Perindopril

Perindopril erbumine-entrapped ultradeformable liposomes alleviate sarcopenia via effective skin delivery in muscle atrophy mouse model

Sarcopenia is a pertinent challenge in the super-aged societies causing reduced functional performance, poor quality of life and increased morbidity. In this study, the potential of perindopril erbumine-loaded ultradeformable liposomes (PE-UDLs) against sarcopenia was investigated. PE-UDLs were prepared by thin-film hydration and extrusion method using egg yolk L-α-phosphatidylcholine (EPC) as a lipid bilayer former and Tween 80 or sodium deoxycholate as an edge activator. Owing to the smallest particle size (75.0 nm) and the highest deformability (54.2) and entrapment efficiency (35.7 %), PE-UDLs with EPC to Tween 80 ratio of 8:2 was selected as the optimized formulation. The optimized PE-UDLs showed substantially higher cumulative amount of drug permeated and permeation rate across the rat skin compared to PE solution (485.7 vs. 50.1 µg and 13.4 vs. 2.3 µg/cm2/h, respectively). Topically applied PE-UDLs successfully ameliorated the effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sarcopenia in mice by improving body weight changes, grip strength and muscle weight. Furthermore, PE-UDLs reduced the shrinkage of muscle fibers as demonstrated by higher cross-sectional area than PE solution. PE-UDLs also increased the expression of myosin heavy chain (MHC) protein and reduced the expression of muscle atrophy F-box (Atrogin-1) and muscle ring-finger protein-1 (MuRF1), thereby improving muscles atrophy. In conclusion, these results demonstrate the therapeutic potential of PE-UDLs against sarcopenia.

Comparison of antihypertensive drugs amlodipine and perindopril on blood pressure variability after long-term treatment of hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the therapeutic effect of different antihypertensive drugs (amlodipine and perindopril) on hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab. Sixty patients with hypertension treated with apatinib or bevacizumab were selected and divided into two groups: one group was treated with amlodipine and the other group was treated with perindopril. Before and after treatment, the dynamic blood pressure (BP) measurement (systolic BP [SBP] and diastolic BP [DBP]), echocardiography (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, interventricular septal thickness [IVST], left ventricular posterior wall thickness [LVPWT], and left atrial diameter [LAD]), and detection of nitric oxide (NO) content in venous blood were performed. In the amlodipine group, the 24hSBP, 24hSSD, 24hSCV, daytime mean SBP (dSBP), daytime mean SSD (dSSD), daytime mean SBP CV, night mean SBP (nSBP), night mean SSD, 24hDBP, 24hDSD, 24 h DBP CV, daytime mean DBP (dDBP), daytime mean DSD (dDSD), daytime mean DBP CV, night mean DBP (nDBP), LAD, and LAD index (LADi) after treatment were all lower than before treatment, while NO was higher than before treatment (all P < 0.05). In the perindopril group, the 24hSBP, dSBP, nSBP, 24hDBP, dDBP, nDBP, LAD, LADi, IVST, LVPWT, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) after treatment were lower than before treatment, and NO level after treatment was higher than before treatment (all P < 0.05). After treatment, the 24hSBP, 24hSSD, dSBP, dSSD, nSBP, 24hDBP, 24hDSD, dDBP, dDSD, nDBP, night mean DSD, and NO were all lower while the LAD, LADi, IVST, LVPWT, and LVMI were higher in the amlodipine group than those in the perindopril group (all P < 0.05). Our study suggests that the SBP and DBP variability of amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension induced by apatinib and bevacizumab is slightly better than that of perindopril, but the effect of perindopril in improving endothelial function indices NO and echocardiographic data is better than that of amlodipine.

Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine in Hypertension: A Profile of Its Use

The single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril (PER)/indapamide (IND)/amlodipine (AML) is a valuable and convenient treatment option for patients with hypertension controlled with two-drug SPC of PER/IND + AML given as two separate pills at the same dose level. PER [an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor], IND (a thiazide-like diuretic) and AML (a calcium channel blocker) are well established antihypertensive agents, which have been available for a long time as monotherapies and dual SPCs and have complementary mechanisms of action. Once-daily PER/IND/AML provided effective BP control, with good tolerability, in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in clinical trials and in large observational prospective studies. The efficacy and tolerability of PER/IND/AML was similar to that of PER/IND + AML in a randomized clinical trial. The therapeutic effect of PER/IND/AML was associated with improved health-related quality of life. Thus, switching from the two-pill PER/IND + AML regimen to single-pill PER/IND/AML reduces pill burden and simplifies drug administration, which may improve adherence to treatment, leading to better BP control and clinical outcomes.

