Tolerability and consistency of effect of zolmitriptan nasal spray in a long-term migraine treatment trial

European Headache Federation (EHF) consensus on the definition of effective treatment of a migraine attack and of triptan failure

Background

Triptans are migraine-specific acute treatments. A well-accepted definition of triptan failure is needed in clinical practice and for research. The primary aim of the present Consensus was to provide a definition of triptan failure. To develop this definition, we deemed necessary to develop as first a consensus definition of effective treatment of an acute migraine attack and of triptan-responder.

Main body

The Consensus process included a preliminary literature review, a Delphi round and a subsequent open discussion. According to the Consensus Panel, effective treatment of a migraine attack is to be defined on patient well-being featured by a) improvement of headache, b) relief of non-pain symptoms and c) absence of adverse events. An attack is considered effectively treated if patient’s well-being, as defined above, is restored within 2 hours and for at least 24 hours. An individual with migraine is considered as triptan-responder when the given triptan leads to effective acute attack treatment in at least three out of four migraine attacks. On the other hand, an individual with migraine is considered triptan non-responder in the presence of failure of a single triptan (not matching the definition of triptan-responder). The Consensus Panel defined an individual with migraine as triptan-resistant in the presence of failure of at least 2 triptans; triptan refractory, in the presence of failure to at least 3 triptans, including subcutaneous formulation; triptan ineligibile in the presence of an acknowledged contraindication to triptan use, as specified in the summary of product characteristics.

Conclusions

The novel definitions can be useful in clinical practice for the assessment of acute attack treatments patients with migraine. They may be helpful in identifying people not responding to triptans and in need for novel acute migraine treatments. The definitions will also be of help in standardizing research on migraine acute care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01502-z.

Nasal Delivery of Acute Medications for Migraine: The Upper Versus Lower Nasal Space

The acute treatment of migraine requires effective drugs that are well tolerated and provide rapid and consistent pain relief. Oral tablets are the most commonly used acute treatment for migraine; however, their effectiveness is limited by the rate of gastrointestinal (GI) tract absorption and first-pass hepatic metabolism, and they may not be ideal for patients experiencing GI motility issues. Nasal delivery is an attractive alternative route as it may circumvent GI tract absorption, avoid first-pass metabolism in the liver, and potentially reduce the frequency of GI adverse events. The large surface area and high vascularity within the nose may permit rapid absorption of therapeutics into the systemic circulation, allowing for rapid onset of action. However, the site of drug deposition (upper versus lower nasal cavity) may influence drug pharmacokinetics. Most approved nasal migraine therapies target the lower nasal space where the epithelium is less permeable, and they may be quickly cleared away due to increased ciliary function or dripping from the nose or swallowing, resulting in variable absorption and limited bioavailability. Together with its abundant vascularization, relative mucosal thickness stability, and low clearance rates, the upper nasal space harnesses the benefits of nasal delivery to potentially maximize drug efficacy.

Preclinical support for the therapeutic potential of zolmitriptan as a treatment for cocaine use disorders

Serotonin 1B receptor (5-HT_1BR) agonists enhance cocaine intake in rats during daily self-administration but attenuate cocaine intake after prolonged abstinence. Here we investigated whether the less selective but clinically available 5-HT_1D/1BR agonist, zolmitriptan, produces similar effects. Male and free-cycling female Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to lever press for cocaine (0.75 mg/kg, i.v.) or sucrose (45 mg pellet) reinforcement until performance rates stabilized. Rats then received zolmitriptan (3.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg, s.c.) prior to testing for its effects on response and reinforcement rates. Under cocaine testing conditions, rats had access to the training dose for the first hour followed by a lower cocaine dose (0.075 mg/kg, i.v.) for the second hour. Zolmitriptan decreased cocaine intake at both cocaine doses and in both sexes even without a period of abstinence and without altering sucrose intake. A separate group of rats underwent identical training procedures and were tested for effects of the selective 5-HT_1B and 5-HT_1D receptor antagonists, SB224289 (3.2, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg, s.c.) and BRL15572 (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), respectively, alone or in combination with zolmitriptan (5.6 mg/kg, s.c.) under identical cocaine testing procedures as above. The zolmitriptan-induced decrease in cocaine intake was reversed by SB224289 and to a lesser extent by BRL15572, suggesting that the effects of zolmitriptan involve both 5-HT_1B and 5-HT_1D receptors. Neither zolmitriptan, SB224289, or BRL15572 altered locomotor activity at the doses effective for modulating cocaine intake. These findings suggest that zolmitriptan has potential for repurposing as a treatment for cocaine use disorders.

Zolmitriptan Nasal Spray: A Review in Acute Migraine in Pediatric Patients 12 Years of Age or Older

The intranasal formulation of zolmitriptan, a selective serotonin 5-HT1B/1D agonist, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute migraine in pediatric patients 12 years of age or older. This article summarizes the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan (Zomig(®)) nasal spray (NS) in acute migraine in this patient group. Zolmitriptan NS 5 mg was more effective in relieving headache pain than placebo in two double-blind studies in pediatric patients 12-17 years of age with acute migraine. Furthermore, zolmitriptan NS 2.5 and 5 mg effectively relieved photophobia and phonophobia, and was associated with a faster return to normal daily activities than placebo. Zolmitriptan NS is rapidly absorbed from the nasal mucosa and is associated with a fast onset of action, with one study showing a significant difference versus placebo with regard to headache response 15 min after administration. In both trials, zolmitriptan NS was generally well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. In conclusion, zolmitriptan NS provides rapid, effective and generally well tolerated treatment of acute migraine in pediatric patients 12 years of age or older and may be of particular benefit for those with nausea or not easily able to swallow tablets.

The pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of AVP-825: a potential advancement for acute treatment of migraine

INTRODUCTION

Oral triptans have dominated the prescription market for acute treatment of migraine for nearly 25 years. Today, patients often express dissatisfaction with prescribed acute treatment in part because they do not have confidence that the therapy will provide consistent efficacy over time. Major limitations to sustained successful use of oral triptans are their relatively slow onset of meaningful clinical benefit and variable absorption/efficacy due to impaired gastrointestinal function during migraine. AVP-825, a new intranasal delivery system for sumatriptan , may be an effective alternative to oral triptans.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews AVP-825, which deposits low-dose sumatriptan powder deep into the vascular mucosa of the posterior nose, allowing rapid absorption of drug into the systemic circulation. Studies suggest that AVP-825 is a highly effective, well-tolerated acute treatment for episodic migraine.

EXPERT OPINION

Oral triptans are limited in providing effective patient-centered outcomes to migraine patients. Failed or suboptimal abortive treatment of migraine is a major driver of migraine chronification and increases in healthcare costs. AVP-825 is an easy to use, novel, breath-powered intranasal delivery system that provides early onset of efficacy with low systemic drug exposure and few triptan-associated adverse events. AVP-825 will be a welcomed therapeutic tool for the acute treatment of migraine.

Subgroups: time to go back to basic statistical principles?

Exploratory subgroup analyses are an increasing source of controversy as part of the interpretation of the results of clinical trials. In this article, we review the major challenges of multiplicity, statistical methods available to assess consistency of effect, and the part appropriate design plays in mitigating the risk of false conclusions from subgroup analyses. We discuss the problems associated with using definitions of consistency based on effect sizes in specific subgroups. We argue that what is required is a return to basic statistical principles, including more use of modeling techniques.

Zolmitriptan for acute migraine attacks in adults

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services, and society. Zolmitriptan is an abortive medication for migraine attacks, belonging to the triptan family. These medicines work in a different way to analgesics such as paracetamol and ibuprofen.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Oxford Pain Relief Database, together with three online databases (www.astrazenecaclinicaltrials.com, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and apps.who.int/trialsearch) for studies to 12 March 2014. We also searched the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm, using zolmitriptan to treat a migraine headache episode.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate risk ratios and numbers needed to treat for an additional beneficial effect (NNT) or harmful effect (NNH) compared with placebo or a different active treatment.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (20,162 participants) compared zolmitriptan with placebo or an active comparator. The evidence from placebo-controlled studies was of high quality for all outcomes except 24 hour outcomes and serious adverse events where only limited data were available. The majority of included studies were at a low risk of performance, detection and attrition biases, but did not adequately describe methods of randomisation and concealment.Most of the data were for the 2.5 mg and 5 mg doses compared with placebo, for treatment of moderate to severe pain. For all efficacy outcomes, zolmitriptan surpassed placebo. For oral zolmitriptan 2.5 mg versus placebo, the NNTs were 5.0, 3.2, 7.7, and 4.1 for pain-free at two hours, headache relief at two hours, sustained pain-free during the 24 hours postdose, and sustained headache relief during the 24 hours postdose, respectively. Results for the oral 5 mg dose were similar to the 2.5 mg dose, while zolmitriptan 10 mg was significantly more effective than 5 mg for pain-free and headache relief at two hours. For headache relief at one and two hours and sustained headache relief during the 24 hours postdose, but not pain-free at two hours, zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray was significantly more effective than the 5 mg oral tablet.For the most part, adverse events were transient and mild and were more common with zolmitriptan than placebo, with a clear dose response relationship (1 mg to 10 mg).High quality evidence from two studies showed that oral zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg provided headache relief at two hours to the same proportion of people as oral sumatriptan 50 mg (66%, 67%, and 68% respectively), although not necessarily the same individuals. There was no significant difference in numbers experiencing adverse events. Single studies reported on other active treatment comparisons but are not described further because of the small amount of data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan is effective as an abortive treatment for migraine attacks for some people, but is associated with increased adverse events compared to placebo. Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg benefited the same proportion of people as sumatriptan 50 mg, although not necessarily the same individuals, for headache relief at two hours.

