[Epidemiological survey of vegetative state patients in the Tohoku District, Japan--special reference to the follow-up study after one year (author's transl)]

The vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: a systematic review of prevalence studies

One of the worst outcomes of acquired brain injury is the vegetative state, recently renamed 'unresponsive wakefulness syndrome' (VS/UWS). A patient in VS/UWS shows reflexive behaviour such as spontaneous eye opening and breathing, but no signs of awareness of the self or the environment. We performed a systematic review of VS/UWS prevalence studies and assessed their reliability. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched in April 2013 for cross-sectional point or period prevalence studies explicitly stating the prevalence of VS/UWS due to acute causes within the general population. We additionally checked bibliographies and consulted experts in the field to obtain 'grey data' like government reports. Relevant publications underwent quality assessment and data-extraction. We retrieved 1032 papers out of which 14 met the inclusion criteria. Prevalence figures varied from 0.2 to 6.1 VS/UWS patients per 100 000 members of the population. However, the publications' methodological quality differed substantially, in particular with regards to inclusion criteria and diagnosis verification. The reliability of VS/UWS prevalence figures is poor. Methodological flaws in available prevalence studies, the fact that 5/14 of the studies predate the identification of the minimally conscious state (MCS) as a distinct entity in 2002, and insufficient verification of included cases may lead to both overestimation and underestimation of the actual number of patients in VS/UWS.

Brain-injured persons in an altered state of consciousness: measures and intervention strategies

We evaluated the states of consciousness of seven persons who had sustained a severe head injury, and describe the behavioural manifestations associated with four treatment strategies. The subjects were between the ages of 19 and 55 and were recruited from both acute and long-term care facilities; all were in an altered state of consciousness. The severity of the injury was measured by time in coma, the scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale [1] and the Coma Near Coma Scale [2]. Structured interventions consisted of visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory and tactile stimulation; behaviour was measured using the Disability Rating Scale [3, 4] and a portion of the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale [5]. Sensory-motor indications were recorded using a questionnaire developed by Freeman [6] and a quality-of-life instrument, developed for use with individuals having multiple disabilities [7], was adapted for the purpose of this study. Our results suggest that the use of structured interventions in the first 24 months following severe head injury is associated with a trend towards improved auditory and visual skills performance, manual performance, swallowing and language. Whereas initially no subject had any form of verbalization, by the final evaluation five subjects had some form of communication, either verbal or non-verbal.