Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine

Quality by Design Assisted Optimization of a Chiral Capillary Electrokinetic Chromatographic Method for the Separation of Amlodipine Enantiomers Using Maltodextrin as Chiral Selector

Analytical-method development based on design of experiment has been applied for optimizing the enantioseparation of amlodipine by chiral capillary electrokinetic chromatography using maltodextrin as the chiral selector. The effect of different factors on the enantioresolution quality was screened. Three separation factors, namely maltodextrin concentration, pH of the background electrolyte and applied voltage were selected as independent variables. The number of experiments was reduced while maximizing the information content using design of experiment. Based on a full-quadratic design that included three variables on three levels, the total design space could be reduced to fifteen factor combinations using a D-optimal algorithm. The aim of the experiment was to find the optimal factor combinations with respect to resolution. The maltodextrin concentration (7.5–10% w/v) demonstrated the strongest effect on the resolution followed by pH (2–4) of the background electrolyte and the applied voltage (15–20 kV). An increase in the maltodextrin concentration was found to result in a greater stereoselectivity, represented by the higher resolution values (R_s ≥ 1.5). The separation conditions in the proposed method were feasible to be adjusted within the applied range with an acceptable resolution.

Effectiveness of Levoamlodipine Maleate for Hypertension Compared with Amlodipine Besylate: a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Study

PURPOSE

Antihypertensive treatment is the most important method to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. However, there is scant evidence of the benefits of levoamlodipine maleate for antihypertensive treatment using a head-to-head comparison in the real-world. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of levoamlodipine maleate used to treat outpatients with primary hypertension compared with amlodipine besylate in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a pragmatic comparative effectiveness study carried out at 110 centers across China in outpatients with primary hypertension treated with levoamlodipine maleate or amlodipine besylate, with 24 months of follow-up. The primary outcomes used for evaluating the effectiveness were composite major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), adverse reactions, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Among the included 10,031 patients, there were 482 MACCE, 223 (4.4%) in the levoamlodipine maleate group (n = 5018) and 259 (5.2%) in the amlodipine besylate group (n = 5013) (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.75-1.08, P = 0.252). The levoamlodipine maleate group had lower overall incidences of any adverse reactions (6.0% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001), lower extremity edema (1.1% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.001) and headache (0.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.045). There was a nearly 100% chance of the levoamlodipine maleate being cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of 150,000 Yuan per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, resulting in more QALYs (incremental QALYs: 0.00392) and cost savings (saving 2725 Yuan or 28.8% reduction in overall costs) per patient.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, levoamlodipine maleate could reduce cost by 29% with a similar MACCE incidence rate and lower occurrence of adverse reactions (especially edema and headache) compared with amlodipine besylate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01844570 registered at May 1, 2013.

Combination therapy in the extended cardiovascular continuum: a focus on perindopril and amlodipine

The progression of cardiovascular disease could be regarded as following atherosclerosis-related and age-related pathways. The starting points for these pathways are different--risk factors or aortic ageing--but they conclude in the same way: end-stage heart disease. Together these interlinked pathways form the extended cardiovascular continuum. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have been shown to interrupt or slow the progression of cardiovascular disease along one pathway, the cardiovascular atherosclerotic continuum. Cardiovascular protection with RAAS inhibitors varies; different RAAS inhibitors offer different levels of protection. Similarly, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) also have clearly shown protective effect of cardiovascular system, especially as it regards cerebrovascular disease risk. The AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) showed that a combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril and CCB amlodipine offered better cardiovascular protection in at-risk hypertensive patients than beta-blocker and thiazide. By attenuating the deleterious effects of cardiovascular disease at multiple stages of the extended cardiovascular continuum on top of lowering blood pressure (BP), perindopril and amlodipine could interrupt and slow the progression of cardiovascular disease. These antihypertensive agents have complementary vascular effects that enhance cardiovascular protection and reduce side-effects. Evidence from ASCOT shows that antihypertensive and vascular effects of amlodipine with and without perindopril have translated into real-life clinical benefits. A strategy using ACE inhibitors and CCBs, such as perindopril and amlodipine, to target multiple stages in both pathways of cardiovascular disease could effectively reduce cardiovascular risk and lower BP.

Titration of amlodipine to higher doses: a comparison of Asian and Western experience

In this retrospective analysis, data pooled from two Phase III/IV open-label Asian studies were used to quantify the additional blood pressure efficacy achieved when titrating amlodipine from 5 mg to 10 mg in mild/moderate hypertensive patients, and compared to data pooled from three Western studies. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to the specified time point (4–8 weeks, depending on the trial). For the Asian analysis (n=174), both mean SBP and DBP were significantly decreased at the final visit (SBP −13.3 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −15.5 to −11.0; DBP −9.2 mmHg, 95% CI −10.6 to −7.8; both P<0.0001). These results were similar to the Western analysis (n=369; SBP −11.5 mmHg, 95% CI −13.1 to −10.0; DBP −6.3, 95% CI −7.1 to −5.5; both P<0.0001). In summary, titration of amlodipine from 5 mg to 10 mg significantly decreased both SBP and DBP in Asian patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Adverse effects of the amlodipine on bone healing of the mandibular fracture: an experimental study in rats

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers are effective antihypertensive agents, but they may affect many metabolic processes, including bone metabolism.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate by radiographic, histologic, and biochemical analyses the effects of amlodipine on bone healing of a defect simulating a fracture in mandibular ramus of rats.

METHODS

Fifty male Wistar rats were submitted to the same unilateral surgical procedure simulating a mandibular fracture. Experimental group received oral doses of amlodipine 0.04 mg/rat/day starting 12 days before procedure, while control group received water. Animals were sacrificed at 1, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days postoperatively. Numerical values were submitted to statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Radiographic analysis showed larger radiolucent area into bone defect to the experimental group at the periods of 14 (p = 0.016), 30 (p = 0.009), and 90 (p = 0.028) days. In the histological analysis, the experimental group had a slight delay in the chronology of the repair process. In the histomorphometric analysis, the experimental group presented significant lowering of newly formed bone volume at 7 and 14 days periods (p = 0.049). There was a significant decrease of alkaline phosphatase levels in experimental group in the initial periods (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that chronic use of amlodipine compromised bone neoformation in the repairing process of surgical defect in the mandibular ramus of rats, but no precluded occurrence of fracture consolidation.

Combination therapy with renin-angiotensin system blockers: Will amlodipine replace hydrochlorothiazide?

Amlodipine is a highly effective and safe antihypertensive dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker. It is even more effective when used in combination with other antihypertensive medications, including hydrochlorothiazide. When antihypertensive calcium channel blockers were first introduced, evidence in the laboratory that they had some natriuretic properties was adduced to suggest that they would be "the diuretics of the 1990s." This turned out not to be the case. Because of its clinical efficacy, amlodipine is frequently used in fixed-dose combination products, but it is not likely to replace hydrochlorothiazide.