Intranasal zolmitriptan for the treatment of acute migraine

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, tolerability, and patient acceptance of zolmitriptan nasal spray (NS).

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis may delay or diminish the absorption of oral triptans, and nausea or vomiting may do the same and/or make it difficult to take a tablet. Some migraineurs require or prefer faster relief than oral medications provide. Injectable triptans provide the fastest drug delivery into the bloodstream, but many patients are reluctant to use them. Nasal sprays may address some of the problems with tablets and injectables while still providing rapid absorption of drug.

METHODS

Non-systematic review.

RESULTS

Significant levels of zolmitriptan NS are detectable in plasma within 2-5 minutes, and the rapid absorption is due to early uptake through the nasal mucosa. In 2 randomized trials, users of zolmitriptan NS were significantly more likely than placebo recipients to be pain-free at 15 minutes post-dose, the first time point measured, and about half of patients had sustained response at 24 hours. Studies in which patients could treat a migraine of any severity have documented significant headache response or relief with zolmitriptan NS at 10 minutes. In one trial, the rate of total symptom relief was significantly better with the NS than with placebo from 30 minutes post-dose. The most common side effect of zolmitriptan NS is unusual taste. Patient satisfaction studies indicate that zolmitriptan NS is appreciated for its speed of onset, ease of use, reliability, and overall efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan NS provides onset of headache relief within 10 minutes for some patients and quickly abolishes some of the major migraine symptoms. Good candidates are migraineurs whose episodes rapidly escalate to moderate-to-severe pain and those who have morning migraine, have a quick time to vomiting, or have failed oral triptans.

Are the current IHS guidelines for migraine drug trials being followed?

In 2000, the Clinical Trials Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS) published the second edition of its guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine. The purpose of this publication was to improve the quality of such trials by increasing the awareness amongst investigators of the methodological issues specific to this particular illness. Until now the adherence to these guidelines has not been systematically assessed. We reviewed all published controlled trials of drugs in migraine from 2002 to 2008. Eligible trials were scored for compliance with the IHS guidelines by using grading scales based on the most essential recommendations of the guidelines. The primary efficacy measure of each trial was also recorded. A total of 145 trials of acute treatment and 52 trials of prophylactic treatment were eligible for review. Of the randomized, double-blind trials, acute trials scored an average of 4.7 out of 7 while prophylactic trials scored an average of 5.6 out of 9 for compliance. Thirty-one percent of acute trials and 72% of prophylactic trials used the recommended primary efficacy measure. Fourteen percent of the reviewed trials were either not randomized or not double-blinded. Adherence to international guidelines like these of IHS is important to ensure that only high-quality trials are performed, and to provide the consensus that is required for meta analyses. The primary efficacy measure for trials of acute treatment should be “pain free” and not “headache relief”. Open-label or non-randomized trials generally have no place in the study of migraine drugs.

