A Novel Development of Sarcoidosis Following COVID-19 Vaccination and a Literature Review

Prevalence of SARS-COV-2 infection and outcomes in Greek sarcoidosis patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is limited data on the prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in sarcoidosis patients and the underlying parameters linked to severity. We aimed to conduct a national multicenter study to explore the prevalence of SARS-COV-2 in sarcoidosis patients and investigate its impact on hospitalization and infection rates, describe the characteristics of the infected population and assess the role of these characteristics in determining the likelihood of infection or hospitalization.

METHODS

We recruited all the adult sarcoidosis patients with who were examined across eight Greek Health Interstitial Lung Disease Referral Centers from the beginning of the pandemic until August 1, 2022. All the data was collected using structured questionnaires.

RESULTS

530 sarcoidosis patients with a mean age of 54±12 years, 60% of whom were females, were recruited. 43% of them were under corticosteroid treatment, and 39% were under additional immunosuppression. 18% of Greek sarcoidosis patients were infected by the virus, which is a lower rate than the general population. The infection was mainly mild. Only one-fifth of the infected sarcoidosis patients required hospitalization, and no deaths or ICU admissions were recorded. Vaccination was found to be associated with a reduced likelihood of infection. Younger age, a longer period since diagnosis, abnormal PET-CT findings, and immunosuppression were associated with an increased probability of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The COVID-19 infection rate among Greek sarcoidosis patients was lower than the general population. Fewer than 20% needed hospitalization. There were no deaths or ICU admissions. Vaccination reduces the likelihood of infection. Younger age, longer diagnosis, abnormal PET-CT findings, and immunosuppression increased the chance of infection.

An Unexpected Post-Egg-Free Influenza Vaccine Granulomatous Reaction

ABSTRACT

A 53-year-old woman presented with a pruritic plaque on the left upper arm that appeared following an egg-free flu vaccine due to a history of reaction to the standard vaccine. The affected area enlarged over a several month period immediately following vaccine administration. Physical examination revealed an 8 × 4 cm coalescent pink plaque on the left upper arm. A shave biopsy of the lesion showed dermal "naked" granulomas, or granulomas with sparse lymphocytic infiltrate at the margins, as typically seen in sarcoidosis. No foreign material was seen in the granulomatous reaction, including with polarization. Special stains, including acid fast bacilli, Grocott methenamine silver, periodic acid-Schiff, and Gram, were negative for organisms. The diagnosis of granulomatous dermatitis was made. Subsequent imaging demonstrated no findings suggestive of sarcoidosis. While vaccine-associated hypersensitivity reactions occur frequently, these reactions are typically due to individual vaccine components, such as egg protein, and do not normally result in the formulation of granulomas. Vaccination-induced granulomas are more often associated with the use of aluminum as an adjuvant; however, this is not present in the egg-free influenza vaccine. Thus, a granulomatous reaction to the egg-free influenza vaccine is very unusual and, to our knowledge, not previously reported.

Sarcoidosis and Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Granulomas following COVID-19 Vaccination (ChAdOx1): Successful Treatment with Tofacitinib

Sarcoidosis and complications related to fillers have been reported following the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, cutaneous sarcoidosis has been observed around polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) injection sites. Foreign-body reactions to PMMA can occur simultaneously with systemic sarcoidosis, suggesting a shared pathogenic mechanism between both conditions. To report a case of sarcoidosis and PMMA granulomas following COVID-19 vaccination (ChAdOx11), successfully treated with tofacitinib. We present a 59-year-old woman who developed systemic sarcoidosis and a granulomatous reaction to PMMA filler following the COVID-19 vaccination (ChAdOx11). Notably, both PMMA and the vaccine were potential triggers for sarcoidosis. Treatment with tofacitinib produced marked improvement in both the cutaneous and pulmonary involvement of sarcoidosis and the granulomatous reaction to PMMA. This successful outcome suggests tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, an alternative treatment for cutaneous and systemic sarcoidosis, as well as a potential therapy for granulomatous complications of dermal fillers, such as PMMA.

