Clinical trials research in pediatrics: strategies for effective collaboration between investigator sites and the pharmaceutical industry

A Delphi process to optimize quality and performance of drug evaluation in neonates

BACKGROUND

Neonatal trials remain difficult to conduct for several reasons: in particular the need for study sites to have an existing infrastructure in place, with trained investigators and validated quality procedures to ensure good clinical, laboratory practices and a respect for high ethical standards. The objective of this work was to identify the major criteria considered necessary for selecting neonatal intensive care units that are able to perform drug evaluations competently.

METHODOLOGY AND MAIN FINDINGS

This Delphi process was conducted with an international multidisciplinary panel of 25 experts from 13 countries, selected to be part of two committees (a scientific committee and an expert committee), in order to validate criteria required to perform drug evaluation in neonates. Eighty six items were initially selected and classified under 7 headings: "NICUs description-Level of care" (21), "Ability to perform drug trials: NICU organization and processes (15), "Research Experience" (12), "Scientific competencies and area of expertise" (8), "Quality Management" (16), "Training and educational capacity" (8) and "Public involvement" (6). Sixty-one items were retained and headings were rearranged after the first round, 34 were selected after the second round. A third round was required to validate 13 additional items. The final set includes 47 items divided under 5 headings.

CONCLUSION

A set of 47 relevant criteria will help to NICUs that want to implement, conduct or participate in drug trials within a neonatal network identify important issues to be aware of.

SUMMARY POINTS

1) Neonatal trials remain difficult to conduct for several reasons: in particular the need for study sites to have an existing infrastructure in place, with trained investigators and validated quality procedures to ensure good clinical, laboratory practices and a respect for high ethical standards. 2) The present Delphi study was conducted with an international multidisciplinary panel of 25 experts from 13 countries and aims to identify the major criteria considered necessary for selecting neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) that are able to perform drug evaluations competently. 3) Of the 86 items initially selected and classified under 7 headings--"NICUs description-Level of care" (21), "Ability to perform drug trials: NICU organization and processes (15), "Research Experience" (12), "Scientific competencies and area of expertise" (8), "Quality Management" (16), "Training and educational capacity" (8) and "Public involvement" (6)--47 items were selected following a three rounds Delphi process. 4) The present consensus will help NICUs to implement, conduct or participate in drug trials within a neonatal network.

Orally inhaled fixed-dose combination products for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: not simple math

Over the past decade, orally inhaled fixed-dose combination products (FDCs) have emerged as an important therapeutic class for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the conceptual simplicity of inhaled FDCs belies both the complexity of their development, and the profound advantages they offer patients. The benefits of combining agents are not merely additive, and range from increased compliance via simple convenience to complex receptor-level synergies. Similarly, though, the development challenges often exceed the sum of their parts. FDC formulation and analytical method development is generally more complex than for two monotherapy products. Likewise, FDC clinical programs can easily eclipse those of their monotherapy peers and their inherent complexity is often furthered by the diverse regulatory requirements for worldwide approval. As such, the proposition of developing an orally inhaled FDC for global registration often represents a significant increase in both the potential rewards and assumed risks of drug development.

Impact of the Number of Dermatologists on Dermatology Biomedical Research: A Canadian Study

Background:

Fewer dermatologists than other clinical specialists are entering and being retained as physicians in the Canadian medical workforce. Studies suggest that dermatologist numbers may influence skin disease outcomes. No study has questioned whether the number of clinical dermatologists can influence academic productivity.

Objective:

To quantify the correlation of the number of dermatologists with biomedical scientific production in this field from 1996 to 2008 in Canada.

Methods:

Canadian dermatology biomedical scientific production from SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) were merged with Canadian Medical Association (CMA) dermatologist demographic data. Linear regression analyses were used to model the relationships.

Results:

The low growth of dermatologist numbers by 8.16% in Canada from 1996 to 2008 correlates with a small increase in articles by 7.59% published in this subject area during this period. This has reduced the scientific importance of Canadian dermatology in the world.

Conclusion:

The number of dermatologists was a significant predictor of biomedical research production in the field of dermatology. This suggests that specialist availability may be one factor influencing dermatology research and publications.

Pediatric drugs--a review of commercially available oral formulations

Pediatric oral formulations can be quite scientifically challenging to develop and the prerequisites for both a measurable dosage form to administer based upon bodyweight, and also taste-masking are two of the challenges unique for pediatric oral formulations. The physicochemical and organoleptic properties of the active drug substance such as solubility, chemical stability, and taste along with the intended dose can determine which formulations are feasible to develop. Oral pediatric formulations are available in 17 different varieties and can be either a ready-to-use formulation such as a solution, syrup, suspension, tablet, scored tablet, chewable tablet, orally disintegrating tablet, or thin strip, or can also be a formulation that requires manipulation such as a powder for constitution to a suspension, tablet for constitution to a suspension, powder for constitution to a solution, drops for reconstitution to a suspension, concentrated solution for dilution, effervescent tablet, bulk oral granules, bulk oral powder, or solid in a capsule to mix with food or drink. Recently there has been an increase in pediatric formulation development inspired by increased regulatory incentives. The intent of this review is to educate the reader on the various types of formulations administered orally to pediatrics, the rationale in deciding which type of formulation to develop, the excipients used, development challenges, the in-use handling of oral pediatric formulations, and the regulatory incentives.