Alternatives to randomized controlled trials in telemedicine

Research designs other than true experiments may be useful in the evaluation of telemedicine. Potential methods include those that do not rely on randomization and tight control of the intervention, and analysis of existing administrative and clinical databases. Quasi-experimental designs may also be useful, especially when conducted in association with careful statistical methods that allow the investigator to control for certain differences between groups. Databases, such as those maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, contain information on both outcomes and claims, as well as disease/procedure registries and electronic health records. This may provide a potential tool for understanding the effects of telemedicine on access to care in conjunction with costs and quality. These different approaches have advantages and disadvantages, but may be useful in telemedicine, where the conduct of randomized controlled trials is generally very expensive and frequently not feasible.

Exposure Therapy for Problem Gambling via Videoconferencing: A Case Report

This case report of a 31 year old woman who described her main problem as an uncontrollable urge to gamble on electronic gaming machines describes the application of exposure therapy (ET) by videoconferencing and the use of a clinical therapy assistant in the treatment of pathological gambling. The case study is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of this treatment with six sessions of therapy and 4 year follow up. The use of videoconferencing is discussed in relation to treatment effectiveness, ongoing follow up for the client and education and support for a community mental health nurse, therapy assistant, in a rural setting in South Australia. The implications of using this modality for the treatment of rural patients with problem gambling is discussed.