Intravenous esomeprazole

Structure-Guided Evolution of Cyclohexanone Monooxygenase Toward Bulky Omeprazole Sulfide: Substrate Migration and Stereoselectivity Inversion

Structure-guided engineering of a CHMO from Amycolatopsis methanolica (AmCHMO) was performed for asymmetric sulfoxidation activity and stereoselectivity toward omeprazole sulfide. Initially, combinatorial active-site saturation test (CASTing) and iteratively saturation mutagenesis (ISM) were performed on 5 residues at the "bottleneck" of substrate tunnel, and MT3 was successfully obtained with a specific activity of 46.19 U/g and R-stereoselectivity of 99 % toward OPS. Then, 4 key mutations affecting the stereoselectivity were identified through multiple rounds of ISM on residues at the substrate binding pocket region, resulting MT8 with an inversed stereoselectivity from 99 % (R) to 97 % (S). MT8 has a greatly compromised specific activity of 0.08 U/g. By introducing additional beneficial mutations, MT11 was constructed with significantly increased specific activity of 2.29 U/g and stereoselectivity of 97 % (S). Enlarged substrate tunnel is critical to the expanded substrate spectrum of AmCHMO, while reshaping of substrate binding pocket is important for stereoselective inversion. Based on MD simulation, pre-reaction states of MT3-OPSproR, MT8-OPSproS, and MT11-OPSproS were calculated to be 45.56 %, 17.94 %, and 28.65 % respectively, which further confirm the experimental data on activity and stereoselectivity. Our results pave the way for engineering distinct activity and stereoselectivity of BVMOs toward bulky prazole thioethers.

Oral Ppi VS IV Ppi in Hospitalized Patient

Objectives: Of this study have been produced in order to promote effective use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and (H2RAs) histamine II receptor antagonists at AL-Zahraa University Hospital (ZUH) in Lebanon. The aims: Of the study are to ensure PPIs use is limited to situations where there is indicated and there is a clear evidence of benefit, in order to decrease the cost when possible without affecting the patient’s clinical outcome. Setting: Medical and surgical in-patients floors at AL-Zahraa University Hospital (ZUH) were used for this study, which include 57medical and 43 surgical beds. Methods: In this study 100 patients files were reviewed for appropriate IVPPIs uses in two separate time intervals, over six months period started on January 1st, 2016 and ended on June 30th, 2016 and divided into two equal separate time intervals, pre implementation and post implementation of restriction dispensing policy, in order to determine the proper indication and the cost impact of restriction procedure. The main outcomes measure the cost difference between pre and post restriction periods. Results: During the pre-restriction period, the majority of IVPPIs vials were dispensed to patients able to tolerate oral medications with no proper indications to IVPPIs use, the daily consumption of IVPPIs were 48 vials (960 $) in the pre-restriction period as compared to only 2 vials (40$) in the post restriction period, therefore the associated daily cost was reduced from 960$ to 40$. Conclusion: This study highlighted the impact of proper use of PPIs based on implantation of the dispensing authorization restriction form of IVPPIS use which based on the international protocols for peptic ulcer drugs uses, leading to statistically significant in hospital patient’s daily cost reduction by 24 folds.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of esomeprazole for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of acid-related diseases such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). They are recommended by the American College of Gastroenterology for healing erosive esophagitis (EO) and as long-term treatment in patients with healed EO. The available PPIs differ somewhat in their pharmacokinetics and clinical properties, but whether these differences are of clinical relevance is a matter of debate. Some safety concerns have been raised with the use of PPIs, mostly an increased incidence of infectious diseases such as community-acquired pneumonia or Clostridium difficile diarrhea.

AREAS COVERED

This article explores the results of clinical studies on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of esomeprazole , as well as on its clinical efficacy to manage patients with GERD.

EXPERT OPINION

GERD is a public health concern as its worldwide incidence and associated complications are increasing alongside the exponentially increasing problem of obesity. PPIs are the first pharmacological option because of their efficacy and overall positive risk-to-benefit ratio. Improved efficacy with the use of stereospecific isomers of PPIs, such as esomeprazole, has not yet been convincingly demonstrated. Nevertheless, because of individual experience with former treatment, some patients may report better symptom control when treated with a specific PPI rather than with others.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of esomeprazole injection/infusion in healthy Chinese volunteers: a five-way crossover study

BACKGROUND

Esomeprazole provides effective and long lasting inhibition of gastric acid secretion. However, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous esomeprazole in the Chinese population remain unclear.

AIM

To compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous esomeprazole (injection and infusion) and their clinical safety and tolerability in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

A randomized, single-center, open-label, five-way crossover study was conducted in 20 healthy volunteers. CYP2C19 metabolizer genotype and Helicobacter pylori status were examined. Five dosing regimens were used: single 40 mg injection, 40 mg infusion every 12 h, 40 mg infusion followed by continuous infusion at 8 mg/h, 80 mg infusion followed by continuous infusion at 4 or 8 mg/h. Intragastric pH was recorded within 24 h. Plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), steady state concentration, and total plasma clearance were determined. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Continuous infusion resulted in a higher mean area under the curve and Cmax than injection. There were no significant differences among the four infusion groups in terms of percentages of time at pH > 4, > 5, > 6, > 7 within 24 h and pH > 6 within the first 3 h. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic or pH values among variants of CYP2C19 genotype. The pH value within 24 h was unaffected by H. pylori infection in subjects with continuous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole administrated by infusion produces better pharmacokinetic and intragastric pH profiles compared with those by injection. The optimal administration schedule for esomeprazole in Chinese subjects is infusion with 40 mg/12 h.

Esomeprazole: potent acid suppression in the treatment of acid-related disorders

Esomeprazole (S-omeprazole), an enantiomer of the racemate omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor to be developed as an isomer. This confers improved pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics compared with the racemate R/S-omeprazole. The difference in the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole and the R-isomer is due to reductions in total body clearance and first-pass metabolism in the liver. Pharmacodynamic studies showed that esomeprazole 40 mg provides greater intragastric acid control than respective doses of all the other proton pump inhibitors on the market. Several well-designed clinical trials, employing both endoscopic and symptomatic response criteria, have compared the efficacy of esomeprazole with that of other proton pump inhibitors in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients, and in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. In addition, the efficacy of esomeprazole for the healing and prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspeptic symptoms and ulcers has been established. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and consequent clinical importance of esomeprazole in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

A clinical guide to using intravenous proton-pump inhibitors in reflux and peptic ulcers

Intravenous (IV) proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are potent gastric acid suppressing agents, and their use is popular in clinical practice. Both IV and oral PPIs have similarly short half-lives, and their effects on acid secretion are similar, thus their dosing and dosage intervals appear to be interchangeable. The possible exception is when sustained high pHs are required to promote clot stabilization in bleeding peptic ulcers. Continuous infusion appears to be the only form of administration that reliably achieves these high target pHs. IV PPI is indicated in the treatment of high-risk peptic ulcers, complicated gastroesophageal reflux, stress-induced ulcer prophylaxis, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and whenever it is impossible or impractical to give oral therapy. The widespread use of PPIs has been controversial. IV PPIs have been linked to the development of nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care setting and to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients. This review discusses the use of IV PPI in different clinical scenarios, its controversies, and issues of appropriate use.