1
|
Yuan J, Cheng Z, Feng J, Xu C, Wang Y, Zou Z, Li Q, Guo S, Jin L, Jiang G, Shang Y, Wu J. Prognosis of lung cancer with simple brain metastasis patients and establishment of survival prediction models: a study based on real events. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:162. [PMID: 35477385 PMCID: PMC9047387 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-01936-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for the prognosis of lung cancer with simple brain metastasis (LCSBM) patients and to establish a prognostic predictive nomogram for LCSBM patients. Materials and methods Three thousand eight hundred and six cases of LCSBM were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 using SEER Stat 8.3.5. Lung cancer patients only had brain metastasis with no other organ metastasis were defined as LCSBM patients. Prognostic factors of LCSBM were analyzed with log-rank method and Cox proportional hazards model. Independent risk and protective prognostic factors were used to construct nomogram with accelerated failure time model. C-index was used to evaluate the prediction effect of nomogram. Results and conclusion The younger patients (18–65 years old) accounted for 54.41%, while patients aged over 65 accounted for 45.59%.The ratio of male: female was 1:1. Lung cancer in the main bronchus, upper lobe, middle lobe and lower lobe were accounted for 4.91%, 62.80%, 4.47% and 27.82% respectively; and adenocarcinoma accounted for 57.83% of all lung cancer types. The overall median survival time was 12.2 months. Survival rates for 1-, 3- and 5-years were 28.2%, 8.7% and 4.7% respectively. We found female (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75–0.87), the married (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.75–0.86), the White (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.95) and primary site (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.39–0.52) were independent protective factors while higher age (HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.40–1.62), advanced grade (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.25) and advanced T stage (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.05–1.13) were independent risk prognostic factors affecting the survival of LCSBM patients. We constructed the nomogram with above independent factors, and the C-index value was 0.634 (95% CI 0.622–0.646). We developed a nomogram with seven significant LCSBM independent prognostic factors to provide prognosis prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaying Yuan
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Zhiyuan Cheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200240, China
| | - Jian Feng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Chang Xu
- Clinical College of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423043, China
| | - Yi Wang
- School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Zixiu Zou
- School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200120, China
| | - Shicheng Guo
- School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Li Jin
- School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200433, China
| | - Gengxi Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Yan Shang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China. .,Department of General Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Junjie Wu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kandathil A, Kay FU, Butt YM, Wachsmann JW, Subramaniam RM. Role of FDG PET/CT in the Eighth Edition of TNM Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiographics 2019; 38:2134-2149. [PMID: 30422775 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, and accurate staging plays a vital role in determining prognosis and treatment. The recently revised eighth edition of the TNM staging system for lung cancer defines new T and M descriptors and updates stage groupings on the basis of substantial differences in survival. There are new T descriptors that are based on the findings at histopathologic examination, and T descriptors are reassigned on the basis of tumor size and extent. No changes were made to the N descriptors in the eighth edition of the TNM staging of lung cancer, because the four N categories that are based on the location of the diseased nodes can be used to consistently predict prognosis. The eighth edition includes a new M1b descriptor for patients with a single extrathoracic metastatic lesion in a single organ (M1b), because they have better survival and different treatment options, compared with those with multiple extrathoracic lesions (M1c). Examination with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is the standard of care and is an integral part of the clinical staging of patients with lung cancer. To provide the treating physicians with accurate staging information, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware of the updated classification system and should be cognizant of the site-specific strengths and limitations of FDG PET/CT. In this article, the eighth edition of the TNM staging system is reviewed, as well as the role of FDG PET/CT in the staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Kandathil
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K., F.U.K., J.W.W., R.M.S.) and Pathology (Y.M.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9316
| | - Fernando U Kay
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K., F.U.K., J.W.W., R.M.S.) and Pathology (Y.M.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9316
| | - Yasmeen M Butt
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K., F.U.K., J.W.W., R.M.S.) and Pathology (Y.M.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9316
| | - Jason W Wachsmann
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K., F.U.K., J.W.W., R.M.S.) and Pathology (Y.M.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9316
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.K., F.U.K., J.W.W., R.M.S.) and Pathology (Y.M.B.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9316
| |
Collapse
|