Trigeminal pathways deliver a low molecular weight drug from the nose to the brain and orofacial structures

Intranasal delivery has been shown to noninvasively deliver drugs from the nose to the brain in minutes along the olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways, bypassing the blood-brain barrier. However, no one has investigated whether nasally applied drugs target orofacial structures, despite high concentrations observed in the trigeminal nerve innervating these tissues. Following intranasal administration of lidocaine to rats, trigeminally innervated structures (teeth, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and masseter muscle) were found to have up to 20-fold higher tissue concentrations of lidocaine than the brain and blood as measured by ELISA. This concentration difference could allow intranasally administered therapeutics to treat disorders of orofacial structures (i.e., teeth, TMJ, and masseter muscle) without causing unwanted side effects in the brain and the rest of the body. In this study, an intranasally administered infrared dye reached the brain within 10 minutes. Distribution of dye is consistent with dye entering the trigeminal nerve after intranasal administration through three regions with high drug concentrations in the nasal cavity: the middle concha, the maxillary sinus, and the choana. In humans the trigeminal nerve passes through the maxillary sinus to innervate the maxillary teeth. Delivering lidocaine intranasally may provide an effective anesthetic technique for a noninvasive maxillary nerve block. Intranasal delivery could be used to target vaccinations and treat disorders with fewer side effects such as tooth pain, TMJ disorder, trigeminal neuralgia, headache, and brain diseases.

Efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray in adolescent migraine

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray in the treatment of adolescent migraine.

METHODS

The "Double-Diamond" study used a novel, single-blind, "placebo challenge" in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-way, 2-attack, crossover design. A total of 248 US adolescent patients (12-17 years of age) with an established diagnosis of migraine, with or without aura, were enrolled. A single-blind placebo challenge was used for each migraine attack. No additional medications were taken if a headache response to the initial placebo treatment was achieved at 15 minutes; if migraine intensity remained moderate or severe, then patients treated the attack with zolmitriptan (5 mg) nasal spray or placebo according to a randomized, crossover schedule (double-blind). The primary efficacy variable was headache response at 1 hour after treatment. A comprehensive range of secondary end points included sustained headache response at 2 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients (mean age: 14.2 years; 57.3% female) treated > or = 1 attack with study medication (intention-to-treat population). The onset of significant pain relief was apparent 15 minutes after treatment with zolmitriptan nasal spray. At 1 hour after the dose, zolmitriptan nasal spray produced a higher headache response rate than did placebo (58.1% vs 43.3%). Zolmitriptan nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo in improvement in pain intensity, pain-free rates, sustained resolution of headache, and resolution of associated migraine symptoms. Return to normal activities was also consistently faster with zolmitriptan nasal spray than with placebo, with less use of any escape medication. Treatment with zolmitriptan nasal spray was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel, placebo-challenge study demonstrated that zolmitriptan nasal spray was well tolerated and provided fast and significantly effective relief of migraine symptoms in the acute treatment of adolescent migraine.

Nasal delivery of antimigraine drugs: clinical rationale and evidence base

The intranasal route of administration for antimigraine drugs offers many theoretical and practical advantages. A drug that is administered intranasally is absorbed by the highly vascular mucous membranes of the nose, which allows for rapid delivery of un-metabolized drug to the central nervous system. The onset of action is thus considerably earlier than with oral administration requiring gastrointestinal absorption. The intranasal route also provides several practical advantages, such as greater acceptability to patients because of the noninvasive mode of delivery, the ability to take medication when severe nausea or vomiting is present, and a better adverse event profile. Three antimigraine drugs are available in intranasal formulation: dihydroergotamine, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these agents. All are well tolerated by patients and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of migraine headache. Each of these drugs has a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, which may support a clinical preference for one intranasal agent over another in treating patients with specific headache features.

Effectiveness and Satisfaction with Zolmitriptan 5mg Nasal Spray for??Treatment of Migraine in??Real-Life Practice

OBJECTIVE

Addressing the needs of migraineurs by actively seeking patient feedback on disease-related disability and treatment satisfaction may lead to improved management and treatment outcomes. Patient feedback can be collected in postmarketing surveillance (PMS) studies. The objective of this PMS study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray to treat migraine attacks of any severity and were followed up after a maximum of 4 months. Patients evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray, and were asked whether they wished to continue using zolmitriptan nasal spray and their preference compared with previous treatments. Physicians also assessed the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray.

RESULTS

A total of 1838 patients (84.8% females) participated in the study. Within 30 minutes of administration of zolmitriptan nasal spray, 85.0% of patients reported improvements in headache pain, with 25.1% reporting an improvement within 10 minutes. At 1 hour post-dose, 57.9% of patients were pain free and 61.7% were able to resume usual daily activities. Most patients (72.9%) rated zolmitriptan nasal spray as 'better' than previous therapy. The majority (88.8%) expressed a wish to continue using zolmitriptan nasal spray. Physicians evaluated the efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray as 'excellent' or 'good' in 89.4% of patients. Tolerability was evaluated as 'excellent' or 'good' in 91.6% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray provides favourable efficacy and tolerability in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Most patients assessed zolmitriptan nasal spray as 'better' than previous treatment, with nearly all wishing to continue using it.

