Positron Emission Tomography-Based Pharmacokinetic Analysis To Assess Renal Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions of Antimicrobial Drugs

Transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are of concern in antimicrobial drug development, as they can have serious safety consequences. We used positron emission tomography (PET) imaging-based pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis to assess the effect of different drugs, which may cause transporter-mediated DDIs, on the tissue distribution and excretion of [18F]ciprofloxacin as a radiolabeled model antimicrobial drug. Mice underwent PET scans after intravenous injection of [18F]ciprofloxacin, without and with pretreatment with either probenecid (150 mg/kg), cimetidine (50 mg/kg), or pyrimethamine (5 mg/kg). A 3-compartment kidney PK model was used to assess the involvement of renal transporters in the examined DDIs. Pretreatment with probenecid and cimetidine significantly decreased the renal clearance (CLrenal) of [18F]ciprofloxacin. The effect of cimetidine (-86%) was greater than that of probenecid (-63%), which contrasted with previously published clinical data. The kidney PK model revealed that the decrease in CLrenal was caused by inhibition of basal uptake transporters and apical efflux transporters in kidney proximal tubule cells. Changes in the urinary excretion of [18F]ciprofloxacin after pretreatment with probenecid and cimetidine resulted in increased blood and organ exposure to [18F]ciprofloxacin. Our results suggest that multiple membrane transporters mediate the tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin, with possible species differences between mice and humans. Concomitant medication inhibiting renal transporters may precipitate DDIs, leading to decreased urinary excretion and increased blood and organ exposure to ciprofloxacin, potentially exacerbating adverse effects. Our study highlights the strength of PET imaging-based PK analysis to assess transporter-mediated DDIs at a whole-body level.

Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions

Transporters in proximal renal tubules contribute to the disposition of numerous drugs. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of tubular secretion have been progressively elucidated during the past decades. Organic anions tend to be secreted by the transport proteins OAT1, OAT3 and OATP4C1 on the basolateral side of tubular cells, and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2, MRP4, OATP1A2 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) on the apical side. Organic cations are secreted by organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 on the basolateral side, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins MATE1, MATE2/2-K, P-glycoprotein, organic cation and carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 and OCTN2 on the apical side. Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may affect any of these transporters, altering the clearance and, consequently, the efficacy and/or toxicity of substrate drugs. Interactions at the level of basolateral transporters typically decrease the clearance of the victim drug, causing higher systemic exposure. Interactions at the apical level can also lower drug clearance, but may be associated with higher renal toxicity, due to intracellular accumulation. Whereas the importance of glomerular filtration in drug disposition is largely appreciated among clinicians, DDIs involving renal transporters are less well recognized. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles, quantitative importance and clinical relevance of these transporters in drug therapy. It proposes an approach based on substrate-inhibitor associations for predicting potential tubular-based DDIs and preventing their adverse consequences. We provide a comprehensive list of known drug interactions with renally-expressed transporters. While many of these interactions have limited clinical consequences, some involving high-risk drugs (e.g. methotrexate) definitely deserve the attention of prescribers.

Fluoroquinolone disposition: identification of the contribution of renal secretory and reabsorptive drug transporters

INTRODUCTION

Fluoroquinolones (FQs) exist as charged molecules in blood and urine making their absorption, distribution, and elimination likely to be influenced by active transport mechanisms. Greater understanding of in vivo FQ clearance mechanisms should help improve the predictability of drug-drug interactions, enhance the clinical safety and efficacy, and aid future novel drug design strategies.

AREAS COVERED

The authors present an overview of FQ development and associated drug-drug interactions, followed by systematic quantitative review of the physicochemical and in vivo pharmacokinetic properties for 15 representative FQs using historical clinical literature. These results were correlated with in vitro studies implicating drug transporters in FQ clearance to link clinical and in vitro evidence supporting the contribution of drug transport mechanisms to FQ disposition. Specific transporters likely to handle FQs in human renal proximal tubule cells are also identified.

EXPERT OPINION

Renal handling, that is, tubular secretion and reabsorption, appears to be the main determinant of FQ plasma half-life, clinical duration of action, and drug-drug interactions. Due to their zwitterionic nature, FQs are likely to interact with organic anion and cation transporters within the solute carrier (SLC) superfamily, including OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, OCTN1, OCTN2, MATE1, and MATE2. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters MDR1, MRP2, MRP4, and BCRP also may interact with FQs.

Validated Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Gemifloxacin and H2‐receptor Antagonists in Bulk, Pharmaceutical Formulations and Human Serum by RP‐HPLC; In‐vitro Applications

Simple, isocratic and rapid RP‐HPLC method has been developed for the simultaneous analysis of gemifloxacin and H2‐receptor antagonists i.e. Cimetidine, Famotidine and Ranitidine, in bulk, pharmaceutical formulation and human serum. Separation was achieved on the RP‐Mediterranea column [C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μ)] at ambient temperature using mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile: methanol: water (20:28:52 v/v/v pH 2.8 adjusted by phosphoric acid). Flow rate was 1.0 mL/min with an average operating pressure of 180 kg/cm2. Gatifloxacin (GATI) was used as an internal standard (IS). Quantitation was achieved with UV detection at 221, 256 and 267 nm, respectively. Linear calibration curves, at concentration ranges of 0.05‐37.5 μgmL‐L with a correlation coefficient of ±0.9994. The detection and quantification limits were in the ranges of 0.023‐0.250 μgmL‐L and 0.071‐0.756 μgmL‐L, respectively. Friedman's and Student's t‐test were applied to correlate these results. Method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, precision, robustness, recovery, limits of detection and quantitation and is applicable to the routine analysis of GFX and H2‐receptor antagonists, alone or in combination.

Competitive inhibition of renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and metabolite by probenecid

AIMS

Probenecid influences transport processes of drugs at several sites in the body and decreases elimination of several quinolones. We sought to explore extent, time course, and mechanism of the interaction between ciprofloxacin and probenecid at renal and nonrenal sites.

METHODS

A randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers (in part previously published Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995; 58: 532-41). Subjects received 200 mg ciprofloxacin as 30-min intravenous infusion without and with 3 g probenecid divided into five oral doses. Drug concentrations were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Ciprofloxacin and its 2-aminoethylamino-metabolite (M1) in plasma and urine with and without probenecid were modelled simultaneously with WinNonlin.

RESULTS

Data are ratio of geometric means (90% confidence intervals). Addition of probenecid reduced the median renal clearance from 23.8 to 8.25 l h(-1)[65% reduction (59, 71), P < 0.01] for ciprofloxacin and from 20.5 to 8.26 l h(-1) (66% reduction (57, 73), P < 0.01] for M1 (estimated by modelling). Probenecid reduced ciprofloxacin nonrenal clearance by 8% (1, 14) (P < 0.08). Pharmacokinetic modelling indicated competitive inhibition of the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1 by probenecid. The affinity for the renal transporter was 4.4 times higher for ciprofloxacin and 3.6 times higher for M1 than for probenecid, based on the molar ratio. Probenecid did not affect volume of distribution of ciprofloxacin or M1, nonrenal clearance or intercompartmental clearance of ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Probenecid inhibited the renal tubular secretion of ciprofloxacin and M1, probably by a competitive mechanism and due to reaching >100-fold higher plasma concentrations. Formation of M1, nonrenal clearance and distribution of ciprofloxacin were not affected.

Competitive inhibition of renal tubular secretion of gemifloxacin by probenecid

Probenecid interacts with transport processes of drugs at several sites in the body. For most quinolones, renal clearance is reduced by concomitant administration of probenecid. The interaction between gemifloxacin and probenecid has not yet been studied. We studied the extent, time course, site(s), and mechanism of this interaction. Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, two-way crossover study. Subjects received 320 mg gemifloxacin as an oral tablet without and with 4.5 g probenecid divided in eight oral doses. Drug concentrations in plasma and urine were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. WinNonlin was used for noncompartmental analysis, compartmental modeling, and statistics, and NONMEM was used for visual predictive checks. Concomitant administration of probenecid increased plasma gemifloxacin concentrations and amounts excreted in urine compared to baseline amounts. Data are average estimates (percent coefficients of variation). Modeling showed a competitive inhibition of the renal tubular secretion of gemifloxacin by probenecid as the most likely mechanism of the interaction. The estimated K(m) and Vmax for the saturable part of renal elimination were 9.16 mg/liter (20%) and 113 mg/h (21%), respectively. Based on the molar ratio, the affinity for the renal transporter was 10-fold higher for gemifloxacin than for probenecid. Since probenecid reached an approximately 200-times-higher area under the molar concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h than gemifloxacin, probenecid inhibited the active tubular secretion of gemifloxacin. Probenecid also reduced the nonrenal clearance of gemifloxacin from 25.2 (26%) to 21.0 (23%) liters/h. Probenecid inhibited the renal tubular secretion of gemifloxacin, most likely by a competitive mechanism, and slightly decreased nonrenal clearance of gemifloxacin.