Comparison of Pipeline Embolization and Coil Embolization for the Treatment of Large Unruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pipeline Embolization Device in Anterior and Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Flow diversion using the pipeline embolization device (PED) has been a paradigm shift for anterior circulation (AC) aneurysms. However, only a few studies report the long-term (≥1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes for posterior circulation (PC) aneurysms. This study aims to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of treatment of AC and PC aneurysms with PED.

METHODS

The databases included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane, and Scopus. Studies with at least 10 patients and 1-year follow-up were included. Twenty-four studies met our inclusion criteria. A random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed to estimate the pooled rates of long-term complete aneurysmal occlusion, symptomatic stroke, aneurysmal rupture, and intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

There were 1952 aneurysms, of which 1547 (79.25%) were in the AC and 405 (20.75%) in the PC. The 1-year occlusion rate was 78% in AC compared to 73% in PC aneurysms (P < 0.01). The symptomatic infarct rate was 5% in AC compared to 13% in PC (P < 0.01). While the rupture rate was 1% in AC compared to 4% in PC (P = 0.01), the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% for both (P = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term occlusion rate after PED was higher in AC aneurysms, and the cumulative incidence of stroke and aneurysm rupture was higher in PC aneurysms.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms

Background

Currently, endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (ICAs) is limited by low complete occlusion rates. The advent of novel endovascular technology has expanded the applicability of endovascular therapy; however, the superiority of novel embolic devices over the traditional Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) is still debated. We performed a systematic review of literature that reported Raymond-Roy occlusion classification (RROC) rates of modern endovascular devices to determine their immediate and follow-up occlusion effectiveness for the treatment of unruptured saccular ICAs.

Methods

A search was conducted using electronic databases (PUBMED, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science). We retrieved studies published between 2000-2022 reporting immediate and follow-up RROC rates of subjects treated with different endovascular ICA therapies. We extracted demographic information of the treated patients and their reported angiographic RROC rates.

Results

A total of 80 studies from 15 countries were included for data extraction. RROC rates determined from angiogram were obtained for 21,331 patients (72.5% females, pooled mean age: 58.2 (95% CI: 56.8-59.6), harboring 22,791 aneurysms. The most frequent aneurysm locations were the internal carotid artery (46.4%, 95% CI: 41.9%-50.9%), the anterior communicating artery (26.4%, 95% CI: 22.5%-30.8%), the middle cerebral artery (24.5%, 95% CI:19.2%-30.8%) and the basilar tip (14.4%, 95% CI:11.3%-18.3%). The complete occlusion probability (RROC-I) was analyzed for GDCs, the Woven EndoBridge (WEB), and flow diverters. The RROC-I rate was the highest in balloon-assisted coiling (73.9%, 95% CI: 65.0%-81.2%) and the lowest in the WEB (27.8%, 95% CI:13.2%-49.2%). The follow-up RROC-I probability was homogenous in all analyzed devices.

Conclusions

We observed that the coil-based endovascular therapy provides acceptable rates of complete occlusion, and these rates are improved in balloon-assisted coils. Out of the analyzed devices, the WEB exhibited the shortest time to achieve >90% probability of follow-up complete occlusion (~18 months). Overall, the GDCs remain the gold standard for endovascular treatment of unruptured saccular aneurysms.

Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of small vs. large aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms with high obliteration rates and low morbidity. However, long-term (≥ 1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes still require further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion and complication rates for small (< 10 mm) versus large (10-25 mm) aneurysms at long-term following treatment with PED. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a comprehensive search of English language databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our studies included a minimum of 10 patients treated with PED for small vs. large aneurysms and with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of clinical complications measured by the occurrence of symptomatic stroke (confirmed clinically and radiographically), intracranial hemorrhage, or aneurysmal rupture. The primary efficacy endpoint was the complete aneurysm occlusion rate. Our analysis included 19 studies with 1277 patients and 1493 aneurysms. Of those, 1378 aneurysms met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.9 years, and most aneurysms were small (89.75%; N = 1340) in women (79.1%; N = 1010). The long-term occlusion rate was 73% (95%, CI 65 to 80%) in small compared to 84% (95%, CI 76 to 90%) in large aneurysms (p < 0.01). The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was 5% (95%, CI 3 to 9%) in small compared to 7% (95%, CI 4 to 13%) in large aneurysms (p = 0.01). The rupture rate was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.92), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.96) for small vs. large aneurysms, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The long-term occlusion rate after PED treatment is higher in large vs. small aneurysms. Symptomatic thromboembolic rates with stroke are also higher in large vs. small aneurysms. The difference in the rates of aneurysm rupture and intracranial hemorrhage was insignificant. Although the PED seems a safe and effective treatment for small and large aneurysms, further studies are required to clarify how occlusion rate and morbidity are affected by aneurysm size.

