Adherence and Persistence on Prostaglandin Analogues for Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically review, synthesize and quantify studies reporting patterns of adherence and persistence with prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) in order to comprehensively understand real-world treatment behavior among patients with glaucoma who are prescribed PGAs. These data can inform the decision between a glaucoma therapy based on either topical PGA medications or procedural PGA-based intervention.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis (MA).

METHODS

We updated a 2011 SLR using electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [CDSR]), supplemented by hand searches of SLR and MA bibliographies. We included observational studies conducted in adult glaucoma patients treated with PGAs that reported objective measures of persistence or adherence. In addition to estimated rates of adherence and persistence, adherence among patients on any/unspecified PGA was characterized by mean MPR/PDC (medication possession ratio/proportion of days covered, where values >80% indicate good adherence). Duration of therapy was defined as the time period between initial therapy prescription and time of therapy discontinuation or switch.

RESULTS

The SLR included 50 publications reporting on 47 unique studies and involving 961,000 patients. The subsequent MA included all but four studies which did not report the age distribution of patients. The mean proportion of patients on any/unspecified PGA who were adherent at Year 1 was 44% (95% CI: 31%-58%). Among patients on any/unspecified PGA, the mean MPR/PDC was 54% (95% CI: 38%-75%) at Year 1 and 60% at Year 2 (95% CI: 39%-94%). The mean proportion of patients on any/unspecified PGA who were persistent fell from 75% (95% CI: 66%-85%) at Month 6 to 31% (95% CI: 12%-55%) at Year 3, with a smaller decrease observed between Year 1 (56%; 95% CI: 45%-66%) and Year 2 (53%; 95% CI: 45%-62%), and a larger decrease between Years 2 and 3. The mean duration on therapy was 315.7 days (95% CI: 190.0%-441.5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Suboptimal adherence and persistence with PGAs are common, with further decreases as duration lengthens. These findings may underscore the value of procedural glaucoma treatments that do not depend on daily patient engagement with topical medications.

Current Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Cost-Effectiveness in Glaucoma Pharmacotherapy: A Glaucoma Specialists Focus Group Study

Background

Rising healthcare costs motivate continued cost-reduction efforts. To help lower costs associated with open-angle glaucoma (OAG), a prevalent, progressive disease with substantial direct and indirect costs, clinicians need to understand the cost-effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering pharmacotherapies. There is little published information on clinicians’ knowledge and attitudes about cost-effectiveness in glaucoma treatment.

Purpose

This pilot focus group study aimed to explore clinician attitudes and perspectives around the costs and cost drivers of glaucoma therapy; the implementation of cost-effectiveness decisions; the clinical utility of cost-effectiveness studies; and the cost-effectiveness of available treatments.

Methods

Six US glaucoma specialists participated in two separate teleconferencing sessions (three participants each), managed by an independent, skilled moderator (also a glaucoma specialist) using a discussion guide. Participants reviewed recent publications (n=25) on health economics outcomes research in glaucoma prior to the sessions.

Results

Participants demonstrated a clear understanding of the economic burden of glaucoma therapy and identified medications, diagnostics, office visits, and treatment changes as key cost drivers. They considered cost-effectiveness an appropriate component of treatment decision-making but identified the need for additional data to inform these decisions. Participants indicated that there were only a few recent studies on health economics outcomes in glaucoma which evaluate parameters important to patient care, such as quality of life and medication adherence, and that longitudinal data were scant. In addition to efficacy, participants felt patient adherence and side-effect profile should be included in economic evaluations of glaucoma pharmacotherapy. Recently approved medications were evaluated in this context.

Conclusion

Clinicians deem treatment decisions based on cost-effectiveness data as clinically appropriate. Newer IOP-lowering therapies with potentially greater efficacy and favorable side-effect and adherence profiles may help optimize cost-effectiveness. Future studies should include: clinicians’ perspectives; lack of commercial bias; analysis of long-term outcomes/costs; more comprehensive parameters; real-world (including quality-of-life) data; and a robust Markov model.

