Bemiparin

Bemiparin in neonatal thrombosis: therapeutic dosing and safety

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic dose and safety of bemiparin in neonatal thrombosis treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review was conducted on infants treated with bemiparin between 2018 and 2023 at a tertiary hospital.

RESULTS

72 neonates with a mean gestational age of 37 weeks were included. Twenty were preterm, with a median gestational age of 33.5 weeks and a median birth weight of 1847.5 grams. The mean (SD) initial and therapeutic bemiparin doses were 170.5 (31) and 200 (37.2) IU/kg/day, respectively. Only 32% of patients reached the therapeutic target range (TTR) with the initial dose. Preterm infants required higher doses to reach TTR (215 vs 194.7 IU/kg/day, p = 0.05). Adverse events were minimal (1.4%) and unrelated to the starting dose or prematurity.

CONCLUSION

Bemiparin appears to be a potential therapeutic option for anticoagulation in neonates; however, targeted anti-Xa levels were rarely achieved with the initial dose and most patients required uptitration.

Quality control, safety assessment and preparation approaches of low molecular weight heparin

Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs) are well-established for use in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic diseases, and as a substitute for unfractionated heparin (UFH) due to their predictable pharmacokinetics and subcutaneous bioavailability. LMWHs are produced by various depolymerization methods from UFH, resulting in heterogeneous compounds with similar biochemical and pharmacological properties. However, the delicate supply chain of UFH and potential contamination from animal sources require new manufacturing approaches for LMWHs. Various LMWH preparation methods are emerging, such as chemical synthesis, enzymatic or chemical depolymerization and chemoenzymatic synthesis. To establish the sameness of active ingredients in both innovator and generic LMWH products, the Food and Drug Administration has implemented a stringent scientific method of equivalence based on physicochemical properties, heparin source material and depolymerization techniques, disaccharide composition and oligosaccharide mapping, biological and biochemical properties, and in vivo pharmacodynamic profiles. In this review, we discuss currently available LMWHs, potential manufacturing methods, and recent progress for manufacturing quality control of these LMWHs.

How to use low-molecular-weight heparin to treat neonatal thrombosis in clinical practice

Among children, neonates have the highest incidence of thrombosis due to risk factors such as catheter instrumentation, an evolving coagulation system and congenital heart disease. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are the most commonly used anticoagulants in neonates. Published guidelines delineate dosing and monitoring protocols for LMWH therapy in newborns. However, challenging clinical situations frequently present that warrant healthcare providers to think critically beyond the range of guidelines, and judiciously resolve specific problems. This review describes the use of LMWH in the neonatal population, including practical aspects such as route and site of administration, preparation from concentrated formulations and methods to minimize pain of subcutaneous injection. It is followed by a discussion on dosing, monitoring and outcomes of LMWH therapy in neonates. The risk of recurrence of thrombosis in neonates after LMWH therapy is approximately 3% based on a pooled analysis of studies reporting this outcome over the last 24 years. The article concludes with an overview of the side-effects of LMWH, including the risk of bleeding which is around 4% based on pooled analyses of more than 30 studies.

Pharmacological and clinical application of heparin progress: An essential drug for modern medicine

Heparin is the earliest and most widely used anticoagulant and antithrombotic drug that is still used in a variety of clinical indications. Since it was discovered in 1916, after more than a century of repeated exploration, heparin has not been replaced by other drugs, but a great progress has been made in its basic research and clinical application. Besides anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects, heparin also has antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and other pharmacological activities. It is widely used clinically in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, lung diseases, kidney diseases, cancer, etc., as the first anticoagulant medicine in COVID-19 exerts anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects. At the same time, however, it also leads to a lot of adverse reactions, such as bleeding, thrombocytopenia, elevated transaminase, allergic reactions, and others. This article comprehensively reviews the modern research progress of heparin compounds; discusses the structure, preparation, and adverse reactions of heparin; emphasizes the pharmacological activity and clinical application of heparin; reveals the possible mechanism of the therapeutic effect of heparin in related clinical applications; provides evidence support for the clinical application of heparin; and hints on the significance of exploring the wider application fields of heparin.

