Gene therapy. Clinical potential and relationship to drug treatment

Cancer gene therapy update

Objective. To provide an update about gene marking and gene therapy trials in cancer patients.

Data Sources. A MEDLINE search using the term “gene therapy” was conducted for the period 1985 to 1998. The reference lists from retrieved articles were reviewed. Meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting (published in their proceedings) and the Annual Cancer Gene Therapy Symposium (published in Cancer Gene Therapy) that concerned gene therapy in cancer patients were also included.

Data Extraction. Both authors reviewed the retrieved material and included preclinical data, case reports, and clinical trials related to gene transfer or gene therapy in cancer patients.

Data Synthesis. There are several possible approaches to using gene therapy for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and for the monitoring of cancer therapy. Exogenous genes may be used to mark cells to help better understand cancer biology or may be used directly for cancer treatment. Gene-marking trials have already provided new information about cancer biology and have demonstrated that reinfused progenitor cells may be a source of relapse in patients with acute or chronic myelogenous leukemia and neuroblastoma.

Approaches using gene therapy for cancer treatment include: using lymphocytes as gene carriers, using foreign genes to increase tumor immunogenicity, introducing tumor regression antigen genes into viruses, introducing “sensitivity” genes to produce new cytotoxic agent(s) within tumors, producing new protein product(s) to protect normal cells, replacing missing or mutant tumor suppressor genes, and inactivating oncogenes. Clinical trials using these strategies have demonstrated that gene transfer is feasible (albeit with low transduction efficiency) and that gene expression occurs; in addition, clinical responses have been noted.

Safety and tolerability of cyclosporine and cyclosporine microemulsion during 18 months of follow-up in stable renal transplant recipients: a report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Study Group

BACKGROUND

There has been concern that the increased drug exposure associated with treatment with cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) would lead to an increase in adverse events.

METHODS

The long-term safety and tolerability of conventional cyclosporine (CsA) and CsA-ME were compared in a randomized, multicenter, pharmacoepidemiologic study involving 1097 stable renal transplant patients after 18 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

No significant difference was seen in change in serum creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance between the two groups. Episodes of deterioration in renal function (change in serum creatinine > or = 20%) were categorized with the following results for CsA-ME versus CsA, respectively: acute rejection, 4.5% vs. 4.5%; chronic rejection, 8% vs. 11%; CsA nephrotoxicity, 12% vs. 7% (P=0.008); transient changes, 17% vs. 12%; other causes, 4% vs. 6%. During the first 6 months of the study, a transient increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events was seen in the CsA-ME group compared with the CsA group. Up to 18 months, patients in the CsA group reported significantly fewer hearing and vestibular disorders, but more cardiovascular problems than those in the CsA-ME group (P=0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolerance to CsA and CsA-ME was similar. Renal function over 18 months was not adversely affected by the increased drug exposure with CsA-ME, although there was a transient increase in nephrotoxicity. The frequency of acute and chronic rejection did not change.

[In search of a national forum for bioethics in Brazilian public policy]

This article focus on bioethics as a public policy issue. It analyzes the main existing international codes on biomedical ethics and presents a brief review of the work of some national bioethics committees in developing countries. The author concludes by commenting on the most relevant and controversial aspects to be considered in the Brazilian experience.