Modeling the Pharmacotherapy Cost and Outcomes of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma With Dry Eye

We aimed to analyze and model the cost and results of current outpatient pharmacotherapy practice in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma concomitant with dry-eye disease (POAG+DE). The point of view is that of the health care system and patients, and the time horizon was 1 year. Data were collected through a prospective, observational, real-life study of therapy practice in patients admitted to the specialized ophthalmology clinic at the Alexandrovska University Hospital in Sofia. Pharmacotherapy was recorded and analyzed by therapeutic group and INN. The probability of being prescribed preservative-free or non-free formulations was calculated, as were the cost of yearly therapy, reimbursed cost, and patient co-payment. A decision tree exploring the cost-effectiveness of preservative-free and preservative non-free formulations was built. Outcomes were recorded through three tests measuring tear film stability: TMS, NIBUT Ave, and ST. TMS values below 3, ST above 10 mm, and NIBUT Ave above 14 s were considered as indicators of good disease control. A total of 140 eyes were diagnosed with POAG, of which 64 had concomitant dry-eye disease and were included in the analysis. Monotherapy was prescribed to 34: 14 on preservative-free formulations and 20 on non-free. Meanwhile, 30 eyes received combination therapy: six on preservative-free and 24 on non-free. The monotherapy product was most commonly Prostaglandin Analogs (PG−73.5%), followed by beta-blockers (BB−26.5%). No carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (Ca AA) or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (alfa 2 AA) were prescribed as monotherapy. The majority of patients showed poor disease control according to all three measures. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 744 BGN for TMS and 131 BGN for NUBIT for each successfully controlled eye—far below three times GDP per capita. For ST, the ICER was negative, benefiting non-free formulations. Therapy of POAG+DED with preservative-free formulations is cost-effective according to the WHO threshold of three times GDP. The median costs of the two treatment modalities were similar. Current practice shows that patients experience a higher burden in terms of co-payment than do institutions such as the NHIF.

Comparison of resource utilization in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma between two cities in Finland: is more better?

INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy associated with neural rim loss of the optic disc and the retinal nerve fibre layer typically causing visual field (VF) deterioration. Generally, glaucomatous lesions in the eye and in the visual field progress slowly over the years. In population-based cross-sectional studies, the percentage of unilateral or bilateral visual impairment varied between 3-12%. In screening studies, 0.03-2.4% of patients have been found to suffer visual impairment. Glaucoma has previously been associated with substantial healthcare costs and resource consumption attributable to the treatment of the disease. The disease also causes reduction in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

This study compares patients with diagnosed open-angle glaucoma from two geographically different regions in Finland. A total of 168 patients were examined, 85 subjects from an area with higher per patient treatment costs (Oulu) and 83 patients from a region with lower per patient treatment costs (Turku). All patients had a history of continuous glaucoma medication use for a period of 11 years. For each patient, the total direct costs from glaucoma treatment were calculated and the total amount of resource consumption was determined from registries and patient records. Each patient underwent a clinical examination with visual field assessment and fundus photography. These data were used to determine the current stage of disease for each patient. Health-related quality of life questionnaire (15D) was used in determining each patient's subjective HRQoL score.

RESULTS

When applying the current diagnostic criteria for open-angle glaucoma, a total of 40% of patients did not to display any structural or functional damage suggesting glaucoma after 11 years of continuous medical treatment and follow-up. Patients with higher glaucoma stage (worse disease) were found to have statistically higher treatment costs compared with those at lower disease stages. Resource consumption was also greater in the patients in higher glaucoma stage. Patients in the Oulu district consumed more resources, and glaucoma treatment was more expensive than in the Turku area. The total treatment cost in Oulu and Turku was 6010 € and 4452 €, respectively, for the whole 11-year period. There was no statistically significant difference in quality-of-life scores between the two areas. No difference was noted between the higher-spending and lower-spending areas in this respect. However, when the population was analysed as a whole, patients with higher glaucoma stage were found to have lower vision-based 15D scores compared with those at lower disease stages. This observation was made also at both districts independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Major cost source in open-angle glaucoma treatment is medication, up to 74% of annual costs. In addition, it seems that higher resource consumption and higher treatment costs do not increase the patients' HRQoL as assessed by the 15D instrument.

Glaucoma costs in Denmark in treatment naive patients

PURPOSE

To describe the costs and providers of glaucoma treatment in Denmark.

METHODS

Analyses were based on National Register data. Glaucoma/OHT patients were identified by their first prescription for glaucoma medication (ATC-codes) in the Danish Register of Medicinal Product Statistics 2002-2007. Patients had used no glaucoma medication for 6 months. Data for 2007 were sampled cross-sectionally for a budgetary analysis of glaucoma (ICD10 code) medication and services consumed in the primary and secondary health care services. Patients were categorized according to their number of treatment changes.

