Subacute thrombosis after coronary stenting occurring with resistance to ticlopidine

Heparin, coumarin, protein C, antithrombin, fibrinolysis and other clotting related resistances: old and new concepts in blood coagulation

The concept of resistance in blood coagulation has become important. In the past it was limited to the resistance shown by some patients to heparin, coumarin or aspirin. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that a mutation in a single clotting factor, FV, showed resistance to activated protein C. Since activated protein C is supposed to downregulate aFV and aFVIII, their persistence in the circulation gives origin to a hypercoagulable state. Recently antithrombin resistance has been defined. Several prothrombin abnormalities (dysprothrombinemias) have been shown to be resistant to the action of antithrombin. This is associated with the occurrence of a trombophilic state. Prothrombin may therefore be associated like FV with both a bleeding condition (prothrombin deficiency) and a thrombophilic state (some dysprothrombinemias). Finally, thrombomodulin resistance has been defined in liver cirrhosis. These patients often show an increased ratio between FVIII levels and protein C. This imbalance may be partly responsible for the frequent presence of portal vein thrombosis seen in these patients. All these studies have greatly increased the complexity of the clotting mechanisms and interactions. They have cast light on clinical events which had remained unknown or ill-defined.

Benefits of clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary stenting significantly depend on loading dose: evidence from a meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel is an established alternative to ticlopidine in addition to aspirin after coronary stenting because of its safety, but its optimal initial dosing is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials comparing clopidogrel versus ticlopidine, focusing on clopidogrel front-loading.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for pertinent studies (updated August 2006). Random-effect odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were computed for death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and weighted least squares random-effect meta-regression was performed to explore the impact of loading versus nonloading clopidogrel scheme.

RESULTS

We retrieved 7 trials (3382 patients, average follow-up of 7 months). In 5 studies, both clopidogrel and ticlopidine were started with a loading dose, in 1 trial clopidogrel was administered without loading, and in 1 trial clopidogrel could be administered with or without loading. Overall analysis (P for heterogeneity = .02) showed similar results for clopidogrel and ticlopidine (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.44-1.84, P = .77). In studies administering clopidogrel with loading, this treatment was, however, significantly better than ticlopidine (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99, P = .05). This significant interaction between clopidogrel loading and its superiority in comparison with ticlopidine was also formally confirmed by meta-regression (beta = -0.64, P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

This work supports the superiority of a clopidogrel regimen including an initial loading dose in comparison with ticlopidine in patients undergoing coronary stenting.