Changes in Care- A Systematic Scoping Review of Transitions for Children with Medical Complexities

Follow-up care and support to parents of premature children: Multidisciplinary versus regular follow-up care

BACKGROUND

Preterm care involves clinical measures almost exclusively aimed at keeping the preterm alive and ready for discharge from hospital. Children are then enrolled in clinical follow-up care after this stressful period, but mental or specialised care for parents and child is often not embedded in the routine of a neonatal hospital ward and the family is then dependent on institutions for mental health or child health clinics, that is, regular care that is regionally scattered. This study aimed to investigate experiences of parents with regular care and compare them with parents visiting a fixed, specialised, multidisciplinary institute, outside the hospital walls, for preterm follow-up care.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 56 parents (regular follow-up care N = 26; multidisciplinary follow-up care N = 30) of children born prematurely. The survey consisted out of items like parents' experiences with follow-up care, like the organisation of care, supportive care, environmental support and experienced stress.

RESULTS

Parents receiving multidisciplinary follow-up care reported higher levels of satisfaction with organisation of care (F = 5.45; p = 0.023) and supportive care (F = 11.69; p = 0.001) than parents receiving regular follow-up care. Also, it was found that the extent of support from the social environment alleviated stress but only in parents receiving regular follow-up care (ß = -0.47; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study findings indicate that experience with follow-up care is valued higher when receiving multidisciplinary care than regular care, and the degree in environmental support alleviates stress in parents receiving regular care.

Hospital-to-home transitions for children with medical complexity: part 1, a systematic review of reported outcomes

Outcome selection to evaluate interventions to support a successful transition from hospital to home of children with medical complexity (CMC) may be difficult due to the variety in available outcomes. To support researchers in outcome selection, this systematic review aimed to summarize and categorize outcomes currently reported in publications evaluating the effectiveness of hospital-to-home transitional care interventions for CMC. We searched the following databases: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science for studies published between 1 January 2010 and 15 March 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted the data with a focus on the outcomes. Our research group extensively discussed the outcome list to identify those with similar definitions, wording or meaning. Consensus meetings were organized to discuss disagreements, and to summarize and categorize the data. We identified 50 studies that reported in total 172 outcomes. Consensus was reached on 25 unique outcomes that were assigned to six outcome domains: mortality and survival, physical health, life impact (the impact on functioning, quality of life, delivery of care and personal circumstances), resource use, adverse events, and others. Most frequently studied outcomes reflected life impact and resource use. Apart from the heterogeneity in outcomes, we also found heterogeneity in designs, data sources, and measurement tools used to evaluate the outcomes.     Conclusion: This systematic review provides a categorized overview of outcomes that may be used to evaluate interventions to improve hospital-to-home transition for CMC. The results can be used in the development of a core outcome set transitional care for CMC.

Length of Stay and Barriers to Discharge for Technology-Dependent Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, technology-dependent children are at risk of encountering barriers to hospital discharge because of limits to in-home services. Transition difficulties could increase length of stay (LOS). With this study, we aim to (1) evaluate change in LOS and (2) describe barriers to hospital discharge between prepandemic and early pandemic periods for technology-dependent children.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of technology-dependent children discharged from an acute and specialty pediatric hospital within a single urban area between January 1 and May 28, 2020 was conducted. Technology dependence was defined by using a validated complex chronic condition coding system. Patients discharged prepandemic and during the pandemic were compared. Outcomes included LOS and the number and type of discharge barriers (a factor not related to a medical condition that delays discharge). Multivariate regression modeling and parametric and nonparametric analysis were used to compare cohorts.

RESULTS

Prepandemic, 163 patients were discharged, and 119 were discharged during the early stages of the pandemic. The most common technology dependence was a feeding tube. The unadjusted median LOS was 7 days in both groups. After adjusting for patient-level factors, discharge during the pandemic resulted in a 32.2% longer LOS (confidence interval 2.1%-71.2%). The number of discharge barriers was high but unchanged between cohorts. Lack of a trained caregiver was more frequent during the pandemic (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to discharge were frequent for both cohorts. Discharge during the pandemic was associated with longer LOS. It was more difficult to identify a trained caregiver during the pandemic.

Programmes to support transitions in community care for children with complex care needs: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to map the range of programmes in the literature to support children and youth with complex care needs and their families during transitions in care in the community.

DESIGN

A scoping review of the literature.

CONTEXT

This review included programmes that supported the transition in care to home and between settings in the community.

DATA SOURCES

We implemented our strategy to search five databases: (1) PubMed; (2) CINAHL; (3) ERIC; (4) PyscINFO and (5) Social Work Abstracts. The search was last implemented on 29 April 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Our search results were imported into Covidence Systematic Review Software. First, two reviewers assessed titles and abstracts against our eligibility criteria. Relevant articles were then retrieved in full and reviewed by two reviewers for inclusion. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data were extracted related to population, concept, context, methods and key findings pertinent to our review objective.

RESULTS

A total of 2482 records were identified. After our two-stage screening process, a total of 27 articles were included for analysis. Articles ranged in the type of transitions being supported and target population. The most common transition reported was the hospital-to-home transition. Intervention components primarily consisted of care coordination using a teams-based approach. The most reported barriers and enablers to implementing these transition care programmes were related to physical opportunities.

LIMITATIONS

Included articles were limited to English and French.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified important gaps within the literature, as well as areas for future consideration to ensure the effective development and implementation of programmes to support children and youth with complex care needs during transitions in care.