Cutaneous adverse reactions associated with COVID-19 vaccines: Current evidence and potential immune mechanisms

As the number of vaccinated individuals has increased, there have been increasing reports of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. The main COVID-19 vaccines administered include messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines, non-replicating viral vector vaccines, inactivated whole-virus vaccines, and protein-based vaccines. These vaccines contain active components such as polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, aluminum, tromethamine, and disodium edetate dihydrate. Recent advances in understanding the coordination of inflammatory responses by specific subsets of lymphocytes have led to a new classification based on immune response patterns. We categorize these responses into four patterns: T helper (Th)1-, Th2-, Th17/22-, and Treg-polarized cutaneous inflammation after stimulation of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the association between COVID-19 vaccination and these cutaneous adverse reactions remains controversial, the occurrence of rare dermatoses and their short intervals suggest a possible relationship. Despite the potential adverse reactions, the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the ongoing battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Insights into the diagnosis and management of sarcoid uveitis: A review

Sarcoidosis is a leading cause of non-infectious uveitis that commonly affects middle-aged individuals and has a female preponderance. The disease demonstrates age, sex and ethnic differences in clinical manifestations. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis is made based on a compatible clinical presentation, supporting investigations and histologic evidence of non-caseating granulomas, although biopsy is not always possible. Multimodal imaging with widefield fundus photography, optical coherence tomography and angiography can help in the diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis and in the monitoring of treatment response. Corticosteroid remains the mainstay of treatment; chronic inflammation requires steroid-sparing immunosuppression. Features on multimodal imaging such as vascular leakage may provide prognostic indicators of outcome. Female gender, prolonged and severe uveitis, and posterior involving uveitis are associated with poorer visual outcomes.

A Case of Ocular Sarcoidosis Post-COVID-19 Vaccination

A 35-year-old gentleman came to the ophthalmology outpatient department with complaints of bilateral ocular pain, redness and photophobia since three weeks with similar prior history. The patient was a diagnosed case of systemic sarcoidosis since two years with pulmonary, dermatological and neurological involvement for which he was already on treatment which included oral immunosuppressants, steroids, anticonvulsants and multivitamins. On examination, the best corrected visual acuity was 6/18 in the right eye and 6/12 in the left eye. On slit lamp and fundus examination, the patient showed signs of anterior and posterior uveitis in both eyes, the right eye more than the left eye. Treatment was initiated with topical corticosteroids and beta blockers and the patient improved following medical management.

New-Onset Rheumatic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccinations until May 2023: A Systematic Review

A comprehensive, up-to-date systematic review (SR) of the new-onset rheumatic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (R-IMIDs) following COVID-19 vaccinations is lacking. Therefore, we investigated the demographics, management, and prognosis of new R-IMIDs in adults following SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, LitCovid, and Cochrane was conducted. We included any English-language study that reported new-onset R-IMID in adults following the post-COVID-19 vaccination. A total of 271 cases were reported from 39 countries between January 2021 and May 2023. The mean age of patients was 56 (range 18-90), and most were females (170, 62.5%). Most (153, 56.5%) received the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Nearly 50% of patients developed R-IMID after the second dose of the vaccine. Vasculitis was the most prevalent clinical presentation (86, 31.7%), followed by connective tissue disease (66, 24.3%). The mean duration between the vaccine's 'trigger' dose and R-IMID was 11 days. Most (220, 81.2%) received corticosteroids; however, 42% (115) received DMARDs such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, tocilizumab, anakinra, IV immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, or rituximab. Complete remission was achieved in 75 patients (27.7%), and 137 (50.6%) improved following the treatment. Two patients died due to myositis. This SR highlights that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may trigger R-IMID; however, further epidemiology studies are required.

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease and COVID

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) is a rare multisystem inflammatory disease affecting the eyes, ears, brain, skin, and hair. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new contagious infection that might trigger the onset of VKH disease, as previously proposed for other viruses. Moreover, after the mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, cases of VKH disease associated with COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. We present an overview of VKH and a comprehensive literature revision of all the VKH cases described after COVID-19 infection and vaccination, adding our experience. No differences have been found considering epidemiology and clinical findings of the disease compared to those reported in the no-COVID era. All of the patients promptly responded to systemic and local corticosteroid therapy with a good final visual prognosis. Different possible pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the onset of VKH after COVID-19 vaccination are discussed, while the presence of the HLA DR4 antigen as a genetic predisposition for the onset of the disease after COVID-19 infection and vaccination is proposed. VKH disease is one of the most frequently reported uveitic entities after COVID-19 vaccination, but a good response to therapy should not discourage vaccination. Nevertheless, ophthalmologists should be alerted to the possibility of VKH occurrence or relapse after COVID-19 vaccination, especially in genetically predisposed subjects.

