Impact of Pleural Effusion on Outcomes of Patients Receiving Osimertinib for NSCLC Harboring EGFR T790M

Efficacy of osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

As an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), osimertinib has emerged as a standard EGFR-mutation positive treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of osimertinib for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, comparing those with and without MPE.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with osimertinib at our hospital between April 2016 and June 2021. TTF was defined as the duration from osimertinib initiation to discontinuation, and OS as the duration until death, irrespective of the reason.

RESULTS

Among 229 patients receiving osimertinib, 84 had MPE before administration, 39 acquired EGFR exon20 T790M mutation following previous EGFR-TKI therapy, and 45 were EGFR-TKI-naive. Among EGFR-TKI-naive patients, median TTF was 14.8 and 19.8 months for those with and without MPE, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-2.18; p = 0.12). Median OS was 32.0 and 42.0 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.43; 95% CI: 0.86-2.38; p = 0.16). Among patients with T790M mutation, median TTF was 12.3 and 13.1 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.55; p = 0.88). Median OS for patients with and without MPE was 23.2 and 24.7 months, respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72-1.67; p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, the evidence of MPE has little effect on survival with osimertinib.

Impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in non-small-cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion treated with targeted therapy: Propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

EGFR-mutant (EGFR-M) and ALK-positive (ALK-P)are common in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (MPE-NSCLC). The impact of thoracic tumor radiotherapy on survival in such patients remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether thoracic tumor radiotherapy could improve overall survival (OS) in such patients.

METHODS

According to whether or not patients accepted thoracic tumor radiotherapy, 148 patients with EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy were classified into two groups: DT group without thoracic tumor radiotherapy and DRT group with thoracic tumor radiotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical baseline characteristics. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier, compared by log-rank test, and evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median survival time (MST) was 25 months versus 17 months in the DRT group and DT group. The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years in the DRT group and DT group were 75.0%, 52.8%, 26.8%, 11.1% and 64.5%, 28.4%, 9.2%, 1.8%, respectively (χ2  = 12.028, p = 0.001). Compared with DT group, the DRT group still had better survival after PSM (p = 0.007). Before and after PSM, factors associated with better OS through multivariable analysis were that thoracic tumor radiotherapy, radiotherapy, N0-2 , and ALK-TKIs. Grades 4-5 radiation toxicities were not observed in patients; 8 (11.6%) and 7 (10.1%) out of the DRT group suffered from Grade 3 radiation esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results for EGFR-M or ALK-P MPE-NSCLC showed that thoracic tumor radiotherapy may be crucial factor in improving OS with acceptable toxicities. Potential biases should not be neglected: Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm this result.

Failure pattern and radiotherapy exploration in malignant pleural effusion non-small cell lung cancer treated with targeted therapy

Purpose

Actionable mutations are common in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)with malignant pleural effusion(MPE)(MPE-NSCLC). The pattern of failure in MPE-NSCLC treated with targeted therapy after MPE control remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the failure pattern of such patients in a cohort study and explore the possibility of radiotherapy.

Patients and methods

Computed tomography scans of 86 patients were reviewed in this study. We classified first pattern of failure after MPE control as initial disease sites only (IF), new distant sites only (NF), or IF and NF detected simultaneously (INF). Patients evaluated suitable for radiotherapy after disease progression were divided into two groups: D group without radiotherapy and RD group with radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses.

Results

Disease progression after MPE control was observed in 42 patients with complete serial imaging. Median time to any progression was 9.5 months. Rate of the IF, NF and INF were 50%, 17% and 33% for all patients,60%,0% and 40% for patients with MPE recurrence (n=10,23.8%) and 47%, 22% and 31% for patients (n=32,76.2%) without MPE recurrence, respectively. Out of 10 patients(23.8%) with MPE recurrence, 7 patients simultaneous underwent primary tumor progression and 5 MPE were cytologically confirmed in 7 patients with examination. The overall survival (OS )rates at 1, 2, 3 years for the RD group and D group were 88.2%, 50.5%, 21.7% and 80.0%, 20.3%, 0%, respectively; the corresponding MST were 26.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively (χ2 = 4.959, p =0.026).

Conclusions

Our data indicates that 50% of patients with actionable mutations MPE- NSCLC after MPE control are likely to fail at their initial sites of disease and the use of radiotherapy may bring OS benefits during the course of their disease. Multicenter RCT is necessary to confirm the result in the future.

Efficacy of osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with pleural effusion

Background

Osimertinib is a standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Although malignant pleural effusion (PE) is a common clinical problem in NSCLC, information about the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with PE is limited, especially regarding its efficacy in EGFR T790M-negative patients with PE remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib in our institution between May 2016 and December 2020.

