Effects of the Preoperative Administration of Dexketoprofen Trometamol on Pain and Swelling After Implant Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

The fear of postoperative pain is often mentioned by patients as one of the factors that is most frequently associated with dental implants. To reduce this factor, a single oral dose of 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol (DKT) or placebo was administered 15 minutes before implant surgery. One hundred patients who required single-implant treatments were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 blinded groups. The patients in the test group were given 25 mg DKT (DKT group), and those in the control group were given 500 mg vitamin C as a placebo (PLACEBO group). A subjective visual analogue scale of 100 mm in length was used to evaluate pain. Inflammation and complications were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. An analysis of variance, t-tests, and a Mann-Whitney U test were performed. Among the 100 patients, 83 completed the study (there were 8 dropouts in the PLACEBO group and 9 in the DKT group). The patients who received DKT reported a lower pain intensity during the immediate postoperative period. The inflammatory response was weaker in the DKT group than the control group at 48 hours, but bleeding was greater. There were no other complications in either of the groups. In conclusion, the preemptive use of 25 mg soluble DKT administered orally 15 minutes before implant surgery can reduce the severity of immediate postoperative pain.

Multimodal analgesia in moderate-to-severe pain: a role for a new fixed combination of dexketoprofen and tramadol

BACKGROUND

Untreated and under-treated pain represent one of the most pervasive health problems, which is worsening as the population ages and accrues risk for pain. Multiple treatment options are available, most of which have one mechanism of action, and cannot be prescribed at unlimited doses due to the ceiling of efficacy and/or safety concerns. Another limitation of single-agent analgesia is that, in general, pain is due to multiple causes. Combining drugs from different classes, with different and complementary mechanism(s) of action, provides a better opportunity for effective analgesia at reduced doses of individual agents. Therefore, there is a potential reduction of adverse events, often dose-related. Analgesic combinations are recommended by several organizations and are used in clinical practice. Provided the two agents are combined in a fixed-dose ratio, the resulting medication may offer advantages over extemporaneous combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexketoprofen/tramadol (25 mg/75 mg) is a new oral fixed-dose combination offering a comprehensive multimodal approach to moderate-to-severe acute pain that encompasses central analgesic action, peripheral analgesic effect and anti-inflammatory activity, together with a good tolerability profile. The analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen/tramadol combination is complemented by a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, characterized by rapid onset and long duration of action. This has been well documented in both somatic- and visceral-pain human models. This review discusses the available clinical evidence and the future possible applications of dexketoprofen/tramadol fixed-dose combination that may play an important role in the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain.

A comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of diclofenac in osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) commonly prescribed for pain relief in osteoarthritis (OA). The relative efficacy of diclofenac compared to other pain relief medications used in OA (e.g., alternative NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase type 2 [COX-2] inhibitors) is uncertain. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the current evidence on efficacy of diclofenac versus other pain relief medications.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out for randomised, well controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy of diclofenac with other pain relief medications in OA (reviews, meta-analyses and n = 1 trials were excluded). The databases searched were EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Ovid MEDLINE Daily Update. Articles were included from 1999 onwards. Retrieved articles were discussed by comparator medication.

RESULTS

Of the 263 articles identified in the literature search, 37 were eventually included in this review. These were comparisons with the selective COX-2 inhibitors etoricoxib, celecoxib, lumiracoxib and rofecoxib; comparisons with the NSAIDs aceclofenac, dexketoprofen, etodolac, lornoxicam, meloxicam, nabumetone and nimesulide; and comparisons to acetaminophen, tramadol, diacerein, oxaceprol, oral hydrolytic enzyme therapies, Chinese herbal remedies and castor oil supplementation. Overall, in the majority of the trials at therapeutic doses diclofenac provided similar efficacy to comparator treatments; and in general diclofenac was able to support its position as a reference medication of choice for OA trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of diclofenac is largely unchallenged in that it remains as effective as newer pain relief medications employed in OA. A review of the available data demonstrates that diclofenac continues to provide physicians with a benchmark pharmacological treatment for OA.

