On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations

Proton pump inhibitors and risk of vitamin and mineral deficiency: evidence and clinical implications

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the superior choice worldwide in antisecretory therapy in the evidence-based treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders including gastroesophageal reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease. PPI overutilization in ambulatory care settings is often a result of failure to re-evaluate the need for continuation of therapy, or insufficient use of on-demand and step-down therapy. Nonjudicious use of PPIs creates both preventable financial as well as medical concerns. PPIs have been associated with an increased risk of vitamin and mineral deficiencies impacting vitamin B12, vitamin C, calcium, iron and magnesium metabolism. While these risks are considered to be relatively low in the general population, they may be notable in elderly and malnourished patients, as well as those on chronic hemodialysis and concomitant PPI therapy. No current evidence recommends routine screening or supplementation for these potential vitamin and mineral deficiencies in patients on either short- or long-term PPI therapy. Reducing inappropriate prescribing of PPIs can minimize the potential risk of vitamin and mineral deficiencies.

Proton pump inhibitors: potential cost reductions by applying prescribing guidelines

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are being over prescribed in both primary and secondary care. This study aims to establish potential cost savings in a community drug scheme for a one year period according to published clinical and cost-effective guidelines for PPI prescribing.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study in the Republic of Ireland using the Health Services Executive (HSE) Primary Care Reimbursement Services (PCRS) pharmacy claims database. The HSE-PCRS scheme is means tested and provides free health care including medications to approximately 30% of the Irish population. Prescription items are WHO ATC coded and details of every drug dispensed and claimants' demographic data are available. Potential cost savings (net ingredient cost) were estimated according to UK NICE clinical guidelines for all HSE-PCRS claimants on PPI therapy for ≥3 consecutive months starting in 2007 with a one year follow up (n=167,747). Five scenarios were evaluated; (i) change to PPI initiation (cheapest brand); and after 3 months (ii) therapeutic switching (cheaper brand/generic equivalent); (iii) dose reduction (maintenance therapy); (iv) therapeutic switching and dose reduction and (v) therapeutic substitution (H2 antagonist).

RESULTS

Total net ingredient cost was €88,153,174 for claimants on PPI therapy during 2007. The estimated costing savings for each of the five scenarios in a one year period were: (i) €36,943,348 (42% reduction); (ii) €29,568,475 (34%); (iii) €21,289,322 (24%); (iv) €40,505,013 (46%); (v) €34,991,569 (40%).

CONCLUSION

There are opportunities for substantial cost savings in relation to PPI prescribing if implementation of clinical guidelines in terms of generic substitution and step-down therapy is implemented on a national basis.

[The Mexican consensus on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Part I]

BACKGROUND

The changes, advances, and new discoveries regarding different aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have made it necessary to update the Mexican Consensus published in 2002.

AIMS

To elaborate a new Mexican Consensus on GERD.

METHODS

The general project coordinators selected six GERD experts to carry out an extensive review of the literature for the purpose of elaborating statements on the principal aspects of GERD. These were then placed under the consideration of specialists in the study of this disease. Definitive approval by all participants was reached using the modified Delphi method with three rounds of anonymous and iterative voting. The following scale was employed: A- in complete agreement; B- in agreement, but with minor concerns; C- in agreement, but with major concerns; D- in disagreement, but with major concerns; E- in disagreement, but with minor concerns; or F- in complete disagreement. Consensus was declared when 67.00% or more of the participants concurred on a category of agreement (A, B, or C).

RESULTS

A consensus was reached on 160 of the statements upon completion of the voting rounds, with 90.00% concurrence for the majority of them.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2011 Mexican Consensus on Gastroesophageal Disease is a practical and up-to-date consultation tool, providing the opinion of Mexican experts on all the new information available about this disease. It allows there to be homogeneity in diagnostic and therapeutic criteria, all of which serves to benefit our patients.

Overutilization of proton-pump inhibitors: what the clinician needs to know

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the leading evidence-based therapy for upper gastrointestinal disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and peptic ulcer disease. The effectiveness of PPIs has led to overutilization in multiple treatment arenas, exposing patients to an increasing number of potential risks. The overutilization of PPIs in ambulatory care settings is often a result of failure to re-evaluate the need for continuation of therapy, or insufficient use of on-demand and step-down therapy. PPI overutilization in the inpatient setting is often a result of inappropriate stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in nonintensive care unit patients, and failure to discontinue SUP prior to hospital discharge. Potential consequences of prolonged PPI therapy include hypergastrinemia, enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia, and parietal cell hypertrophy, leading to rebound acid hypersecretion. PPIs have been linked via retrospective studies to increased risk of enteric infections including Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, community-acquired pneumonia, bone fracture, nutritional deficiencies, and interference with metabolism of antiplatelet agents. Reducing inappropriate prescribing of PPIs in the inpatient and outpatient settings can minimize potential for adverse events, and foster controllable cost expenditure.

