Dalteparin: an update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease

Molecular dissection of cobra venom highlights heparinoids as an antidote for spitting cobra envenoming

Snakebites affect about 1.8 million people annually. The current standard of care involves antibody-based antivenoms, which can be difficult to access and are generally not effective against local tissue injury, the primary cause of morbidity. Here, we used a pooled whole-genome CRISPR knockout screen to define human genes that, when targeted, modify cell responses to spitting cobra venoms. A large portion of modifying genes that conferred resistance to venom cytotoxicity was found to control proteoglycan biosynthesis, including EXT1, B4GALT7, EXT2, EXTL3, XYLT2, NDST1, and SLC35B2, which we validated independently. This finding suggested heparinoids as possible inhibitors. Heparinoids prevented venom cytotoxicity through binding to three-finger cytotoxins, and the US Food and Drug Administration-approved heparinoid tinzaparin was found to reduce tissue damage in mice when given via a medically relevant route and dose. Overall, our systematic molecular dissection of cobra venom cytotoxicity provides insight into how we can better treat cobra snakebite envenoming.

Effects of dalteparin on anti-Xa activities cannot be predicted in critically ill COVID-19 patients

Critically ill COVID‐19 patients are at high risk of thromboembolic events despite routine‐dosed low‐molecular‐weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. However, in recent randomized trials increased‐intensity thromboprophylaxis seemed futile and possibly even harmful. In this explorative pharmacokinetic (PK) study we measured anti‐Xa activities on frequent timepoints in 15 critically ill COVID‐19 patients receiving dalteparin and performed PK analysis by nonlinear mixed‐effect modelling. A linear one‐compartment model with first‐order kinetics provided a good fit. However, wide interindividual variation in dalteparin absorption (variance 78%) and clearance (variance 34%) was observed, unexplained by routine clinical covariates. Using the final PK model for Monte Carlo simulations, we predicted increased‐intensity dalteparin to result in anti‐Xa activities well over prophylactic targets (0.2‐0.4 IU/mL) in the majority of patients. Therapeutic‐intensity dalteparin results in supratherapeutic anti‐Xa levels (target 0.6‐1.0 IU/mL) in 19% of patients and subtherapeutic levels in 22%. Therefore, anti‐Xa measurements should guide high‐intensity dalteparin in critically ill COVID‐19 patients.

Inhaled Heparin: Therapeutic Efficacy and Recent Formulations

Heparin is well known for its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties. Inhaled heparin regimens are increasingly being used to manage lung disease. It has been used to treat cystic fibrosis, thromboembolism, and pulmonary fibrosis, as well as bronchial asthma and asthma-induced airway hypersensitivity. Several preclinical studies attained some useful effects of heparin-administered, parenterally and through inhalation, treatment of lung disease. Besides, recent clinical trials suggest that inhaled heparin for lung diseases is beneficial and safe, but such data remain to be limited. In 2005, the orphan designation was granted by the European Commission for heparin sodium (inhalation use) for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. The positive results of heparin in the pulmonary route necessitate a focus on the preparation and evaluation of heparin in advanced drug delivery systems, namely nano/microparticles and liposomes. Through this pulmonary delivery, heparin is protected from enzymatic degradation within the airway. Heparin is thus passively targeted into the lungs, and long-lasting localized treatment is achieved. On the other hand, these systems have encountered several problems as follows: (1) polymers, such as poly-L-lactide-glycolic acid, poly (lactic acid), and chitosan, used to prepare heparin-loaded microparticle/nanoparticle (MP/NP) systems have not been granted approval for lung application by the FDA and (2) liposomal and NP formulation stability is the main problem of formulation design. We propose that additional in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to assess the clinical applicability of this treatment strategy. The present article discusses heparin treatments for lung diseases and the use of heparin and/or heparin-loaded drugs in advanced delivery systems through the pulmonary route.

A retrospective analysis of outcomes of dalteparin use in pediatric patients: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Dalteparin is a commonly used low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with extensive safety data in adults. With distinct advantages of once daily dosing and relative safety in renal impairment, it has been used off-label in pediatric practice; however, age-based dosing guidelines, safety and efficacy data in children are evolving.

OBJECTIVES

To report our institutional experience with the use of dalteparin in the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all children (0-18years) that received dalteparin from December 1, 2000 through December 31, 2011. Doses per unit body weight per day (units/kg/day) were calculated for age-based group comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 166 patients identified, 116 (70%) received prophylactic doses while 50 (30%) received therapeutic doses of dalteparin. Infants (<1year) required significantly higher weight-based dosing to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels compared to children (1-10years) or adolescents (>10-18years) (mean dose units/kg/day; 396.6 versus 236.7 and 178.8 respectively, p<0.0001). Overall response rate, including complete and partial thrombus resolution, was 83%. Bleeding complications were minor and the rates were similar in therapeutic and prophylaxis patients. No significant differences in dosing or bleeding events were noted based on obesity or malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, dalteparin is effective for prophylaxis and therapy of VTE in pediatric patients. Dosing should be customized in an age-based manner with close monitoring of anti-Xa activity in order to achieve optimal levels, prevent bleeding complications, and to allow full benefit of prevention or therapy of thrombotic complications.

Carbohydrate-based therapeutics

In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in the biological roles of carbohydrates and as a result it is now known that carbohydrates are involved in a vast array of disease processes. This review summarises progress in the development of carbohydrate-based therapeutics that involve: inhibition of carbohydrate-lectin interactions; immunisation, using monoclonal antibodies for carbohydrate antigens; inhibition of enzymes that synthesise disease-associated carbohydrates; replacement of carbohydrate-processing enzymes; targeting of drugs to specific disease cells via carbohydrate-lectin interactions; carbohydrate based anti-thrombotic agents.

International recommendations for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication and a leading cause of death in oncological patients. Recent guidelines have been established for the treatment and prevention of VTE in oncological patients in various clinical situations. These guidelines recommend: (a) prophylactic anticoagulation in all hospitalized oncological patients in whom there are no contraindications; (b) prophylactic anticoagulation in patients scheduled for major oncological surgery in whom there are no contraindications; (c) prolonged (>or=6 months) anticoagulant therapy in oncological patients with manifest VTE in order to prevent a new episode; (d) no routine prophylactic anticoagulation in ambulatory patients without VTE receiving chemotherapy, except when they are receiving treatment with anti-cancer agents with a high risk of thrombogenicity, such as thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based chemotherapeutic regimens; and (e) no use of prophylactic anticoagulants to improve survival in patients with cancer without manifest VTE. Although vitamin K antagonists, unfractionated heparin and in some cases fondaparinux sodium could be used for the treatment of VTE, low molecular weight heparins are recommended for initial and continuous anticoagulant treatment in oncological patients with VTE, as well as for its prevention.

Clinical pharmacology of antithrombotic drugs in coronary artery disease

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death in the Western world. Antithrombotic therapy is the cornerstone of its successful treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated that antithrombotic therapy reduces the risk for recurrent myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants interfere with haemostasis and thus bleeding is a major risk factor of these drugs. The benefit of antithrombotic therapy must therefore be carefully balanced with the risk of bleeding and other potential adverse reactions of these drugs. However, to date there is no firm evidence that dosage adaptation of aspirin or clopidogrel according to platelet aggregation testing translates directly into any clinical benefit. Resistance to antithrombotic drugs is a serious problem because these patients are at a higher risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. It has most recently been demonstrated that resistance to clopidogrel is at least in part caused by polymorphism of CYP2C19. Clinical trials have also demonstrated that optimal benefit in different settings depends unequivocally on the meticulous choice of the various drugs. Thus, profound knowledge of the clinical pharmacological profiles of the different antithrombotic drugs is indispensable for successful treatment.

