A new combination chemotherapy with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (Nedaplatin) and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal cancers

Progress in the study of reproductive toxicity of platinum-based antitumor drugs and their means of prevention

Platinum-based antitumor drugs are broad-spectrum agents with unique mechanisms of action. Combination chemotherapy regimens based on platinum drugs are commonly used in cancer treatment. However, these drugs can cause various adverse reactions in the human body through different routes of administration, including reproductive toxicity, genetic toxicity, and embryonic developmental toxicity. Preventing adverse effects is crucial to enhance patients' quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. This article discusses the types and developmental history of antitumor active platinum compounds, their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, and their potential reproductive, genetic, and embryonic developmental toxicity. This text explores preventive measures based on animal experimental results. Its aim is to provide references for personalized treatment and occupational protection when using platinum drugs. The continuous progress of science and technology, along with the deepening of medical research, suggests that the application of platinum drugs will broaden. Therefore, the development of new platinum drugs will be an important direction for future research.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is less controlled at delayed phase in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective registration study by the CINV Study Group of Japan

Chemotherapy is an indispensable therapeutic approach for esophageal cancer. Although chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most crucial adverse events, the current state of CINV in patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. This multicenter prospective observational study analyzed data for 192 patents with esophageal cancer who underwent moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). The patients recorded their CINV incidence and severity daily for 7 days after receiving chemotherapy, using visual analog scales (VAS). Of the 192 patients, 181 received HEC including cisplatin, and 11 patients received MEC including nedaplatin. Approximately 81% of HEC and 82% of MEC patients received antiemetic therapy in compliance with guidelines. Although CINV was controlled relatively well in the early phase (days 1-4), it was not fully controlled in late phase (days 5-7) for both the HEC and MEC groups. Female sex was a major risk factor for delayed vomiting (P=0.034). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for VAS revealed that motion sickness, age, and use of other antiemetics were risk factors for delayed nausea. Adherence to antiemetic guidelines effectively controls vomiting but is less effective against delayed CINV in both HEC and MEC patients. Identification of individual risk factors, such as female sex, will help develop personalized treatments for CINV. In the clinical setting for esophageal cancer, regimens that include nedaplatin might need to be treated as HEC.

Efficacy and feasibility of ambulatory treatment-based monthly nedaplatin plus S-1 in definitive or salvage concurrent chemoradiotherapy for early, advanced, and relapsed esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is an optional treatment for patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer. However, there are some demerits in this regimen because CDDP administration requires a large transfusion volume and 5-FU must be continuously infused over 24 h. Therefore, hospitalization is unavoidable. We collected retrospectively the data of definitive CRT with nedaplatin and S-1 as carried out in our institution.

METHODS

Patients with early and advanced esophageal cancer and relapsed esophageal cancer after radical surgery were included. Nedaplatin 80 mg/m(2) was given on days 1 and 29, and S-1 80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and 29-42. No prophylactic treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor was administered. Patients received two courses of concurrent radiotherapy of more than 50 Gy with or without two additional courses as adjuvant therapy every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Between August 2011 and June 2015, 89 patients (age range, 44-86 years; K-PS 90-100, 81 %; squamous cell carcinoma histology, 97 %; definitive/salvage CRT, 75/25 %) were collected. Twenty-one (24 %) patients completed four cycles, and 94 % received two or more cycles. Grade 4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 12, 7, and 10 % of the patients, respectively. Five patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity included infection in 12 %, mucositis/esophagitis in 3 %, kidney in 3 %, and fatigue in 3 %. Sixty-four patients (72 %) received the prescribed full dose and full cycles of chemotherapy. A complete response was achieved in 76 patients (85 %). The 3-year overall survival rate was 54.4 % in definitive CRT and 39.8 % in salvage CRT, respectively. Sixty-two subjects (70 %) received treatment as outpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

Nedaplatin and S-1 in combination with radiotherapy is feasible, and toxicity is tolerable. This treatment method has the potential to shorten hospitalization without impairing the efficacy of CRT.

Involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy for 239 esophageal cancers: a single institutional retrospective study

Background

This retrospective study on early and locally advanced esophageal cancer was conducted to evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in combination with concurrent chemotherapy.

Methods

We assessed all patients with esophageal cancer of stages I-IV treated with definitive radiotherapy from June 2000 to March 2014. Between 2000 and 2011, ENI was used for all cases excluding high age cases. After Feb 2011, a prospective study about IFRT was started, and therefore IFRT was used since then for all cases. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen was nedaplatin (80 mg/m² at D1 and D29) and 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m² at D1-4 and D29-32).