Monitoring anti-Xa levels in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treated with bemiparin

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relationship between therapeutic (weight-adjusted) dose of bemiparin and anti-Xa activity in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in comparison with a cohort of patients with VTE without cancer, and its relationship with outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study that comprised a cohort of patients with cancer-associated VTE and a cohort of non-cancer patients with VTE, all of them treated with bemiparin. The ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from the patients.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included (52 with cancer and 48 without cancer), with a median follow-up of 9.8 months. Mean anti-Xa activity was 0.89 (± 0.33) UI/mL in oncological patients and 0.83 (± 0.30) UI/mL in non-cancer patients (mean difference - 0.05 95% CI - 0.18; 0.06). A multiple linear regression model showed that anti-Xa peak was associated with the dose/kg independently of possible confounding variables (presence of cancer, age, sex and eGFR-estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate), in a way that for every 1 UI of dose/kg increase, the anti-Xa peak activity increased 0.006 UI/mL (95% CI 0.003; 0.009) (p < 0.001). The predictive capacity of anti-Xa peak in the oncology cohort showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.46 (95% CI 0.24-0.68), 0.70 (95% CI 0.49-0.91) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.44-0.94) for death, first bleeding and recurrence of VTE, respectively, and none was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

In patients with venous thromboembolism treated with bemiparin, anti-Xa levels were not influenced by the presence of cancer.

Effects of Bemiparin Sodium Versus Dabigatran Etexilate After Anastomosis in Rat Carotid Arteries on the Development of Neointima and Thrombolytic Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Revascularization before infarct development after cerebral ischemia may affect morbidity. The success of revascularization can be less than expected because of spontaneous thrombosis or restenosis with intimal hyperplasia. The aim of this study was to compare dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, with bemiparin sodium, a second-generation low-molecular-weight heparin, after carotid artery anastomosis.

METHODS

This study used 24 randomly selected Sprague-Dawley rats. The rats were separated into 3 equal groups: group 1 (control group); group 2 (dabigatran group), in which dabigatran 10 mg/kg was orally administered for 7 days; and group 3 (bemiparin group), in which bemiparin 250 IU/kg was subcutaneously administered for 7 days. The right-side carotid artery of rats was used for anastomosis and the left-side carotid artery was used for the control. The carotid artery was explored and transected. Anastomosis was applied using 10/0 polypropylene sutures. After 7 days of treatment, the right and left carotid arteries were removed. Lumen diameter, lumen area, tunica media thickness, edema, vessel wall injury, intimal hyperplasia, thrombus, and inflammation were evaluated in tissue biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

Bemiparin used after anastomosis caused less thickening of tunica media and reduced intimal hyperplasia but did not decrease lumen diameter and area. Dabigatran increased edema and inflammation but did not prevent intimal hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Bemiparin reduced intimal hyperplasia and prevented thrombosis angiogenesis, but dabigatran did not prevent intimal hyperplasia, and its anticoagulation effect was more than the antithrombotic effect.

The Role of Tinzaparin in Oncology

Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin treatment in patients with cancer with established venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this article was to study the pharmacological properties and effectiveness of tinzaparin in patients with cancer as well as its potential anticancer properties. A search of PubMed and ScienceDirect databases up to March 2016 was carried out to identify published studies that detect the properties and use of tinzaparin in oncology. Protamine sulfate partially (60% to 65%) neutralized tinzaparin’s anti-Xa activity. No dose adjustment of tinzaparin is needed even in patients with severe renal impairment and Creatinine Clearance ≥20 mL/min. Tinzaparin demonstrated a statistically significant decline in VTE recurrence at 1 year post the index thromboembolic event. A statistically significant reduction in minor bleeding rates was also described, whereas major bleeding events did not decrease in patients with cancer treated with tinzaparin versus those who received vitamin K antagonists. Tinzaparin treatment in patients suffering from deep vein thrombosis reduced the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome and venous ulcers. Tinzaparin’s ability to prevent both metastatic dissemination of cancer cells and tumor angiogenesis has been delineated in preclinical research. Current data show that tinzaparin is safe and efficacious either for short-term or for long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Clinical trials are needed in order to examine the utility of tinzaparin in primary prevention of VTE and validate its potential anticancer advantages exhibited in preclinical research.

Bemiparin, an effective and safe low molecular weight heparin: a review

Bemiparin is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) indicated for the acute treatment of deep vein thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in surgical and non-surgical patients and for the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during hemodialysis. Due to its excellent pharmacological profile-the second-generation LMWH with the lowest molecular weight, the longest half-life and the highest anti-Factor Xa/anti-Factor IIa activity ratio-it can be safely used in special categories of patients (children, elderly, patients with renal impairment and congestive heart failure). Several studies demonstrated its safety and efficacy, while cost analyses show the economic benefits of bemiparin treatment as compared to other heparins. Recent evidences suggested the application of bemiparin even in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate literature according to results coming from studies involving bemiparin administration in various clinical conditions.