Myopathy and eosinophilic pneumonia coincidentally induced by treatment with daptomycin

Daptomycin eosinophilic pneumonia, a systematic review of the literature and case series

PURPOSE

Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) is a rare yet severe adverse event that requires rapid recognition and management. Diagnosing a definite case is challenging and involves meeting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria, although alternative criteria have been suggested. This study aims to conduct a systematic review of literature and includes a case series.

METHODS

Six cases of DIEP identified at Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy have been described. A systematic review was carried out adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement guidelines.

RESULTS

a total of 74 cases of DIEP were analysed. Using ATS clinical criteria, 15 were classified as definite (20.3%), 54 as probable (73.0%), and 5 as possible (6.8%). Phillips criteria and the Lyon Algorithm identified 43/74 (58.2%) and 64/67 (95.5%) cases as definite, respectively. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in 43 cases, revealing an average eosinophil count of 28.6% (SD 24.4). Radiological findings highlighted recurring features like bilateral opacities (68.1%), ground-glass opacities (41.7%), patchy infiltrates (30.6%), and peripheral predominance (19.4%). Upon suspicion, daptomycin was discontinued; 20 cases required no additional treatment, 38 received corticosteroids, and 12 received both corticosteroids and antibiotics. Recovery rates were high across all treatment types (≥ 73.7%). Most reports described rapid improvement post-withdrawal (within 96 h).

CONCLUSIONS

DIEP is a rare, fast-progressing condition where early diagnosis and prompt treatment are vital. Diagnosis relies on clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations. Stopping daptomycin is essential, with corticosteroids often necessary. Further research is needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy for this disease.

Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin

OBJECTIVE

The association between daptomycin exposure and eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and provide more evidence for better identify and management of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in clinical practice.

METHODS

Literature from 1991 to October 31, 2021 on EP induced by daptomycin were collected for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (40 male and 7 female) from 35 studies were included. The median age was 67 years (range 28-89), and 78.7% of patients were ≥60 years. Daptomycin was mainly used in patients undergoing osteoarticular infections (63.8%). Typical initial symptoms were fever (91.5%), cough (55.3%) and dyspnea (59.6%). The median onset time of symptom was 3 weeks. EP recurred in 14.9% of patients after the re-administration of daptomycin, and 57.1% of EP recurred within 24h. Most cases were accompanied by marked accumulation of eosinophils in peripheral (41 cases) and/or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (27 cases). The main radiological features were pulmonary infiltration, ground glass opacity or consolidation in CT/CXR. All patients had symptom resolution after discontinuation of daptomycin except for one patient died due to the progression of the primary disease, the median time to symptoms relief was 3 days. Corticosteroids have been shown to help symptoms relief in some cases (59.6%).

CONCLUSION

Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare and serious complication. Physicians should consider eosinophilic pneumonia as a differential diagnosis when receiving daptomycin therapy, particularly in elderly male patients.

Data mining for adverse drug reaction signals of daptomycin based on real-world data: a disproportionality analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Previous reports on daptomycin's adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been insufficient, often because of limited data. Pharmacovigilance risk signal detection is innovative and has been applied to the safety monitoring and reevaluation of drugs post-marketing.

AIM

The study aimed to promote safe daptomycin prescribing by mining and evaluating the daptomycin ADR signals from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHOD

A disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio ROR and proportional reporting ratio PRR) was utilized for FAERS data mining from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2021 (the most recent quarterly data at the time of the study). Preferred Terms of ADR reports were categorized by System Organ Class (SOC) based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.

RESULTS

This study retrieved 12,221 cases within the reporting period. A total of 140 repetitive signals were obtained by ROR and PRR, of which 53 new ADR signals were not recorded in the drug labels/datasheets. The top three ADR reports were "blood creatine phosphokinase elevation" (ROR, 56.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 51.07-62.87, PRR 51.94), "eosinophilic pneumonia" (ROR 696.71, 95%CI 603.21-804.70, PRR 657.57), and "rhabdomyolysis" (ROR 22.85, 95%CI 19.94-26.18, PRR 21.83). The highest ROR of "antimicrobial susceptibility test resistant" was found at 9808.14. Reports of rare adverse events, such as "necrotizing fasciitis and compartment syndrome," have emerged. The significant SOCs were "Infections and Infestations" and "Investigations."

CONCLUSION

New daptomycin ADR signals were detected. Clinicians should monitor these potential ADRs in patients receiving daptomycin.

Daptomycin-induced Eosinophilic Pneumonia and a Review of the Published Literature

A 53-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of cellulitis and osteomyelitis. Twenty-four days after the initiation of daptomycin and sulbactam/ampicillin, he developed a fever and pulmonary infiltration. Bronchoalveolar lavage revealed a high number of eosinophils, while an intracutaneous test revealed positivity for daptomycin. The patient improved after discontinuing antimicrobial therapy. The plasma daptomycin minimum concentration (C_min) was elevated (27.4 μg/mL), but plasma protein binding of daptomycin was low (87.8%). Although the pathophysiology of eosinophilic pneumonia remains unclear, antigenic stimulation due to daptomycin accumulation in the alveoli may have caused continuous immune activation.

Two patients with daptomycin induced eosinophilic pneumonia with different presentations and treatment

We present two cases of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia with characteristic chest x ray, CT scan and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings. It is not a commonly seen complication of Daptomycin but when it happens, it could cause a diagnostic and treatment dilemma. Patients could present acutely with hypoxic respiratory failure or a less dramatic chronic presentation is also possible. Our two patients presented with acute hypoxic respiratory failure and presentation resembles that of an infectious etiology. Diagnosis is confirmed by bronchoscopy with BAL in one of them and the other was treated empirically as the clinical and radiologic presentation was typical. Treatment includes removal of the offending agent, daptomycin. Corticosteroids are used if symptoms are severe and can result in rapid clinical improvement. There is no agreed upon dose and duration of steroids and we suggest a long taper of steroids for patients who present with severe symptoms and a short course steroid for patients with milder symptoms.

Eosinophilic pneumonia caused by daptomycin: Six cases from two institutions and a review of the literature

Here we report six cases of daptomycin (DAP)-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (DIEP) encountered at two medical centers and present a review of 43 DIEP patients from 26 studies to compare the clinical characteristics and radiographic findings of acute and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP; CEP). Four of the six patients did not exhibit respiratory symptoms, and one patient with only fever was misdiagnosed with DAP-induced fever. According to our literature review and the present findings, male sex and old age were dominant risk factors for DIEP. Fever and fine crackles were the most common clinical manifestations. The DAP dose and duration of administration were not significant risk factors for DIEP, and we also could not find any association between allergic predisposition and DIEP. Among the reviewed patients, 51.8% did not show more than 25% eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage, which is a criterion for the diagnosis of drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia. Chest images of all patients showed CEP patterns such as multiple reticulonodular infiltrates in the subpleural region and diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates with ground-glass opacities. However, 66.7% of patients also exhibited pleural effusion, a feature specific to AEP. All patients showed prompt recovery after DAP withdrawal. Our results suggest that clinicians should consider DIEP as a differential diagnosis when patients receiving DAP therapy, particularly men and elderly patients, present with fever, even in the absence of respiratory symptoms. Furthermore, they should be aware that the occurrence of DIEP is independent of the DAP dose and administration duration, and allergic reaction.

Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia - a systematic review

PURPOSE

Eosinophilic pneumonia comprises a group of lung diseases in which eosinophils appear in increased numbers in the lungs and sometimes in the bloodstream. Several case reports link daptomycin use to this phenomenon.

SUMMARY

We performed a systematic literature review to identify cases of eosinophilic pneumonia associated with daptomycin use. Relevant studies were identified by searching Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clin-Alert from inception to May 2016, and manual searches of reference lists. All case reports that include information regarding patient age, indication, clinical and objective findings, treatment and outcome were evaluated. Abstracts from conference proceedings as well as case reports not in English were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Thirty-five patient-cases were included in the final analysis. Patients most likely to be identified with daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia were male (83%) and elderly (mean age 65.4 ± 15 years). The dose for daptomycin ranged from 4 to 10 mg/kg/day, but included a large number of patients with renal dysfunction. The average duration of daptomycin therapy upon onset of EP symptoms was 2.8 ± 1.6 weeks. Majority of patients presented with dyspnea (94%), fever (57%) and were also found to have peripheral eosinophilia (77%) and infiltrates/opacities of CT/CXR (86%). Symptom improvement was seen after daptomycin discontinuation (24 h to 1 week). The majority of patients were also prescribed treatment with corticosteroids (66%).

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia and its symptoms along with its presentation and treatment.