Antithrombin effect on coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles after living donor liver transplantation: a pilot study

Early after liver transplantation, patients are in a hypercoagulable state because of an imbalance between coagulation and fibrinolysis because of the slow recovery of depleted anticoagulant proteins. Antithrombin (AT) is used in anticoagulant protocols to prevent thrombosis. The subjects of the present study were 17 men and eight women that underwent living donor liver transplantation. The initial 15 cases were administered AT concentrate (1500 U/day) on postoperative days (POD) 1 through 3 (AT group) and the following 10 consecutive cases were not administered AT (control). AT, thrombin-AT complex, plasmin-alpha2 plasmin inhibitor complex, thrombomodulin, fibrin degradation product D-dimer (FDP-DD) level, prothrombin time international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, and platelet counts were measured. In the AT group, AT activity was maintained at levels >80% for 5 days after transplantation. In the control group, AT activity did not return to normal during the first 2 weeks after the operation. FDP-DD levels were significantly higher in the control group than in the AT group (P < 0.05). Six patients in the control group and three patients in the AT group required transfusions with platelet concentrate (P < 0.05). AT supplementation might reduce FDP-DD levels and prevent decreased platelet counts in the early stages after liver transplantation.

Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: role of dalteparin

Cancer is a major risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Conventional anticoagulant therapy with a vitamin K antagonist is more problematic in cancer patients due to an increased risk of recurrent VTE, and an increased risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding. In recent years, there has been a shift toward treating cancer patients with VTE with extended duration dalteparin. Dalteparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, has been shown to be more effective, and as safe as conventional anticoagulant therapy, in cancer patients with VTE. This paper will (a) review the relationship between cancer and VTE, and (b) provide an overview of the role of dalteparin in the management of VTE in patients with cancer.

Primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients

Venous thromboembolism is a major risk for surgical patients during the perioperative period. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism remains a critical component of surgical patient care. The risk for venous thromboembolism in surgical patients can be stratified by their risk factors and by the type of operation. Pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism includes unfractionated heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, warfarin, antiplatelet therapy, and direct thrombin inhibitors. Mechanical devices such as graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compressions, and venous foot pumps are also effective modalities for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The optimal preventive measure of venous thromboembolism should be based on the degree of risk for venous thromboembolism with the intensity of prophylaxis while balancing potential treatment benefits and risks in each individual patient. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism, the methods for achieving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and the approach to institute venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in surgical patients undergoing various operative interventions are reviewed in this article.

Low molecular weight heparin prevents hepatic fibrogenesis caused by carbon tetrachloride in the rat

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In this study, we investigated the effect of dalteparin sodium, a low molecular weight (LMW)-heparin, on hepatic fibrogenesis caused by chronic carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) administration in the rat.

METHODS

Female Wistar rats were given a single, or repeated intraperitoneal injections of CCl4 (1ml/kg, twice per week) and dalteparin (50IU/kg, daily) for 7 weeks.

RESULTS

Dalteparin did not prevent acute CCl4-induced hepatic necrosis and elevation in serum aminotransferases levels; however, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive hepatocytes were dramatically increased 24h after simultaneous administration of CCl4 and dalteparin. Interestingly, serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) levels 12h after injection of CCl4 were almost doubled when dalteparin was given simultaneously. Hepatic fibrosis following 7-week CCl4 treatment was markedly ameliorated by daily co-administration of dalteparin. Indeed, dalteparin largely inhibited CCl4-induction of smooth muscle alpha-actin expression, alpha1(I)procollagen and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 mRNA levels in the liver. Further, dalteparin blunted platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced increases in 5-bromo-2'deoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake in 3-day cultured hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalteparin enhances hepatic regeneration and minimizes hepatic fibrogenesis caused by chronic CCl4 treatment. The mechanism underlying these effects most likely involves both up-regulation of HGF and inhibition of HSC proliferation.

Coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles and appropriate use of heparin after living-donor liver transplantation

Heparin is widely used to reduce the incidence of vascular thrombosis after liver transplantation. Appropriate use of heparin based on changes in coagulation and fibrinolytic profiles, however, has not yet been discussed in detail. We performed living-donor liver transplantation for 128 adult patients. In this series, dalteparin (25 IU/kg/d) was administered until post-operative day (POD) 2. On POD 3, the anticoagulant drug was changed to heparin (unfractionated heparin sodium, 5000 U/d), the dose of which was changed according to the level of activated clotting time (ACT) targeted between 130 and 160 s. The plasma level of plasmin-alpha2 plasmin inhibitor complex, thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), and fibrin degradation product D-dimer (FDP-DD) were monitored in the 21 patients. Predictors for heparin doses were analyzed among clinical parameters (n = 128). Four patients (3%) were complicated with thrombosis despite the above-mentioned anticoagulation protocol. Transfusion and/or relaparotomy for hemostasis were necessary for bleeding in 19 patients (15%). The TAT level markedly elevated until POD 3 and FDP-DD peaked later. The required heparin dose to maintain adequate ACT levels increased linearly until POD 8, and kept constant thereafter, which correlated with the weight of the liver graft (p = 0.01). Thus, frequent monitoring of the heparin dosage is necessary to keep the ACT level in the target range in the first post-operative week. High hemorrhage complications in our series indicate that the lower target ACT range may be preferable in the second post-operative week.

Ximelagatran/Melagatran

Ximelagatran (Exanta), the first available oral direct thrombin inhibitor, and its active form, melagatran, have been evaluated in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. After oral administration ximelagatran is rapidly bioconverted to melagatran. Melagatran inactivates both circulating and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the thrombin active site, thus, inhibiting platelet activation and/or aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis time. The efficacy of subcutaneous melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran has been investigated in four European trials and the efficacy of an all oral ximelagatran regimen has been investigated in five US trials. In a dose-ranging European study, preoperatively initiated subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg twice daily followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than subcutaneous dalteparin sodium 5000IU once daily in preventing the occurrence of VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. In one study, there were no significant differences in VTE prevention between subcutaneous melagatran 3 mg administered after surgery followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily and enoxaparin sodium (enoxaparin) 40 mg once daily. Compared with enoxaparin, significantly lower rates of proximal DVT and/or PE (major VTE) and total VTE were observed when melagatran was initiated preoperatively (2mg) then postoperatively (3mg) and followed by ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. In the US, four studies showed that postoperatively initiated ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily was of similar efficacy to enoxaparin or warfarin in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement. However, ximelagatran 36 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin (target international normalised ratio of 2.5) at preventing the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing total knee replacement in two studies.Ximelagatran alone or after melagatran was generally well tolerated. Overall, the incidence of bleeding events and transfusion rates were not markedly different from those documented for comparator anticoagulants. In a post-hoc analysis of one study, transfusion rates were lower in ximelagatran than enoxaparin recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral ximelagatran alone or in conjunction with subcutaneous melagatran has shown good efficacy and was generally well tolerated in the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients receiving ximelagatran/melagatran do not require anticoagulant monitoring. The drug has a low potential for drug interactions and can be administered either by subcutaneous injection or orally. Thus, on the basis of available evidence, ximelagatran/melagatran appears poised to play an important role in the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran and its active metabolite melagatran: a mini-review

Ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) is a novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) that is rapidly converted to melagatran, its active form, following absorption. Melagatran has been shown to be a potent, rapidly binding, competitive inhibitor of human alpha-thrombin that inhibits both thrombin activity and generation. Melagatran also effectively inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin. Melagatran has a wide therapeutic interval that enables it to be administered safely across a wide range of doses with no increased risk of bleeding, in contrast with warfarin whose narrow therapeutic window necessitates monitoring of its pharmacodynamic effect. Although melagatran has all the pharmacodynamic properties required of a new antithrombotic agent, low oral bioavailability that is even further reduced by the concomitant intake of food precludes its development as an oral agent. It was this that propelled the development of its prodrug, ximelagatran, which is 170 times more lipophilic than melagatran and uncharged at intestinal pH. Ximelagatran is therefore much better than melagatran at penetrating the gastrointestinal barrier and, as a consequence, has sufficient bioavailability (20%) for oral administration. Moreover, its pharmacokinetic properties following oral administration are stable and reproducible, with no food interactions and a low potential for drug-drug interactions. These properties allow ximelagatran to be administered twice daily according to a fixed dose regimen without coagulation monitoring. As a consequence of its favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, ximelagatran is currently undergoing full-scale clinical development for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders.

