Postoperative care of the transplanted patient

Understanding the role of temporary epicardial pacemakers after heart transplantation in the cardiac intensive care unit

The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients recommend the placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires at the time of surgery. However, there is little data regarding optimal postoperative pacing modality and its implications on intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 187 patients who underwent heart transplantation from January 1, 2019 to February 28, 2023 and had postoperative epicardial pacemaker wires placed. The study's primary outcome was to observe the association between pacing modalities and prolonged ICU LOS (greater than 5 days). The secondary outcome was to observe the association between pacing modalities and prolonged hospital LOS (greater than 15 days), readmission within 30 days of discharge, days on inotropic and pressor support, death, high-grade rejection on biopsy, coronary artery vasculopathy at 1 year, primary graft dysfunction, mediastinitis, and development of a malignancy. Twenty-two patients (12%) had their pacing mode turned off at the time of arrival to the ICU, 36 patients (19%) had their pacing mode set to atrially paced, atrially sensed, inhibit, 101 patients (54%) had theirs set to dual chamber paced, dual chamber sensed, triger/inhibit sensed events, and 28 (15%) had theirs set to ventricularly paced, ventricularly sensed, inhibit. No mode of epicardial pacing was associated with an increased ICU LOS, hospital LOS, increased readmission rates, increased short-term adverse effects, increased long-term adverse effects, or increased duration of support with vasoactive medications. Our study demonstrated no significant association between the mode of temporary pacing and LOS or adverse effects after heart transplantation.

Anti-hypertensive treatment in the immediate post-operative period and 1 year after pediatric heart transplantation

Hypertension is a known complication of pediatric heart transplantation. We sought to identify factors associated with anti-hypertensive use in pediatric heart transplant recipients immediately post-transplant and oral anti-hypertensive use at discharge and 1-year post-transplant. Retrospective chart review was conducted of patients ≤18 years who underwent heart transplantation at two major heart transplant centers between August 1, 2009 and December 31, 2017 with ≥1-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included re-transplant, multi-organ recipients, survival <1 year, and comorbidities associated with hypertension. Anti-hypertensive use was recorded during initial ICU stay, at discharge, and 1-year post-transplant. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined associations of demographic and diagnostic factors and need for anti-hypertensives. There were 188 patients that met inclusion criteria. Anti-hypertensive infusions were required in the ICU post-transplant in 46 patients (24.5%) for a median of 3 days (1-21 days). Oral anti-hypertensives were required in 58 patients (30.9%) at discharge and 1-year post-transplant. Anti-hypertensive infusion in the ICU post-transplant was associated with donor-to-recipient weight ratio. Oral anti-hypertensive use at discharge was associated with weight ratio and pretransplant VAD use, and at 1-year, post-transplant was associated with age at transplant, steroid use at discharge, and oral anti-hypertensive use at discharge. Hypertension is common immediately following and 1-year post-transplant. Weight ratio was the only independent predictor of anti-hypertensive use in the early post-transplant period, whereas VAD use was also associated with anti-hypertensive use at discharge. Anti-hypertensive use 1-year post-transplant was not associated with those factors, but rather with age at transplant and steroid use.

Acute and chronic kidney disease after pediatric liver transplantation: An underestimated problem

Acute and chronic kidney injuries represent critical issues after liver transplantation (LTx), but whereas renal dysfunction in adult transplant patients is well documented, little is known about its prevalence in childhood. It is a challenge to accurately evaluate renal function in patients with liver disease, due to several confounding factors. Creatinine-based equations estimating glomerular filtration rate, validated in nephropathic patients without hepatic issues, are frequently inaccurate in end-stage liver disease, underestimating the real impact of renal disease. Moreover, whereas renal issues observed within 1 year from LTx were often related to acute injuries, kidney damage observed after 5-7 years from LTx, is due to chronic, irreversible mechanisms. Most immunosuppression protocols are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and corticosteroids, but mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus could play significant roles, also in children. Early diagnosis and personalized treatment represent the bases of kidney disease management, in order to minimize its close relation with increased mortality. This review analyzed acute and chronic kidney damage after pediatric LTx, also discussing the impact of pre-existent renal disease. The main immunosuppressant strategies have been reviewed, highlighting their impact on kidney function. Different methods assessing renal function were reported, with the potential application of new renal biomarkers.

