Current management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation

Isolated left atrial cryoablation of atrial fibrillation in conventional mitral valve surgery

Background

Recent trends of surgery for atrial fibrillation (AF) are towards more safe and effective energy sources, as well as to simplified sets of atrial lesions.

Methods

One hundred eighteen (mean age, 67.4 ± 9.2 years) selected patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF and mitral valve (MV) disease underwent cryoablation of AF combined with conventional (not via mini-thoracotomy) MV surgery; the lesion set was limited to only the left atrium. Multivariable analyses identified predictors of cardiac rhythm at hospital discharge and follow-up.

Results

There were 7 (5.9%) hospital deaths; 33 (28%) patients were discharged on AF. Higher values of preoperative left atrial volume index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.01-1.13) and mixed etiology of MV disease (OR = 4.19, 95%CI: 1.23-14.2) were predictors of hospital discharge on AF. Seventy-four (66.7%) patients were on stable sinus rhythm at follow-up (median period, 6.6 years); the 1, 5, and 10-year nonparametric estimates of adjusted freedom from AF were 98.1%, 89.2% and 45.6%, respectively. Higher values of preoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressure (hazard ratio [HR] = HR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.08) and AF at hospital discharge (HR = 4.14, 95%CI: 1.50-11.4) were predictors of AF at follow-up.

Conclusions

During conventional MV surgery, a cryo-lesion set limited to only the left atrium may give good, immediate and long-term results. Left atrial dilation and mixed etiology of MV disease were predictors of hospital discharge on AF. Preoperative pulmonary hypertension and AF at discharge combined with an increased risk of AF at follow-up.

Medication-related complications in the trauma patient

Trauma patients are twice as likely to have adverse reactions to medication as nontrauma patients. The need for medication in trauma patients is high. Surgery is often necessary, and immunosuppression and hypercoagulability may be present. Adverse drug events can be caused in part by altered pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and polypharmacy. Medications may also have serious long-term adverse effects, which must be considered. It is not the purpose of this review article to discuss all adverse effects of all medications. This article will discuss the more common adverse effects of medications for trauma patients in the acute care setting, in the following categories: pain control, sedation, antibiotics, seizure prophylaxis in head trauma, atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prophylaxis, hemodynamic support, adrenal insufficiency, factor VIIa.

Iohexol contrast medium induces QT prolongation in amiodarone patients

AIMS

Amiodarone is widely used in ventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation, known to prolong QT-intervals. Concurrent administration of drugs prolonging QT- time can induce life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

METHODS

QT-interval changes following use of Iohexol contrast-medium for coronarangiography were observed comparing 21 patients taking long-term amiodarone therapy with 21 controls not taking amiodarone or QT-prolonging drugs retrospectively.

RESULTS

Concurrent use of Iohexol and amiodarone was associated with significant prolongation of QTc-interval (433, 95%CI: 419-448 ms vs. 480, 95%CI: 422-483 ms, P < 0.001) the day after coronarangiograpgy. 6/21 patients showed severe prolonged QTc-interval of >500 ms.

CONCLUSION

Caution is advised until more is known about pro-arrhythmic effects of Iohexol.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation

In the post-AFFIRM era, treatment of AF has become the treatment of symptoms. In some patients, this will be simple rate control, but there remain a significant cohort of patients in whom rate control alone does not give acceptable symptom relief. In this group, antiarrhythmic therapy still has a role, and the AFFIRM trial indicates that this therapeutic strategy is without significant deleterious effect on mortality. The choice of antiarrhythmic agent must be individualized according to underlying cardiac pathologies and comorbidities, however. Most recently, the introduction of dofetilide has widened the therapeutic options in patients with severe heart disease, and the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation indicated the superior efficacy of amiodarone at low doses. The release/ development of newer Class III antiarrhythmic agents may offer hope for the benefits of amiodarone without the serious adverse effects with long-term therapy.

