Naturalistic Studies of Second Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

A naturalistic multicenter study of intramuscular olanzapine in the treatment of acutely agitated manic or schizophrenic patients

Background

We conducted a naturalistic, multicenter, 24-hour, nonrandomized, observational study describing for the first time the effectiveness and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine to control agitation and aggression in “real world” patients with psychosis. The data thus obtained was compared with that reported from randomized double-blind clinical trials.

Method

92 patients attending psychiatric emergency settings were enrolled. The study subjects were 44 male and 48 female patients with a mean age of 36.5 ± 12 years and DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of schizophrenia (48.9%), psychotic disorder not specified (23.9%) or bipolar disorder (27.2%). 10 mg IM olanzapine was administered to all patients. An optional second injection was permitted ≥ 2 hours later in line with hospital policy. Evaluations (PANSS-EC and CGI-S) were performed at baseline and 2 and 24 hours following the IM injection.

Results

Two hours after IM olanzapine was administered, a mean decrease of –9.6 in the PANSS-EC from a baseline score of 26.5 was recorded. At the 24-hour endpoint a statistically and clinically significant reduction in the PANSS-EC scores (11.6 ± 5.3) was observed as compared with values at study entry (26.5 ± 5.9) and at 2 hours endpoint (16.9 ± 9.3), which represent a mean decrease of –14.9 and –5.3, respectively.

Conclusion

The present naturalistic study provides naturalistic data on the effectiveness of IM olanzapine in the treatment of acute agitation in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania that is in line the data obtained in randomized double-blind clinical trials.

Evaluation of different approaches for confounding in nonrandomised observational data: a case-study of antipsychotics treatment

Although randomised controlled trials are regarded as the gold standard for treatments efficacy, evidence from observational studies remains relevant. To address the problem of possible confounding in these studies, investigators must employ analysis methods that adjust for confounders and lead to an unbiased estimation of the treatment effect. In this paper, the authors describe two relevant statistical methods. The first method represents the classical approach consisting of a multiple regression model including the effects of treatment and covariates. This approach considers the relation between prognostic factors and the outcome variable as a relevant criterion for adjustment. The second method is based on the propensity score, and focuses on the relation between prognostic factors and treatment assignment. These approaches were applied to a cohort of 183 French schizophrenic patients who were followed for a 2-year period (from 1998 to 2000). The probability of relapse according to antipsychotic treatment exposure was modelled using Cox regression models with the two statistical methods. Goodness-of-fit criteria were used to compare the modelling approaches. This study demonstrates that the propensity score, a predicted probability, has an important balancing property that underscores its value in strengthening the results of nonrandomised observational studies.

The effect of antipsychotic medication on sexual function and serum prolactin levels in community-treated schizophrenic patients: results from the Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole (STAR) study (NCT00237913)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia in a community based study on sexual function and prolactin levels comparing the use of aripiprazole and standard of care (SOC), which was a limited choice of three widely used and available antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) (The Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole [STAR] study [NCT00237913]).

METHOD

This open-label, 26-week, multi-centre, randomised study compared aripiprazole to SOC (olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone) in patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR criteria). The primary effectiveness variable was the mean total score of the Investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) at Week 26. The outcome research variables included the Arizona Sexual Experience scale (ASEX). This along with the data collected on serum prolactin levels at week 4, 8, 12, 18 and 26 will be the focus of this paper.

RESULTS

A total of 555 patients were randomised to receive aripiprazole (n = 284) or SOC (n = 271). Both treatment groups experienced improvements in sexual function from baseline ASEX assessments. However at 8 weeks the aripiprazole treatment group reported significantly greater improvement compared with the SOC group (p = 0.007; OC). Although baseline mean serum prolactin levels were similar in the two treatment groups (43.4 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group and 42.3 mg/dL in the SOC group, p = NS) at Week 26 OC, mean decreases in serum prolactin were 34.2 mg/dL in the aripiprazole group, compared with 13.3 mg/dL in the SOC group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that aripiprazole has the potential to reduce sexual dysfunction, which in turn might improve patient compliance.

Long-term, naturalistic treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy: 24-month results from the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia who were treated in routine clinical practice settings for a period of 2 years. The incidence and persistence of adverse events encountered during long-term therapy are also reported. Method. Outpatients with schizophrenia who entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to their initially prescribed antipsychotic monotherapy: olanzapine (n=3222), risperidone (n=1116), quetiapine (n=189), or haloperidol (n=256). Patients were included in the analysis for as long as this treatment was maintained. Results. Over 2 years, olanzapine recipients had significantly (P≤0.001) greater reduction in overall CGI-S score (and the negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms domains), lower incidence of sexual and motor dysfunction, and greater odds of response compared to risperidone or haloperidol-treated patients. However, olanzapine patients gained more weight than patients in other treatment groups. The incidence of motor dysfunction was significantly (P≤0.001) greater in haloperidol-treated patients, relative to the atypical treatment groups. Conclusion. The results of this observational study indicate that, in these patients with schizophrenia, long-term monotherapy with olanzapine may offer benefits over risperidone and haloperidol, but the potential for weight gain should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of ziprasidone for treating schizophrenia patients undergoing usual care: a 12-month, open-label, flexible-dose, naturalistic observational trial

OBJECTIVE

This is a first report from a long-term study aimed to evaluate efficacy, safety, tolerability, cognitive functioning, and quality of life outcomes during ziprasidone treatment of chronic schizophrenia patients in the "real-world".

METHOD

Seventy clinically unstable schizophrenia patients with persistent symptoms or troublesome side effects were assigned to a 12-month, open-label, flexible-dose (40-160 mg/day), large-scale, naturalistic trial. Outcome measures were taken at baseline, 6, and 12 months, and included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-S) scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) scores, treatment-emergent adverse events, body weight, and drug attitude.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients fully completed the study protocol. A discontinuation of treatment for any cause occurred in 54.3% of patients; the mean time until discontinuation was 4.4 +/- 2.7 months. A discontinuation due to lack of clinical efficacy was more predominantly linked to patient perception (25.7%) than to physicians' conclusions alone (8.6%), adverse events (11.4%), and other reasons (8.6%). After controlling daily dose of ziprasidone, concomitant medications and sex, ANCOVA revealed improvement in PANSS factors, and global functioning among patients who had completed the study. Improvement in PANSS and GAF dimensions was evident at a 6-month visit, and it continued until the endpoint. When a cutoff of 20% improvement of PANSS total scores was used, the response rate among completers was 43.8%. Most common side effects were: fatigue, sleep disturbances, and headache. Ziprasidone did not appear to be linked to weight gain.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that ziprasidone may be beneficial for long-term treatment of schizophrenia patients in terms of severity of symptoms, and general functioning. Ziprasidone is well tolerated during the long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenia patients undergoing usual care.

Trazodone for Alzheimer's disease: a naturalistic follow-up study

This study intended to provide a patient profile for trazodone (a triazolopyridine-derivative of phenylpiperazine) prescription in everyday clinical practice in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to describe clinical evaluation and the impact on caregiver burden at a 6-month follow-up. A naturalistic, prospective and observational study was performed, with a 6-month follow-up in 396 patients with probable AD, according to the NINCDS-ARDRA criteria. At the baseline and at the 6-month visit, patients were administered the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) to determine their Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD), and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) to assess the impact on caregiver burden. Trazodone was prescribed for 6.1% of patients. With respect to the baseline visit, the untreated group showed an increased global NPI score (3.1 points; 95% CI=1.9-4.2; p=0.001) and ZBI score (2.2 points; 95% CI=0.9-3.4; p=0.001). At 6 months, the global NPI and ZBI scores remained unchanged for the treated group. The treated group showed a significant reduction in the NPI irritability subscale score (2.1 points; 95% CI=0.4-3.7; p=0.015). In the clinical practice, trazodone treatment was prescribed for patients with irritability, agitation and disinhibition. After 6 months, patients treated with trazodone exhibited no increase in BPSD frequency or severity, nor was an increase noted in the caregiver burden.

A multicentre, randomized, naturalistic, open-label study between aripiprazole and standard of care in the management of community-treated schizophrenic patients Schizophrenia Trial of Aripiprazole: (STAR) study

Background

Naturalistic effectiveness trials of atypical antipsychotics are needed to provide broader information on efficacy, safety, and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia treated in a community practice setting.

Method

in this 26-week, open-label, multicentre study, patients with schizophrenia requiring a switch in antipsychotic medication because current medication was not well tolerated and/or clinical symptoms were not well controlled were randomized to receive aripiprazole or an atypical antipsychotic standard of care (SOC) treatment (i.e., olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone based on the investigator's judgment of the optimal treatment for the individual patient and the patient's prior response to antipsychotic medication). The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of a 26-week treatment of aripiprazole versus SOC, as measured by the investigator Assessment Questionnaire (IAQ) total score at Week 26 last observation carried forward (LOCF) (primary endpoint), a validated measure that monitors relief or worsening of 10 key symptoms associated with the psychopathology of schizophrenia and side effects of antipsychotic treatment. Secondary objectives were to further assess effectiveness using the Clinical Global Impression – Global Improvement (CGI-I) and Clinical Global Impression – Severity of Illness scale, to assess time to treatment discontinuation, patient preference of medication, quality of life, and the tolerability of aripiprazole compared with SOC.

Results

Aripiprazole treatment (n = 268) resulted in significantly better effectiveness than SOC treatment (n = 254; P < 0.001; Week 26 LOCF) as evidenced by the IAQ total score beginning at Week 4 (the first assessment point) and sustained through Week 26. A similar relationship was demonstrated among patients who completed the study (observed cases analysis); aripiprazole was associated with significantly better effectiveness at all time points with a greater differential effect from SOC over time. Patients treated with aripiprazole also demonstrated significantly greater improvements on the CGI-I scale (responder rate, P = 0.009 at Week 26 LOCF), as well as on quality of life (Quality of Life scale total score; P < 0.001 at Week 26). Furthermore, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving aripiprazole rated their study medication as “much better” on the Preference of Medication Questionnaire (POM) scale than their pre-study medication compared with SOC patients (P < 0.001; Week 26). Time to treatment discontinuation and rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. The incidence of patients with one or more extrapyramidal symptom (e.g., akathisia, dystonia, parkinsonian events, and residual events) was higher in patients receiving aripiprazole compared with patients treated with SOC (13.5% vs. 5.6%); however, a higher proportion of patients in the SOC-treated group had clinically significant weight gain (21.2% vs. 7.3% for aripiprazole) and potentially clinically relevant elevated fasting levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum prolactin compared with patients receiving aripiprazole.