Cost effectiveness of extended treatment with low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) in unstable coronary artery disease: results from the FRISC II trial

BACKGROUND

In unstable coronary artery disease short term treatment with low molecular weight heparin in addition to aspirin has been shown to be effective.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of extended treatment with dalteparin in patients managed with a non-invasive treatment strategy.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, multicentre study.

SETTING

58 centres in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, of which 16 were interventional.

PATIENTS

After at least five days' treatment with open label dalteparin, 2267 patients were randomised to continue double blind treatment with either subcutaneous dalteparin twice daily or placebo for three months. The patients' use of health service resources was recorded prospectively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Death/myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

After one month into the double blind period there was a 47% relative reduction in death or myocardial infarction in the dalteparin group compared with the placebo group (p = 0.002). There was a non-significant mean cost difference, favouring the placebo group, of 849 Swedish crowns (SEK) per patient (equivalent to 58 pounds sterling). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for giving dalteparin treatment for one month was SEK 30 300 (range -78 000 to 139 000) (2060 pounds sterling, range -5300 pounds sterling to pound 9400 pounds sterling) per avoided death or myocardial infarct. At three months, the decrease in death or myocardial infarction was not significant, precluding cost effectiveness analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a marginal and non-significant increase in costs for one month of extended dalteparin treatment compared with placebo. Extended dalteparin treatment lowers the risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. While in many countries the resources for early intervention are limited, extended dalteparin treatment up to one month is a cost effective bridge to invasive intervention.

Dalteparin sodium treatment during resuscitation inhibits hemorrhagic shock-induced leukocyte rolling and adhesion in the mesenteric microcirculation

BACKGROUND

Ischemia/reperfusion-induced polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocyte (PMN) adhesion and extravasation are pivotal for the development of postinjury multiple organ failure. We hypothesized that the deleterious microcirculatory consequences of hemorrhagic shock (HS) could be altered by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy. Our aim was to investigate the effects of dalteparin sodium on leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions when LMWH treatment was initiated before HS or during resuscitation.

METHODS

Anesthetized dogs underwent HS (40 mm Hg mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes) and resuscitation either with shed blood or with lactated Ringer's (LR) solution. LMWH or conventional heparin sodium pretreatment was administered subcutaneously before hemorrhage; or LMWH was given intravenously during resuscitation. Mesenteric postcapillary venules were observed by intravital video microscopy before and after HS, and 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and 180 minutes after resuscitation, and leukocyte rolling and firm adherence were determined.

RESULTS

HS significantly increased PMN rolling and adhesion in the mesenteric microcirculation. LMWH, but not heparin sodium pretreatment, significantly inhibited both primary and secondary interactions. LMWH treatment was also effective when initiated during resuscitation. LMWH exerted the same inhibitory effect regardless of the type of resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

LMWH treatment during resuscitation effectively inhibits PMN rolling and adhesion.

Dalteparin sodium

Dalteparin sodium (Fragmin, Pharmacia Corporation) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a mean molecular weight of approximately 5000 Da. As with the other LMWHs, dalteparin sodium has certain advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), most important of which are improved bio-availability by sc. injection, a prolonged antithrombotic activity which is highly correlated with body weight permitting the o.d. administration of the drug. Dalteparin sodium has been subjected to a large number of well-designed randomised clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disorders. Based on data from the randomised clinical trials, dalteparin sodium has been approved internationally for a wide spectrum of clinical indications (e.g., prevention of thromboembolic events after surgery). Dalteparin sodium has also been studied in randomised controlled trials in the maintenance of graft patentcy following peripheral vascular surgery, in place of warfarin for the long-term treatment of patients presenting with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in the prevention of upper extremity thrombosis in patients with indwelling portacath devices and in pregnant patients with a history of previous venous thromboembolism with or without thrombophilia. Dalteparin sodium has been compared with heparin for the prevention of thrombotic complications during haemodyalisis and haemofiltration. These studies have shown promising results but further work is required before dalteparin sodium can be recommended for these indications.