The Role of Ghrelin Signals in Breast Cancer- A Systematic Review

Multiple roles of ghrelin in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most threatening malignant tumors in women worldwide; hence, investigators are continually performing novel research in this field. However, an accurate prediction of its prognosis and postoperative recovery remains difficult. The severity of breast cancer is patient-specific and affected by several health factors; thus, unknown mechanisms may affect its progression. This article analyzes existing literature on breast cancer, ranging from the discovery of ghrelin to its present use, and aims to provide a reference for future research into breast cancer mechanisms and treatment-plan improvement. Various parts of ghrelin have been associated with breast cancer by direct or indirect evidence. The ghrelin system may encompass the direction of expanding breast cancer treatment methods and prognostic indicators. Therefore, we compiled almost all studies on the relationship between the ghrelin system and breast cancer, including unacylated ghrelin, its GHRL gene, ghrelin O-acyltransferase, the receptor growth hormone secretagogue receptor, and several splice variants of ghrelin to lay the foundation for future research.

Attribution of Ghrelin to Cancer; Attempts to Unravel an Apparent Controversy

Ghrelin is an endogenous peptide hormone mainly produced in the stomach. It has been known to regulate energy homeostasis, stimulate secretion of growth hormone, and mediate many other physiologic effects. Various effects attributed to ghrelin contribute to many aspects of cancer development and progression. Accordingly, a large body of evidence has emerged about the association of ghrelin with several types of cancer in scales of cell-line, animal, and human studies. However, existing data are controversial. This controversy occurs in two main domains: one is the controversial results in local effects of ghrelin on different types of human cancer cell-lines; the second is the apparent disagreement in the results of in-vitro and clinical studies that investigated ghrelin association to one type of cancer. These inconsistencies have hampered the indications to consider ghrelin as a potential tumor biomarker or therapeutic agent in cancer patients. Previous studies have reviewed different parts of current literature about the ghrelin-cancer relationship. Although they have highlighted these controversial results in various ways, no specific recommendations have been given to address it. In this study, we comprehensively reviewed in-vitro, in-vivo, and clinical studies and attempted to use the following approaches to unravel the inconsistencies detected: (a) to distinguish local and systemic effects of ghrelin in interpreting its summary clinical role in each cancer; (b) scrutinizing factors that regulate local effects of ghrelin and could justify different effects of ghrelin on different cancer cell-lines. These approaches could have notable implications for future in-vitro and clinical studies.

Energy homeostasis genes and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study

PURPOSE

The leptin-signaling pathway and other genes involved in energy homeostasis (EH) have been examined in relation to breast cancer risk as well as to obesity. We test the hypothesis that genetic variation in EH genes influences survival after diagnosis with breast cancer and that body mass index (BMI) will modify that risk.

METHODS

We evaluated associations between 10 EH genes and survival among 1,186 non-Hispanic white and 1,155 Hispanic/Native American women diagnosed with breast cancer. Percent Native American (NA) ancestry was determined from 104 ancestry-informative markers. Adaptive rank truncation product (ARTP) was used to determine gene and pathway significance.

RESULTS

The overall EH pathway was marginally significant for all-cause mortality among women with low NA ancestry (P(ARTP) = 0.057). Within the pathway, ghrelin(GHRL) and leptin receptor (LEPR) were significantly associated with all-cause mortality (P(ARTP) = 0.035 and 0.007, respectively). The EH pathway was significantly associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among women with low NA ancestry (P(ARTP) = 0.038). Three genes cholecystokinin (CCK), GHRL, and LEPR were significantly associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among women with low NA ancestry (P(ARTP) = 0.046,0.015, and 0.046, respectively), while neuropeptide Y (NPY) was significantly associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among women with higher NA ancestry(P(ARTP) = 0.038). BMI did not modify these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support our hypothesis that certain EH genes influence survival after diagnosis with breast cancer; associations appear to be most important among women with low NA ancestry.