Conclusions

Aripiprazole is an effective atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of schizophrenia, demonstrating better effectiveness than SOC agents used in this study in patients for whom a switch in antipsychotic medication was warranted.

The "Seroquel" Outcomes Study (SOS): Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in a long-term, naturalistic study of patients with schizophrenia

Objective. The "Seroquel" Outcomes Study (SOS) aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia in the clinical practice setting. Methods. A 6-month, non-comparative, open-label study in adults with schizophrenia in a standard care setting in Spain. Outpatients received flexibly dosed quetiapine. Efficacy was evaluated using the Brief Psychiatry Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. BPRS response was defined as≥30% decrease from baseline. Tolerability was assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and a modified Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side-effects scale. Results. A total of 2029 patients enrolled. Significant changes from baseline to Month 6 were recorded for BPRS total and subscale scores (P<0.001). Compared with doses of≥600 mg/day, doses of<400 mg/day were a strong predictor of a lower response rate (OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.82) and higher withdrawal rate (OR 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 4.4). Mean change in weight was minimal (+0.4 kg). Somnolence (26.7%), asthenia (12.5%), and constipation (9.8%) were the most common adverse events. Conclusion. Quetiapine was found to improve symptoms of schizophrenia, as indicated by a significant decrease in BPRS scores, and was well tolerated by patients in clinical practice.

Effectiveness, tolerability and subjective well-being in patients receiving quetiapine: findings of a post-marketing surveillance study in schizophrenia

Objectives. Previous studies of antipsychotics have mainly focused on efficacy and tolerability. However, patient subjective well-being is increasingly being accepted as a valid and important measure of antipsychotic treatment outcomes and tolerability. Methods. In this open-label, observational trial data from 1322 outpatients with schizophrenia treated with flexibly dosed quetiapine were collected at baseline, Week 4 and Week 12. Patient well-being was assessed using Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics (SWN-K) scale and disease severity with the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale following quetiapine treatment. In addition, safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Results. Quetiapine treatment, mean endpoint dose 337 mg/day, led to a significant reduction in disease severity, with improvements in CGI-S score of -0.7 at Week 4 and -1.3 at Week 12 (both P<0.001). In addition, patients' subjective well-being was significantly improved at Week 12, with a mean (SD) increase from baseline in SWN-K total score of 22.9 (18.7) (P<0.001). Further, an improved tolerability profile compared with previous medication was reported. Conclusions. This study emphasises the importance of patients' subjective well-being and the favourable acceptability of quetiapine among patients with schizophrenia.

Effectiveness and tolerability of schizophrenia treatment in Central and Eastern Europe: results after 1 year from a prospective, observational study (IC-SOHO)

Objective. The Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study is intended to complement smaller, shorter-term observational studies and randomised controlled clinical trials in providing information on the treatment of schizophrenia in various geographies that have not been well studied previously. Methods. Interim results after 12 months are presented for a subset of patients from eight Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries initiating or switching to olanzapine, risperidone, or typical antipsychotic monotherapy at Baseline (n=1387). Results. Patients initially prescribed olanzapine and risperidone experienced significantly greater improvements in a broad range of schizophrenia symptom domains compared with patients prescribed typicals. Furthermore, patients in the olanzapine group showed significantly greater improvements in overall and negative symptom domains compared with the risperidone group (all P≤0.05). While patients in the olanzapine group gained more weight than the other two groups, they had significantly lower odds of developing extrapyramidal symptoms, loss of libido, and sexual dysfunction. Patients initially prescribed olanzapine were also significantly less likely to have changed or added antipsychotics during 12 months of treatment compared with the risperidone and typicals groups. Conclusion. In this CEE sample, schizophrenia treatment outcomes after 12 months varied between patients initially prescribed different antipsychotics.

Treatment-refractory schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to critically review the current literature on treatment-refractory schizophrenia with an emphasis on emergent themes and key findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

New information continues to emerge on the impact of each second-generation antipsychotic on the treatment-refractory patient population and on the traditionally more difficult-to-treat components (e.g. cognition, suicidality, violence) of the illness. There are continued efforts with pharmacogenetics to predict response and side-effect risk with antipsychotic medications. Polypharmacy continues to be a major and poorly understood treatment practice.

SUMMARY

Our field is advancing the therapeutic nuances of therapy with second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Additionally, there is a growing appreciation of the emergent adverse-effect profile of antipsychotic medications and these risk-benefit considerations are more pronounced in severely ill patients.