Managing Lung Cancer with Comorbid Interstitial Pneumonia

Assessing the diagnostic utility of serum tumor markers for lung cancer detection in patients with interstitial pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of lung cancer among individuals afflicted with interstitial pneumonia (IP) stands at approximately 20%. The early detection of lung cancer via chest computed tomography (CT) surveillance proves challenging in IP patients. Our investigation sought to identify a potential biomarker capable of providing early indications of the presence of lung tumors in such patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the attributes of serum tumor markers, imaging characteristics, and histological findings in individuals diagnosed with IP, both with and without concurrent lung cancer.

RESULTS

106 patients diagnosed with IP were included in the study, comprising 36 individuals with concurrent lung cancer and 70 patients solely diagnosed with IP. Serum concentrations of CEA and CA12-5 were notably elevated in IP patients with lung cancer, compared to those with IP alone. Logistic regression analyses revealed that, in comparison to IP patients within the first quartile of CEA levels, the relative risk of developing lung cancer associated with IP escalated by 4.0-fold, 3.1-fold, 11.0-fold, and 13.3-fold in the second, third, fourth, and fifth quartiles, respectively. Upon controlling for gender and age, statistical significance in risk was observed solely for the fourth and fifth quartiles. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis conducted in patients diagnosed with ILD-CA identified a CEA cutoff point of 6.9 ng/mL, demonstrating sensitivities of 61.1% and specificities of 78.5%. The area under the curve was calculated as 0.7(95% CI: 0.63-0.81).

CONCLUSION

The serum levels of CEA were notably elevated in IP patients with concurrent lung cancer in contrast to those who were just suffering from IP. The heightened serum CEA levels correlate with an escalated risk of cancer occurrence among IP patients, suggesting that serum CEA levels could potentially serve as an indicative marker for the presence of cancer in IP patients.

Comparison of survivals between sublobar resection and lobar resection for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with early-stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow-up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p < 0.01, <0.01). Death due to lung cancer and locoregional recurrence were significantly more frequent in the sublobar resection group than in the lobar resection group (p = 0.034, <0.01, respectively). On propensity score matching analysis, the 5-year OS rates of the 19 matched pairs were 46.3% and 73.2%, and the RFS rates were 31.6% and 67.6% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p = 0.036, <0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant association between lobar resection and improved survival (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The patients in the lobar resection group had better survival rates than those in the sublobar resection group. In terms of long-term prognosis, deliberately limited surgery may not be necessary for patients who tolerate lobectomy.

Prognostic and predictive value of interstitial lung abnormalities and EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine the predictive value of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and assess the prognostic significance of EGFR and ILA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We reviewed 797 consecutive patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of primary NSCLC from January 2013 to October 2018. Of these, 109 patients with NSCLC were found to have concomitant ILA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the significant clinical and computed tomography (CT) findings in predicting EGFR mutations. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify significant prognostic factors.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were identified in 22 of 109 tumors (20.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that the models incorporating clinical, tumor CT and ILA CT features yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.749, 0.838, and 0.849, respectively. When combining the three models, the independent predictive factors for EGFR mutations were non-fibrotic ILA, female sex, and small tumor size, with an AUC value of 0.920 (95% confidence interval[CI]: 0.861-0.978, p < 0.001). In the multivariate Cox model, EGFR mutations (hazard ratio = 0.169, 95% CI = 0.042-0.675, p = 0.012; 692 days vs. 301 days) were independently associated with extended overall survival compared to the wild-type.

CONCLUSION

Non-fibrotic ILA independently predicts the presence of EGFR mutations, and the presence of EGFR mutations rather than non-fibrotic ILA serves as an independent good prognostic factor for patients with NSCLC.