Endovascular Treatment and Microsurgical Clipping for the Management of Paraclinoid Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of microsurgical clipping versus endovascular treatment (EVT) for paraclinoid aneurysms.

METHODS

A systematic search for studies including patients with paraclinoid aneurysms treated with a microsurgical or endovascular technique was conducted in 6 databases from inception to February 2022. Efficacy outcomes included complete angiographic occlusion at last follow-up, favorable functional outcome, and recurrence of the aneurysm. For safety, we assessed a composite of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies including 6711 patients, 3029 in the surgical group and 3682 in the EVT group were found. Pooled rates of complete occlusion were 94% (95% CI 91%-96%; I2 = 0%) in the surgical group and 69% (95% CI 63%-74%; I2 = 79%) in the EVT group, respectively. The favorable functional outcome rate was 86% (95% CI 76%-92%; I2 = 72%) with surgical treatment and 95% (95% CI 92%-97%; I2 = 61%) with EVT. The rate of aneurysm recurrence with surgical treatment was 1% (95% CI 0%-4%; I2 = 0%) and 12% (95% CI 9%-16%; I2 = 57%) with EVT. The composite safety outcome rate in the surgical group was 24% (95% CI 18%-30%; I2 = 90%) and 10% (95% CI 8%-13%; I2 = 71%) in the EVT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that microsurgical clipping seems to have a higher efficacy than EVT in terms of angiographic occlusion and aneurysm recurrence; however, EVT seems to be safer in terms of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Considering the heterogeneity and low-level evidence of the data available, further prospective randomized studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Efficacy of pipeline embolization device vs. traditional coils in embolization of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

In recent years, the Pipeline embolization device (PED) has been widely used in the embolization of intracranial aneurysms, but there are some inconsistent findings on whether its efficacy and safety are superior to those of traditional coils embolization (coils alone, stent-assisted coils and balloon-assisted coils). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PED in intracranial aneurysm embolization by comparing with traditional coils.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies (case-control studies and cohort studies) comparing the efficacy of PED with traditional coils in intracranial aneurysm embolization published before April 1, 2022. The endpoints observed in this meta-analysis were procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage, procedure-related intracranial ischemia, other procedure-related complications (e.g., aneurysm rupture, neurological impairment, etc.), retreatment rate, complete occlusion (100%) of the aneurysm at the last follow-up, and favorable functional outcome (MRS ≤ 2).

Results

A total of 10 studies with a total of 1,400 patients (PED group: 576 and Traditional coils: 824) were included in this meta-analysis. A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that the PED group had a higher rate of complete aneurysm occlusion [OR = 2.62, 95% Cl (1.94, 3.55), p &lt; 0.00001] and Lower re-treatment rate [OR = 0.20, 95% Cl (0.12, 0.34 p &lt; 0.00001)] compared with the traditional coil embolization group at the last follow-up. In terms of procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage [OR = 3.04, 95% Cl (1.08, 8.57), p = 0.04] and other procedure-related complications [OR = 2.91, 95% Cl (1.48, 5.57), p = 0.002], the incidence of PED was higher than that of the traditional coil embolization group. Moreover, in terms of favorable functional outcome [OR = 0.4, 95% Cl (0.22, 0.71), p = 0.002] of patients at the last follow-up, the PED group was lower than the traditional coil embolization group. There was no statistically significant between the two groups in terms of surgery-related intracranial ischemia complications [OR = 0.88, 95% Cl (0.47, 1.64), p = 0.68].

Conclusion

PED had higher rates of complete aneurysm occlusion and lower rates of aneurysm retreatment compared with traditional coils, but traditional coils was superior to the PED group in terms of procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage complication and other procedure-related complications (aneurysm rupture, neurological impairment), and favorable functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2). This result still needs to be further confirmed by additional large-sample, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022325673.