Non-oral formulations of triptans and their use in acute migraine

The introduction of triptans (5-HT (1B/1D) agonists) into clinical practice has expanded the therapeutic options for doctors treating migraine sufferers. The triptans are available in several different formulations such as conventional oral tablets, orally disintegrating wafers, subcutaneous injections, nasal sprays, and suppositories, which provide an excellent opportunity to tailor therapy to individual patients' needs. Although the oral formulations are the most popular with patients, they are not the most appropriate route of administration for drug delivery during the migraine attack. Due to gastrointestinal dysmotility, the intestinal absorption of any triptan administered orally may be impaired and treatment effects become inconsistent. For this reason, triptans preferably should be prescribed in a non-oral formulation (injection, nasal spray, or suppository). Parenteral administration of a triptan is more likely to provide relief of symptoms, even when it is used later in the course of the migraine attack.

Zolmitriptan Intranasal: A Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Efficacy

Migraine is a common disabling neurological disorder, associated with headache, nausea, and on occasions vomiting. Zolmitriptan is a widely available serotonin 5HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a long track record in clinical studies and in the treatment of acute migraine. A nasal formulation has been developed that has clear evidence for local absorption, resulting in plasma drug concentrations within 2 minutes of dosing, central nervous system penetration 3 minutes later, and a significant efficacy benefit versus placebo 10 to 15 minutes after dosing. Intranasal zolmitriptan offers advantages to migraineurs, particularly those seeking a more rapid onset of effect without wishing to self-inject, or those with gastrointestinal upset. The comparison of pharmacokinetic and clinical data available from different formulations of zolmitriptan contributes both to the understanding of its mode of action and the characteristics required of an acute migraine treatment if it is to meet patient needs.

Intranasal zolmitriptan

Intranasal zolmitriptan has recently been launched in the US and Canada and is a novel formulation of the antimigraine drug zolmitriptan. This drug has been used extensively in its oral formulation. The intranasal formulation offers a more rapid onset of action. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that it is absorbed rapidly into the systemic circulation and traces can be seen in the brain within 5 min. The onset of efficacy in the Real Life Intranasal Zolmitriptan Exposure (REALIZE) study was measurable at 10 min and at 15 min in the US 22 study, which demonstrates rapid absorption and effect at the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. This article reviews the initial studies of intranasal zolmitriptan; three of the most recent studies will be examined in detail.

Speed of onset, efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a common, disabling condition that has a significant impact on patients and relatives, and is a considerable economic burden on society. Migraine patients want fast-acting treatments with high efficacy. Previous studies have demonstrated that orally administered formulations of zolmitriptan are rapidly and highly effective in the acute treatment of migraine. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy, speed of onset and tolerability of the nasal spray formulation of zolmitriptan in migraine treatment.

METHODS

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind study recruited 2122 patients (aged 18-65 years) who had an established diagnosis of migraine (according to International Headache Society criteria), with or without aura. Patients were randomised to receive zolmitriptan 5mg nasal spray or placebo to treat up to two migraine attacks within 15 minutes of headache pain becoming moderate or severe. The primary endpoint was headache response (reduction in migraine pain from severe/moderate to mild/none) at 2 hours, 1 hour, 30 minutes and 15 minutes post-dose (analysed using a step-down approach). Secondary endpoints included headache response at 4 hours, pain-free rates at 30 minutes and 1, 2 and 4 hours, and sustained headache response and pain-free status at 24 hours post-dose.

RESULTS

The headache response rate at 2 hours post-dose was 66.2% for the zolmitriptan group, compared with 35.0% for the placebo group (p < 0.001). Zolmitriptan nasal spray also produced significantly higher headache response rates than placebo at all earlier timepoints assessed, starting as early as 15 minutes post-dose (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for the analysis of the first attack. Significantly higher pain-free rates were obtained with zolmitriptan nasal spray, compared with placebo, from 15 minutes post-dose onward (p < 0.005). Zolmitriptan nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo for headache response at 4 hours, sustained headache response at 24 hours and sustained pain-free rate at 24 hours. Zolmitriptan nasal spray was well tolerated, with most adverse events being of short duration and mild or moderate intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan nasal spray is highly effective in the acute treatment of migraine and has a very fast onset of action, producing significant headache response and pain-free rates as early as 15 minutes post-dose (the earliest assessment in this study). In addition to the very fast onset of action, zolmitriptan nasal spray produced significantly higher sustained headache response and pain-free rates at 24 hours post-dose compared with placebo. These desirable efficacy outcomes were combined with good tolerability.

