Levocarnitine and Dialysis: A Review

Among the various metabolic abnormalities documented in dialysis patients are abnormalities related to the metabolism of fatty acids. Aberrant fatty-acid metabolism has been associated with the promotion of free-radical production, insulin resistance, and cellular apoptosis. These processes have been identified as important contributors to the morbidity experienced by dialysis patients. There is evidence that levocarnitine supplementation can modify the deleterious effects of defective fatty-acid metabolism. Patients receiving hemodialysis and, to a lesser degree, peritoneal dialysis have been shown to be carnitine deficient, as manifested by reduced levels of plasma free carnitine and an increase in the acyl:free carnitine ratio. Cardiac and skeletal muscles are particularly dependent on fatty-acid metabolism for the generation of energy. A number of clinical abnormalities have been correlated with a low plasma carnitine status in dialysis patients. Clinical trials have examined the efficacy of levocarnitine therapy in a number of conditions common in dialysis patients, including skeletal-muscle weakness and fatigue, cardiomyopathy, dialysis-related hypotension, hyperlipidemia, and anemia poorly responsive to recombinant human erythropoietin therapy (rHuEPO). This review examines the evidence for carnitine deficiency in patients requiring dialysis, and documents the results of relevant clinical trials of levocarnitine therapy in this population. Consensus recommendations by expert panels are summarized and contrasted with present guidelines for access to levocarnitine therapy by dialysis patients.

Histamine type 2 receptor expression on peripheral blood regulatory lymphocytes in patients with allergic rhinitis treated with specific immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Both histamine H1- and H2-receptors (H2R) were found on regulatory T (Treg) cells; however, there is a paucity of information regarding the role of H2R in Treg function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of natural allergen stimulation and specific immunotherapy (SIT) on H2R expression in Treg cells in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR).

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 41 patients with AR were screened for 1 year and treated with SIT (n = 21) or placebo (n = 20) for the next 2 years. Fifteen healthy subjects were included as a control. Subsets of Treg cells that expressed H2R were assessed annually in the blood by flow cytometry: before, at the height of the pollen season, and after, at the end of the pollen season. In addition, total nasal symptom score, the use of rescue medication, and nasal eosinophilia were evaluated.

RESULTS

Treg cells of AR patients slightly up-regulate H2R out of the pollen season. Natural allergen stimulation results in prompt up-regulation of H2R within these cells. SIT significantly decreased the number of Treg cells with increased expression of H2R in the blood exclusively at the height of pollen season, which, however, had no impact on the expression of H2R in Treg cells. SIT improved significantly the symptom score, rescue medication use, and decreased nasal eosinophilia.

CONCLUSION

Natural pollen exposure results in up-regulation of H2R in Treg cells. Immunotherapy might transiently decrease the number of Treg-H2R(+) cells in the blood, which may be associated with their migration to the peripheral tissues. This study was part of the clinical trial registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov.