Effectiveness of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy on Chronic Epipharyngitis and the Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels

Autonomic Stimulation Action of EAT (Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy) on Chronic Epipharyngitis

This study investigated the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of chronic epipharyngitis, which presents a variety of symptoms, with a focus on autonomic neuropathy symptoms, and also investigated the literature for information on EAT, which is useful as a treatment method. The mechanism of action of EAT has recently been clarified in terms of its immune system-stimulating and endocrine system-stimulating effects. However, the autonomic nerve-stimulating effects of EAT are still largely unexplained. This study was conducted to collect and integrate previous studies and papers focusing on the autonomic nerve-stimulating effects of EAT and to provide insight into the still not fully elucidated autonomic nerve-stimulating effects of EAT on chronic epipharyngitis. The local stimulating effects of zinc chloride and the bleeding and pain effects of EAT are also summarized, suggesting that EAT exerts its therapeutic effects through the interaction of the immune system, the endocrine system, and the autonomic nervous system. It is important to determine which mechanism is predominantly involved in each case of chronic epipharyngitis and to utilize it in treatment. Elucidating the effects of EAT on the autonomic nervous system will be an important guideline in determining the treatment strategy for chronic epipharyngitis.

Differences Between Patients With Chronic Epipharyngitis With and Without Previous COVID-19 Infection

Objective Epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) is effective in patients with chronic epipharyngitis who previously had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study aimed to evaluate differences between patients with chronic epipharyngitis with (long COVID) or without a history of COVID-19 (non-long COVID). Methods This is a retrospective study based on the analysis of medical records of patients who visited the Mogitate ENT Clinic in Kawasaki, Japan, for six months from March 2022. Results Patients with long COVID were significantly younger (p=0.018). Fatigue and brain fog were prevalent in patients with long COVID, whereas throat discomfort, postnasal drip, and sputum were more common in those with non-long COVID. Epipharyngeal endoscopic findings in patients with long COVID showed significantly higher scores (p<0.001) compared with patients with non-long COVID. Conclusions The primary differences between patients with long COVID and non-long COVID were age, symptoms, and severity scores of endoscopic findings. The EAT should be aggressively implemented in patients with chronic epipharyngitis with or without COVID-19 infection, as there is no reason not to treat a patient with a condition caused by COVID-19 infection.

Epipharynegal Abrasive Therapy Downregulates the Number of Epipharyngeal Abrasive CD4 Cells With Symptomatic Recovery

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the author focused on CD4 and CD8 profiles in epipharyngeal abrasive cells in patients with chronic epipharyngitis and investigated how the profiles differ from those in normal healthy subjects and how epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) influences these profiles.

METHODS

This study included 18 patients (one male and 17 females, median age: 46 (30.0-56.5) years) who had been treated for chronic epipharyngitis between June 2021 and September 2021. Epipharyngeal abrasive cells were collected from patients with chronic epipharyngitis before EAT and three months after repeated EAT and were subjected to two-color flow cytometric analyses for CD4 and CD8 expression. The severity of participants' symptoms was monitored using the visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Symptoms of chronic epipharyngitis were significantly abated after three months of repeated EAT (p <0.001). The number of epipharyngeal abrasive CD4(+) T cells in patients with chronic epipharyngitis before EAT, which was significantly higher than that in normal healthy subjects (p <0.01), significantly decreased by the third month of repeated EAT (p = 0.01), alongside symptomatic recovery.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that epipharyngeal CD4(+) T cells may have a critical role in treating the persistent inflammation of chronic epipharyngitis, and EAT may reduce the number of CD4 cells, which results in symptomatic recovery.

The Effect of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) on the Baroreceptor Reflex (BR)

Introduction Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) has been used as a treatment for chronic epipharyngitis, and although autonomic nerve stimulation has been pointed out as one of the mechanisms by which EAT produces therapeutic effects, there have been few reports examining this mechanism of action. This study investigated the effects of repeated EAT on autonomic nervous system activity in chronic epipharyngitis patients over time, using heart rate variability analysis. In addition, we conducted a loading test using the active standing test (AS test) to examine the effects of EAT on the baroreceptor reflex (BR). Subjects and methods A retrospective study was conducted on 39 patients who visited our clinic between July 2017 and November 2019 and underwent autonomic function tests with a diagnosis of chronic nasopharyngeal inflammation. The subjects were divided into two groups: the improvement group and the invariant group for comparison. Electrocardiographic recordings and blood pressure measurements were made under the stress of the AS test. Heart rate, high-frequency (HF) component, low-frequency (LF) component, and Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval were evaluated as indices of autonomic function. Component coefficient of variance high frequency was used as an index of parasympathetic function. ccvLF/ccvHF ratio was calculated by dividing the component coefficient of variance low frequency by ccvHF. The AS test was conducted in phase 1 in the initial resting sitting position, in phase 2 in the standing position, in phase 3 in the standing and holding the standing position, and in phase 4 in the seated and holding the sitting position. Systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were obtained in each phase. A paired t-test was used to compare the improved and invariant groups before and after treatment. The post-treatment comparison between the improved group and the invariant group was performed by unpaired t-test. Variation of the evaluation index over time was evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method. Results The EAT showed that parasympathetic activity was significantly suppressed in the improvement group, while the AS test showed significant fluctuations over time for the improvement and invariant groups. The interaction between the time course and the two factors in the improvement and invariant groups was not statistically evident. Although no significant difference was found, the improvement group showed a tendency to suppress parasympathetic activity and a tendency to stimulate sympathetic activity compared to the invariant group. Blood pressure in the improvement group showed a tendency to decrease. Conclusions EAT was found to suppress parasympathetic activity over time, and the AS test did not reveal an interaction effect of EAT on BR. However, there was a trend toward suppression of parasympathetic activity and stimulation of sympathetic activity in the improved group compared to the invariant group. Blood pressure in the improved group tended to decrease. It is possible that EAT may have a positive effect on autonomic neuropathy symptoms such as orthostatic dysregulation (OD), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), etc. by stimulating the BRs. It is thought that the autonomic nervous system stimulating action and the immune system stimulating action act synergistically to express the therapeutic effect of EAT.