Results

Of the 239 consecutive patients assessed (120 ENI vs. 119 IFRT), 59 patients (24.7 %) had stage IV disease and all patients received at least one cycle of chemotherapy. The median follow-up time for survivors was 34.0 months. There were differences in 3-year local control (44.8 % vs. 55.5 %, p = 0.039), distant control (53.8 % vs. 69.9 %, p = 0.021) and overall survival (34.8 % vs. 51.6 %, p = 0.087) rates between ENI vs. IFRT, respectively. Patients treated with IFRT (8 %) demonstrated a significantly lower risk (p = 0.047) of high grade late toxicities than with ENI (16 %). IFRT did not increase the risk of initially uninvolved or isolated nodal failures (27.5 % in ENI and 13.4 % in IFRT).

Conclusions

Nodal failure rates in clinically uninvolved nodal stations were not increased with IFRT when compared to ENI. IFRT also resulted in significantly decreased esophageal toxicity, suggesting that IFRT may allow for integration of concurrent systemic chemotherapy in a greater proportion of patients. Both tendencies of improved loco-regional progression-free survival and a significant increased overall survival rate favored the IFRT arm over the ENI arm in this study.

Involved-field irradiation concurrently combined with nedaplatin/5-fluorouracil for inoperable esophageal cancer on basis of (18)FDG-PET scans: a phase II study

PURPOSE

A prospective study was performed on chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer using involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) based on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. The goal of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy of the IFRT procedure in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were adults with newly diagnosed untreated, inoperable esophageal cancer in stages I-IV with lymph node metastases. Patients received nedaplatin 80mg/m(2) per day on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 800mg/m(2) on days 1-4 intravenously repeated every 28days for 2-4 cycles, and combined IFRT. Elective nodal irradiation was not performed. Irradiation was applied only to the primary tumor and positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

From September 2009 to July 2012, of the 63 patients enrolled, 58 were evaluable for response. The primary end point of isolated out-of-field loco-regional nodal recurrence was seen in only two patients. The expectant rate was assumed to be less than 5%. The threshold value was set as 10% to calculate the number of registrations. Progression-free and overall survival rates at 36months were 47.7% and 51.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 34.6months, and overall survival was 38.4months. Salvage surgery was tried for 11 patients (17.5%) due to residual or recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point of the trial was demonstrated, indicating the efficacy of IFRT in the treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer mostly of squamous cell carcinoma.

Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Esophagus with Rapid Growth of Lymph Node. A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We present a case of undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus (UCE) treated with chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil plus nedaplatin and radiotherapy. The patient developed rapid growth of lymph nodes and died of massive hematemesis 2 months after the diagnosis. UCE is rare but highly malignant. Since there is no established treatment for UCE, its clinical outcome is invariably poor. We also reviewed the effectiveness of chemotherapy against UCE.

Pharmacotherapy for oesophagogastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the seventh and oesophageal cancer the ninth most common cancer in the UK, and >50% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The incidence of oesophageal and oesophagogastric junctional tumours is increasing, making these important disease entities to understand and research. Despite improvements in surgical and peri-operative supportive care, 3-year overall survival with surgery alone for resectable disease is still poor. Outcomes in localised oesophageal cancer are improved with pre-operative chemotherapy, and in gastric cancer with peri-operative treatment or post-operative chemoradiotherapy. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy as an alternative to surgery. While survival in patients presenting with metastatic disease is improved with the addition of systemic chemotherapy, median survival remains <1 year. Patients who are otherwise fit can be offered chemotherapy and this is superior to best supportive care. Regimens including a platinum and an anthracycline agent are favoured by the results of randomised trials. No standard second-line therapy has emerged. New research into taxanes has shown promising anti-cancer activity, and novel areas of investigation include incorporation of agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor or epidermal growth factor receptor into standard regimens. This review focuses on the clinical trial evidence that dictates the optimal management of localised and advanced oesophagogastric cancer, focusing on pharmacotherapy. We examine areas of current research and highlight future therapeutic directions.

Dose escalation study of docetaxel and nedaplatin in patients with relapsed or refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus pretreated using cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiation with cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been playing an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer, but some patients are not curable or have recurrent lesions. However, few chemotherapeutic regimens are available for such patients. Docetaxel and nedaplatin are active for esophageal cancer. We conducted a dose-escalation study of docetaxel and nedaplatin as second line-chemotherapy after definitive chemoradiation in patients with relapsed or refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after chemoradiation.

METHODS

Nedaplatin was administered on day 1 and docetaxel was administered on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. Dose escalation was based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observed during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled. At a docetaxel dose of 30 mg/m(2) and a nedaplatin dose of 80 mg/m(2), one grade 4 neutropenia occurred and caused one treatment break longer than 2 weeks, but there were few DLTs. At doses of 35 and 80 mg/m(2), respectively, two grade 4 neutropenias and one grade 2 thrombopenia occurred and caused three treatment breaks longer than 2 weeks. Therefore, the maximum tolerated dose was established at this dose level. Two grade 3 anorexias and one grade 3 nausea occurred, but other non-hematological toxicities were generally mild. Responses were seen in one-fourth of the 12 patients, including one complete remission.

CONCLUSION

The recommended doses of docetaxel and nedaplatin were 30 and 80 mg/m(2), respectively. This combination could be a potential second-line treatment for this target population.

Recent developments in the systemic therapy of advanced gastroesophageal malignancies

Cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract are a common cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. The prognosis for patients with these cancers remains poor and only a minority of patients are cured. Systemic therapy has been used to treat patients with advanced disease but outcomes have not improved dramatically in the past few decades. Newer, more effective agents are desperately needed, and agents such as the taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel), irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine have recently shown some promise. In addition, molecularly targeted, non-cytotoxic therapies are being evaluated with the hope of improving the available therapeutic options. This article reviews the current clinical data regarding systemic therapy for patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Results of radiation therapy combined with nedaplatin (cis-diammine-glycoplatinum) and 5-fluorouracil for postoperative locoregional recurrent esophageal cancer

Background

Although the effectiveness of radiotherapy with concurrent administration of several anti-tumor drugs for postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer has been demonstrated, the results are not satisfactory. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of radiotherapy combined with nedaplatin and 5-FU for postoperative locoregional (excluding hematogenous metastasis) recurrent esophageal cancer.

Methods

In June 2000, we started a phase II study on treatment of postoperative locoregional recurrent esophageal cancer with radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fr/6 weeks) combined with chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of nedaplatin (70 mg/m²/2 h) and 5-FU (500 mg/m²/24 h for 5 days).

The primary endpoint of the present study was overall survival rate, and the second endpoints were irradiated-field control rate, tumor response and toxicity.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included in this study. The 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 60.6% and 56.3%, respectively, with a median survival period of 39.0 months, and the 1-year and 3-year irradiated-field control rates were 86.4% and 72%, respectively. Complete response and partial response were observed in 13.3% and 60.0% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 or higher leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 30% and 3.3% of the patients, respectively, but renal toxicity of grade 3 or higher was not observed. The regimen was completed in 76.7% of the patients.

In univariate analysis, the difference between survival rate in preradiotherapy performance status, recurrent pattern (worse for patients with anastomotic recurrence) and age (worse for younger patients) were statistically significant.

Conclusion

Radiotherapy combined with nedaplatin and 5-FU is a safe and effective salvage treatment for postoperative locoregional recurrent esophageal cancer.

A phase I/II study of nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the recommended dose (RD) of cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (nedaplatin) when given concurrently with 5-FU and high dose radiation therapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer. The purpose of the phase II trial is to determine efficacy and further define the side effect profile.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with clinical stage I to IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were enrolled in a non-surgical treatment comprised of a fixed dose of fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 administered as continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-5 and days 8-12) plus escalating doses of nedaplatin (40 mg/m2 in level 1, 50 mg/m2 in level 2, or 60 mg/m2 in level 3 on days 1 and 8), repeated twice every 3 weeks with concurrent radiotherapy (60 Gy).

RESULTS

Between July 1998 and February 2004, a total of 26 patients entered this trial, all of whom were considered evaluable for toxicity assessment. In phase I of the study, 12 patients were treated in sequential cohorts of three to six patients per dose level. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at level 3 with two grade 4 neutropenia and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Thus, the recommended dosing schedule is level 2. Of the 20 patients treated at the RD level 2, including 6 patients of the RD phase I portion, 8 out of 20 patients (40%) had grade 3-4 neutropenia, 5 patients (25.0%) had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, 4 patients (20.0%) had grade 3 anemia and 4 patients (20.0%) had grade 3-4 esophagitis. Other toxicities were relatively mild and usually of grade 2 or less. Objective responses were noted in the 26 patients (overall response rate, 88.5%) including 11 (42.3%) complete remissions. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 65.1 and 37.2%, respectively, with a median survival time of 21.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of nedaplatin and 5-FU with radiation is a feasible regimen that shows promising antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with esophageal cancer.