Analgesic properties of dexketoprofen trometamol

SUMMARY Dexketoprofen trometamol is the dextrorotary enantiomer of the NSAID ketoprofen formulated as a tromethamine salt. The purpose of administering 50% of the racemic mixture is to keep the same analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect while reducing the adverse events due to both enantiomers. This article describes the pharmacological properties and evaluates the analgesic effects of dexketoprofen trometamol reported in acute and chronic pain conditions. The main conclusions are that dexketoprofen trometamol appears as effective as the double dose of the racemic drug. However, the reduction of adverse effects still has to be demonstrated. In addition, the formulation as tromethamine salt appears beneficial regarding fast onset of analgesia in acute pain conditions.

Systematic review of dexketoprofen in acute and chronic pain

BACKGROUND

Dexketoprofen, an NSAID used in the management of acute and chronic pains, is licensed in several countries but has not previously been the subjected of a systematic review. We used published and unpublished information from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of dexketoprofen in painful conditions to assess evidence on efficacy and harm.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Central were searched for RCTs of dexketoprofen for pain of any aetiology. Reference lists of retrieved articles and reviews were also searched. Menarini Group produced copies of published and unpublished studies (clinical trial reports). Data were abstracted into a standard form. For studies reporting results of single dose administration, the number of patients with at least 50% pain relief was derived and used to calculate the relative benefit (RB) and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief compared with placebo.

RESULTS

Thirty-five trials were found in acute pain and chronic pain; 6,380 patients were included, 3,381 receiving dexketoprofen. Information from 16 trials (almost half the total patients) was obtained from clinical trial reports from previously unpublished trials or abstracts. Almost all of the trials were of short duration in acute conditions or recent onset pain.All 12 randomised trials that compared dexketoprofen (any dose) with placebo found dexketoprofen to be statistically superior. Five trials in postoperative pain yielded NNTs for 12.5 mg dexketoprofen of 3.5 (2.7 to 4.9), 25 mg dexketoprofen of 3.0 (2.4 to 3.9), and 50 mg dexketoprofen of 2.1 (1.5 to 3.5). In 29/30 active comparator trials, dexketoprofen at the dose used was at least equivalent in efficacy to comparator drugs. Adverse event withdrawal rates were low in postoperative pain and somewhat higher in trials of longer duration; no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Dexketoprofen was at least as effective as other NSAIDs and paracetamol/opioid combinations. While adverse event withdrawal was not different between dexketoprofen and comparator analgesics, the different conditions and comparators studies precluded any formal analysis. Exposure was limited, and no conclusions could be drawn about safety in terms of serious adverse events like gastrointestinal bleeding or cardiovascular events.

Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and hepatic injury associated with dexketoprofen trometamol therapy in a previously healthy 35-year-old woman

This case report describes a previously healthy 35-year-old woman, with an episode of fever, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and elevation of biochemical markers of liver injury, 10 days after beginning drug therapy with dexketoprofen trometamol. Infectious and autoimmune causes of neutropenia, and viral or autoimmune hepatitis were excluded. The resolution following withdrawal of dexketoprofen trometamol confirms the possibility of an adverse drug reaction.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of two sustained-release formulations of diclofenac: results of a double-blind, randomised study in patients with osteoarthritis and a reappraisal of diclofenac's use in this patient population

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of a sustained-release pellet formulation of diclofenac (Olfen-100 SR Depocaps, SR-CAP, Mepha Ltd, Aesch, Switzerland) with the standard reference formulation (Voltaren retard 100, SR-TAB, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland), both containing 100 mg diclofenac sodium, in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and/or hip. In addition, diclofenac's current place in the symptomatic therapy of OA is briefly reviewed.

METHODS

In this 2-week double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial, 210 OA patients were randomised to receive either SR-CAP once daily or SR-TAB once daily (n = 105 for both groups). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (0-100 mm) at rest at Day 14 compared with baseline. Secondary variables included the change in VAS pain score on movement and global assessments of efficacy and tolerability using verbal rating scales (VRS).

