Oncological, cognitive, and employment outcomes in a series of patients with IDH-mutated glioma resected following neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Maximal safe tumor resection is the first line of treatment for IDH-mutated gliomas. However, when upfront surgical resection is deemed unsatisfactory due to tumor size and location, chemotherapy could represent an interesting alternative for reducing glioma extension and allowing for a safer and more efficient removal.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study (June 2011 to December 2021) on patients with IDH-mutated gliomas undergoing chemotherapy with a neoadjuvant intent, followed by surgical excision in awake conditions. MRI-imaging follow-up was conducted every 3-6 months. Neuropsychological assessments (NPSA) were performed for all patients before surgery, during post-operative period, and at later follow-up, and patients were periodically interviewed about their clinical and job status.

RESULTS

We included 6 patients who underwent awake surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (temozolomide in 5 cases, PCV in 1 case) for an IDH-mutated glioma (3 oligodendrogliomas and 3 astrocytomas). Median tumor volume reduction was 47%, allowing for complete resection in one patient, subtotal resection in 4 patients, and partial resection in 1 patient. No major adverse effects were observed under chemotherapy. At the 4 months NPSA, a worsening of flexibility was observed in 2 patients (verbal fluencies in one case and trail making test in the other). Three out of the four patients working full time before procedure resumed their job full time, after a 7 to 10 months delay.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by maximal safe resection can be offered to patients affected by IDH-mutated gliomas for whom upfront surgery would be inadequate. More studies are necessary given the limited size of our sample.

Frontal lobe low-grade tumors seizure outcome: a pooled analysis of clinical predictors

OBJECTIVE

Seizures present in 50-90 % of cases with low-grade brain tumors. Frontal lobe epilepsy is associated with dismal seizure outcomes compared to temporal lobe epilepsy. Our objective is to conduct a systematic review, report our case series, and perform a pooled analysis of clinical predictors of seizure outcomes in frontal lobe low-grade brain tumors.

METHODS

Searches of five electronic databases from January 1990 to June 2022 were reviewed following PRISMA guidelines. Individual patient data was extracted from 22 articles that fit the inclusion criteria. A single-surgeon case series from our institution was also retrospectively reviewed and analyzed through a pooled cohort of 127 surgically treated patients with frontal lobe low-grade brain tumors.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 30.8 years, with 50.4 % of patients diagnosed as oligodendrogliomas. The majority of patients (81.1 %) were seizure-free after surgery (Engel I). On the multivariate analysis, gross total resection (GTR) (OR = 8.77, 95 % CI: 1.99-47.91, p = 0.006) and awake resection (OR = 9.94, 95 % CI: 1.93-87.81, p = 0.015) were associated with seizure-free outcome. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the probability of seizure freedom fell to 92.6 % at 3 months, and to 85.5 % at 27.3 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy from tumor origin demands a balance between oncological management and epilepsy cure. Our pooled analysis suggests that GTR and awake resections are positive predictive factors for an Engel I at more than 6 months follow-up. To validate these findings, a longer-term follow-up and larger cohorts are needed.

Repeated Awake Surgical Resection(s) for Recurrent Diffuse Low-Grade Gliomas: Why, When, and How to Reoperate?

