1
|
Chetina EV, Markova GA, Sharapova EP. [there any association of metabolic disturbances with joint destruction and pain?]. BIOMEDIT︠S︡INSKAI︠A︡ KHIMII︠A︡ 2020; 65:441-456. [PMID: 31876515 DOI: 10.18097/pbmc20196506441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis and type 2 diabetes mellitus represent two the most common chronic diseases. They possess many shared epidemiologic traits, have common risk factors, and embody heterogeneous multifactorial pathologies, which develop due to interaction of genetic an environmental factors. In addition, these diseases are often occurring in the same patient. In spite of the differences in clinical manifestation both diseases have similar disturbances of cellular metabolism, primarily associated with ATP production and utilization. The review discusses molecular mechanisms determining pathophysiological processes associated with glucose and lipid metabolism as well as the means aiming to alleviate the disturbances of energy metabolism as a new a therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E V Chetina
- Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia
| | - G A Markova
- Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia
| | - E P Sharapova
- Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Migliore A, Gigliucci G, Alekseeva L, Avasthi S, Bannuru RR, Chevalier X, Conrozier T, Crimaldi S, Damjanov N, de Campos GC, Diracoglu D, Herrero-Beaumont G, Iolascon G, Ionescu R, Isailovic N, Jerosch J, Lains J, Maheu E, Makri S, Martusevich N, Matucci Cerinc M, Micu M, Pavelka K, Petrella RJ, Tarantino U, Raman R. Treat-to-target strategy for knee osteoarthritis. International technical expert panel consensus and good clinical practice statements. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2019; 11:1759720X19893800. [PMID: 31903099 PMCID: PMC6923692 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x19893800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In this work, we aimed to establish a clinical target in the management of
knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and to propose good clinical practice (GCP)
statements for carrying out a treat-to-target strategy. Methods: A steering committee of seven experts had formulated a provisional set of
recommendations that were exposed for discussion and modification to a
technical expert panel (TEP) of 25 multidisciplinary experts from Europe,
North America, South America and Asia. The level of evidence and strength of
each recommendation was discussed. The TEP formulated overarching principles
and GCP statements based on the level of agreement for each item with a vote
using a 10-point numerical scale. Results: Two overarching principles and 10 GCP statements were formulated by the TEP.
These GCP statements suggest: treatment should achieve clinical improvement
bringing the patient to the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS);
pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment should begin as early as
possible, with an early diagnosis of symptomatic KOA; the patient should be
evaluated every 3–6 months; risk factors of KOA progression should be
identified and managed with patients at the beginning of the treatment and
monitored regularly; treatment should be adapted according to patient
phenotype and disease severity; healthy lifestyle must be promoted and
monitored. The level of agreement average ranged from 8.7 to 9.6 on
scale. Conclusions: The proposed overarching principles and GCP statements have the aim of
involving patients, general practitioners and multidisciplinary specialists
in sharing a therapeutic treat-to-target strategy for KOA management based
on the best evidence and expert opinions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Migliore
- Rheumatology Unit, San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Liudmila Alekseeva
- Department of Metabolic Diseases of Bone and Joints, VA Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Sachin Avasthi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Lucknow, India
| | - Raveendhara R Bannuru
- Centre for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Sergio Crimaldi
- Chirurgia Ortopedica Mininvasiva e Nuove Tecnologie, Humanitas Research Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Nemanja Damjanov
- Institute of Rheumatology, University of Belgrade Medical School, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Demirhan Diracoglu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Division of Pain Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania 'L Vanvitelli', Caserta, Italy
| | - Ruxandra Ionescu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Sf. Maria Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Carol Davila', Bucharest, Romania
| | - Natasa Isailovic
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Via A. Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan 20089, Italy
| | - Jörg Jerosch
- Orthopaedic Department, Johanna Etienne Hospital, Neuss, Germany
| | - Jorge Lains
- Physical Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Rovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre, Tocha, Portugal
| | - Emmanuel Maheu
- Rheumatology Department, AP-HP, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Souzi Makri
- EUPATI Graduate and Patient Advocate, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Natalia Martusevich
- Department of Rheumatology, Belorussian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Marco Matucci Cerinc
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mihaela Micu
- Second Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Robert J Petrella
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Kinesiology University Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada
| | - Umberto Tarantino
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 'Policlinico Tor Vergata' Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Raghu Raman
- Academic Department of Orthopaedics, Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cook CE, Décary S. Higher order thinking about differential diagnosis. Braz J Phys Ther 2019; 24:1-7. [PMID: 30723033 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis is a systematic process used to identify the proper diagnosis from a set of possible competing diagnoses. METHODS The goal of this masterclass is to discuss the higher order thinking components of differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS For healthcare providers, diagnosis is one of many necessary components during the clinical decision making process and it is hallmarked by differentiation of competing structures for a definitive understanding of the underlying condition. The diagnostic process involves identifying or determining the etiology of a disease or condition through evaluation of patient history, physical examination, and review of laboratory data or diagnostic imaging; and the subsequent descriptive title of that finding. Whereas differential diagnosis is a varied skill set among all healthcare providers, the concept of a diagnosis is equally germane, regardless of one's background. In theory, a diagnosis improves the use of classification tools, improves clarity and communication, provides a trajectory of treatment, improves understanding of a person's prognosis, and in some cases, may be useful for preventative treatments. To achieve these improvements, one must have an understanding of relation of the clinical utility of tests and measures with diagnosis, and how to best implement these findings in clinical practice. This requires a deeper understanding (higher order thinking) of the role of diagnosis in the management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad E Cook
- Division of Physical Therapy, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
| | - Simon Décary
- Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Faculty of Medicine, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu J, Wang F. Preoperative celecoxib analgesia is more efficient and equally tolerated compared to postoperative celecoxib analgesia in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A randomized, controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e13663. [PMID: 30572485 PMCID: PMC6320042 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000013663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative celecoxib administration in alleviating postoperative pain in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).A total of 226 knee OA patients underwent TKA were consecutively recruited and randomized into preoperative analgesia group and postoperative analgesia group as 1:1 ratio. Preoperative analgesia group received celecoxib before and post operation; postoperative analgesia group received celecoxib post operation, all patients received TKA and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) post operation. Pain visual analog scale (VAS), patient's global assessment (PGA), flexional angles, PCA consumption, percentage of patients receiving pethidine, pethidine consumption, and adverse events were assessed.Pain VAS scores at rest and at flexion were both lower in preoperative analgesia group compared to postoperative analgesia group at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours post operation. Preoperative analgesia group also exhibited decreased PGA score compared to postoperative analgesia group at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours post operation. Meanwhile, active flexional angle and passive flexional angle in preoperative analgesia group were larger than that in postoperative analgesia group at 72 hours post operation. More interestingly, preoperative analgesia group patients consumed less PCA compared to postoperative analgesia group patients at 72 hours post operation. No difference of adverse event incidences between 2 groups was observed.Preoperative administration of celecoxib exhibits better efficacy and equal safety profiles compared to postoperative administration of celecoxib in knee OA patients undergoing TKA.
Collapse
|