Zolmitriptan Nasal Spray Exhibits Good Long-Term Safety and Tolerability in Migraine: Results of the INDEX Trial

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray has a fast onset of action, high efficacy, and good tolerability in the acute treatment of migraine. Objective.-This open-label, noncomparative, multicenter, multinational phase III study was designed to further evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray in a population of migraineurs largely naive to triptan nasal sprays who treated multiple migraine attacks over a 1-year period.

METHODS

Patients were required to have an established diagnosis of migraine with or without aura (based on International Headache Society criteria), a high frequency of migraine attacks, and were allowed to treat migraine with any baseline headache intensity. A secondary objective of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray. A subgroup analysis aimed to determine whether rhinitis had any influence on outcomes of treatment.

RESULTS

The safety population consisted of 538 patients who treated 20,717 migraine attacks with zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray. Overall, adverse events occurred in 32.8% of attacks, and led to treatment withdrawal in 4.5% of patients. The most common adverse events were unusual taste (19.0%) and paresthesia (6.8%). Adverse events were generally of mild intensity, transient, and well tolerated, showing a decline in incidence over time. Serious adverse events were rare. The presence of rhinitis and use of a second dose of trial medication had no effect on the incidence of adverse events. At 2 hours, 53.8% of attacks treated with zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg were rendered pain free. The highest 2-hour pain free rates were seen for headaches of mild baseline intensity (83.3%), followed by headaches of moderate (56.5%), and severe (32.2%) baseline intensity. The 2-hour pain-free rate remained consistent throughout the study period. The presence of rhinitis had no effect on efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray demonstrated a well-tolerated and efficacious profile in the acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks over a 1-year period.

Zolmitriptan 5 mg Nasal Spray: Efficacy and Onset of Action in the Acute Treatment of Migraine-Results From Phase 1 of the REALIZE Study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of phase 1 (reported here) of this two-phase study was to assess the efficacy of zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray, in terms of ability to provide relief from all migraine symptoms, in a controlled setting, designed to replicate clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

Zolmitriptan nasal spray has been shown to be fast acting and highly effective in the treatment of migraine, as assessed using standard endpoints, such as headache response and pain-free rates.

METHODS

In the double-blind first phase of the study, patients with migraine were randomized to receive zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray or placebo to treat a single migraine attack. Attacks were treated according to patients' normal patterns of use, in order to closely reflect clinical practice; that is, no specific regimen was dictated in terms of time to treatment or at what level of pain intensity the headache should be treated. Patients could take a second dose of study medication or an agreed escape medication if adequate pain relief had not been achieved 2 hours after the first dose. The primary efficacy endpoint was total symptom relief (freedom from pain, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia) 1 hour after the first dose. Secondary efficacy endpoints included headache response, pain-free status and sustained pain-free status, and ability to perform normal activities.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population comprised 461 zolmitriptan nasal spray recipients and 451 placebo recipients. The total symptom relief rate 1 hour post-dose was significantly higher in the zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray group than in the placebo group (14.5% vs. 5.1%; P < .0001); the difference between the groups was significant from 30 minutes post-dose. Treatment with zolmitriptan nasal spray, compared with placebo, also produced a higher headache response rate from 10 minutes post-dose (15.1% vs. 9.1%; P = .0079) and a higher pain-free rate from 30 minutes post-dose (7.7% vs. 3.2%; P = .0039). Zolmitriptan nasal spray was also significantly superior to placebo in terms of sustained pain-free status and patients' ability to perform normal activities. Zolmitriptan nasal spray was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm the efficacy demonstrated by zolmitriptan nasal spray in previous clinical trials.