Early maximal surgical resection is the first treatment in diffuse low-grade glioma (DLGG), because the reduction of tumor volume delays malignant transformation and extends survival. Awake surgery with intraoperative mapping and behavioral monitoring enables to preserve quality of life (QoL). However, because of the infiltrative nature of DLGG, relapse is unavoidable, even after (supra)total resection. Therefore, besides chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the question of reoperation(s) is increasingly raised, especially because patients with DLGG usually enjoy a normal life with long-lasting projects. Here, the purpose is to review the literature in the emerging field of iterative surgeries in DLGG. First, long-term follow-up results showed that patients with DLGG who underwent multiple surgeries had an increased survival (above 17 years) with preservation of QoL. Second, the criteria guiding the decision to reoperate and defining the optimal timing are discussed, mainly based on the dynamic intercommunication between the glioma relapse (including its kinetics and pattern of regrowth) and the reactional cerebral reorganization—i.e., mechanisms underpinning reconfiguration within and across neural networks to enable functional compensation. Third, how to adapt medico-surgical strategy to this individual spatiotemporal brain tumor interplay is detailed, by considering the perpetual changes in connectome. These data support early reoperation in recurrent DLGG, before the onset of symptoms and before malignant transformation. Repeat awake resection(s) should be integrated in a global management including (neo)adjuvant medical treatments, to enhance long-lasting functional and oncological outcomes. The prediction of potential and limitation of neuroplasticity at each step of the disease must be improved to anticipate personalized multistage therapeutic attitudes.

Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome after Brain Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Supplementary motor area syndrome (SMAS) may occur after frontal tumor surgery, with variable presentation and outcomes. We reviewed the literature on postoperative SMAS following brain tumor resection.

METHODS

PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies reporting SMAS after brain tumor resection.

RESULTS

We included 31 studies encompassing 236 patients. Most tumors were gliomas (94.5%), frequently of low-grade (61.4%). Most lesions were located on the left hemisphere (64.4%), involving the supplementary motor area (61.4%) and the cingulate gyrus (20.8%). Tractography and functional MRI evaluation were completed in 45 (19.1%) and 26 (11%) patients. Gross total resection was achieved in 46.3% cases and complete SMA resection in 69.4%. 215 procedures (91.1%) utilized intraoperative neuromonitoring mostly consisting of direct cortical/subcortical stimulation (56.4%), motor (33.9%), and somatosensory (25.4%) evoked potentials. Postoperative SMAS symptoms occurred within 24 hours after surgery, characterized by motor deficits (97%) including paresis (68.6%) and hemiplegia (16.1%), and speech disorders (53%) including hesitancy (24.2%) and mutism (22%). Average SMAS duration was 45 days (range, 1-365), with total resolution occurring in 188 patients (79.7%) and partial improvement in 46 (19.5%). 48 patients (20.3%) had persisting symptoms, mostly speech hesitancy (60.4%) and fine motor disorders (45.8%).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative SMAS may occur within the first 24 hours after mesial frontal tumor surgery. Preoperative mapping and intraoperative neuromonitoring may assist resection and predict outcomes. Neuroplasticity and interhemispheric connectivity play a major role in resolution.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy to Improve the Extent of Resection in "Unresectable" Gliomas

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection plays a pivotal role in the management of glial tumors and a greater extent of resection (EOR) should be the goal in most surgeries to improve overall survival. Many factors may limit the EOR. A potential role for preoperative chemotherapy to decrease the volume and/or infiltration of gliomas, thereby facilitating a safe radical resection, has been recently suggested. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of neoadjuvant therapy in the field of glioma surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify articles of low- and high-grade gliomas that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery to improve the EOR from 2000 to 2020. Full-text articles that addressed this subject were included for evaluation.

RESULTS

Case reports and clinical trials have been published for the use of chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy to improve surgical resection in low-grade gliomas. More scarce information exists regarding this strategy for high-grade glioma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has played a role in overcoming obstacles that limit the EOR in patients with complex gliomas, especially low-grade gliomas.

Repeat surgery for recurrent low-grade gliomas should be standard of care

The importance of surgery and maximal extent of resection (EOR) is well established in primary low-grade glioma (LGG) management. However, the role of surgery in the management of recurrent LGG is less clear. A recent review on the management of recurrent LGG concluded there was insufficient evidence to recommend surgery. Here, we summarize the recent advances regarding the role of surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy in the management of recurrent LGG. There is increasing evidence to support maximal EOR for treating recurrent LGG, as it may improve progression free survival (PFS) after recurrence and overall survival (OS). Based on the studies presented in this review, we suggest that repeat surgery with maximal EOR should be standard of care for recurrent LGG treatment.

