Management of medication noncompliance in solid-organ transplant recipients

Life Quality and Compliance After Transplant: The Case of Turkey

OBJECTIVE

Chronic renal failure is one of the most significant health problems in Turkey, as it is all over the world, and negatively affects quality of life. The aim of this study is to find factors affecting compliance levels and quality of life of patients undergoing kidney transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The population of the study consisted of 244 patients who underwent kidney transplant. Although the study aimed to cover the entire target population in the sampling selection, it was conducted among 206 patients. The data were collected by face-to-face interview.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 92.7% were between 46 and 59 years of age, 54.4% had a living donor transplant, 54.9% had adverse effects, and 2.9% had rejection due to incompatibility. There was a significant relationship between compliance and quality of life; increasing frequency of adverse effects would decrease in direct proportion to compliance, which would, therefore, increase quality of life. All the subscale scores of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey were found to have an average of 60 and above. The mean of the compliance scale was 48.33 (SD, 3.21), and, with the maximum score at 55, the mean of the group was high. In our country, patients view transplant as a final and definite treatment method. This might be related to fact that the longer the time after transplant, the lower the level of compliance.

Psychopharmacology in transplantation medicine

Organ transplantation has become a well-established treatment option in patients with end-stage organ diseases. Although quality of life has markedly improved, psychiatric disorders before and after transplantation are more frequent compared to the general population. Psychopharmacological treatment is recommended for almost all mental disorders according to current guidelines, but may pose particular problems in organ transplant patients. Changes in the metabolism and elimination of drugs during organ insufficiency, drug interactions, and overlapping side effects between psychopharmacological and immunosuppressive drugs are challenging problems in clinical management. Furthermore, questions frequently arise concerning the use of psychopharmacological treatment options for sleeping and anxiety disorders. This article reviews psychopharmacology in organ transplant patients, with particular attention to frequent psychiatric disorders observed in the disease course of end-stage organ diseases.

Patient-reported immunosuppression nonadherence 6 to 24 months after liver transplant: association with pretransplant psychosocial factors and perceptions of health status change

CONTEXT

Knowing the prevalence and risk factors of immunosuppression nonadherence after liver transplant may help guide intervention development.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether sociodemographic and psychosocial variables before liver transplant are predictive of nonadherence after liver transplant.

DESIGN

Structured telephone interviews were used to collect self-report immunosuppression adherence and health status information. Medical record reviews were then completed to retrospectively examine the relationship between immunosuppression adherence and pretransplant variables, including sociodemographic and medical characteristics and the presence or absence of 6 hypothesized psychosocial risk factors.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A nonprobability sample of 236 adults 6 to 24 months after liver transplant at 2 centers completed structured telephone interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Immunosuppressant medication nonadherence, categorized as missed-dose and altered-dose "adherent" or "nonadherent" during the past 6 months; immunosuppression medication holidays.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (35%) were missed-dose nonadherent and 34 patients (14%) were altered-dose nonadherent. Seventy-one patients (30%) reported 1 or more 24-hour immunosuppression holidays in the past 6 months. Missed-dose nonadherence was predicted by male sex (odds ratio, 2.46; P= .01), longer time since liver transplant (odds ratio, 1.08; P= .01), pretransplant mood disorder (odds ratio, 2.52; P=.004), and pretransplant social support instability (odds ratio, 2.25; P=.03). Altered-dose nonadherence was predicted by pretransplant mood disorder (odds ratio, 2.15; P= .04) and pretransplant social support instability (odds ratio, 1.89; P= .03).

CONCLUSION

Rates of immunosuppressant nonadherence and drug holidays in the first 2 years after liver transplant are unacceptably high. Pretransplant mood disorder and social support instability increase the risk of nonadherence, and interventions should target these modifiable risk factors.

Nursing and Transplant Coordination: A Call for Clarity

Organ transplantation is a complex and highly regulated field. This review focuses on the role of nurses and transplant coordinators in solid organ transplantation, excluding both inpatient staff nursing and procurement activities. The literature describes a robust and autonomous transplant coordinator role; a key member of the multidisciplinary transplant team. Transplant coordinators facilitate patient care throughout all phases of transplantation. However, a lack of consensus on licensure and educational preparation of these important practitioners was evident from the review of literature. Synthesis of the data suggests that the role of transplant coordinator is not distinct but a description of a wide variety of functions, duties, and tasks that require varying levels of licensure and educational preparation. Greater clarity for both practitioners and consumers could be achieved by creating certification levels similar to nephrology nurses. As no transplant-specific staffing models or benchmarks were discovered, rigorous research regarding optimal staffing patterns is also recommended.

Cross-Cultural Assessment and Management in Primary Care

The increasing number of culturally diverse patients in primary care and the demands to provide culturally sensitive health care make it essential that physicians provide care that is responsive to a culturally diverse population. Physicians must use cross-cultural techniques in their assessment and management practices. The cross-culturally competent physician has the potential to increase his or her ability to provide effective and culturally responsive treatment to a wider spectrum of patients, resulting in more positive treatment outcomes.

Rates and Risk Factors for Nonadherence to the Medical Regimen After Adult Solid Organ Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite the impact of medical regimen nonadherence on health outcomes after organ transplantation, there is mixed and conflicting evidence regarding the prevalence and predictors of posttransplant nonadherence. Clinicians require precise information on nonadherence rates in order to evaluate patients' risks for this problem.

METHODS

A total of 147 studies of kidney, heart, liver, pancreas/kidney-pancreas, or lung/heart-lung recipients published between 1981 and 2005 were included in a meta-analysis. Average nonadherence rates were calculated for 10 areas of the medical regimen. Correlations between nonadherence and patient psychosocial risk factors were examined.

RESULTS

Across all types of transplantation, average nonadherence rates ranged from 1 to 4 cases per 100 patients per year (PPY) for substance use (tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs), to 19 to 25 cases per 100 PPY for nonadherence to immunosuppressants, diet, exercise, and other healthcare requirements. Rates varied significantly by transplant type in two areas: immunosuppressant nonadherence was highest in kidney recipients (36 cases per 100 PPY vs. 7 to 15 cases in other recipients). Failure to exercise was highest in heart recipients (34 cases per 100 PPY vs. 9 to 22 cases in other recipients). Demographics, social support, and perceived health showed little correlation with nonadherence. Pretransplant substance use predicted posttransplant use.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimated nonadherence rates, overall and by transplant type, allow clinicians to gauge patient risk and target resources accordingly. Nonadherence rates in some areas--including immunosuppressant use--appear unacceptably high. Weak correlations of most patient psychosocial factors with nonadherence suggest that attention should focus on other classes of variables (e.g., provider-related and systems-level factors), which may be more influential.