Fentanyl transdermal matrix patch (Durotep MT patch; Durogesic DTrans; Durogesic SMAT): in adults with cancer-related pain

Comparison of Pain Scale, Hemodynamics, and Side Effects of Percutaneous and Intravenous Fentanyl in Post Sectio Caesaria Patients at Bunda Hospital

This is novel research about comparison pain scale, hemodynamics, and side effects of percutaneous and intravenous fentanyl in post sectio cesarean patients. Sectio cesarean is a method of delivering a fetus through an incision in the abdominal wall (laparotomy) and the uterus wall. This method induces pain in the incision, so patients feel complicated or afraid to mobilize. Fentanyl is one of the opioid analgesics, which is the main choice in section caesarian surgery because safe for breastfeeding, is more potent than morphine, and acts as balanced anesthesia—comparing the use of percutaneous fentanyl with intravenous fentanyl with pain scale parameters, hemodynamics, and side effects in sectio caesarian patients at Bunda Mother and Child Hospital Jakarta. Before conducting this research, an observational study first makes an ethical approval. Data were taken prospectively and collected simultaneously to compare percutaneous and intravenous fentanyl performed on post sectio cesarean patients with the physical status of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I–II at Bunda Mother and Child Hospital Jakarta from September to November 2020. Comparative data observed were pain scale parameters, hemodynamics, and side effects after percutaneous fentanyl therapy or intravenous fentanyl therapy. Data were processed using SPSS 22 version and Microsoft Excell 2016. In conclusion, intravenous fentanyl is more effective in reducing pain scale and has more minor side effects than percutaneous fentanyl. There is no significant difference in hemodynamic parameters (p-value >0.05).

Degradable polymeric vehicles for postoperative pain management

Effective control of pain management has the potential to significantly decrease the need for prescription opioids following a surgical procedure. While extended release products for pain management are available commercially, the implementation of a device that safely and reliably provides extended analgesia and is sufficiently flexible to facilitate a diverse array of release profiles would serve to advance patient comfort, quality of care and compliance following surgical procedures. Herein, we review current polymeric systems that could be utilized in new, controlled post-operative pain management devices and highlight where opportunities for improvement exist.

Pharmacokinetic study between a bilayer matrix fentalyl patch and a monolayer matrix fentanyl patch: single dose administration in healthy volunteers

Aims

Transdermal fentanyl is a well established treatment for cancer pain. The aim of the present study is to assess the relative bioavailability of fentanyl from two different transdermal systems by evaluating plasma drug concentrations after single administration of Fentalgon® (test), a novel bilayer matrix type patch, and Durogesic SMAT (reference), a monolayer matrix type patch. In the Fentalgon patch the upper 6% fentanyl reservoir layer maintains a stable concentration gradient between the lower 4% donor layer and the skin. The system provides a constant drug delivery over 72 h.

Methods

This was an open label, single centre, randomized, single dose, two period crossover clinical trial, that included 36 healthy male volunteers. The patches were applied to non-irritated and non-irradiated skin on the intraclavicular pectoral area. Blood samples were collected at different time points (from baseline to 120 h post-removal of the devices) and fentanyl concentrations were determined using a validated LC/MS/MS method. Bioequivalence was to be claimed if the 90% confidence interval of AUC(0,t) and C_max ratios (test: reference) were within the acceptance range of 80–125% and 75–133%, respectively.

Results

The 90% confidence intervals of the AUC(0,t) ratio (116.3% [109.6, 123.4%]) and C_max ratio (114.4% [105.8, 123.8%] were well included in the acceptance range and the C_max ratio also met the narrower bounds of 80–125%. There was no relevant difference in overall safety profiles of the two preparations investigated, which were adequately tolerated, as expected for opioid-naïve subjects.

Conclusions

The new bilayer matrix type patch, Fentalgon®, is bioequivalent to the monolayer matrix type Durogesic SMAT fentanyl patch with respect to the rate and extent of exposure of fentanyl (Eudra/CT no. 2005-000046-36).

Efficacy of fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of chronic soft tissue cancer pain

BACKGROUND

Cancer pain may be a major problem for health care providers worldwide. According to different studies reporting the pain severity, one-third of patients reported to have moderate to severe pain. Management of cancer pain is one of the most important goals of palliative care. Recently, different research results on the efficacy of opioid analgesics in chronic pain management have played a role to implement standards in pain control by government agencies worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fentanyl transdermal patch in the treatment of chronic soft tissue cancer pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective descriptive study, we evaluated 86 patients with soft tissue tumors with chronic pain referred to cancer institute of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during 2006-2007. For all patients, transdermal fentanyl patch (25 μg/h) was administered. The appearance of patches was the same. Pain severity was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) initially and 24, 48 and 72 hours after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients' characteristics and VAS score before the treatment were not significantly different (P > 0.05). According to our findings, the pain severity was significantly reduced after the treatment (P = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events in patients was significantly high (72%). The most common adverse events were sleepiness, nausea and vomiting in 30.2% and 18.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Transdermal fentanyl patch was an effective and safe method to reduce pain in patients with soft tissue tumors. Moreover, it could improve the quality of life in these patients, but adverse events occurred in approximately 72% of patients.

The efficacy of transdermal fentanyl for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Epigastric pain management following endoscopic submucosal dissection is an important consideration. This study aimed to investigate the utility and safety of fentanyl patches for pain relief after the procedure.

METHODS

Patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection were prospectively randomised to either a transdermal fentanyl patch group or a placebo control group. An additional pethidine was intravenously administered when pain developed and a numerical rating scale was used to evaluate both pre- and post-procedural pain.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 12 mcg/h fentanyl patch or a control patch on the night before the procedure. The fentanyl patch group had significantly lower pain scores immediately following the procedure (mean, 5.17 vs. 4.26, p=0.030). Maximal pain scores during the first 24 h (5.43 vs. 4.46, p=0.038) and pain scores on the day after the procedure (2.98 vs. 1.20, p<0.001) were also lower in the fentanyl patch group. In addition, the fentanyl patch group required a significantly lower dose of pethidine for pain management (24.54 vs. 11.25, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The application of a transdermal fentanyl patch is an effective, convenient, and safe method to control epigastric pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Simple and rapid HPLC-UV method using an ultrafine particle octadecylsilane for determination of residual fentanyl in applied Durotep MT transdermal matrix patches and its clinical application

A few complicated and time-consuming methods are available for the determination of residual fentanyl in Durotep MT transdermal patches, however, their application to clinical settings is limited. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and rapid HPLC-UV method using an ultrafine particle octadecylsilane (ODS) for the determination of residual fentanyl in applied Durotep MT transdermal matrix patches. Patch extraction involved sonicating a shredded Durotep MT patch in acetonitrile for 15 min. Fentanyl separation was completed within 2 min using a 2.3-μm particle ODS column (50 × 4.6 mm i.d.) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. No peaks interfering with fentanyl (1.27 min) and papaverine (0.89 min) as an internal standard were observed. The calibration curve for fentanyl was linear over the range of 0.015-9.0 mg as a Durotep MT patch. The intra- and inter-assay precisions and accuracies of each patch were within 5.3% and 103.9-110.5% and within 8.2% and 97.1-104.3%, respectively. The validated method was applied to determine residual fentanyl in Durotep MT patches used in 35 cancer patients. Although the plasma fentanyl concentration was significantly correlated with its measured absorption rate, the measured absorption rate normalized fentanyl concentration showed a large inter-individual variation. The validated simple and rapid HPLC-UV method established in the present study is helpful for evaluating the absorption rate of fentanyl in patients receiving Durotep MT patches.

Transdermal matrix fentanyl membrane patch (matrifen): in severe cancer-related chronic pain

The matrix fentanyl membrane patch is a new transdermal patch designed with a reduced drug load compared with established reservoir and matrix fentanyl patches. The drug is contained within a silicone matrix with a rate-controlling membrane designed to maintain constant serum fentanyl concentrations over the 72-hour application period. The matrix fentanyl membrane patch was equivalent to the reservoir fentanyl patch in terms of transdermal delivery of fentanyl, as demonstrated after both single (100 microg/h) and multiple (50 microg/h) applications by the peak serum fentanyl concentration and the area under the serum concentration-time curve over 72 hours. In a randomized, nonblind, multicentre trial, the transdermal matrix fentanyl membrane patch was noninferior to standard opioid therapy (transdermal reservoir or matrix fentanyl patch or an oral opioid) in terms of analgesic efficacy over 30 days in patients with cancer-related chronic pain requiring long-term opioid use. The transdermal matrix fentanyl membrane patch was as well tolerated as standard opioid therapy; patient-rated tolerability scores for constipation, nausea, daytime drowsiness and sleep disturbance were similar between treatments.