Determination of amlodipine, indapamide and perindopril in human plasma by a novel LC-MS/MS method: Application to a bioequivalence study

A robust and rapid UPLC-MS/MS method has been developed, optimized and validated for determination of amlodipine (AML), indapamide (IND) and perindopril (PRN) in human plasma. A positive electrospray ionization mode was used in a Xevo TQD LC-MS/MS instrument. A single sample preparation step using extraction technique was applied to extract the three analytes from plasma samples. There was no need to extract indapamide from blood samples in a further step. Extraction of the three drugs and internal standards was done using a solvent mixture composed of methyl tertiary butyl ether, dichloromethane and ethyl acetate. The prepared samples were analyzed using an Acquity UPLC HSS C₁₈ (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) column. Ammonium acetate and methanol, pumped at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min, were used as a mobile phase. Method validation was done as per the US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Linearity was achieved in the range of 0.2-15 ng/ml for AML, 0.5-50 ng/ml for IND and 0.5-120 ng/ml for PRN. Accuracy and precision were estimated and found to be within the acceptable ranges. The rapid chromatography permits analysis of many samples per batch, making the method suitable for clinical and pharmacokinetic investigations. The developed and validated method was applied to estimate AML, IND, and PRN in a fasting bioequivalence study in healthy human volunteers.

Physicochemical property trends of marketed prodrugs

Many prodrug reviews describe specific examples of the successful application of prodrug technology to produce blockbuster drugs, such as simvastatin, omeprazole, acyclovir and enalapril. These reviews are helpful to understand the previous success stories and case histories of prodrug technology. The aim of the current review seeks to more clearly define quantitative trends in the changes in the physicochemical property parameters between the successful prodrug and the active parent molecule. This information can serve to guide medicinal chemists toward more successful pharmaceutical prodrugs in the future.

Efficient access to enantiomerically pure cyclic alpha-amino esters through a lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution

A series of alpha-amino acid derivatives containing the 2,3-dihydroindole or octahydroindole core have been chemoenzymatically synthesized in good overall yields and high enantiomeric purity under mild reaction conditions using lipases for the introduction of chirality. Candida antarctica lipase type A has shown excellent activity and high enantiodiscrimination ability towards the two cyclic amino esters used as substrates. The selectivity of the process proved to be greatly dependent on the alkoxycarbonylating agent. Thus, the enzymatic kinetic resolution of methyl indoline-2-carboxylate has been successfully achieved using 3-methoxyphenyl allyl carbonate, whereas (2R,3aR,7aR)-benzyl octahydroindole-2-carboxylate required the less reactive diallyl carbonate.

Platelet hyperaggregability: impaired responsiveness to nitric oxide ("platelet NO resistance") as a therapeutic target

Platelet hyperaggregability and associated thrombosis have been documented in a number of cardiovascular disease states. While one of the current mainstays of anti-thrombotic treatment (i.e. aspirin, clopidogrel, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists) has been directed at reducing platelet activation and aggregation, it is apparent that there are limitations to the effectiveness of these therapies. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in platelet physiology. The ability of NO to regulate cyclic guanosine-3,'5'-monophosphate (cGMP), via activation of soluble guanylate cyclase, is the principal mechanism of negative control over platelet activity. NO is not only of the endothelial source, it is also released from activated platelets, providing a negative feedback. Studies in patients with symptomatic ischemia, chronic heart failure, diabetes and various risk factors for cardiovascular disease have demonstrated that platelets from these subjects exhibit reduced responsiveness to the anti-aggregating efficacy of NO: a phenomenon termed "platelet NO resistance". It constitutes an impaired physiological response to endogenous NO (endothelium-derived relaxing factor or EDRF), and as such may contribute to the increased risk of ischemic events. NO resistance also accounts for reduced pharmaco-activity of exogenous NO donors, e.g. organic nitrates. Platelet NO resistance results largely from a combination of "scavenging" of NO by superoxide anion radical and inactivation of soluble guanylate cyclase. NO resistance has both diagnostic and prognostic implications. The current review examines the association of platelet NO resistance with pathological hyperaggregability and discusses potential therapeutic strategies targeting this abnormality.