RESULTS

Between baseline and Day 14, mean +/- SD VAS pain score at rest decreased by 44.4 +/- 18.5 mm in the SR-CAP group (n = 89) compared with 41.2 +/- 19.8 mm in the SR-TAB group (n = 82) based on the per protocol population. Comparable changes were observed in the intention-to-treat population. The lower bound of the 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval was -2.7 mm and greater than the prespecified non-inferiority limit of -10 mm. There was a trend towards a better tolerability with SR-CAP compared with SR-TAB based on mean +/- SD VRS scores (SR-CAP, 0.6 +/- 0.68; SR-TAB, 0.9 +/- 1.0 for assessment by patients; p = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

SR-CAP is as effective as and possibly better tolerated than SR-TAB in patients suffering from painful OA.

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind Study Comparing the??Efficacy and Tolerability of Intramuscular Dexketoprofen versus Diclofenac in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is an important medical problem in Western industrialised countries. NSAIDs are one of the main options for symptomatic pain relief in the early management of this painful condition. Dexketoprofen is an NSAID belonging to the arylpropionic acid group that has demonstrated good analgesic efficacy and a good safety profile in different acute and chronic painful conditions.

METHODS

A randomised, double-blind, parallel, active controlled, multicentre study that included 370 outpatients with acute low back pain was conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen 50mg twice daily versus diclofenac 75mg twice daily administered intramuscularly for 2 days. Efficacy outcomes were assessment of pain intensity (PI) measured on a visual analogue scale, total PI scores from baseline to 6 hours after the first-dose administration (primary efficacy endpoint; SAPID(0-6)), score on a physical disability scale using the Roland Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and use of rescue medication. Tolerability and safety were also assessed as secondary variables.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean (SAPID(0-6)) scores were very similar, 117.3 mm/h with dexketoprofen and 114.7 mm/h with diclofenac. The adjusted ratio of means was 1.023 and the lower 95% confidence limit was 0.81, demonstrating non-inferiority of dexketoprofen (defined by a lower limit of the 95% CI >0.80) in comparison with diclofenac (per-protocol analysis). The median change in the RDQ was -6 points for both groups (p = 0.69), showing an overall improvement on the disability scale. No significant differences between groups were observed regarding the percentage of patients needing rescue medication or in the mean values of pain after repeated doses (SAPID(0-last)). Dexketoprofen was well tolerated, with a reported incidence of adverse events similar to that of diclofenac. No serious adverse events were reported in either treatment group.

CONCLUSION

From the results of this study it can be concluded that dexketoprofen 50mg administered twice daily intramuscularly provides a clinically relevant analgesic effect with good tolerability after single and repeated doses in patients with acute severe low back pain.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenously Administered Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Ketoprofen in the Management of Pain after Orthopaedic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of dexketoprofen trometamol, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in comparison with that of racemic ketoprofen (both administered by intravenous infusion), in patients with postoperative pain.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study. 252 patients with moderate to severe pain following hip or knee replacement surgery performed under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either dexketoprofen trometamol 50 mg or ketoprofen 100 mg, both administered by intravenous infusion every 8 hours over 2 days. A level of > or =40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was required for inclusion in the study. Pain intensity on the VAS at different time-points after the administration of the first dose was assessed and the sum of pain intensity differences (SAPID(0-8 h)) was calculated as the primary efficacy variable. The use of rescue medication, maximum pain intensity difference (PID(max)), time to PID(max) and safety were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SE) adjusted SAPID(0-8 h) scores in the per-protocol population were 310.9 +/- 19.2 and 326.3 +/- 19.0 mm x h after dexketoprofen trometamol and ketoprofen treatment, respectively. The 95% CI for the difference between treatments (-59.1 to 28.3) was fully included within the range of equivalence of +/-65.3 mm x h. There were no significant differences with regard to secondary variables. The need for rescue analgesia was high in both groups; 81.3% of patients receiving dexketoprofen trometamol treatment and 87.1% receiving ketoprofen treatment required rescue analgesia. The time to achieve PID(max) was 284.7 and 308.5 min after dexketoprofen and ketoprofen, respectively. Treatment- related adverse events were experienced by 16% of patients in the dexketoprofen trometamol group compared with 21.3% in the ketoprofen group. Most patients were concomitantly treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (94.4%), and no haemorrhagic events related to the surgical procedure were reported. No adverse events related to renal function were detected during the study.

