Arteriovenous Loops Enable Free Tissue Transfer With Otherwise Inadequate Local Donor and Recipient Vessels

One vs. two-stage arteriovenous loops in lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps: Systematic review and metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous loops are one of the main therapeutic alternatives to address the absence of recipient vessels in lower extremity microsurgical reconstruction. However, there is no consensus on whether to perform them in one or two surgical stages. The objective of this work is to determine whether the outcome of lower limb free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops depends on the number of surgical stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines, on vascular loops and free flaps in lower limb. Survival rate, as well as major and minor complications were studied. A forest plot and Pearson's chi-square were used for statistical analysis. Study quality was assessed in duplicate using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. This study was registered on PROSPERO.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles using free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops in lower limb, either one or two-stage, were selected. A total of 296 flaps were included, 52% (n = 154) in one and 48% (n = 142) in two surgical times. No statistically significant differences were found in the survival rate (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.62; 5.47, p = .09 and p = .344) or major complications (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.31; 1.57, p = .56 and p = .92) of flaps between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, the outcome of free flaps anastomosed to vascular loops in the lower limb does not depend on the number of surgical stages they undergo. Although there is some heterogeneity in the groups studied, the decision on the number of procedures to be performed should be determined by the surgeon, concerning the clinical situation of the patient, as well as to the vascular, bone and soft tissue status of the extremity.

Combined treatment using cross-leg free flap and the Masquelet technique: a report of two cases

We introduce a treatment that combines the cross-leg free flap with the Masquelet technique and describe two cases using this method for bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Both patients were successfully treated and ambulatory. This novel method can be safely performed using the delay technique, indocyanine-green angiography and near-infrared spectroscopy.

The Role of Free Tissue Transfers for Defect Coverage over the Body in Geriatric Populations

The treatment of soft tissue defects in multimorbid frail patients requires optimized preoperative and perioperative management with a differentiated interdisciplinary approach. Preoperative assessment with established scores, such as the ASA score, is important in order to stratify the operative complication risk. Following the reconstructive ladder is important to avoid unnecessary long operations and consecutively higher operative risks. In cases where a free flap procedure is needed, infections should be treated properly, and vascular status and coagulation should be optimized before performing a free flap procedure. Attention should be paid to maintain independency, functionality and quality of life while choosing the best treatment option.

Efficacy of the Arteriovenous Loop for Free Flap Reconstruction in Patients with Complex Limb Trauma: Case Series and Literature Review

Background and objectives: Complex limb traumas are commonly treated with microsurgical reconstruction and free flaps. However, complications are frequent in patients affected by a previous trauma or comorbidity, atheromasia and a single valid vessel. Free flap reconstruction is indeed a challenging procedure in complex injuries, which may increase the risk of limb ischemia. The Arteriovenous loop (AVL) technique may be considered an efficient alternative treatment. We herein report our procedure and previous research regarding the AVL method using a two-step reconstruction in cases of complex high-energy limb injuries. Materials and Methods: In this single center retrospective cohort study, all the patients from 2014 to 2018 who underwent to AVL reconstruction were assessed. A total of six patients were included in the study for traumatic limb trauma. The two-stage technique was performed each time. The age and sex of patient, the time between stage one and two, the length of AVL loop and rate of free flap success were evaluated. Results: A total of seven AVL reconstructions were performed. The mean age of patients was 36 years old. Eight free flaps were performed; six free flaps were transferred to the vascular loops. The average time between stage one and two was 13 days. The mean length of the pedicle was 25 cm for the upper limb and 33.7 cm for the lower limb. All the free flaps successfully take root. In one case, a surgical revision was required the second day post-operatory due to venous congestion. Conclusions: AVL is a useful and safe technique in microsurgical reconstruction which will prevent vascular complications. Our investigations suggest the efficacy and feasibility of a two-step intervention in acute post-traumatic events. A single-step procedure should be preferred in chronic situation and oncologic reconstruction.