Results

A total of 63 patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC were treated with osimertinib; 33 (12 with PE) had no EGFR T790M mutation, while 30 (12 with PE) had EGFR T790M mutation. In EGFR T790M-negative NSCLC, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with PE was comparable to that of the patients without PE (median PFS 19.8 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.693). In EGFR T790M- positive NSCLC, the PFS and overall survival (OS) of the patients with PE were significantly shorter than those of the patients without PE (median PFS 16.8 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.003; median OS 44.9 vs. 14.2 months, p = 0.007). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of PE was independently associated with shorter PFS and OS in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients, but not EGFR T790M-negative patients.

Conclusions

These data suggest the efficacy of osimertinib may differ between EGFR T790M-positive and -negative NSCLC patients with PE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09701-2.

A comprehensive prognostic analysis of osimertinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired EGFR-T790M mutation: a real-world study

PURPOSE

Osimertinib is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with T790M mutation after the failure of first-/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). We comprehensively analyzed factors that affect the therapeutic efficacy of the osimertinib treatment in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

351 NSCLC patients with T790M mutation receiving osimertinib treatment were included. We investigated the value of different factors in predicting the clinical outcomes of the osimertinib therapy, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Logistic and COX regression were used to identify prognosticators.

RESULTS

In osimertinib therapy, EGFR mutation status (19Del/L858R) at initial diagnosis and the therapeutic choice of prior EGFR-TKI agent was not associated with patients' prognosis. Notably, the PFS of the prior EGFR-TKI was independently related to ORR (OR, 95% CI 0.98, 0.96-1.00, p = 0.030), PFS (HR, 95% CI 0.98, 0.97-1.00, p = 0.009) and OS (HR, 95% CI 0.96, 0.93-0.98, p < 0.001) of osimertinib treatment. Among distinct organ metastases, only bone metastasis was related to the efficacy of osimertinib, in terms of ORR (OR, 95% CI 1.97, 1.27-3.06, p = 0.002), PFS (HR, 95% CI 1.55, 1.18-2.03, p = 0.001) and OS (HR, 95% CI 1.81, 1.27-2.59, p = 0.001). However, the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib was not further impacted by the accumulation of metastatic organs. A performance status score of 2-4 was also an adverse prognosticator for the osimertinib therapy.

CONCLUSION

PFS of the prior EGFR-TKI treatment, performance status score and bone metastasis were independent prognosticators of the osimertinib treatment. These findings may facilitate clinicians in the decision-making of osimertinib.

Non-significant efficacy of icotinib plus pleurodesis in epidermal growth factor receptor positive mutant lung cancer patients after malignant pleural effusion drainage compared to icotinib alone

Background

To investigate the efficacy and safety of icotinib plus pleurodesis or icotinib alone in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive mutant lung cancer patients after malignant pleural effusion (MPE) drainage.

Methods

In this retrospective study from initially reviewed case reports of 230 lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE who were EGFR mutation positive and treated in our hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2016 consecutively, 51 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into treated with oral icotinib plus pleurodesis and without pleurodesis after pleural effusion drainage groups. Case records including patient gender, age, smoking status and local treatments, as well as adverse events were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes which were measured by progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) & adverse reactions were analyzed by a Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test after follow-ups.

Results

The median PFS of patients who received icotinib plus pleurodesis was 8.4 months, while the median PFS of icotinib alone patients was 9.0 months (P=0.996, χ²=7.241). Similarly, the ORR for MPEs, with or without pleurodesis were not significantly difference (64.29% vs. 67.57%, P=0.824, χ²=0.049). Adverse reactions of pleurodesis were mainly fever, chest pain, gastrointestinal reactions and myelosuppression.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that pleurodesis after MPE drainage had no difference on outcomes of icotinib therapy patients. However, pleurodesis may increase some adverse reactions, which might be inconvenient for patients in clinical practice.

Prior EGFR-TKI Treatment in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Affects the Allele Frequency Fraction of Acquired T790M and the Subsequent Efficacy of Osimertinib

BACKGROUND

The first (1G) and second (2G) generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show differential inhibitory capacities towards EGFR T790M-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ratio of the allele fractions of T790M (AF_T790M) to EGFR-activating mutations (AF_mEGFR) in patients treated with 1G and 2G EGFR TKIs who acquired T790M-mediated resistance and to determine the relationship between AF and the later efficacy of osimertinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The efficacy of osimertinib was reviewed for 54 T790M-positive EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients grouped by the generation of prior EGFR TKI use (1G vs. 2G). AF_mEGFR and AF_T790M were determined by QuantStudio digital PCR using tissues obtained upon acquired resistance.

