Section showing minimal intra-individual variations in masticatory movement

Changes in mandibular movement during chewing of different hardness foods

In order to clarify the change in mandibular movement during chewing of foods with different hardness, 20 healthy subjects were asked to chew 3 types of gummy jellies (containing 6, 8, and 10% gelatin), and the masseter muscular activity and the mandibular movement were recorded. The indicators representing the muscular activity (integral value of masseter muscular activity), the mandibular movement (opening distance, masticatory width, cycle time, opening maximum velocity and closing maximum velocity), and the stability of masticatory movement were calculated, respectively, and compared among the three foods. The integral value of masseter muscular activity was smallest for the 6% gelatin and significantly increased in order as the content of gelatin increased to 8, 10%. The value of each indicator for the mandibular movement increased gradually as the food got harder. The value for all indicators was significantly larger for the 10 than the 6%. However, between the two foods, no significant change was observed for the several indicators. The mean ratio of the 10% gelatin to the 8% gelatin for the cycle time was extremely small, being 1.01, but was between the range of 0.89–1.07 showing aspects of changes within each individual. The other indicators showing small ratio were similar in this aspect. The parameters representing stability of movement showed the lowest values for the 8% gelatin. It was suggested that the hardness of food affected mandibular movement during mastication, but the movement changed variously according to the hardness and exerted muscular activities.

Influence of two masticating conditions on assessment of movement path stability

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to clarify whether differences in masticating conditions affected masticatory path stabilities of healthy subjects and TMD patients.

METHODS

Twenty healthy female subjects as the healthy group, and 20 female Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) patients as the TMD group, were selected. Incisal point movement of during mastication of both masticating condition 1 (mc1; crispy bread chewed until swallowing on the free side) and masticating condition 2 (mc2; softened chewing-gum chewed for 20s on the habitual side) were recorded by MKG. As for mc1, out of all cycles during mastication only those cycles on the habitual chewing side were analyzed. As for mc2, the ten cycles from the fifth cycle were analyzed. For these analyzed sections, the indicators representing movement path stability were calculated and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

As for mc1, though the values of the indicators representing path stability were larger for the TMD group, there were cases where no significant differences were found between the two groups. As for mc2, the values were significantly larger for the TMD group (SDs; P<0.05, SD/ODs; P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

From these results, it was suggested that the differences in masticating conditions affected the assessment of masticatory path stabilities of healthy subjects and TMD patients and the conditions should be considered for analyzing masticatory movement.