Pain-Prescription Differences - An Analysis of 500,000 Discharge Summaries

Influence of a chronic beta-blocker therapy on perioperative opioid consumption - a post hoc secondary analysis

BACKGROUND

Beta-blocker (BB) therapy plays a central role in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. An increasing number of patients with cardiovascular diseases undergoe noncardiac surgery, where opioids are an integral part of the anesthesiological management. There is evidence to suggest that short-term intravenous BB therapy may influence perioperative opioid requirements due to an assumed cross-talk between G-protein coupled beta-adrenergic and opioid receptors. Whether chronic BB therapy could also have an influence on perioperative opioid requirements is unclear.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational (BioCog) study was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective noncardiac surgery as well as total intravenous general anesthesia without the use of regional anesthesia and duration of anesthesia ≥ 60 min. Two groups were defined: patients with and without BB in their regular preopreative medication. The administered opioids were converted to their respective morphine equivalent doses. Multiple regression analysis was performed using the morphine-index to identify independent predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 747 patients were included in the BioCog study in the study center Berlin. 106 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37 were on chronic BB. The latter were preoperatively significantly more likely to have arterial hypertension (94.6%), chronic renal failure (27%) and hyperlipoproteinemia (51.4%) compared to patients without BB. Both groups did not differ in terms of cumulative perioperative morphine equivalent dose (230.9 (BB group) vs. 214.8 mg (Non-BB group)). Predictive factors for increased morphine-index were older age, male sex, longer duration of anesthesia and surgery of the trunk. In a model with logarithmised morphine index, only gender (female) and duration of anesthesia remained predictive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic BB therapy was not associated with a reduced perioperative opioid consumption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02265263 ) on the 15.10.2014 with the principal investigator being Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Claudia Spies.

Metamizole-Associated Risks in Decompensated Hepatic Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Because of the increased risk of acute renal failure (ARF), the use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors is not recommended in patients with decompensated hepatic cirrhosis. Metamizole is not a classic COX inhibitor, but there are insufficient data to support its safe use. In this study, we investigate the effect of metamizole on the risk of ARF in these patients.

METHODS

Metamizole use, ARF incidence, and patient mortality were examined in a large, retrospective, exploratory cohort and validated with data from a prospective registry.

RESULTS

523 patients were evaluated in the exploratory cohort. Metamizole use at baseline was documented in 110 cases (21%) and was independently associated with the development of ARF, severe (grade 3) ARF, and lower survival without liver transplantation at follow-up on day 28 (HR: 2.2, p < 0.001; HR: 2.8, p < 0.001; and HR: 2.6, p < 0.001, respectively). Interestingly, the risk of ARF depended on the dose of metamizole administered (HR: 1.038, p < 0.001). Compared to patients who were treated with opioids, the rate of ARF was higher in the metamizole group (49% vs. 79%, p = 0.014). An increased risk of ARF with metamizole use was also demonstrated in the independent validation cohort (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Metamizole therapy, especially at high doses, should only be used with a high level of caution in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Drug dosing using estimated glomerular filtration rate: Misclassification due to metamizole interference in a creatinine assay

BACKGROUND

The estimated glomerular filtration rate is a rather important measurement for patients under intensive care, since they often receive several drugs, and impaired renal function may result in misleading dosing. The estimated glomerular filtration is derived from mathematical models using serum creatinine, a measurement that suffers interference of some drugs, such as metamizole. This study intended to evaluate the impact on patient stratification for dose adjustment of two antimicrobials (meropenem and vancomycin) caused by metamizole interference in creatinine measurement by dry chemistry.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with a group of 108 hospitalized patients under metamizole prescriptions at fixed intervals. Serum creatinine concentrations were determined by enzymatic dry chemistry and Jaffé assays, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated through the CKD-EPI equation. Patients were stratified in groups according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate for drug dosing of vancomycin and meropenem.

RESULTS

Creatinine values were significantly lower in measurements performed by the dry chemistry method in comparison to Jaffé assay (P < 0.0001) when patients are under metamizole treatment. A significant bias (-40.3%) was observed between those two methods, leading to a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in patient classification according to renal function using the CKD-EPI equation for dosing adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

During the validity of metamizole treatment, the stratification for drug dosing by the estimated glomerular filtration rate is not reliable if the creatinine measurement is done through dry chemistry. Clinical and laboratory staff must be aware of these limitations and cooperate to optimize pharmacotherapy.

Pain severity and analgesics use in the community-dwelling older population: a drug utilization study from Germany

Purpose

Chronic pain is common in the older population and a significant public health concern. However, comprehensive studies on analgesics use in this age group from Germany are scarce. This study aims to give a comprehensive overview on the use of the most common therapeutic groups of analgesics in community-dwelling older adults from Germany.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out using data from a German cohort of 2038 community-dwelling adults aged 63–89 years. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were applied to assess the utilization of analgesics by age, sex, pain severity, pain duration, and locations.

Results

One out of four study participants was suffering from high-intensity or disabling pain. Approximately half of those taking analgesics still reported to suffer from high-intensity or disabling pain. Among analgesics users, occasional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use was the most frequent pain therapy (in 43.6% of users), followed by metamizole (dipyrone) use (16.1%), regular NSAIDs use (12.9%), strong opioids use (12.7%), and weak opioids use (12.0%). In multivariate logistic regression models, higher age, higher pain severity, longer pain duration, abdominal pain, and back pain were statistically significantly associated with opioids use. Metamizole use was also statistically significantly associated with higher pain severity but inversely associated with pain duration.

Conclusions

A significant number of older German adults are affected by high-intensity and disabling chronic pain despite receiving analgesics. Long-term studies are needed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for chronic pain in older adults.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-02954-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Improving the quality of discharge summaries through a direct feedback system

INTRODUCTION

There is a recognised need to improve the quality of discharge documentation to facilitate the safe and effective ongoing care of patients once they leave hospital. Previous studies have focused on individual interventions, such as teaching or feedback. Our continuous quality improvement project aims to improve the quality of discharge documentation at our hospital by providing a comprehensive overhaul of the education and feedback around discharge documentation.

METHODS

We designed a comprehensive data analysis tool to analyse the performance of our discharge summaries. We presented at clinical governance sessions and arranged numerous teaching sessions for junior doctors. We developed a live-feedback system based on the content of a sample set of the previous month's summaries, which included poster-based feedback and group teaching.

RESULTS

Our interventions have significantly improved the quality of our discharge documentation across a broad range of categories, including the summary of the stay, actions for general practitioners and information given to patients in lay terminology.

CONCLUSION

Our comprehensive quality improvement project has improved the quality of our discharge documentation. Further work aims to expand this project into a regional setting, as well as designing a strategy to maintain engagement of key stakeholders to ensure continued progress.