Diltiazem facilitates inactivation of single L-type calcium channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes

Diltiazem is a benzothiazepine Ca2+ channel blocker used clinically for its antihypertensive and antiarrhythmic effects. We studied the mechanism of diltiazem blockade by recording L-type Ca2+ channel currents from cell-attached patches in isolated guinea pig ventricular myocytes using Ba2+ as the charge carrier. With diltiazem (200 microM) in the superfusate, multichannel currents showed a use-dependent decline in amplitude reflecting reductions in the numbers of superpositions of channel openings. Analysis of single-channel currents revealed that both open and closed times were little affected by diltiazem (50 and 100 microM). However, the rate of decay of the averaged current during 150-ms depolarization steps was significantly accelerated and the open state probability in current containing-sweeps was significantly decreased by diltiazem, suggesting that the drug accelerates transition from the activated state to the inactivated state. The effect of diltiazem on the slow gating process was studied by repetitively applying 500-1000 step pulses at selected holding potentials. Decreased channel availability by diltiazem was reflected by the increasing number of blank sweeps per run at depolarized holding potentials. These results suggest that diltiazem reduces Ca2+ influx by accelerating inactivation during action potentials, and that the use-dependent blockade is due to increases in the number of channels in a sustained closed state.

Recent advances in drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Despite the major new insights into our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) gained in the last decade, the treatment of this common arrhythmia remains unsatisfactory in many patients. Although several new treatment modalities (e.g., internal cardioversion, pulmonary vein ablation, preventive pacing) have been developed, pharmacologic therapy remains the first-line therapy in most patients with AF. As illustrated by recent trials comparing rhythm control and rate control, current antifibrillatory drugs are hampered by a relatively low success rate in maintaining long-term sinus rhythm and the occurrence of proarrhythmic and other adverse events. This article discusses currently available antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm and rate control, with special emphasis on more recently developed drugs and drugs still under development. Selective blockers of atrial ion channels (IKur and IK.ACh), multi-ion channel blockers, and selective A1-adenosine receptor antagonists are examples of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs that are expected to be more effective and safer than those currently available.

New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, the prevalence of which is increasing with the aging of the population. Because of its clinical importance and the lack of highly satisfactory management approaches, AF is the subject of active clinical and research efforts. This paper reviews recent and on-going developments in pharmacological and non-drug management of AF. The ideal therapeutic goal for AF is the production and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Comparative studies suggest that available class I and III drugs have comparable and modest efficacy for sinus rhythm maintenance. Amiodarone, with actions of all antiarrhythmic classes, has recently been shown to have clearly superior efficacy compared with other available drugs. Newer agents are in development, but their advantages are as yet unclear and appear limited. A potentially interesting approach is the prescription of drugs upon the occurrence of an attack, rather than on a continuous basis. Recent insights into AF mechanisms may permit therapy to prevent development of the AF substrate. An alternative to sinus rhythm maintenance is a rate control approach, with no attempt to prevent AF. Drugs to effect rate control include digitalis, beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Digitalis has limited value for control of exercise heart rate and for paroxysmal AF, but is particularly well suited for patients with concomitant AF and congestive heart failure. AV-nodal ablation and pacing is an effective alternative for rate control but leaves the patient pacemaker dependent. The relative merits of rate versus rhythm control are being evaluated in ongoing trials, preliminary results of which indicate no statistically significant differences in primary endpoints but highlight the risks of rhythm control therapy. In patients requiring pacemakers, physiological pacing (dual chamber devices or atrial pacing) has an advantage over purely ventricular pacemakers in AF prevention. Newer pacing modalities that produce more synchronised atrial activation, as well as pacemakers that prevent excessive atrial rate swings, show promise in AF prevention and may soon see wider use. The usefulness of automatic atrial defibrillators is presently limited by discomfort during shocks. Targeted destruction of pulmonary vein foci by radiofrequency catheter ablation suppresses paroxysmal AF. Efficacy in persistent AF is lower and still under study. Problems include potential recurrence in other veins and a small but nontrivial risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. Surgical division of the atria into zones with limited electrical connection, the MAZE procedure, is highly effective in AF prevention but is a major intervention that is not applicable to most patients. In conclusion, significant advances are being made in the management of patients with AF but much more work remains to be done.