and actuation must be coordinated. However, efficacy and convenience can be improved when spacer devices are used. Furthermore, spacer devices lessen the oropharyngeal adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids. Dry powder inhalers are more easily used by children and elderly patients than metered-dose inhalers. Regardless of the device used, a maximum of 10% of the inhaled dose reaches the airways. The rest of the dose is swallowed and absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract. Most inhaled drugs have low oral bioavailability, either because of a high first-pass metabolism (beta 2-agonists and glucocorticoids) or because of lack of absorption (sodium cromoglycate). Sulphation of beta 2-agonists occurs in the wall of the gastrointestinal tract and extensive metabolism of inhaled corticosteroids occurs in the liver. Low bioavailability of the swallowed fraction contributes to reduced adverse effects. The pharmacokinetic properties of an inhaled drug are of interest. The fraction of the dose absorbed through the lung has the same disposition characteristics as an intravenous dose, and the swallowed fraction has the same disposition as an orally administered dose. However, for many drugs, pharmacokinetic data after inhalation are limited and cannot be used as a criteria for selection of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacology of asthma. Implications for treatment

The past 10 years have seen three important changes in the philosophy of managing asthma. First, histological studies using fibreoptic bronchoscopy have led to the recognition that asthma is an inflammatory condition of the bronchial mucosa and is not simply caused by smooth muscle spasm. Secondly, there has been some disenchantment with the long term use of regular beta 2-adrenergic agonists as these agents do not appear to control bronchial inflammation and have been associated with deaths from asthma. Thirdly, there has been a general shift away from physician-centred management towards patient-oriented management plans. These three separate strands have led to the development of regional and international consensus documents that emphasise the use of regular anti-inflammatory treatment to control bronchial inflammation and reduce symptoms. With the emphasis on finding the minimum amount of treatment, several traditional anti-asthma medications have been downgraded in importance. The introduction of self-management plans is to be welcomed, but it is important that these new strategies for treating asthma are properly evaluated so that the benefits they confer can be ascertained and maximised.

Nedocromil sodium. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in asthma

Nedocromil sodium, the disodium salt of a pyranoquinoline dicarboxylic acid, has anti-inflammatory properties in vitro, in animal models of asthma, and in humans, as evidenced by inhibition of inflammatory cell activation and mediator release, early and late allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness. Recent therapeutic trials confirm the safety and efficacy of inhaled nedocromil sodium as adjunctive therapy in adult patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled by beta-agonists alone. Nedocromil sodium has also been shown to improve symptoms when added to existing treatment with methylxanthines and corticosteroids. Some studies show nedocromil sodium to be successful replacement therapy for methylxanthines, in addition to enabling a modest reduction in inhaled corticosteroids in some patients. Thus, nedocromil sodium may be suitable in patients with asthma as an adjunct to existing therapy, as an alternative to regularly administered oral and inhaled beta-agonists and oral methyl-xanthines, and potentially, to low dose inhaled corticosteroids as maintenance therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma being considered for corticosteroid therapy.

Treatment options in the child with a chronic cough

Chronic cough is a common symptom in many different disease processes. Because the most effective way to eliminate a chronic cough is to identify and treat the underlying disease, the physician must approach the paediatric patient based on his or her knowledge of the differential diagnosis. The most common causes of cough in children are upper respiratory tract infections, asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, and gastroesophageal reflux. By using a systematic approach, the cause of a chronic cough can almost always be found, and the cough successfully treated. Asthma is the cause of most undiagnosed chronic coughs but sinusitis, rhinitis, and gastroesophageal reflux must also be considered in difficult patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide in asthmatic patients intolerant to aspirin

Inflammation of the airways accompanied by eosinophil infiltration appears to play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of bronchial asthma. Therefore, anti-inflammatory agents (at present corticosteroids, cromoglycate and nedocromil) are the first-line treatment for this condition. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and indomethacin, however, have never been used in this setting, mainly for fear of adverse effects (e.g. severe obstructive reactions); these can occur, in a consistent number of patients as a consequence (according to the most widely accepted theory) of inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. In a double-blind crossover placebo-controlled study involving 20 aspirin-sensitive patients with asthma, we found that oral nimesulide 100mg was well tolerated both clinically and functionally (no significant changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and specific airway resistance after drug intake). In a more recent study, we observed a mild obstructive reaction (easily controlled with inhaled bronchodilators) after oral administration of nimesulide 400mg to 3 patients who had previously tolerated a 100mg dose. On the basis of clinical experience, nimesulide (unlike most other NSAIDs) in the recommended doses appears to be well tolerated in aspirin-sensitive asthmatic patients. Furthermore, this distinctive anti-inflammatory agent might provide a novel approach to the treatment of bronchial asthma.