RESULTS

The Danish annual incidence rate of glaucoma was estimated at 1.2 per 1000 adult persons. Thirty-seven per cent of patients (men 44%, mean age 68 years; women 56%, mean age 71 years) persisted with their initial treatment regimen, 21% had changed to a second regimen, and 43% had experienced ≥ 3 regimens. Treatment costs increased with the number of sequential regimens. Annual glaucoma costs (health care sector perspective) were €305 for patients under their initial regimen, increasing to €740 with ≥ 3 regimens. Drug costs accounted for 57% of total cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs represented the major cost of glaucoma, and those costs increased, obviously, with the number of treatment changes.

Economic considerations of the diagnosis and management for glaucoma in the developed world

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the last 18-month literature related to costs and glaucoma. The emphasis is to look at evidence as a big picture and evaluate the critical points and challenges in methodology, current knowledge and future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of simulation models, treating glaucoma appears to be cost-effective compared with no treatment. The results of the simulation models are, however, not consistent regarding when to treat ocular hypertension and when comparing different therapeutic interventions. Most models simulated starting treatment with prostaglandins compared with other medications, whereas one study simulated also initial laser therapy which appeared to be cost saving compared with medical therapy. The models utilized input data both from randomized controlled trials (ideal outcomes) and observational studies (with incomplete and selective reporting). Models suffer from unreliability of data, for example data from randomized diagnostic trials, empirical data of utility values and glaucoma-induced visual disability are limited.

SUMMARY

As the number of economic evaluations increases, the interpretation and evaluation of their extensive reporting appears very challenging. The published studies highlight the range of uncertainties due to the shortages of our current knowledge and evidence. There is a need for reliable and 'realistic' data for economic evaluations, preferably data from pragmatic randomized trials of 'usual patients'. Similar to emphasizing the cost-effectiveness of care, there is a need to evaluate the expected payback and cost-effectiveness of research interventions. However, even high-quality evidence cannot help our patients if we do not adopt cost-effective interventions.

Objective assessment of compliance and persistence among patients treated for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This study summarizes findings from objective assessments of compliance (or adherence) and persistence with ocular hypotensive agents in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

A PubMed and reference list search was conducted across publication years 1970-2010, using these terms and variants: "compliance," the equivalent term "adherence," and "persistence" in patients with these conditions and therapies. Summaries of selected studies were stratified by measurement method (electronic monitor, prescription fills review, medical chart review). Measures of central tendency across studies were calculated for commonly-reported compliance or persistence measures.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles met all inclusion/exclusion criteria: measurement of compliance-electronic monitoring (seven studies reported in 14 articles), measurement of compliance/ persistence-prescription records (36 studies in 38 articles), and measurement of persistence- medical chart review (six studies in six articles). From electronic monitoring, most therapy-experienced patients took medication consistently, but ≥20% met criteria for poor compliance. From prescription records, only 56% (range 37%-92%) of the days in the first therapy year could be dosed with the medication supply dispensed over this period. At 12 months from therapy start, only 31% (range 10%-68%) of new therapy users had not discontinued, and 40% (range 14%-67%) had not discontinued or changed the initial therapy. From medical chart review, only 67% (range 62%-78%) of patients remained persistent 12 months after starting therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence provided by this review suggests that poor compliance and persistence has been and remains a common problem for many glaucoma patients, and is especially problematic for patients new to therapy. The direction of empirical research should shift toward a greater emphasis on understanding of root causes and identification and testing of solutions for this problem.

Use of glaucoma medications: state of the science and directions for observational research

PURPOSE

To summarize observational studies that focus on the use of glaucoma medications and to identify gaps in knowledge to guide future investigation.

DESIGN

Literature study.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed for English language articles published through December 2009 using the search terms physician's practice patterns, drug prescriptions, pharmaceutical services, medication adherence, ophthalmology, glaucoma, and ophthalmic solutions. We categorized studies by areas of focus and extracted and summarized key features: study population, data sources, and main findings.

RESULTS

We identified 2224 articles by the search. Fifty-five described glaucoma medication use using large databases. Predominant areas of focus were: trends in prescription choices (n = 13); adherence, persistence, or both (n = 31); rational use of medications (n = 9); and policy-related issues (n = 2). Over the last decade, use of β-blockers and miotics has decreased substantially, whereas new agents, particularly prostaglandin analogs, have become more popular. Nonadherence was an issue in more than 25% of patients. A significant proportion of patients with comorbidities, contraindications, or both had received topical β-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, most studies have focused on adherence to glaucoma medications and changes in treatment choices. Major gaps in knowledge include prescribing patterns by prescriber specialty (ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, and optometrists), medication-related problems, and subsequent adverse health outcomes. Well-designed longitudinal observational studies addressing these gaps are warranted to improve patient safety.