Pediatric heart transplantation in the current era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an international perspective and current review of pediatric heart transplantation (PHTx).

RECENT FINDINGS

Waitlist survival and long-term outcomes in PHTx continue to improve. Strategies to maximize donor pool utilization include ABO incompatible listing for infants and expanded donor-to-recipient weight ranges. However, there is a high degree of practice variation internationally, from listing strategies and donor acceptance practices to chronic immunosuppression regimens, long-term graft surveillance, and consideration for retransplantation.

SUMMARY

Common indications for PHTx include end-stage congenital heart disease and cardiomyopathy. Current median graft survival among PHTx recipients ranges from 13 to 22 years. Common morbidities include infection, rejection, renal dysfunction, coronary allograft vasculopathy, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease. International registry data, collaborative initiatives to standardize management, and multicenter studies continue to improve knowledge and advancement of the field.

Perioperative Management of the Cardiac Transplant Recipient

Management of the cardiac transplant recipient includes careful titration of inotropes and vasopressors. Recipient pulmonary hypertension and ventilatory status must be optimized to prevent allograft right ventricular failure. Vasoplegia, coagulopathy, arrhythmias, and renal dysfunction also require careful management to achieve an optimal outcome. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) can be an ominous problem after cardiac transplantation. Although mild degrees of PGD may be managed medically, mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or temporary ventricular assist devices may be required. Retransplantation may be necessary in some cases.

Patterns of kidney injury in pediatric nonkidney solid organ transplant recipients

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and its impact on chronic kidney disease (CKD) following pediatric nonkidney solid organ transplantation is unknown. We aimed to determine the incidence of AKI and CKD and examine their relationship among children who received a heart, lung, liver, or multiorgan transplant at the Hospital for Sick Children between 2002 and 2011. AKI was assessed in the first year posttransplant. Among 303 children, perioperative AKI (within the first week) occurred in 67% of children, and AKI after the first week occurred in 36%, with the highest incidence among lung and multiorgan recipients. Twenty-three children (8%) developed CKD after a median follow-up of 3.4 years. Less than 5 children developed end-stage renal disease, all within 65 days posttransplant. Those with 1 AKI episode by 3 months posttransplant had significantly greater risk for developing CKD after adjusting for age, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at transplant (hazard ratio: 2.77, 95% confidence interval, 1.13-6.80, P trend = .008). AKI is common in the first year posttransplant and associated with significantly greater risk of developing CKD. Close monitoring for kidney disease may allow for earlier implementation of kidney-sparing strategies to decrease risk for progression to CKD.

Peri-operative kidney injury and long-term chronic kidney disease following orthotopic heart transplantation in children

Significant advances in cardiac intensive care including extracorporeal life support have enabled children with complex congenital heart disease and end-stage heart failure to be supported while awaiting transplantation. With an increasing number of survivors after heart transplantation in children, the complications from long-term immunosuppression, including renal insufficiency, are becoming more apparent. Severe renal dysfunction after heart transplant is defined by a serum creatinine level >2.5 mg/dL (221 μmol/L), and/or need for dialysis or renal transplant. The degree of renal dysfunction is variable and is progressive over time. About 3-10 % of heart transplant recipients will go on to develop severe renal dysfunction within the first 10 years post-transplantation. Multiple risk factors for chronic kidney disease post-transplant have been identified, which include pre-transplant worsening renal function, recipient demographics and morbidity, peri-transplant haemodynamics and long-term exposure to calcineurin inhibitors. Renal insufficiency increases the risk of post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Hence, screening for renal dysfunction pre-, peri- and post-transplantation is important. Early and timely detection of renal insufficiency may help minimize renal insults, and allow prompt implementation of renoprotective strategies. Close monitoring and pre-emptive management of renal dysfunction is an integral aspect of peri-transplant and subsequent post-transplant long-term care.