Cutaneous Sarcoidosis-like Eruption Following Second Dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 Vaccine: Case or Relationship?

Various adverse reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been described since the first months of the vaccination campaign. In addition to more frequent reactions, rare reactions, such as sarcoidosis-like, rashes have been reported. We present a case of a 23-year-old woman with a rash on the chin and peribuccal region, which developed approximately 3 weeks after the administration of the second dose of the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. We briefly discuss other reports in the literature.

First reported case of erythrodermic sarcoidosis with systemic involvement during vaccination for Covid-19

Post-vaccinal and parainfectious activation of the immunity with subsequent development of a certain immunological/skin-immunological disease isn’t rare in the clinical practice. This concept is mentioned in relation to molecular/antigenic mimicry. To this day, the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis and sarcoid-type reactions remains a mystery. Moreover, they can be a warning sign of changes in tissue homeostasis, whether it is infectious, non-infectious-immunological, tumor-related, etc. We present a rare form of erythrodermic sarcoidosis with massive systemic involvement (pericarditis, supraventricular tachycardia, hepatitis, iritis/iridocyclitis, pulmonary fibrosis/bihilar lymphadenopathy, and arthritis) developed after receiving the ChadOx1-S vaccine for Covid-19. Systemic immunosuppressive therapy with Methylprednisolone was introduced according to a scheme (in a reduction mode with an initial dose of 40 mg/day intravenously) in combination with: topical Pimecrolimus 1% cream twice a day. Rapid improvement of the symptoms was observed within the first two days of treatment. According to the references in the scientific literature, the presented patient turns out to be the first case of erythrodermic sarcoidosis (with systemic involvement), described as a side effect after vaccination and/or administration of a certain medicinal form.

Drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction three months after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

A 70-year-old man with hepatitis C virus-related recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted for further diagnosis of a 1 cm iso-hyperechoic nodule in segment (S) 5.

CASE SUMMARY

Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) revealed the nodule in S5 with a defect at the hepatobiliary phase, hyperintensity on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed hypervascularity at the early phase, and delayed contrast-enhancement was observed at the late phase. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) revealed incomplete defect at the late vascular phase. Inflammatory liver tumor, lymphoproliferative disease, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (small duct type) and bile duct adenoma were suspected through the imaging studies. US guided biopsy, however, showed a noncaseating hepatic sarcoid-like epithelioid granuloma (HSEG), and histopathological analysis disclosed spindle shaped epithelioid cells harboring Langhans-type multinucleated giant cells. One month after admission, EOB-MRI signaled the disappearance of the defect at the hepatobiliary phase, of hyperintensity on DWI, of hypointensity on ADC map, and no stain at the early phase.

CONCLUSION

That the patient had received BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination 3 mo before the occurrence of HSEG, and that its disappearance was confirmed 4 mo after mRNA vaccination suggested that the drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction (DISR) might be induced by the mRNA vaccination. Fortunately, rechallenge of drug-induced DISR with the third mRNA vaccination was not confirmed.

The Characteristics of COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Uveitis: A Summative Systematic Review

Numerous complications following COVID-19 vaccination has been reported in the literature, with an increasing body of evidence reporting vaccination-associated uveitis (VAU). In this systematic review, we searched six electronic databases for articles reporting the occurrence of VAU following COVID-19 vaccination. Data were synthesized with emphasis on patients' characteristics [age, gender], vaccination characteristics [type, dose], and outcome findings [type, nature, laterality, course, location, onset, underlying cause, and associated findings]. Data are presented as numbers (percentages) for categorical data and as mean (standard deviation) for continuous data. Sixty-five studies were finally included [43 case reports, 16 case series, four cohort, one cross-sectional, and one registry-based study]. VAU occurred in 1526 cases, most commonly in females (68.93%) and middle-aged individuals (41-50 years: 19.71%), following the first dose (49.35%) of vaccination, especially in those who received Pfizer (77.90%). VAU occurred acutely (71.77%) as an inflammatory reaction (88.29%) in unilateral eyes (77.69%), particularly in the anterior portion of the uvea (54.13%). Importantly, most cases had a new onset (69.92%) while only a limited portion of cases had a reactivation of previous uveitis condition. In conclusion, although rare, uveitis following COVID-19 vaccination should be considered in new-onset and recurrent cases presenting with either acute or chronic events.