Radiation therapy combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (nedaplatin) and 5-fluorouracil for Japanese stage II-IV esophageal cancer compared with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil regimen: a retrospective study

To evaluate the treatment outcome of radiotherapy combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (nedaplatin) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for esophageal cancer. From January 2000 to December 2004, a total of 12 esophageal cancer patients with locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer (stages II-IVB) were treated with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy) combined with nedaplatin (80 mg/m(2), bolus infusion) and 5-FU (800 mg/m(2)/24 h, continuous infusion for 4 days) (NDP group). We compared the data with those of patients during the same period receiving a different chemotherapy regimen consisting of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2), bolus infusion) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m(2)/24 h, continuous infusion for 4 days) (n = 29, CDDP group) combined with the same radiation therapy. The median survival period was 11.5 months in the NDP group and 13.1 months in the CDDP group. The overall survival rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-years were 40%, 13%, and 13% in the NDP group and 56%, 42%, and 8% in the CDDP group (P = 0.2472), respectively. Grade III and IV leukocytopenia was observed in six (50%) and none of the patients in the NDP group and 14 (48%) and seven (24%) in the CDDP group, respectively. Grade III thrombocytopenia was observed in three (25%) in the NDP group and four (14%) in the CDDP group. Radiation combined with nedaplatin and 5-FU is a safe and effective method for treating esophageal cancer. We recommend that NDP should be used rather than dose-reduction of CDDP combined with 5-FU in patients with impaired renal function as indicated by low creatinine clearance value (40-60 mL/min).

Phase I study of the combination of nedaplatin, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil for treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

This trial was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, principal toxicity, and recommended dose (RD) for the phase II study of the combination of nedaplatin (NED), adriamycin (ADM), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Patients with previously untreated esophageal cancer were eligible if they had performance status 0-1, were 75 years or younger and had adequate organ function. The dose of NED, the key anticancer platinum complex drug, was increased from 60 to 70, and 80 mg/m(2) on day 1. ADM and 5-FU were administered at fixed doses (30 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 700 mg/m(2) on days 1-5). The dose-limiting toxicities of NED were neutropenia and severe diarrhea, and its maximum-tolerated dose and RD were 70 mg/m(2) and 60 mg/m(2), respectively. There were four responders among the six patients administered the RD. The present study thus revealed combination chemotherapy with NED, ADM, and 5-FU to be active and well-tolerated and to warrant phase II study.

Tumour-inhibiting platinum complexes--state of the art and future perspectives

Thirty years after the onset of the first clinical studies with cisplatin, the development of antineoplastic platinum drugs continues to be a productive field of research. This article reviews the current preclinical and clinical status, including a discussion of the molecular basis for the activity of the parent drug cisplatin and platinum drugs of the second and third generation, in particular their interaction with DNA. Further emphasis is laid on the development of third generation platinum drugs with activity in cisplatin-resistant tumours, particularly on chelates containing 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) and on the promising and more recently evolving field of non-classic ( trans- and multinuclear) platinum complexes. The development of oral platinum drugs and drug targeting strategies using liposomes, polymers or low-molecular-weight carriers in order to improve the therapeutic index of platinum chemotherapy are also covered.

Radiation therapy combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (Nedaplatin) and 5-fluorouracil for untreated and recurrent esophageal cancer

From January 1999 to November 2000, a total of 24 esophageal cancer patients (17 untreated and 7 recurrent cases) were treated with radiation therapy (60-70 Gy) combined with cis-diammine-glycolatoplatinum (Nedaplatin) (80-120 mg/body) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (500-1,000 mg/body/24 h, continuous infusion for 5 days). Grade III leukocytopenia was observed in 6 (25%) of the patients. Grade III and IV thrombocytopenia was observed in one patient each. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates for definitively irradiated patients were 59% and 39%, respectively, and for patients with postoperative recurrence 69% and 69%, respectively. High-dose radiation combined with Nedaplatin and 5-FU is a safe and effective method for treating esophageal cancer.