Surgical management of the forefoot in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a review article

Plantar pressure analysis of different orthoses in patients after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

There is no gold standard for a walking orthosis after first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis surgery. Evaluation of plantar pressure measures and patient perceptions for different orthoses may assist surgeons to choose a postsurgery orthotic. The purpose of this study was to measure plantar pressure under the distal first ray during walking and patient perceptions of comfort, stability, and preference with 4 different orthoses in patients with a history of first MTPJ arthrodesis.

METHODS

Crossover study in a university laboratory. Eleven patients volunteered (8 female, 3 male, age = 59.4 ± 9.1 years, 21.9 ± 17.5 months since surgery) who had a unilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis procedure more than 6 months before study participation. Four orthosis conditions were evaluated in all participants: patient's shoe, carbon fiber insert, OrthoWedge, and Post-Op Shoe. We analyzed peak plantar pressure and pressure-time integral under the whole foot and the distal first ray as well as recorded subjective rating for comfort and stability. Rank ordered for preferred orthosis.

RESULTS

OrthoWedge had significantly lower whole-foot and distal first ray peak pressure than the other conditions. The pressure-time integral for the OrthoWedge was significantly less than the Carbon Fiber Insert and Post-Op Shoe. For stability, comfort, and condition preference, the OrthoWedge was ranked lowest among the 4 conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The OrthoWedge generated the lowest peak plantar pressure but was subjectively ranked as the least preferred orthosis. This discrepancy between objective biomechanical and subjective comfort measures must be weighed as surgeons prescribe an orthosis to patients after first MTPJ arthrodesis.

Altering the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis: The role of immunotherapy and biologics in orthopaedic care

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is an idiopathic disease characterized by systemic inflammation, persistent synovitis, and the presence of autoantibodies. Because of the musculoskeletal deformity caused by RA, multiple orthopaedic procedures are regularly performed as part of the treatment. The changing rates of surgery and the rise in new efficacious medical therapy have improved the prognosis for patients with RA. This review will discuss the natural history of rheumatoid arthritis, common medications used to treat it, how disease progression has changed as a function of new biologic immunotherapy, and the role of orthopaedic intervention in this new landscape of advanced rheumatoid care.

Use of a temporary supramalleolar orthosis to manage foot pain in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by joint pain, stiffness, and functional disability. Approximately 90% of patients will report symptoms in the foot or ankle during the course of their disease.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A case of a 40-year-old woman with a 12-year history of rheumatoid arthritis referred to outpatient physical therapy with a chief complaint of pain in the lateral rearfoot and forefoot is presented. At the time of the initial examination, the patient reported persistent pain ranging from 3 to 9/10, aggravated when standing and walking during activities of daily living. Treatment consisted of the fabrication of a supramalleolar orthosis that incorporated an in-shoe foot orthosis to address functional limitations and abnormal foot and ankle posture. A home exercise program was prescribed to address potential balance deficits and strength loss following the application of the orthosis.

OUTCOMES

Clinically significant improvements were seen in pain, gait speed, and on the Foot Function Index following the implementation of the orthotic device. The patient returned to standing and walking with minimal symptom limitations.

DISCUSSION

This case report highlights the short-term clinical outcomes when using a supramalleolar orthosis in conjunction with an in-shoe foot orthosis to manage lateral rearfoot and forefoot pain in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.

First Metatarsalphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Methods of Fixation

First metatarsalphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a well established and successful treatment; however there still remains controversy over the best choice of construct. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing first metatarsalphalangeal fusion over eighteen months (n=52) using either dorsal non-locking plate with additional compression lag screw fixation or dorsal non-locking plate alone. We found when assessing clinical criteria, patients with dorsal non-locking plates and additional compression lag screw fixation had a significantly higher rate of fusion (100% vs 77.8%), significantly higher rate of fusion within the first two months (55.6% vs 83.3%), significantly earlier time to fusion (52.2 days vs 75.6 days), and significantly lower rate of non-union (0% vs 22.2%). When blindly assessing radiographic criteria, the patients treated with the plate and compression screw had a significantly higher rate of fusion and lower rate of non-union (0% vs 33%). There was no statistically significant difference between the frequencies of complications in the groups. We believe that the interfragmentary compression is a crucial factor in achieving good union rates and recommend the use of non-locking pre-contoured plating with additional interfragmentary compression screw as the fixation method of choice for these procedures.