Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in healthy Chinese volunteers treated with SC0062, a highly selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and food effects (FE) of SC0062, a highly active endothelin-A (ETA ) receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects. The primary objectives of this first-in-human phase I study, comprised of single-ascending-dose, multiple-ascending-dose, and FE parts, were to characterize the safety and tolerability of SC0062, and FE. The secondary objectives were to determine the PK behavior of SC0062 and its major active metabolite M18, whereas exploratory objectives focused on PD effects, principally effects on endothelin-1 (ET-1) and total bile acids (TBA). Single doses of 10 to 100 mg and multiple daily doses of 20 and 50 mg for 6 days were well tolerated. SC0062 was rapidly absorbed and plasma exposure of SC0062 and M18 increased disproportionately with dose, achieving steady state by day 3, with accumulation ratios of 1.22 and 1.89 on day 6 for SC0062 and M18, respectively. The geometric mean (geometric standard deviation) terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 ) values of SC0062 and M18 were 7.25 (1.70) h and 13.73 (1.32) h, respectively. Plasma ET-1 concentrations were dose-proportional, whereas plasma TBA concentrations behaved erratically. Following a single 50 mg dose of SC0062 after a high-fat meal, Cmax values for SC0062 and M18 increased by 41% and 32%, respectively, and median Tmax values for SC0062 were 3 h longer than fasting values; exposure was unaffected. These favorable safety, PK, and PD results provide a foundation for further studies of SC0062 in pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and other relevant indications.

Expanding options of supportive care in IgA nephropathy

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, with a potentially serious prognosis. At present, management of IgAN is primarily based on therapeutic lifestyle changes, and excellent blood pressure control and maximized supportive treatment with the combination of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with either inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme or angiotensin II receptor blockers and inhibitors of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2, and possibly in the future also with endothelin antagonists. Supportive care currently represents the cornerstone of treatment of IgAN. Targeted-release formulation of budesonide should replace systemic corticosteroids in patients with higher proteinuria and active histological lesions. New treatment options are aimed at immunopathogenesis of IgAN including depletion or modulation of Galactose-deficient-Immunoglobulin A1-producing B cells, plasma cells, and the alternate and/or lectin pathway of complement. The exact place of monoclonal antibodies and complement inhibitors will need to be determined. This article reviews potential supportive therapies currently available for patients with IgAN.

Target-Mediated Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

PURPOSE

Bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan are three small-molecule endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), displacing endothelin-1 (ET-1) from its binding site. A target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) pharmacokinetic (PK) model described the non-linearity in the PK of bosentan caused by its high receptor binding affinity with time-dependent varying receptor expression or reappearance. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the presence of TMDD for clazosentan and tezosentan and to corroborate the hypothesis of a diurnal receptor synthesis.

METHODS

PK data from healthy subjects after intravenous (i.v.) administration of single ascending doses of bosentan, clazosentan, and tezosentan were analyzed. Frequent blood samples for PK measurements were collected. Population analyses, simulations, and evaluations were performed using a non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach.

RESULTS

Two-compartment TMDD models were successfully developed describing the PK of all three ERAs with different receptor-complex internalization properties. The observed multiple peaks in the concentration-time profiles were captured with cosine functions on the receptor synthesis rate mimicking a diurnal receptor expression or reappearance. The results strongly suggest that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

CONCLUSION

The developed TMDD PK models are a next step towards understanding the complex PK of ERAs and further support the hypothesis that TMDD is a class effect of ERAs.

Relationship Between Atrasentan Concentrations and Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio in Western and Japanese Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy

PURPOSE

The objective of the current analyses was to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of atrasentan and the exposure-response relationships for the efficacy end point, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), and the treatment-emergent adverse event, peripheral edema, during 8 or 12 weeks of treatment.

METHODS

Results from 3 Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (N = 257) were used for the population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models. Concentration-time and response data for efficacy and tolerability were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects population analysis and logistic regression approaches.

FINDINGS

The pharmacokinetic data were adequately described by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. After weight was accounted for, no clinically meaningful differences were found in CL/F or V_d/F of the central compartment between Western and Japanese patients. Exposure-response analyses confirmed the efficacy of atrasentan in reducing UACR, with an estimated decrease in UACR of ≥37% when the atrasentan dose was 0.75 mg or higher. No significant association between atrasentan exposure and the rate of edema was identified at atrasentan doses of 0.5, 0.75, and 1.25 mg. The rates of peripheral edema were comparable in patients receiving active treatment and placebo.

IMPLICATIONS

The exposure-response relationships for efficacy and tolerability were consistent between Western and Japanese patients. On the basis of these analyses, a dose of 0.75 mg/d was selected for the Phase III trial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01356849, NCT01399580, and NCT01424319.

A phase 3 randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of atrasentan in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atrasentan (Xinlay), a selective endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).

METHODS

This multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 809 men with metastatic HRPC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either atrasentan 10 mg per day or placebo. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression (TTP), which was determined according to radiographic and clinical measures. Analyses of overall survival and changes in biomarkers also were performed.

