Bisphosphonate Therapy in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

Lower dose dexamethasone/thalidomide and zoledronic acid every 3 weeks in previously untreated multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Physicians in Asia have anecdotally reported that Asian patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are frequently intolerant of conventional doses of dexamethasone (Dex) and/or thalidomide (Thal). Since zoledronic acid (Zol) has an anti-MM effect in preclinical studies, we investigated whether the approved 3-times-weekly Zol combined with lower dose Dex/Thal could be an effective and better tolerated regimen in Asian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this first Asian cooperative multicenter phase II study, previously untreated patients with MM (N = 44) received up to 6 cycles of 3-times-weekly low-dose Dex/Thal and 4 mg Zol (the dtZ regimen). Response was graded using Bladé criteria.

RESULTS

The average doses of Dex and Thal administered were 185.2 mg/month; and 87.5 mg/day, respectively. Thirty-nine (88.6%) patients demonstrated at least a partial response (PR), including 18.2% very good partial response (VGPR), 15.9% near complete response (nCR) and 18.2% complete response (CR). Achievement of CR/nCR was related to significant (P < .05), rapid, and sustained inhibition of osteoclasts (OCs) and OC precursors (pOCs) by Zol. Sepsis was the most frequently reported serious toxicity, contributing to 3 of 4 deaths. Importantly, there was no peripheral neuropathy, osteonecrosis of the jaw, or nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the dtZ regimen is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for Asian patients with newly diagnosed MM. The high rate of VGPR/nCR/CR suggests that Zol could have a clinically relevant anti-MM effect. Since infections are the most frequent adverse event, it is probably wise to further lower the dose of Dex in future studies.

Bisphosphonates in preclinical bone oncology

Bisphosphonates, especially nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, are widely used to block bone destruction in cancer patients with bone metastasis because they are effective inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In addition to their antiresorptive effects, preclinical evidence strongly suggests that nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates exert direct and indirect anticancer activities through inhibition of tumor cell functions, enhancement of the cytotoxic activity of chemotherapy agents, inhibition of tumor angiogenesis, and stimulation of antitumor immune reactions. This review examines the current evidence and provides insights into ongoing preclinical research on anticancer activities of these bisphosphonates in animal models of tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Could targeting bone delay cancer progression? Potential mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates

Although dissemination may occur early in the course of many cancers, the development of overt metastases depends upon a variety of factors inherent to the cancer cells and the tissue(s) they colonize. The time lag between initial dissemination and established metastases could be several years, during which period the bone marrow may provide an unwitting sanctuary for disseminated tumor cells (DTCs). Survival in a dormant state within the bone marrow may help DTCs weather the effects of anticancer therapies and seed posttreatment relapses. The importance of the bone marrow for facilitating DTC survival may vary depending on the type of cancer and mechanisms of tumor cell dissemination. By altering the bone microenvironment, bisphosphonates may reduce DTC viability. Moreover, some bisphosphonates have demonstrated multiple anticancer activities. These multiple mechanisms may help explain the improvement in disease outcomes with the use of zoledronic acid in malignancies like breast cancer and multiple myeloma.