Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging

Validation and Feasibility of Ultrafast Cervical Spine MRI Using a Deep Learning-Assisted 3D Iterative Image Enhancement System

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of ultrafast (2 min) cervical spine MRI protocol using a deep learning-assisted 3D iterative image enhancement (DL-3DIIE) system, compared to a conventional MRI protocol (6 min 14s).

Patients and Methods

Fifty-one patients were recruited and underwent cervical spine MRI using conventional and ultrafast protocols. A DL-3DIIE system was applied to the ultrafast protocol to compensate for the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of images. Two radiologists independently assessed and graded the quality of images from the dimensions of artifacts, boundary sharpness, visibility of lesions and overall image quality. We recorded the presence or absence of different pathologies. Moreover, we examined the interchangeability of the two protocols by computing the 95% confidence interval of the individual equivalence index, and also evaluated the inter-protocol intra-observer agreement using Cohen's weighted kappa.

Results

Ultrafast-DL-3DIIE images were significantly better than conventional ones for artifacts and equivalent for other qualitative features. The number of cases with different kinds of pathologies was indistinguishable based on the MR images from ultrafast-DL-3DIIE and conventional protocols. With the exception of disc degeneration, the 95% confidence interval for the individual equivalence index across all variables did not surpass 5%, suggesting that the two protocols are interchangeable. The kappa values of these evaluations by the two radiologists ranged from 0.65 to 0.88, indicating good-to-excellent agreement.

Conclusion

The DL-3DIIE system enables 67% spine MRI scan time reduction while obtaining at least equivalent image quality and diagnostic results compared to the conventional protocol, suggesting its potential for clinical utility.

Application research of AI-assisted compressed sensing technology in MRI scanning of the knee joint: 3D-MRI perspective

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential applicability of AI-assisted compressed sensing (ACS) in knee MRI to enhance and optimize the scanning process.

METHODS

Volunteers and patients with sports-related injuries underwent prospective MRI scans with a range of acceleration techniques. The volunteers were subjected to varied ACS acceleration levels to ascertain the most effective level. Patients underwent scans at the determined optimal 3D-ACS acceleration level, and 3D compressed sensing (CS) and 2D parallel acquisition technology (PAT) scans were performed. The resultant 3D-ACS images underwent 3.5 mm/2.0 mm multiplanar reconstruction (MPR). Experienced radiologists evaluated and compared the quality of images obtained by 3D-ACS-MRI and 3D-CS-MRI, 3.5 mm/2.0 mm MPR and 2D-PAT-MRI, diagnosed diseases, and compared the results with the arthroscopic findings. The diagnostic agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa correlation coefficient, and both absolute and relative evaluation methods were utilized for objective assessment.

RESULTS

The study involved 15 volunteers and 53 patients. An acceleration factor of 10.69 × was identified as optimal. The quality evaluation showed that 3D-ACS provided poorer bone structure visualization, and improved cartilage visualization and less satisfactory axial images with 3.5 mm/2.0 mm MPR than 2D-PAT. In terms of objective evaluation, the relative evaluation yielded satisfactory results across different groups, while the absolute evaluation revealed significant variances in most features. Nevertheless, high levels of diagnostic agreement (κ: 0.81-0.94) and accuracy (0.83-0.98) were observed across all diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

ACS technology presents significant potential as a replacement for traditional CS in 3D-MRI knee scans, allowing thinner MPRs and markedly faster scans without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

3D-ACS-MRI of the knee can be completed in the 160 s with good diagnostic consistency and image quality. 3D-MRI-MPR can replace 2D-MRI and reconstruct images with thinner slices, which helps to optimize the current MRI examination process and shorten scanning time.

KEY POINTS

• AI-assisted compressed sensing technology can reduce knee MRI scan time by over 50%. • 3D AI-assisted compressed sensing MRI and related multiplanar reconstruction can replace traditional accelerated MRI and yield thinner 2D multiplanar reconstructions. • Successful application of 3D AI-assisted compressed sensing MRI can help optimize the current knee MRI process.

Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) and Routine Two-Dimensional Sequences on Lumbar Spine Imaging

Purpose

To evaluate and compare the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) sequences for lumbar disease, as an acceleration method for MRI combining parallel imaging, half-Fourier, compressed sensing and neural network and routine 2D sequences for lumbar spine.

Methods

We collected data from 82 healthy subjects and 213 patients who used 2D ACS accelerated sequences to examine the lumbar spine while 95 healthy subjects and 234 patients used routine 2D sequences. Acquisitions included axial T2WI, sagittal T2WI, T1WI, and T2-fs sequences. All obtained images of these subjects were analyzed in the light of calculating image quality factors such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for selected regions of interest. The lumbar image quality, artifacts and visibility of lesion structure were assessed by two radiologists independently. Differences between the evaluation values above were tested for statistical significance by the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Inter-observer agreements of image quality between two radiologists were measured using Cohen's kappa correlation coefficient.

Results

The ACS accelerated sequences not only reduced the scanning time by 18.9%, but also retained basically the same image quality as the routine 2D sequences in both healthy subjects and patients. Artifacts are less produced on ACS accelerated sequences compared with routine 2D sequences (p < 0.05). Apart from this, there were no significant differences in quantitative SNR, CNR measurements and qualitative scores within reviewing radiologists for each group (p > 0.05). Moreover, inter-observer agreement between two radiologists in scoring image quality was substantial consistently for ACS accelerated sequences and routine sequences (kappa = 0.622-0.986).

Conclusion

Compared with routine 2D sequences, ACS accelerated sequences allow for faster lumbar spine imaging with similar imaging quality and present reliable diagnostic accuracy, which can potentially improve workflow and patient comfort in musculoskeletal examinations.

Ultrafast cervcial spine MRI protocol using deep learning-based reconstruction: Diagnostic equivalence to a conventional protocol

PURPOSE

A major drawback of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is its limited imaging speed. This study proposed an ultrafast cervical spine MRI protocol (2 min 57 s) using deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) and compared the diagnostic results to those of conventional MRI protocols (12 min 54 s).

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent cervical spine MRI using both conventional and ultrafast protocols, including sagittal T1-weighted, T2-weighted, short-TI inversion recovery, and axial T2*-weighted imaging were included in this study. The ultrafast protocol shortened the acquisition time to approximately-one-fourth of that of the conventional protocol by reducing the phase matrix, oversampling rate, and number of excitations, and by applying compressed sensing. To compensate for the decreased signal-to-noise ratio caused by acceleration, noise reduction using DLR was performed. For image interpretation, three neuroradiologists graded or classified degenerative changes, including central canal stenosis, foraminal stenosis, endplate degeneration, disc degeneration, and disc hernia. The presence of other pathologies was also recorded. Given the absence of a reference standard, we tested the interchangeability of the two protocols by calculating the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the individual equivalence index. We also assessed the inter-protocol intra-reader agreement using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Except for endplate degeneration, the 95 % CI of the individual equivalence index for all variables did not exceed 5 %, indicating interchangeability between the two protocols. The kappa values ranged from 0.600 to 0.977, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed ultrafast MRI protocol yielded almost equivalent diagnostic results compared as the conventional protocol.