Impaired tissue responsiveness to organic nitrates and nitric oxide: a new therapeutic frontier?

Nitric oxide (NO) is a physiologically important modulator of both vasomotor tone and platelet aggregability. These effects of NO are predominantly mediated by cyclic guanosine-3,'5'-monophosphate (cGMP) via activation of soluble guanylate cyclase. However, in patients with ischemic heart disease, platelets and coronary/peripheral arteries are hyporesponsive to the antiaggregatory and vasodilator effects of NO donors. NO resistance is also associated with a number of coronary risk factors and presents in different disease states. It correlates with conventional measures of "endothelial dysfunction," and represents a multifaceted disorder, in which smooth muscle and platelet NO resistance are equally important, as sites of abnormal NO-driven physiology. NO resistance results largely from a combination of "scavenging" of NO by superoxide anion radical (O(2)(-)) and of (reversible) inactivation of soluble guanylate cyclase. It constitutes an impaired physiological response to endogenous NO (endothelium-derived relaxing factor, EDRF) and, as such, may contribute to the increased risk of ischemic events. Impairment in responsiveness to NO in ischemic patients implies a potential problem that those patients, in greatest need of nitrate therapy, may be least likely to respond. The prognostic impact of NO resistance at vascular and platelet levels has been demonstrated in patients with ischemic heart disease, and it has been shown that a number of agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, perhexiline, insulin, and possibly statins) ameliorate this anomaly. The current review examines different aspects of the "NO resistance" phenomenon and discusses some related methodological issues.

Perindopril versus Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade in Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is now known to play a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension and a range of other cardiovascular diseases. Two groups of drugs, the ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have been developed with the aim of improving clinical outcomes by regulating the RAAS in patients with cardiovascular disease. Initial assumptions were that these two drug types might be interchangeable, but ongoing research has revealed differences between them in terms of pharmacology and outcomes in clinical trials. Although both groups of drugs lower blood pressure, studies of the ACE inhibitor perindopril have revealed preservation of beneficial vascular and endothelial effects mediated by bradykinin and nitric oxide. The selective blockade exerted by ARBs is not associated with these effects. Furthermore, examination of clinical endpoints in major clinical trials has provoked discussion about outcomes comparing ACE inhibitors and ARBs, with recent debate focusing on the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients receiving these agents. Whether there is an actual difference in protection from MI remains unresolved, although available data confirm the benefit and safety of ACE inhibitors, in particular perindopril, for myocardial protection.

The ASCOT trial: clarifying the role of ACE inhibition in the reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension

Hypertension remains one of the primary causes of preventable death in developed countries. Universally accepted clinical practice guidelines based on well designed trials are needed to ensure standardized treatment for these patients. It has been hypothesized that agents such as calcium channel antagonists and ACE inhibitors may be more effective than beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (beta-blocker)- or diuretic-based regimens. However, until recently, there have been limited data on the efficacy of 'newer' antihypertensive regimens, particularly combination therapy, relative to standard therapeutic options. The ASCOT-BPLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm), a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in >19 250 patients with hypertension, highlights the benefit of a combined amlodipine plus perindopril regimen over an atenolol plus diuretic-based combination in terms of significant reductions (p < 0.05) in all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular events and procedures, and fatal and nonfatal stroke. The ASCOT-BPLA trial underlines the cardiovascular benefit of ACE inhibitors, specifically perindopril, beyond that provided by BP reduction, and potentially reflects a mechanistic feature of the ACE inhibitors. It also suggests that the combination of amlodipine plus perindopril may provide broad-spectrum cardiovascular protection, as well as reduce the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and renal impairment, in addition to its efficacy in lowering BP. The ASCOT-BPLA trial provides evidence of the need to reconsider traditional prescribing recommendations in patients with hypertension, particularly conclusions reached in the US after the publication of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) study. The recently published National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines in the UK emphasize the efficacy of ACE inhibitors as first-line agents for hypertensive patients <55 years of age and recommend ACE inhibitor therapy at any stage of hypertension management.