CONCLUSION

The two medications were equivalent in terms of analgesic activity in the management of postoperative pain after orthopaedic surgery. The high use of rescue analgesics indicates a need for a multimodal approach to analgesia in this type of surgery. Dexketoprofen trometamol appeared to show a trend towards a better tolerability profile compared with the racemic compound.

Double-blind evaluation of short-term analgesic efficacy of orally administered dexketoprofen trometamol and ketorolac in bone cancer pain

The analgesic efficacy and safety of dexketoprofen trometamol (the active enantiomer of the racemic compound ketoprofen) (25mg q.i.d.) vs. ketorolac (10mg q.i.d.) was assessed in 115 patients with bone cancer pain included in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. A level of >/=40 mm on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and >/=10 in the pain rating index were required for inclusion. At the end of treatment on day 7 (+1 day), mean values of VAS were 32+/-24 mm for dexketoprofen and 40+/-30 mm for ketorolac (P=0.12) but the pain rating index was significantly lower in patients given dexketoprofen (8.5+/-2.3 vs. 9.7+/-2.9, P=0.04). Moreover, most of the patients reached a pain intensity difference from baseline >/=20 mm (75% of patients for dexketoprofen and 65% of patients for ketorolac). Around half of patients in both treatments had a pain intensity <30 mm on VAS at the end of treatment (55% for dexketoprofen and 47% for ketorolac). In the overall assessment of efficacy, a higher percentage of both patients and physicians rated dexketoprofen as 'quite effective' or 'very effective' compared to ketorolac. The percentage of patients withdrawn from the study for any reason as well as for insufficient therapeutic effect or due to adverse events was lower in the dexketoprofen group than in the ketorolac group. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% of patients given dexketoprofen and in 24% given ketorolac. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.5% of patients from both groups but only one case of gastrointestinal hemorrhage was considered related to ketorolac. We conclude that dexketoprofen trometamol 25 mg q.i.d. oral route is a good analgesic therapy in the treatment of bone cancer pain, comparable to ketorolac 10 mg q.i.d., with a good tolerability profile.

Comparison of dexketoprofen trometamol and dipyrone in the treatment of renal colic

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used for pain relief in patients with renal colic. Dexketoprofen trometamol is an NSAID that has demonstrated good analgesic efficacy and a good safety profile after oral administration in different models of acute and chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of single intramuscular doses of dexketoprofen trometamol (25 and 50mg) compared with dipyrone (2g) in moderate to severe pain due to renal colic.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study.

PATIENTS

PATIENTS of both sexes aged 18-70 years with a diagnosis of renal colic were eligible for randomisation if they presented with at least moderate pain as assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring ≥40mm on a scale of 100mm immediately before study drug administration.

METHODS

Assessment of analgesic efficacy was done using standard pain intensity and pain relief scales. Total scores from baseline to 6 hours after study drug administration were calculated for the sum of pain intensity differences relative to baseline (SPID), sum of analogue pain intensity differences relative to baseline (SAPID) and total pain relief scores (TOTPAR) as primary efficacy endpoints. Secondary efficacy and safety variables were also analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 333 patients (dexketoprofen 25mg, n = 112; dexketoprofen 50mg, n = 113; dipyrone 2g, n = 108) were included in the study. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups with regard to SPID (p = 0.797), SAPID (p = 0.852) and TOTPAR (p = 0.716). The time-effect course for pain intensity differences and pain relief showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher values for both doses of dexketoprofen trometamol compared with dipyrone during the first hour after treatment administration. More than 90% of the patients in all three groups achieved pain relief of at least 50% as compared with baseline. Similarly, over 70% of the patients in all three groups considered the received treatment as excellent or good in the overall assessment of efficacy at the end of the study. No dose-effect relationship was observed in this pain model between both doses of dexketoprofen trometamol. All three treatments were well tolerated, showing mostly mild to moderate adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Dexketoprofen trometamol is a good analgesic for the treatment of moderate to severe pain due to renal colic, with a good safety profile and an efficacy comparable to that of dipyrone. The significantly greater effect of dexketoprofen trometamol early after administration suggests a faster onset of action, which can be of paramount importance in this condition.