Effect of genetic polymorphisms on therapeutic response in multiple sclerosis relapsing-remitting patients treated with interferon-beta

Treatment with interferon beta (IFNβ) is one of the first-line treatments for multiple sclerosis. In clinical practice, however, many patients present suboptimal response to IFNβ, with the proportion of non-responders ranging from 20 to 50%. This variable response can be affected by genetic factors, such as polymorphisms in the genes involved in the disease state, pharmacodynamics, metabolism or in the action mechanism of IFNβ, which can affect the efficacy of this drug. This review assesses the impact of pharmacogenetics studies on response to IFNβ treatment among patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The results suggest that the detection of polymorphisms in several genes (CD46, CD58, FHIT, IRF5, GAPVD1, GPC5, GRBRB3, MxA, PELI3 and ZNF697) could be used in the future as predictive markers of response to IFNβ treatment in patients diagnosed with RRMS. However, few studies have been carried out and they have been performed on small sample sizes, which makes it difficult to generalize the role of these genes in IFNβ treatment. Studies on large sample sizes with longer term follow-up are therefore required to confirm these results.

Dose response to interferon therapy in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Interferon beta (IFNbeta) is a disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS). Although clinical benefits have been demonstrated in several large, randomized, double-blind studies, the optimal dosing of IFNbeta is controversial.

METHODS

A search was conducted using the key words IFNbeta, multiple sclerosis, Avonex, Rebif, Betaseron/Betaferon, efficacy, MRI, and dose-response relationship in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases to locate relevant pivotal clinical trials, other prospective studies, and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of IFNbeta published between 1985 and 2007. This review summarizes the findings of these studies with regard to defining the value of high-dose, high-frequency (HDHF) IFNbeta regimens.

REVIEW SUMMARY

All IFNbeta formulations and dosages have demonstrated efficacy in well-designed phase 3 trials. Two head-to-head trials suggesting that HDHF regimens result in increased efficacy contained shortfalls in study design that precluded definitive conclusions.

CONCLUSION

Defining the optimal dose and frequency strategy for IFNbeta in patients with MS is complicated by the differences in dosage, route, and frequency of administration among the various agents. Results of well-controlled pivotal trials do not suggest that HDHF IFNbeta regimens provide better long-term benefits for patients with MS than low-dose or low-frequency regimens. In addition, HDHF therapies may increase the incidence of side-effects and neutralizing antibodies that reduce efficacy over time. Although the two head-to-head comparisons of different IFNbeta therapies found HDHF regimens to be more efficacious than lower-dose/lower-frequency regimens, the design limitations of these studies must be considered when weighing the potential value of the findings for recommending treatment strategies.

Dose and Frequency of Administration of Interferon-?? Affect its Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis

Data reviewed in this article demonstrate that both interferon-beta-1a (IFNbeta-1a) and interferon-beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) show a dose-response relationship in multiple sclerosis at current clinical doses. Moreover, the efficacy of these therapies is probably dependent on their frequent administration to maintain optimal levels of biological effect. These results differ from the conclusions of a recent review of data comparing two doses of IFNbeta-1a, given intramuscularly once weekly, that showed no difference in efficacy between the two doses. This and other results were interpreted to indicate that the current dose of this product (30microg intramuscularly once weekly) is optimal. However, the data reviewed here indicate that the efficacy of IFNbeta differs depending on the features of the dose regimen, including total dose, route and frequency of administration. Direct comparative data indicate that 44microg given subcutaneously three times weekly is more effective on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging measures, at least up to 48 weeks of therapy, compared with 30microg intramuscularly once weekly; risk-benefit favours 44mug three times weekly over 30mug once weekly.