The 5-HT1D receptor agonist zolmitriptan for neuroleptic-induced akathisia: an open label preliminary study

Neuroleptic-induced akathisia (NIA) is a common, sometimes incapacitating, adverse side-effect of antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Several non-selective post-synaptic 5-HT2 blockers have shown a beneficial antiakathisic effect. We hypothesized that selective stimulation of the presynaptic 5-HT1D serotonergic inhibitory autoreceptor could also be beneficial in NIA. The study group included eight schizophrenia inpatients with acute or chronic NIA who were treated with unchanged doses of APDs. Participants received, in an open-labelled design, 7.5 mg/day of zolmitriptan (selective 5-HT1D agonist) for 3 consecutive days. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Barnes akathisia scale (BAS) scores were monitored before and at the end of the study. BAS score decreased by 5.25 points following zolmitriptan administration (9.0+/-2.27 to 3.75+/-2.55, t=6.1, d.f.=7, P=0.0005). In one case, the BAS score dropped from a 3-year score >or=9 points (while relatively non-responsive to numerous antiakathisic agents) to 4 points at endpoint. In conclusion, zolmitriptan appears to exert significant and rapid beneficial antiakathisic effect, even in chronic and resistant NIA. Larger, long-term, double-blind, placebo- and comparator- (e.g. propranolol) controlled studies are required to substantiate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of zolmitriptan, as well as the role of serotonergic neurotransmission in NIA.

Assessment of Adverse Events Associated With Triptans—Methods of Assessment Influence the Results

BACKGROUND

A recent study conducted in triptan-naive migraine patients showed that tolerability was the second most important attribute of an acute treatment. However, the proportion of patients reporting side effects after any acute treatment may vary with regard to the method of assessment.

OBJECTIVES

To contrast two methods of assessing adverse events (prompted and unprompted) in those with headache using triptans.

METHODS

This study was conducted in two sites, a headache center in the United States, and a neurology office focusing on headache in Italy. We prospectively surveyed 415 adults with headache, who had been using the same triptan for at least 3 months. Participants were asked about their headache and treatment history. Subjects then completed a standardized questionnaire, assessing adverse events in two different ways. First, subjects were asked if they had any adverse events when using the triptan. After returning the first part of the questionnaire, subjects received a second form, where 49 possible adverse events were listed. We contrasted and correlated both sets of answers.

RESULTS

Most patients (U.S.=74.9%, Italy=65.5%) reported no side effects in the unprompted questionnaire. However, most of them (U.S.=62.9%, Italy=54.1%) reported at least one side effect in the prompted questionnaire. Most patients that reported side effects in the unprompted questionnaire said they had just one adverse event, while most reported two or more side effects in the prompted questionnaire. Both in the unprompted and in the prompted questionnaires, most side effects were rated as mild or moderate. Interestingly, 31 (7.5%) subjects (pooling data from both sites together) graded their adverse events as severe in the prompted questionnaire, but had not self-reported them.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) When assessing adverse events, the method of data collection may dramatically influence the results. (2) From those subjects who did not self-report adverse events after using a triptan, most of them will report positively if presented with a list of side effects.

Intranasal medications for the treatment of migraine and cluster headache

Intranasal medications for the treatment of headache have recently received increased attention. This paper reviews intranasal formulations of a variety of available medications (dihydroergotamine mesylate [dihydroergotamine mesilate], sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, butorphanol, capsaicin and lidocaine [lignocaine]) and one experimental medication (civamide, a cis-isomer of capsaicin) for the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. Although the efficacy of intranasal agents varies with the product used, intranasal delivery may be both convenient and more effective than other modes of drug delivery for a variety of reasons: (i) intranasal administration bypasses small bowel gastrointestinal tract absorption, which is often significantly delayed during the acute phase of a migraine attack; (ii) nauseated patients may prefer non-oral formulations as they decrease the chance of vomiting and are more rapidly effective; (iii) intranasal administration causes no pain or injection site reaction and is easier and more convenient to administer than injection or suppository and so may be used earlier in a migraine attack, resulting in better efficacy; (iv) intranasal medication produces the same number or fewer adverse events than injections; and (v) intranasal formulations offer a more rapid onset of action than oral medications, for some of the above reasons and, as such, may be more useful in patients with cluster headache, although this needs to be verified. However, it is important to emphasise that a preference study showed that most patients prefer oral tablets to an intranasal formulation. Also, some nasal preparations have significant adverse effects or are not well absorbed and therefore do not work consistently; others are more challenging to administer as a result of their delivery apparatus. Nevertheless, it is our opinion that nasal preparations increase therapeutic options and may result in faster response times and better efficacy than oral formulations and better patient satisfaction than injectable preparations.