1
|
Laios A, Kalampokis E, Mamalis ME, Thangavelu A, Tan YS, Hutson R, Munot S, Broadhead T, Nugent D, Theophilou G, Jackson RE, De Jong D. Explaining the Elusive Nature of a Well-Defined Threshold for Blood Transfusion in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cytoreductive Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 14:94. [PMID: 38201403 PMCID: PMC10795734 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
There is no well-defined threshold for intra-operative blood transfusion (BT) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) surgery. To address this, we devised a Machine Learning (ML)-driven prediction algorithm aimed at prompting and elucidating a communication alert for BT based on anticipated peri-operative events independent of existing BT policies. We analyzed data from 403 EOC patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery between 2014 and 2019. The estimated blood volume (EBV), calculated using the formula EBV = weight × 80, served for setting a 10% EBV threshold for individual intervention. Based on known estimated blood loss (EBL), we identified two distinct groups. The Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed satisfactory results for predicting events above the established threshold (AUC 0.823, 95% CI 0.76-0.88). Operative time (OT) was the most significant factor influencing predictions. Intra-operative blood loss exceeding 10% EBV was associated with OT > 250 min, primary surgery, serous histology, performance status 0, R2 resection and surgical complexity score > 4. Certain sub-procedures including large bowel resection, stoma formation, ileocecal resection/right hemicolectomy, mesenteric resection, bladder and upper abdominal peritonectomy demonstrated clear associations with an elevated interventional risk. Our findings emphasize the importance of obtaining a rough estimate of OT in advance for precise prediction of blood requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Laios
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Evangelos Kalampokis
- Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.K.); (M.-E.M.)
- Center for Research & Technology HELLAS (CERTH), 6th km Charilaou-Thermi Rd, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Marios-Evangelos Mamalis
- Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.K.); (M.-E.M.)
| | - Amudha Thangavelu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Yong Sheng Tan
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Richard Hutson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Sarika Munot
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Tim Broadhead
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - David Nugent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | - Georgios Theophilou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| | | | - Diederick De Jong
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; (A.T.); (Y.S.T.); (R.H.); (S.M.); (T.B.); (D.N.); (G.T.); (D.D.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laios A, Kalampokis E, Johnson R, Munot S, Thangavelu A, Hutson R, Broadhead T, Theophilou G, Nugent D, De Jong D. Development of a Novel Intra-Operative Score to Record Diseases' Anatomic Fingerprints (ANAFI Score) for the Prediction of Complete Cytoreduction in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer by Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030966. [PMID: 36765924 PMCID: PMC9913185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) and the Intra-operative Mapping for Ovarian Cancer (IMO), to a lesser extent, have been universally validated in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) to describe the extent of peritoneal dissemination and are proven to be powerful predictors of the surgical outcome with an added sensitivity of assessment at laparotomy of around 70%. This leaves room for improvement because the two-dimensional anatomic scoring model fails to reflect the patient's real anatomy, as seen by a surgeon. We hypothesized that tumor dissemination in specific anatomic locations can be more predictive of complete cytoreduction (CC0) and survival than PCI and IMO tools in EOC patients. (2) Methods: We analyzed prospectively data collected from 508 patients with FIGO-stage IIIB-IVB EOC who underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and December 2019 at a UK tertiary center. We adapted the structured ESGO ovarian cancer report to provide detailed information on the patterns of tumor dissemination (cancer anatomic fingerprints). We employed the extreme gradient boost (XGBoost) to model only the variables referring to the EOC disseminated patterns, to create an intra-operative score and judge the predictive power of the score alone for complete cytoreduction (CC0). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used for performance comparison between the new score and the existing PCI and IMO tools. We applied the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) framework to support the feature selection of the narrated cancer fingerprints and provide global and local explainability. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. (3) Results: An intra-operative disease score was developed based on specific weights assigned to the cancer anatomic fingerprints. The scores range from 0 to 24. The XGBoost predicted CC0 resection (area under curve (AUC) = 0.88 CI = 0.854-0.913) with high accuracy. Organ-specific dissemination on the small bowel mesentery, large bowel serosa, and diaphragmatic peritoneum were the most crucial features globally. When added to the composite model, the novel score slightly enhanced its predictive value (AUC = 0.91, CI = 0.849-0.963). We identified a "turning point", ≤5, that increased the probability of CC0. Using conventional logistic regression, the new score was superior to the PCI and IMO scores for the prediction of CC0 (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.73 and 0.67, respectively). In multivariate Cox analysis, a 1-point increase in the new intra-operative score was associated with poorer progression-free (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09, p < 0.005) and overall survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07), by 4% and 6%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The presence of cancer disseminated in specific anatomical sites, including small bowel mesentery, large bowel serosa, and diaphragmatic peritoneum, can be more predictive of CC0 and survival than the entire PCI and IMO scores. Early intra-operative assessment of these areas only may reveal whether CC0 is achievable. In contrast to the PCI and IMO scores, the novel score remains predictive of adverse survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Laios
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Evangelos Kalampokis
- Information Systems Lab, Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Racheal Johnson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Sarika Munot
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Amudha Thangavelu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Richard Hutson
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Tim Broadhead
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Georgios Theophilou
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - David Nugent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Diederick De Jong
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|