Pharmacokinetics of anorectal nifedipine and lidocaine (lignocaine) ointment following haemorrhoidectomy: an open-label, single-dose, phase IV clinical study

Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids causes less pain than excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but many patients still experience significant postprocedure discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether topical lidocaine, with or without diltiazem, is more effective than placebo for analgesia after hemorrhoid banding.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to 2% lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with 2% diltiazem, or a placebo ointment.

SETTINGS

This study was performed at 2 university public teaching hospitals and 2 private hospitals in Australia.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing hemorrhoid banding were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Topical ointments were applied postprocedure 3× daily for 5 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog pain score, opiate analgesia usage, and patient satisfaction were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of 159 eligible patients, 99 were randomly assigned (33 in each group). Pain scores were reduced at 1 hour for the lidocaine (OR 4.15 [1.12-15.41]; p = 0.03) and lidocaine/diltiazem groups (OR 3.85 [1.05-14.11]; p = 0.04) compared with placebo. Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group had improved satisfaction (OR 3.82 [1.28-11.44]; p = 0.02) and were more likely to recommend the procedure to others (OR 9.33 [1.07-81.72]; p = 0.04). Patients in the lidocaine/diltiazem group required approximately 45% less total and in-hospital analgesia compared with the placebo. There was no difference in complications between any of the groups.

LIMITATIONS

A cost/benefit analysis was not performed. Analgesic efficacy appeared to be short term and the procedures were performed only in the hospital/nonambulatory setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical lidocaine reduced short-term analgesia use, whereas combination lidocaine/diltiazem was associated with both improved analgesia and patient satisfaction after hemorrhoid banding.

LIDOCANA TPICA O UNGENTO DE LIDOCANA/DILTIAZEM DESPUS DE LA LIGADURA HEMORROIDAL CON BANDA ELSTICA UN ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO CONTROLADO Y ALEATORIZADO DE TRES BRAZOS

ANTECEDENTES:La ligadura de hemorroides con banda elástica causa menos dolor que la hemorroidectomía escisional, pero muchos pacientes siguen experimentando molestias significativas tras el procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar si la lidocaína tópica, con o sin diltiazem, es más eficaz que el placebo para la analgesia tras la ligadura hemorroidal.DISEÑO:Este es un ensayo prospectivo, aleatorizado, doble ciego, controlado con placebo. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir lidocaína al 2 %, lidocaína al 2 % con diltiazem al 2 % o ungüento de placebo.AJUSTES:Este estudio se realizó en dos hospitales públicos con docencia universitaria y dos hospitales privados en Australia.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes consecutivos de ≥18 años sometidos a ligadura para hemorroides.INTERVENCIONES:Se aplicaron ungüentos tópicos tras el procedimiento tres veces al día durante 5 días.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La puntuación analógica visual del dolor, el uso de analgésicos opiáceos y la satisfacción del paciente fueron las principales medidas de resultado.RESULTADOS:De 159 pacientes elegibles, 99 fueron aleatorizados (33 en cada grupo). Las puntuaciones de dolor se redujeron a la hora para los grupos de lidocaína (OR 4,15 (1,12-15,41); p = 0,03) y lidocaína/diltiazem (OR 3,85 (1,05-14,11), p = 0,04) en comparación con el placebo.Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem mejoraron su satisfacción (OR 3,82 (1,28-11,44), p = 0,02) y eran más propensos de recomendar el procedimiento a otros (OR 9,33 (1,07-81,72), p = 0,04). Los pacientes del grupo de lidocaína/diltiazem requirieron aproximadamente un 45 % menos de analgesia total e intrahospitalaria en comparación con el grupo de placebo. No hubo diferencia en las complicaciones entre ninguno de los grupos.LIMITACIONES:No se realizó un análisis de costo/beneficio. La eficacia analgésica pareció ser a corto plazo y los procedimientos solo se realizaron en el hospital/entorno no ambulatorio.CONCLUSIÓN:La lidocaína tópica mejora la analgesia a corto plazo, mientras que la combinación de lidocaína/diltiazem se asocia tanto con una mejor analgesia como con la satisfacción del paciente tras la colocación de bandas para hemorroides. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Topical Nifedipine for the Treatment of Pressure Ulcer: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Effect of nifedipine on pressure ulcer (PU) healing has not been evaluated in the human subjects yet.

STUDY QUESTION

In this study, the effect of topical application of nifedipine 3% ointment on PU healing in critically ill patients was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

In this study, 200 patients with stage I or II PU according to 2-digit Stirling Pressure Ulcer Severity Scale were randomized to receive topical nifedipine 3% ointment or placebo twice daily for 14 days. Changes in the size and stage of the ulcers were considered as primary outcome of the study. The stage of the ulcers at baseline and on day 7 and day 14 of study was determined by using 2-digit stirling scale. In addition, the surface area of the wounds was estimated by multiplying width by length.