Cost minimization of on-demand maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

On-demand proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy is one of the suggested strategies for patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease who achieve symptom remission after 4 weeks of continuous treatment. This review evaluates the difference in cost and quality of life of six on-demand proton pump inhibitor maintenance strategies in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. This was performed by decision analysis and Markov modeling of costs (from the perspective of the healthcare service and society) and utility up to 12 months. Median utility scores associated with each proton pump inhibitor ranged from 0.731 to 0.745 quality-adjusted life years and were not statistically different. Annual expected cost, however, was statistically different among the different drugs and the following cost-minimization ranking was obtained for median costs to the healthcare service and society, respectively: rabeprazole (euro 181, euro 295), pantoprazole (euro 223, euro 341), lansoprazole (euro 249, euro 370), omeprazole 10 mg (euro 297, euro 412), esomeprazole (euro 295, euro 419) and omeprazole 20 mg (euro 405, euro 528). Unit cost of proton pump inhibitors was the major determinant of cost to the healthcare service, while the number of productivity days lost due to symptoms was the major determinant of cost to society. In Italy, on-demand use of rabeprazole for maintenance therapy of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease incurs the least cost in comparison with the other proton pump inhibitors evaluated.

Pulmonary or otolaryngologic extraesophageal manifestations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

The extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease that are similar to a heart attack or gastric diseases are well known, while those categorized as pulmonary or otolaryngological are less known and less studied. In this article, we introduce this less known aspect of gastroesophageal reflux.

Pantoprazole on-demand effectively treats symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of pantoprazole as on-demand therapy for the long-term management of patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) has been demonstrated in clinical studies. In this study, the efficacy of pantoprazole 20mg and esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand therapy for relief of symptoms of mild GORD was compared.

METHODS

Patients with reflux oesophagitis grade A or B (Los Angeles classification) or endoscopy-negative reflux disease (enGORD) were treated with pantoprazole 20mg once daily for 28 days during the acute phase (AP, n = 236). Patients without heartburn during the final 3 days of the AP entered the long-term phase (LTP, n = 199) and were randomised to either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg as on-demand treatment for 6 months. Antacids were provided as rescue medication during this phase. The mean intensities of the symptoms of heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing, both separately and as a combined symptom score, together with the mean duration of these symptoms during on-demand treatment, were compared between the two treatment groups. The number of tablets taken was also compared.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment with pantoprazole, 87.3% of patients had relief from heartburn, 74.1% from epigastric pain and 80.8% from acid eructation, according to the investigator assessment. A total of 236 patients were eligible for the on-demand phase. Based on patient diary data, on-demand treatment with pantoprazole resulted in significantly lower mean intensity of heartburn compared with that in the esomeprazole group (1.12 for pantoprazole and 1.32 for esomeprazole, respectively [p = 0.012], in the intention-to-treat [ITT] population). The mean symptom intensities of acid eructation and pain on swallowing, together with the duration of these symptoms, were comparable in the two treatment groups. The combined symptom score of the three symptoms heartburn, acid eructation and pain on swallowing was numerically lower in the pantoprazole group compared with the esomeprazole group (1.72 vs 1.99, respectively, in the ITT population). Tablet intake was comparable in both groups. Relief of symptoms in Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients was also similar in both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated with a good safety profile.

CONCLUSION

On-demand therapy with either pantoprazole 20mg or esomeprazole 20mg is a comparably effective treatment strategy for the long-term treatment of non-erosive and mild GORD. However, the mean intensity of heartburn was significantly lower with pantoprazole treatment.

Programme of stepping down from twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy for symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease associated with a formulary change at a VA medical center

BACKGROUND

In July 2001, our Veterans' Affairs hospital changed its formulary proton pump inhibitor (PPI) from lansoprazole to rabeprazole. All patients previously receiving lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily were switched to rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

AIM

To determine if patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who were previously managed on lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, could be maintained on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred and thirty-five patients had received lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily for at least 12 months before the formulary change. Medical records were reviewed for 12 months before and after the formulary change.

RESULTS

There were 432 men and three women with a mean age of 66.7 years (range: 38-91). Two hundred and twelve patients were excluded. Of the remaining 223, 111 (50%) were maintained successfully on rabeprazole 20 mg once daily. Twenty-three (10%) stayed off all acid suppression during follow-up. The number of endoscopies and clinic visits did not significantly change during the follow-up. Fifty-six percent who had erosive oesophagitis failed a dose taper compared with 31% of those with endoscopy-negative GERD (P<0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients receiving twice daily PPI therapy for GERD could be maintained on once daily PPI or no acid suppression for 12 months of follow-up. Dose reduction was more successful in those without erosive oesophagitis.

Long-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in routine care - results from the ProGERD study

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition frequently requiring long-term pharmacological treatment.

AIM

To describe the long-term pattern of GERD medication use in GERD patients receiving routine care.

METHODS

Patients were recruited as part of the ongoing ProGERD study, a 10-year-cohort study including 6215 patients at baseline. GERD medication and symptoms were assessed with patient questionnaires. During follow-up, medical treatment was prescribed by participating primary care physicians. Associations between patient characteristics and medication were analysed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients who reported using any GERD medication remained constant from year 1 to year 4 (74%, 74%, 73% and 71%). Of patients who reported using GERD medication, the majority were taking proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (79%, 84%, 85%, and 87%). Continuous PPI intake was the predominant prescription pattern (53%, 49%, 56% and 56%), followed by on-demand treatment (26%, 35%, 29% and 29%). Continuous PPI intake was strongly associated with the presence of erosive GERD.

CONCLUSION

Three-quarters of the GERD population in our study reported long-term treatment with a PPI. Continuous PPI intake was the predominant treatment pattern, and the proportion of patients taking a PPI on a continuous basis remained constant over time.

An update on the available treatments for non-erosive reflux disease

Non-erosive reflux disease is defined as the presence of troublesome reflux symptoms, such as heartburn and regurgitation, in the absence of endoscopically-visible damage of the oesophageal mucosa. In comparison with erosive oesophagitis, non-erosive reflux disease is the most common clinical manifestation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Pathophysiologically, it is not a homogeneous disease as only approximately two-thirds of patients have truly acid-related symptoms. This explains the fact that patients with non-erosive reflux disease consistently show a poorer response to proton pump inhibitor treatment than patients with erosive oesophagitis. Nevertheless, profound acid inhibition by proton pump inhibitors is the recommended first-line treatment in patients suffering from this condition, both in the initial phase and for long-term care. Non-responders to proton pump inhibitor therapy should be subjected to a thorough examination and treated on an individual basis. Emerging data on the long-term course of reflux disease under routine clinical care have led to the adoption of new therapeutic strategies that would have been unthinkable only a few years ago.

Management of symptoms in step-down therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Majority of studies on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that include patients with or without erosive disease have documented the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as well as their superiority to H(2)-receptor antagonist (H(2)-RA). The purpose of this study was to clarify the difference in quality of GERD treatment with PPIs and H(2)-RA in step-down protocol using lansoprazole.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with reflux esophagitis were randomly divided into three groups and assessed by severity score; group 1 received 30 mg lansoprazole initially and maintenance therapy with a standard dose H(2)-RA; group 2 received 30 mg of lansoprazole initially and maintenance therapy of 15 mg lansoprazole; and group 3 received 15 mg of lansoprazole once daily for 16 weeks. If the patients experienced symptomatic recurrence while on H(2)-RA, they were switched to PPI maintenance.

RESULTS

Heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia were hardly found in any group at 8 weeks after 15 mg or 30 mg lansoprazole treatment. After 8 weeks, however, heartburn and regurgitation recurred at 50% and 78.6%, respectively, in the stepped down to famotidine group, and quality of life (QOL) was significantly impaired. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) analysis showed reduction of the submucosal layer without any change in the mucosal surface in the stepped down to famotidine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Step-down lansoprazole therapy is considered very effective in terms of rapid effect, long-term effect and high quality GERD treatment.

Economic analysis of on-demand maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

AIM

To evaluate the costs and effectiveness of on-demand maintenance therapy with oral esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole or rabeprazole in patients with endoscopy-confirmed non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) in the UK.

METHODS

A probabilistic model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of five proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in endoscopy-negative, symptomatic NERD patients who had complete resolution of heartburn symptoms following 4 weeks of open-label acute PPI treatment. The total annual expected costs (euro, 2003 values) and utilities gained per patient were measured over a 1-year horizon from the perspective of the UK NHS. Model uncertainty was addressed by sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The base-case annual median costs and utilities gained with on-demand PPI therapy were: 123 euro and 0.89 for rabeprazole 10mg; 176 euro and 0.90 for pantoprazole 20mg; 190 euro and 0.89 for esomeprazole 20mg; 195 euro and 0.91 for lansoprazole 15mg; 201 euro and 0.90 for omeprazole 20mg; and 210 euro and 0.91 for omeprazole 10mg. Differences in costs, but not in outcomes, were statistically significant. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, on-demand use of rabeprazole for the management of NERD incurred the least cost in comparison with the other PPIs evaluated. Utility gains were comparable for all on-demand PPIs. The place of on-demand PPIs in therapy, however, requires further evaluation.

Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were published in 1995 and updated in 1999. These and other guidelines undergo periodic review. Advances continue to be made in the area of GERD, leading us to review and revise previous guideline statements. GERD is defined as symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. Diagnostic guidelines address empiric therapy and the use of endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry in GERD. Treatment guidelines address the role of lifestyle changes, patient directed (OTC) therapy, acid suppression, promotility therapy, maintenance therapy, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic therapy in GERD. Finally, there is a discussion of the rare patient with refractory GERD and a list of areas in need of additional study.

Personal view: rationale and proposed algorithms for symptom-based proton pump inhibitor therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease are chronic, highly prevalent conditions requiring long-term treatment that is both effective and practical. On-demand therapy with a proton pump inhibitor may meet that need. It is becoming a mainstay of long-term treatment because it reduces the risk of over- and under-treatment, is cost-effective and user friendly. Epidemiological and clinical observations speak also in its favour. However, for the anticipated benefits of on-demand therapy to accrue in clinical practice, on-demand treatment algorithms are required. These algorithms must specify the initial evaluation and treatment of candidates, and follow-up protocols for an on-demand strategy. Our group has developed such algorithms, which are presented here.