RESULTS

Atrasentan did not reduce the risk of disease progression relative to placebo (hazards ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.04; P = .136). Most patients progressed radiographically at the first 12-week bone scan without concomitant clinical progression. In exploratory analyses, increases from baseline to final bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were significantly lower with atrasentan treatment (P < .05 for each). The median time to BAP progression (>/=50% increase from nadir) was twice as long with atrasentan treatment (505 days vs 254 days; P < .01). The delay in time to PSA progression did not reach statistical significance. Atrasentan generally was tolerated well, and the most common adverse events associated with treatment were headache, rhinitis, and peripheral edema, reflecting the vasodilatory and fluid-retention properties of endothelin-A receptor antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrasentan did not delay disease progression in men with metastatic HRPC despite evidence of biologic effects on PSA and BAP as markers of disease burden.

Effect of endothelin-A receptor blockade with atrasentan on tumor progression in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomized, phase II, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atrasentan (ABT-627), an endothelin-A receptor antagonist, in the treatment of asymptomatic, hormone-refractory prostatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPCa) patients was conducted in the United States and Europe. Two hundred eighty-eight asymptomatic patients with HRPCa and evidence of metastatic disease were randomly assigned to one of three study groups receiving a once-daily oral dose of placebo, 2.5 mg atrasentan, or 10 mg atrasentan, respectively. Primary end point was time to progression; secondary end points included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, bone scan changes, and changes in bone and tumor markers.

RESULTS

The three treatment groups were similar in all baseline characteristics. Median time to progression in intent-to-treat (ITT) patients (n = 288) was longer in the 10-mg atrasentan group compared with the placebo group: 183 v 137 days, respectively; (P =.13). Median time to progression in evaluable patients (n = 244) was significantly prolonged, from 129 days (placebo group) to 196 days (10-mg atrasentan group; P =.021). For both ITT and evaluable populations in the 10-mg atrasentan group, median time to PSA progression was twice that of the placebo group (155 v 71 days; P =.002). Patients who received placebo continued to have significant increases from baseline in serum (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), a marker of disease burden; elevations in LDH were uniformly attenuated by atrasentan in the ITT population. Headache, peripheral edema, and rhinitis were primary side effects, typically of mild to moderate severity. Quality of life was not adversely affected by atrasentan.

CONCLUSION

Atrasentan is an oral, targeted therapy with favorable tolerability and the potential to delay progression of HRPCa.

Atrasentan, an endothelin-receptor antagonist for refractory adenocarcinomas: safety and pharmacokinetics

PURPOSE

Endothelin receptors, particularly the ET(A) receptor, have been shown to participate in the pathophysiology of prostate and other cancers. Atrasentan, an endothelin antagonist, binds selectively to the ET(A) receptor. This study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and maximum-tolerated dose of atrasentan in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who were 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma refractory to therapy enrolled in this 28-day, open-label, phase I study. Enrollment was planned for cohorts of three patients at doses escalating from 10 to 140 mg/d. When any patient had dose-limiting toxicity, that cohort was expanded. The primary outcome variable was safety; secondary outcome variables were pharmacokinetics, tumor response, and pain relief.

RESULTS

Thirty-one cancer patients (14 prostate) were treated at daily atrasentan doses of 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, and 75 mg (n = 3 to 8 per cohort). The most common adverse events, such as rhinitis, headache, asthenia, and peripheral edema, were reversible on drug discontinuation and responded to symptom-specific treatment. Reversible hemodilution was apparent in laboratory findings and weight gain. Clinically significant headache was the dose-limiting adverse event; the maximum-tolerated dose was 60 mg/d. Pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional across the 10- to 75-mg dose range. Atrasentan was rapidly absorbed; the time to maximum observed concentration was approximately 1.5 hours. The terminal elimination half-life was approximately 24 hours, and steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 7 days. Decreases in prostate-specific antigen and pain relief were noted in a patient subset.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events were consistent with atrasentan's pharmacologic vasodilatory effect. Linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics suggest that atrasentan can be easily and consistently dosed.

Determination of atrasentan by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection in human plasma

Atrasentan is an endothelin antagonist selective for the ET(A) receptor in development at Abbott Laboratories for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and cell proliferation disorders. A simple and sensitive chromatographic method for the determination of atrasentan in human plasma has been developed and validated. The analytical method involves acidification of the plasma samples with 0.3 N HCl prior to extraction with 1:1 (v:v) hexane/tert-butylmethylether. The organic extract was evaporated to dryness, reconstituted with 20:80 (v:v) acetonitrile/0.05 M K(2)HPO(4) and washed with 75:25 (v:v) hexane/tert-butylmethylether. The organic layer was discarded and the aqueous layer was injected into the HPLC. Atrasentan and internal standard (ABT-790) were separated from interference using a 250 x 4.6 mm, 5 microm, 120 A Phenomenex Spherisorb C(8) analytical column with a 50 x 4.6 mm, Alltech Absorbosphere 5 microm CN guard cartridge using a mobile phase consisting of 25:15:5:55 (v:v:v:v) acetonitrile/isopropanol/methanol/0.05 M K(2)HPO(4), pH 7.0, at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Fluorescence detection was achieved using lambda(ex) 278 nm and lambda(em) 322 nm. For a 1.0 mL plasma sample volume, the limit of quantitation was approximately 200 pg/mL. The method was linear from 0.2 to 1300 ng/mL (r(2) = 0.9986). Inter- and intra-day assay RSD (n = 6) were less than 10%. Mean accuracy determinations showed the quality control samples to range between 94 and 99% of the theoretical concentration.