RESULTS

In total, 83 patients in each group completed the study. The groups were matched for the baseline stage and size of PUs. Mean decrease in the stage of PU in the nifedipine group was significantly higher than the placebo group on day 7 (-1.71 vs. -0.16, respectively, P < 0.001) and day 14 (-0.78 vs. -0.09, respectively, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean decrease in the surface area of PU was significantly higher in the nifedipine group compared with the placebo group on day 7 (-1.44 vs. -0.32, respectively, P < 0.001) and day 14 (-2.51 vs. -0.24, respectively, P < 0.001) of study.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical application of nifedipine 3% ointment for 14 days significantly improved the healing process of stage I or II PUs in critically ill patients.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous, subcutaneous, and topical administration of lidocaine hydrochloride and metabolites 3-hydroxylidocaine, monoethylglycinexylidide, and 4-hydroxylidocaine in horse

Intravenous (iv), subcutaneous (sq), and topical (tp) lidocaine was administered to six horses in a cross-over, randomized design study. Samples were collected for up to 72 hr. Compartmental models were used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of (LD) and its metabolites 3-hydroxylidocaine (3-OH), 4-hydroxylidocaine (4-OH), and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Metabolites 3-OH and 4-OH were present in conjugated forms, whereas LD and metabolite MEXG were present primarily in the un-conjugated form. Plasma concentrations of LD after iv administration (100 mg) were described by three-compartment model with an additional three compartments to describe the elimination of metabolites. Median (range) elimination micro-constants (K_e ) for LD, 3-OH, 4-OH, and MEXG were 4.12 (2.62-6.23), 1.25 (1.10-2.15), 1.79 (1.22-2.39), and 1.69 (1.03-1.99)/hr, respectively. Median (range) values of alpha (t_½α ), beta (t_½β ), and gamma (t_½γ ) half-lives were 0.08 (0.07-0.13), 0.57 (0.15-1.25), and 4.11 (0.52-7.36) hr. Plasma concentrations of LD after sq (200 mg) administration were described by absorption and two-compartment elimination model. The median (range) of the LD absorption half-life (t_½ab ) was 0.47 (0.29-0.61) hr. The K_e for LD, 3-OH, 4-OH, and MEXG was 3.91 (1.48-9.25), 1.00 (0.78-1.08), 1.76 (0.96-2.11), and 1.13 (0.69-1.33)/hr. The median (range) of t_½α and t_½β was 0.15 (0.06-0.27) and 3.04 (2.53-6.39) hr. Plasma concentrations of LD after tp (400 mg) application were described by one-compartment model with a t_½ab of 8.49 (5.16-11.80) hr. The K_e for LD, 3-OH, and MEXG was 0.24 (0.10-0.81), 0.41 (0.08-0.93), and 0.38 (0.26-1.14)/hr.

Development of a HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of nifedipine and lidocaine in human plasma

The method for simultaneous determination of nifedipine (NIF) and lidocaine (LID) in human plasma by one-step sample preparation has been developed for the first time. Due to the photosensitivity of nifedipine and its low plasma concentrations a precise and reliable method was required. The method involved liquid-liquid extraction (methyl tert-butyl ether, MTBE), and 10μL of the resulting sample was analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an YMC-Triart C18 HPLC column (100×2.0mm; S-5μm 12nm). The mobile phase was methanol:water, 60:40 (v/v) and contained 0.15% acetic acid. The linearity of the method was established in the concentration ranges of 0.5-50ng/mL for NIF and 1.0-500ng/mL for LID. Photodestruction of NIF under ambient light was evaluated. The validated method was successfully applied to analyze human plasma samples after rectal application of the drug (1g) containing 2.0% LID and 0.3% NIF.

A literature review on the role of chemical sphincterotomy after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

OBJECTIVE

A literature review of agents used to induce chemical sphincterotomy after hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from January 1935 to August 2010.

RESULTS

Two randomized controlled trials compared calcium channel blockers (Ca2) with placebo. Pain appeared to be less for up to 7 days, and its side-effect profile was comparable to the control group. Four randomized controlled trials examined the role of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN). GTN may be used up to 6 weeks to aid healing. Pain may be slightly less during its use and potentially offers less pain during defecation in the first 48 h. Its side-effect profile including headache appears comparable to placebo. Three randomized controlled trials investigated botulinum toxin A (BTX). BTX may be used to aid healing after hemorrhoidectomy. Pain may be less for up to a week after surgery. Its side-effect profile including incontinence to flatus appears comparable to placebo. It would be especially useful in cases where poor patient compliance is envisaged. Only one paper was found comparing BTX with GTN. BTX may be preferred over GTN due to better pain control and fewer side effects.

CONCLUSION

BTX, Ca2, and GTN may give effective pain relief for a week after hemorrhoidectomy. Their side-effect profiles are comparable to placebo.