Neurocognitive functioning in adult WHO grade II gliomas: impact of old and new treatment modalities

In the treatment of patients with low-grade glioma, there still is controversy on how surgical intervention, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy contribute to an ameliorated progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related neurotoxicity. With the ongoing changes in treatment options for these patients, neurocognitive functioning is an increasingly important outcome measure, because neurocognitive impairments can have a large impact on self-care, social and professional functioning, and consequently, health-related quality of life. Many factors contribute to neurocognitive outcome, such as direct and indirect tumor effects, seizures, medication, and oncological treatment. Although the role of radiotherapy has been studied extensively, the adverse effects on neurocognitive function of other treatment-related factors remain elusive. This holds for both resective surgery, in which the use of intraoperative stimulation mapping has a high potential benefit concerning survival and patient functioning, and the use of chemotherapy that might have some interesting new applications, such as the facilitation of total resection for initially primary or recurrent diffuse low-grade glioma tumors. This article will discuss these treatment options in patients with low-grade glioma and their potential effects on neurocognitive functioning.

Chemotherapy in low-grade gliomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the recent studies in adults' diffuse low-grade gliomas (LGGs) chemotherapy, including response assessment and potential predictive biomarkers of chemosensitivity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have confirmed that chemotherapy is an interesting treatment option in LGGs. About 25-50% of LGGs achieve radiological responses with temozolomide or a procarbazine-CCNU-vincristine (PCV) regimen. Clinical and quality-of-life improvements are commonly observed with more than half of the patients with epilepsy, demonstrating a significant reduction of seizure frequency. Dynamic volumetric studies have provided a better description of LGGs evolution after chemotherapy. They have shown that an ongoing volume decrease can be observed many months after chemotherapy discontinuation, particularly after PCV, raising the question of how and for how long should LGGs be treated. New response criteria have been defined by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology group. In addition to 1p/19q codeletion and MGMT promoter methylation, IDH1 mutation might also be a potential predictive biomarker of chemosensitivity.

SUMMARY

It has now been widely accepted that chemotherapy is an interesting treatment option in LGGs. However, several questions remain unanswered regarding its optimal use. Ongoing phase III studies will allow a better delineation of the role of chemotherapy in LGGs and will also help to better determine the potential predictive value of a 1p/19q codeletion, a MGMT promoter methylation and an IDH1 mutation.

Combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection as a new strategy for WHO grade II gliomas: a study of cognitive status and quality of life

Diffuse WHO grade II (GIIG) may be unresectable when involving critical structures. To assess the feasibility and functional tolerance (cognition and quality of life) of an original therapeutic strategy combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for initially inoperable GIIG. Ten patients underwent Temozolomide for unresectable GIIG, as initial treatment or at recurrence after previous partial resection, due to invasion of eloquent areas or bi-hemispheric diffusion preventing a total/subtotal removal. Functional outcome after both treatments was assessed, with evaluation of seven cognitive domains. Chemotherapy induced tumor shrinkage (median volume decrease 38.9%) in ipsilateral functional areas in six patients and in the contralateral hemisphere in four. Only four patients had a 1p19q codeletion. The tumor shrinkage made possible the resection (mean extent of resection 93.3%, 9 total or subtotal removals) of initially inoperable tumors. Postoperatively, three patients had no deficits, while verbal episodic memory and executive functions were slightly impaired in seven patients. However, global quality of life was roughly preserved on the EORTC QLQ C30 + BN 20 (median score: 66.7%). Role functioning score was relatively reduced (median score: 66.7%) whereas KPS was preserved (median score: 90, range 80-100). Seven patients became seizure-free while three improved. This combined treatment is feasible, efficient (surgery made possible by neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and well-tolerated (preservation of quality of life, no serious cognitive disturbances). Cognitive deficits seem mostly related to tumor location. Because KPS is not reliable enough, a detailed neuropsychological assessment should be systematically performed in GIIG.