Safety and Efficacy of Single-Fraction Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer with Interstitial Pneumonia

Patients with lung cancer complicated by interstitial pneumonia (IP) often lose treatment options early owing to acute exacerbation of IP concerns. Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) can provide superior tumor control and low toxicity at high dose concentrations. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of a single-fraction CIRT using 50 Gy for IP-complicated lung cancer. The study included 50 consecutive patients treated between April 2013 and September 2022, whose clinical stage of lung cancer (UICC 7th edition) was 1A:1B:2A:2B = 32:13:4:1. Of these, 32 (64%) showed usual interstitial pneumonia patterns. With a median follow-up of 23.5 months, the 3-year overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival, and local control rates were 45.0, 75.4, and 77.8%, respectively. The median lung V5 and V20 were 10.0 and 5.2%, respectively (mean lung dose, 2.6 Gy). The lung dose, especially lung V20, showed a strong association with OS (p = 0.0012). Grade ≥ 2 pneumonia was present in six patients (13%), including two (4%) with suspected grade 5. CIRT can provide a relatively safe and curative treatment for patients with IP-complicated lung cancer. However, IP increases the risk of severe radiation pneumonitis, and further studies are required to assess the appropriate indications.

Current pharmacotherapies for advanced lung cancer with pre-existing interstitial lung disease : A literature review and future perspectives

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, are at increased risk of developing lung cancer (LC). Pharmacotherapy for advanced LC has dramatically progressed in recent years;however, management of LC with pre-existing ILD (LC-ILD) is challenging due to serious concerns about the risk of acute exacerbation of ILD (AE-ILD). As patients with LC-ILD have been excluded from most prospective clinical trials of advanced LC, optimal pharmacotherapy remains to be elucidated. Although the antitumor activity of first-line platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy appears to be similar in advanced LC patients with or without ILD, its impact on the survival of patients with LC-ILD is limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may hold promise for long-term survival, but many challenges remain, including safety and appropriate patient selection. Further understanding the predictive factors for AE-ILD after receiving pharmacotherapy in LC-ILD may lead to appropriate patient selection and lower treatment risk. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence related to pharmacotherapy for advanced LC-ILD and discuss emerging areas of research. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 9-22, February, 2024.

Tolerability of sotorasib for KRAS positive lung adenocarcinoma patient with pre-existing interstitial pneumonia; A case report

A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital with an abnormal chest shadow. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass in the left upper lobe and interstitial pneumonia (IP). The patient underwent CT-guided needle biopsy and was diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma with cT2aN1M1a Stage IVA (PUL). The patient was administered 6 cycles of CBDCA + nab-paclitaxel as first-line, 3 cycles of atezolizumab as second-line, and 8 cycles of S-1 as third-line treatment but finally showed tumor progression. Because comprehensive genome profiling test revealed KRAS G12C mutation, sotorasib was initiated as fourth-line treatment and showed tumor regression without exacerbation of pre-existing IP.

Risk factors for acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease during chemotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors for acute exacerbation (AE) of interstitial lung disease caused by chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases from the establishment of each database to April 2023. Eligible studies were included, and the data on risk factors related to AE caused by chemotherapy in interstitial lung disease were extracted.

Results

A total of 878 articles were retrieved and 21 met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 1,275 patients with lung cancer combined with interstitial lung disease. The results of the meta-analysis showed four significant risk factors for AE of interstitial lung disease, namely age < 70 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-3.72), forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD=-9.33, 95% CI: -13.7-4.97), usually interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on computed tomography (CT) (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.43-3.11), and serum surfactant protein D (SP-D) (SMD: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.03-0.67).

Conclusion

When patients with lung cancer complicated with interstitial lung disease are aged < 70 years, have a UIP pattern on CT, have lower FVC values, and have higher serum levels of SP-D, chemotherapy should be carried out with care.

Treatment and Prognosis of Patients with Lung Cancer and Combined Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with a higher lung cancer (LC) risk and may impact cancer's clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes. This impact's extent is unclear, particularly in Caucasians.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the files of all LC patients diagnosed in a 38-month period. Expert radiologists reviewed the computed tomography scans performed at diagnosis. Patients with LC and ILD (n = 29, 7%) were compared to those without ILD (n = 363, 93%) for population and cancer characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients with LC and ILD were older (73 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 11 years; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in LC histology, localization, stage, or treatment modalities. The respiratory complication rate after cancer treatment was significantly higher in the ILD group (39% vs. 6%; p < 0.01). Overall survival rates were similar at 12 (52% vs. 59%; p = 0.48) and 24 months (41% vs. 45%; p = 0.64) but poorer in the ILD group at 36 months, although not statistically significant (9% vs. 39%; p = 0.06). The ILD group had a higher probability of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.49 [0.96;2.27]), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). In a Cox regression model, patients with ILD treated surgically had a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 2.37 [1.1;5.09]; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with combined LC and ILD have worse clinical outcomes even when similar treatment modalities are offered.