RESULTS

The progression-free survival (PFS; 20.3 vs. 11.6 months, p = 0.031) and the 1-year PFS rate (63.2 vs. 37.5%, p = 0.029) for osimertinib were significantly better for group 1G compared to group 2G. The ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR in group 1G was significantly higher than in group 2G (46.16 ± 5.40% vs. 25.86 ± 4.25%, p = 0.009). An unbiased analysis revealed three AF-associated clusters (ARCs) suggesting the ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR correlates with the efficacy of osimertinib. We found all patients in ARC2 having the highest ratio of AF_T790M to AF_mEGFR to have previously been treated with a 1G EGFR TKI and to show the longest osimertinib PFS compared to ARC3 (NR vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.060) and ARC1 (NR vs. 12.4 month, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired T790M fraction of EGFR-mutated NSCLC is linked to different generations of prior EGFR TKI use and the later efficacy of osimertinib.

Negative impact of malignant effusion on osimertinib treatment for non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation

3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including osimertinib, have reasonable efficacy in non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. However, the efficacy of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with fluids, such as pleural, pericardial and abdominal effusions, is unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib in this specific setting. NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790 M mutations who experienced progressive disease after first EGFR-TKI treatment and started osimertinib treatment between April 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively screened. In particular, we assessed the efficacy of osimertinib for NSCLC with EGFR T790 M mutations in patients who were diagnosed with EGFR T790 M mutation by malignant effusion. Among 90 patients with EGFR T790 M mutation who started osimertinib treatment after EGFR-TKI failure, 21 were diagnosed from malignant effusions excluding cerebrospinal fluid (F group) and 69 using other methods including tissue biopsies (NF group). Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Overall response was 50%, and significantly worse in the F group (29%) than the NF group (57%; P = 0.025). Median progression-free survival with osimertinib treatment in the F group (7.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3–14.0) was significantly shorter than that in the NF group (11.9 months, 95% CI: 9.5–16.0; P = 0.046)). Median drainage-free time was 10.9 months (95% CI: 1.4 months– not reached). The present study showed that the efficacy of osimertinib for NSCLC in which EGFR T790 M mutation is detected by malignant effusion may be less than in EGFR T790 M-mutated NSCLC detected by other methods.

Comparison of PNA Clamping-assisted Fluorescence Melting Curve Analysis and PNA Clamping in Detecting EGFR Mutations in Matched Tumor Tissue, Cell Block, Pleural Effusion and Blood of Lung Cancer Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study compared the efficacy of PANAMutyper™, a novel technology that integrates PNAClamp™ and PANA S-Melting™, and PNAClamp™ alone for the detection of EGFR mutations in lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PANAMutyper™ and PNAClamp™ were used to assess the EGFR mutation status in tissue, cell block, pleural effusion, and blood samples of 90 lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion.

RESULTS

PANAMutyper™ detected more EGFR mutations than PNAClamp™, especially in body fluids (pleural effusion and serum). Patients with additional EGFR mutations detected using PANAMutyper™ had a favorable response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of PANAMutyper™ was superior to that of PNAClamp™ for the detection of EGFR mutations. It was also better at identifying lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion who were likely to benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment.

Malignant pleural effusion as a predictor of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the presence of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) as a negative predictor of anti‐PD‐1 antibody efficacy.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients with advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer treated with an anti‐PD‐1 antibody between December 2015 and March 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan, was conducted. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with and without MPE. Additional survival analysis according to PD‐L1 expression status was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

A total of 252 patients were identified before the commencement of anti‐PD‐1 antibody treatment: 33 with MPE and 219 without MPE. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in patients with MPE than in patients without MPE (median PFS 3.0 vs. 5.8 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.7, P = 0.014; median OS 7.9 vs. 15.8 months, HR 2.1, P = 0.001). In patients with PD‐L1 expression in ≥ 1% of their tumor cells, the PFS of patients with MPE was significantly shorter than of patients without MPE (median PFS 3.1 vs. 6.5 months, HR 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0–3.5; P = 0.021). The presence of MPE was independently associated with a shorter PFS and OS in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The presence of MPE in patients administered an anti‐PD‐1 antibody is associated with shorter PFS and OS, regardless of the presence of PD‐L1 expression ≥ 1% of tumor cells.

An Accurate and Effective Method for Measuring Osimertinib by UPLC-TOF-MS and Its Pharmacokinetic Study in Rats

Osimertinib, a new-generation inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor, has been used for the clinical treatment of advanced T790M mutation-positive tumors. In this research, an original analysis method was established for the quantification of osimertinib by ultra-performance liquid chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS) in rat plasma. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile and sorafinib (internal standard, IS), they were chromatographed through a Waters XTerra MS C₁₈ column. The mobile phase was acetonitrile and water (including 0.1% ammonia). The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the intra- and inter-day results ranged from 5.38 to 9.76% and from 6.02 to 9.46%, respectively, and the extraction recovery and matrix effects were calculated to range from 84.31 to 96.14% and from 91.46 to 97.18%, respectively. The results illustrated that the analysis method had sufficient specificity, accuracy and precision. Meanwhile, the UPLC-TOF-MS method for osimertinib was successfully applied into the pharmacokinetics of SD rats.