The Combined Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Adoptive Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Qualified randomized controlled trial (randomized controlled trial, RCT), or nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial (NRCCT), published in various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese journal full-text database, Medline, Cochrane database, and VIP Chinese database, and the Revman5. 0 software performed the data analysis.

Results

We found the significantly different curative effect between the experimental and control groups (OR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.46, 2.58), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.59), effect of adoptive immunotherapy on the progression of disease (OR = 1.80, 95% CI (1.38, 2.35), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.33), adoptive immunotherapy on overall survival (OR = 2.19, 95% CI (1.60, 2.99), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 4.91), and adverse effects of adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.25, 2.48), P = 0.001, I 2 = 0%, Z = 3.26).

Conclusion

Adoptive immunotherapy combined with microradiotherapy can decrease the recurrence of NSCLC and improve patient survival, as well as early patients can be benefited more significantly from immunotherapy.

Identification of Hub Genes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and NSCLC Progression:Evidence From Bioinformatics Analysis

Background: Lung cancer is the most common comorbidity of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thus there is an urgent need for the research of IPF and carcinogenesis

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore hub genes which are common in pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer progression through bioinformatic analysis.

Methods: All the analysis was performed in R software. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were explored by comparing gene expression profiles between IPF tissues and healthy lung tissues from GSE24206, GSE53845, GSE101286 and GSE110147 datasets. Venn Diagram analysis was used to identify the overlapping genes, while GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were used to explore the biological functions of the DEGs using clusterprofiler package. Hub genes were identified by analyzing protein-protein interaction networks using Cytoscape software. Nomogram was constructed using the rms package. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) analysis was used to quantify the immunotherapy and chemotherapy sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Results:COL1A1, COL3A1, MMP1, POSTN1 and TIMP3 were identified as the top five hub genes. The five hub genes were used to construct a diagnostic nomogram that was validated in another IPF dataset. Since the hub genes were also associated with lung cancer progression, we found that the nomogram also had diagnostic value in NSCLC patients. These five genes achieved a statistically difference of overall survival in NSCLC patients (p < 0.05). The expression of the five hub genes was mostly enriched in fibroblasts. Fibroblasts and the hub genes also showed significant ability to predict the susceptibility of NSCLC patients to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Conclusion: We identified five hub genes as potential biomarkers of IPF and NSCLC progression. This finding may give insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of IPF and lung cancer progression and provides potential targets for developing new therapeutic agents for IPF patients.

Outcomes of proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with interstitial pneumonia

Background

Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a disease with a poor prognosis. In addition, IP patients are more likely to develop lung cancer. Since IP patients frequently develop toxicities during cancer treatment, minimally invasive cancer treatment is warranted for such patients to maintain their quality of life. This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of proton therapy (PT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with IP.

Methods

Twenty-nine NSCLC patients with IP were treated with PT between September 2013 and December 2019. The patients had stage IA to IIIB primary NSCLC. Ten of the 29 patients exhibited the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern. The prescribed dose was 66–74 Grays (relative biological effectiveness) in 10–37 fractions.

Results

The median follow-up period was 21.1 months [interquartile range (IQR), 15.6–37.3] for all patients and 37.2 months (IQR, 24.0–49.9) for living patients. The median patient age was 77 years (IQR, 71–81). The median planning target volume was 112.0 ml (IQR, 56.1–246.3). The 2-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85% (95% confidence interval: 57–95), 30% (15–47), and 45% (26–62), respectively. According to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0), grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis (RP) was observed in 1 patient. Two patients developed grade 3 late RP, but no other patients experienced serious toxicities. The patients’ quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 and SF-36) scores had not changed after 3 months.

Conclusions

PT may be a relatively safe treatment for NSCLC patients with IP, without deteriorating quality of life scores within 3 months.

Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on a rat model of bleomycin-induced interstitial pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Even if lung cancer is detected at an early stage, surgery may be difficult in patients with severe comorbidities, like interstitial pneumonia (IP). Radiation therapy cannot be performed due to the high risk of acute IP exacerbation. Therefore, an effective alternative, such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), is required. To prove that acute exacerbation is not induced after PDT in peripheral lung cancer, we investigated the effects of PDT on IP rat models.

METHODS

Bleomycin (BLM) was administered intratracheally. Seven days after administration, left thoracotomy was performed. Talaporfin sodium was injected, and diode laser irradiation (664 nm, 150mW, 100J/cm²) was performed. Seven days after PDT, the whole blood and left lungs were collected. A total of 23 rats, comprising BLM + PDT (n = 4), BLM + non-PDT (n = 10), non-BLM + PDT (n = 2), non-BLM + non-PDT (n = 5), and two rats that died immediately after PDT were observed. Serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6, surfactant protein-D, lactate dehydrogenase, and serum C-reactive protein were measured. Fibrosis and macrophage scorings, and the ​​collagen fibers percentage were examined by staining with hematoxylin and eosin, Elastica van Gieson, anti-α smooth muscle antibody, and anti-CD68 antibodies.

RESULTS

There was no remarkable difference in the values of each marker in fibrosis and macrophage scores with or without PDT. In case of death, fibrosis was mild, and PDT was not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

In IP rat models, PDT did not induce lung fibrosis or acute exacerbation.

Glasgow prognostic score for prediction of chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation interstitial lung disease in patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Predicting the incidence of chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) in patients with lung cancer is important because AE-ILD confers a poor prognosis. The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which is an inflammation-based index composed of serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin, predicts prognosis in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) without ILD. In this study, we investigated AE-ILD and survival outcome based on the GPS in patients with ILD associated with SCLC who were receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who received platinum-based first-line chemotherapy between June 2010 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to compare the incidence of AE-ILD and overall survival (OS) between GPS 0, 1, and 2.

RESULTS

Among our cohort of 31 patients, six (19.3%) experienced chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD. The AE-ILD incidence increased from 9.5% to 25.0% and 50.0% with increase in GPS of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed remarkable associations between GPS 2 and both AE-ILD (odds ratio for GPS 2, 18.69; p = 0.046) and prognosis (hazard ratio of GPS 2, 13.52; p = 0.002). Furthermore, median OS in the GPS 0, 1, and 2 groups was 16.2, 9.8, and 7.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that GPS 2 is both a predictor of risk of chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and a prognostic indicator in patients with ILD associated with SCLC. We propose that GPS may be used as a guide to distinguish chemotherapy-tolerant patients from those at high risk of AE-ILD.

Glasgow Prognostic Score predicts chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation-interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) worsens the prognosis for overall survival (OS) due to chemotherapy-triggered acute exacerbation (AE)-ILD. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), which is based on serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels, has been suggested as a reliable prognostic tool for mortality in cancer patients, including NSCLC. In this study, we investigated whether GPS is a predictor for chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and the prognosis in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing ILD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review on 56 NSCLC and ILD patients at our hospital who received platinum agent-based treatment as first-line chemotherapy between June 2010 and May 2019. We categorized these patients according to their GPS (0-2) and compared the incidence of chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and OS.

RESULTS

The GPS 0, 1, and 2 groups included 31, 16, and nine patients, respectively, out of 56. A total of 12 (21.4%) patients showed chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD. The median OS was at 11.5 months (95% confidence interval: 8.0-15.1). The incidence of chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD within the first year of chemotherapy in the GPS 0, 1, and 2 groups was three (9.6%), four (25.0%), and five (55.5%), and the median OS time was 16.9, 9.8 and 7.6 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that only GPS 2 could predict both chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and OS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

GPS assessment of patients with NSCLC and pre-existing ILD is a valuable prognostic tool for predicting chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and OS.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: We found that GPS 2 was an independent risk factor for chemotherapy-triggered AE-ILD and prognosis in patients with ILD associated with NSCLC.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

GPS may potentially enable the discrimination of patients tolerant of chemotherapy from those at an increased risk of AE-ILD and predict the prognosis in patients with NSCLC and ILD receiving chemotherapy.